₦airaland Forum

Kobojunkie:
Why does your perception of success differ greatly from that indicated in the earlier explanation of what natural selection is in fact about?

And if, according to you, only those with your idea of success genes pursue polygamy in order to proliferate said genes should it equally translate to mean that all those bread by these success gene progenitors ought also to have the same same in them?

You are now beating about the bush after you've clearly lost an argument YOU started!
I made a simple statement that natural selection (survival of the most successful - however you define success in that environment) mandates that men be polygamous!

Kobojunkie:
What "success" genes? Why are you unable to clearly express this connection you claim exists between polygamy man and the concept of natural selection? This all may make sense inside of the confines of your noggin but you at least need to be able to communicate it to the world outside given we don't all have mind-reading abilities.

But it has been clearly expressed - unless you are a total dummy!
For success genes to be selected for (that's a natural selection lingo ), successful men must have a desire to spread those genes in several women, not just one (that's what we call POLYGAMY!!); of course those women must also prefer those genes to those of unsuccessful men.
Of course you can still pretend not to understand, rather than admit you've lost a fight you started!

They the very WORST!!!

imokings:
These men made Lagos

I know, together with these men below

Oyindamolah:
Go and sit your ass in the corner

Yo momma

Kobojunkie:
I am afraid you will probably have to explain this one to me since I don't see how natural selection is connected to the practice of polygamy?

Ok, I'll patiently explain to you, my boy. I only ask you quietly LEARN and not argue.
Note the words that appear consistently:
success and passing on of genes.
The only way success genes of men (the genes that "aided their success" - I know if I don't spell it out you’ll still come back to ask a dumb question about it) is if two things are present:
1) Women must prefer successful men
2) Men must be POLYGAMOUS!!!!!!

Now run along and stop asking dumb, pretentious questions!

cococandy:
good to know you’re not a woman. Just speaking out of turn

See again. Did I say that??!!

Kobojunkie:
I am sorry, what? Are you certain that you clearly grasp the concept of Natural selection?

Does everything have to be typed out for you people?Why can't you draw a simple inference?! Doesn't the scenario I described make for selection of high-achieving genes??

cococandy:
Are you a woman?

I don't have to be. There are plenty rich women and women who have won lottery, inheritance, or other sudden wealth to observe from

How much are you paying sir?
That's the question

Kayceenaz:
CC: RoyalRoy, Mynd44, Seun. A front page material to address the trending Davido-pregnancy impasse.

Problem is, same topic has been on FP so many times. But I see your point

Kobojunkie:
Natural selection? I am afraid I fail to see the connection between that and this here issue.

Natural selection would mandate that men be polygamous by nature, while women are not. For a man, the best guarantee that his genes would be passed on is to spread them into several women. For a woman, the best way is to give the limited number she has the best chance at survival. So besides taking good care of them, she'd also give them the best genes possible by mating with a high-achieving man.
Nature could have made it so that once a man mates with a female, he'd only have eyes for her. It did not!

Kobojunkie:
Of all of the examples you lot continue to cite, absolutely none of those same men you cite did started their so-called polygamous ways and breeding like rats as soon as they were out of diapers, leading us to believe there was a turning point in their lives and hence reasoning that influenced such lifestyle. The most likely explanation is they failed to acquired needed self-discipline and self-control as far as sexual encounters with the opposite sex

Forget all that. What do you think NATURE intended? What do you think natural selection supports.
Don't just rush to reply as soon as you read. Try to THINK first, so your comments are not knee-jerk reactions

lavylilly:
A player spotted.

Rubyjade:

Kobojunkie:
It is nothing but lack of self-control and self-discipline, nothing natural about that.

The problem is we don't THINK. We met BIOLOGY a certain way. We did not make it that way - NATURE did! It is NOT us that made it so a woman can get pregnant only ONCE EVERY TWO YEARS or so, while a man can imprenant several women in ONE DAY!
It is a cheating of society to confine special or high-achieving men to only one woman.
This man below would have had 4 kids, while some short, dumb, weakling would likely have 9!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFNx7ZhkW9A

The insane woman is baaaack!
Her royal madness

lavylilly:
Multiple signs show that humans are mostly monogamous by design. Males and females are roughly the same.

