Dolphinheart's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dolphinheart's Profile › Dolphinheart's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 (of 84 pages)
[quote author=tola9ja post=28935372]just to show you how quran is different from all the book on earth no contradiction no variation free dose not preach violence e.t.c[/quote Oh my! Where do I start from In the court of law, u re saying that a book is incorrect while quoting from that incorrect book to prove the correctness of another book. The judge will definitely ask you if ur real name is Mr. Bean . U dnt say Mr A is a liar and then use Mr A statements to prove that Mr B is telling the truth. They say the their God is not Allah, y are u trying to forcefully Link them together. I once asked a moslem cleric that the only way I can believe him is if he can show me from the Koran prophesies that has been fufilled , and such prophesies must 1. Not be fufilled under a very short period of time eg 20 years 2. Not be fufilled in the lifetime of the person who recorded the prophecy. 3. Not to be attributed to any other source Not to be proven by scientific theory. 4 the prophecy must be specific as to occurrence and not indirectly atributed to it. Up till now nothing . As to Christians and there ways in relatin to Muslims who follow the quran 1. Christians dnt quote from the bible to kill 2. Jesus did not kill anyone for any reason at all . 3. Jesus preached peace without any condition attached 4. Jesus said , turn the other cheeck when slapped 5. Jesus, despite his powers , did not force himself to gain earthly political powers and lord it over others . 6. Jesus preached love . 7. Jesus was arrested, beaten and slapped, flogged, denied his basic human rights, but he did not fight back or revenge. 8. Jesus never killed his wife former husband, never married his adopted son ex wife,never married an older woman cus of money. 9. Jesus begged God to forgive his oppressors . 10. Jesus perfomed miracles to help humans and not grand standing magic Now I should have listed the other religion leader and its followers traits. But I've been advised not to for my safety. |
Baddestguyp:1. Yes it is hard, but based on the attributes of madrid I mentioned earlier, it is always done , example is the getafe u mentioned. 2. There is no goal scoring team like present madrid some years back . |
tola9ja:So what do we take from all the scriptures u quoted. That Christians use the sword to kill? That some Christians where told to kill? That jesus killed? That yaweh is same as Allah? That Christians are not peaceful? That Christians give u conditions to be peaceful with you? What exactly do we take home from ur quotes. Its very funny seeing u quote from a book u claim is adulterated. How are u sure the verse u quoted are not the adulterated parts. But its not funny to see that its the religion that does not mention sword that has been massively killing from its prophet days till now . |
Yooguyz:Sir, ur blind drive in trying to make the watchtower look bad only exposes ur bad heart condition to the world. Pls tell us what it means to be baptized in the name of the father , and of the son, and of the holy spirit? If you know, tell us, if you dnt , then dnt go about insinuating that some people are not baptizing the right way . Secondly , ur hypocrisy shows by ur fully not understanding the import of the watchtower questions. There answering yes to the questions means they are in the right heart condition to undergo baptism . Sir, read well, the question or answer to the question does not baptise them! |
Baddestguyp:It means he is versertile, can move to any other position FROM the wings. |
torchwave:1.Prove it 2. Answer the questions i asked initially 3. Add this to ur answers: what is the soul and how did humans come to have souls |
Baddestguyp:I can underestimate arsenal, so far they have not proved me wrong in my estimation. They fail when facing big teams in elimination challenges. U can't park the bus agaist a team like madrid for the following reason 1. Madrid don't waste time in attack, play possession football or try to sneak through ur defence. If u dnt attack them, they'll attack u the more. So its suicide parcking the bus . 2.Madrid can shoot from anywhere outside the box, bale, ronaldo, benzena, James, kroos and modric have good long range shooting ability. So madrid dnt need to be inside the box to score. 3. Madrid players are good at dead balls. 4 . Madrid players are strong and can jump well in the box . Pepe, Ramos, varane, benzema, ronaldo and bale 5. Madrid have good long range passers , so it takes them less than 5 seconds to get back into ur box after you kick it out. 6 . Most importantly , madrid always scores. To beat them ull have to outscore them . Average is over 3 goals per match |
Baddestguyp:1. The BBC alternate positions during the match, so its not uncommon to see ronaldo in the box. 2. The team sometimes use a 4-4-2 formation instead of 4-3-3, so ull see ronaldo in the box mostimes. 3. The efficiency of marcelo , Kroos, and modric/isco/James have mostly done the job of a winger, so y always stay there to muddle things up. 4 . Funny, but Important. Ronaldo is so fast you dnt know when he moves from wing to box with or without the ball. So he is still a winger with the efficiency of being everywhere in attack |