Oyindamolah:
Men are naturally non-monogamous.
Men are also naturally monogamous.

Meerahbel:
Some men, yes they are polygamous by nature. A lot of women like to sleep around as well so don't blame men.

Hamachi:
Men aren’t monolithic group, some are polygamous and some are monogamous. The same is with women, some are polygamous and some are monogamous.

Rubyjade:
Monogamy originated early because it takes the full time effort of 2 people to raise children.

You folks can fool yourselves all you want with all sorts of wishful thinking. Here is the TRUTH:
A young woman's dream is an EXCLUSIVE monogamous relationship with ONE man she is attracted to.
While for a young man the very thought of it is SUFFOCATING!!
The two sexes are simply wired differently.
(Of course there are the few outliers, but we are talking vast majority!)

Samantha124:
Sure, women want an exclusive monogamous relationship, but you'll be shocked to find out that most of those women in long distance relationships or marriages also have side dudes and in most cases, their boyfriends or husbands never get to find out about it.

Most men who are in long distance relationships or marriages keep fathering children that are not biologically theirs...

So if men are polygamous in nature, then it also means that women are polyandrous in nature too and you guys should respect that...

You are funny . Is long distance relationship natural state of things? We are talking of a couple living together in a satisfying relationship. Men and women are simply differently wired

mcemma:
Hey men, has this once happen to you?

Yes! I told her I just wasn't ready for marriage

This forum is SERIOUSLY addictive. A wise person would treat it as you would treat anything addictive!

Samantha124:
Some women are also chronic cheaters... Will we then say women are also polyandrous

Those are outliers. The vast majority of women, no matter how much money they have, want an exclusive monogamous relationship with ONE man they are attracted to. Men are wired differently

Kayceenaz:
Noted.

Indeed, men should always acknowledge it is a choice they make, not a natural obligation.

Kayceenaz:
They are not. Those women made a choice. My argument above also applies to women.

Almost everything is a choice, including having sex at all. That's different from natural inclination. Men are NATURALLY inclined to be more sexually aroused by a new woman than a woman they've been with for a while. It's not same with women

Kayceenaz:
cc:lalasticlala

Why u calling lala that's no longer a mod and no longer participates in the forum (see below).
As to the topic history has consistently shown that if they could, men would have variety in women

Naijanascam:
Ayamnotunderstanding

Maybe this below will help you understand a little.
U can take the agbero out of the hood but you can't take the hood out of agbero!

Anonchi:
Do you think I should add that I previously attended uni but didn’t finish or I should just exclude it entirely.

In his heart, knowing Nigerians, the officer will even be questioning authenticity of documents you brought, how much more something that is not documented. So you can mention anything you wish - if you don't have documentation to prove it, it doesn't matter. Just make sure you are with the documents you do have

dawnomike:
I love your kind of friend... But please, stay away!!!

If you had visited him in 2019 or 2020, it would hv bn fine
Trust me, you'll lack the right words to say and you don't know how much prison has changed gim after 3yrs. Before you'll seek to squat wuth you after his release someday.

Emperormartin why didn't you correct this dude that your guy has been in jail since 2009 not 2019?

May also be he is telling the truth

For people who do relationship

All depends on the visa officer and how LUCKY you are

Amalekki:
Hahahahaha nothing person won't read on Nairaland. All I can say is that your ignorance is truly spectacular

Of course, because you're talking crap. Exactly what NLC is demanding is what you say is impossible because of Buhari!!!

Amalekki:
Even Obi said he would remove subsidy on Day 1. I saw the interview. There is no right way on Day 1 as the previous government left no room for that. The budget made no provision for subsidy beyond June 1.

You are talking PURE NONSENSE. The man's words are right there for all to see.
As for "budget", semantics, absolutely NOTHING ties an administration to a previous one's. They even can revert to old prices right now