The only reason why shalke is playing madrid is that ,unlike other teams , shalke fans did not pray well well. I would have preferred to massacr.e arsenal, but their night vigil payed off. |
Baddestguyp:The BBC movement is confusing you, they are so fluid in their interactions that you(not being a Madrid fan) cannot know who is in the wings and who is at the center. |
torchwave:You re d one twisting what he said. Y did u remove the word imortal from his statement! |
torchwave:You can use the bible to guide me through what you just posted, I'm welcome to a discussion. Wanna know ur view on the following : 1. What is hell and who go there ? 2. What is hell fire ? 3. What part of the man goes to hell? God is a God of justice, he will not render judgement on you for more than what you did, expecialy since you where created imperfect and prone to sin . Evalasting life is a gift from God for those whose heart is toward him, if u reject a gift, are u supposed to be purnished forever for it? God knows we are imperfect , through no fault of ours, and he will still prescribe such heavy purnishment on us ? When d isrealites where passing their children through the fire, God said such thing has not come up in his heart , so when did God create hell fire |
paulGrundy:The perfect definition of the word "anything goes" in relation to beliefs and doctrines. Abeg , what is the name of that church that upholds sola scriptural that you attend.! |
If you have to build an image to remind you that you have a God u must worship.!......then I wonder. Funny thing is, even some pagans who use images have exact copy or image of the God they worshiped. |
torchwave:If you are told the answer, would you believe, cus the answer to that affect your view on what happens to man when he dies. God is justice God is compassionate God is merciful to those who repent Most importantly, God is Love. Would a god that has such attribute now condemn some people to evalasting torment lasting billions and billions of years because they sinned during their initial 30 to 70 years of existence? Remember this sinners are not perfect |
MzNelly:Good questions, will wait for an answer |
To the best of my knowledge, there are characters in the bible who made mistakes and god did not condemn them for such wrongdoings. What God does is to correct them and show them the right way , in his own way and time. There are many prophets, anointed kings, wise ones, apostles, disciples, bible writers who made wrong moves or had wrong beliefs about God ,his ways and directives, but in due course they were corrected with better knowledge and they changed. The questions to be asked by any fellow who seeks the truth from any organization are : 1. Do they claim perfection? 2. Do they make mistakes? 3. Do they accept there mistakes? 4. Do they follow on their mistakes and seek for better understanding of the bible? 5. Are they trying their best , despite their imperfection in serving their God, even if death challenge their service ? 6. Are they always striving to seek better understanding of Gods word.? 7. Does individuals who give directives in the organization do it for personal gain, maybe fame or money.? 8. Do you think following any of their teachings can make you not to gain evalasting life. ? 9. What are there present beliefs and teaching. 10. Has the teaching changed over the years and why ? 11. Can they defend, using the bible their present beliefs.? 12. At what level or percentage can you place their effort on the following in relation to other organizations: preaching what they know about Gods word, loving their neighbour, loving God, hating and abstaining from what is bad, not associating with bad and wicked people. ? If you take having the holy spirit guide you as meaning that you are above mistake as an imperfect human and as an organization , then ill advise you study the scriptures more. Then use that knowledge to search for Gods means of dispensing the truth on earth today. On a last note, what are your own beliefs and why do you believe in them? |
MzNelly:Pls rephrase the question and ask if he was once a jw,how long and what cong. You will be suprised with the answers. |
dolphinheart:Trinitarians state : Jesus is self-existent. As the Creator of all things (John 1:3; Colossians 1:16; Hebrews 1:2), Christ himself must be uncreated. Colossians 1:17 tells us that Christ is “before all things, and in Him all things consist.” The issue of Christ and creation has already been addressed. See proverbs 8:20-31. Is jesus self existent? Does Colossians 1:16, 17 (RS) exclude Jesus from having been created, when it says “in him all things were created . . . all things were created through him and for him”? The Greek word here rendered “all things” is pan′ta, an inflected form of pas. At Luke 13:2, RS renders this “all . . . other”; JB reads “any other”; NE says “anyone else.” (See also Luke 21:29 in NE and Philippians 2:21 in JB.) In harmony with everything else that the Bible says regarding the Son, some translations assigns the same meaning to pan′ta at Colossians 1:16, 17 so that it reads, in part, “by means of him all other things were created . . . All other things have been created through him and for him.” Thu he is shown to be a created being, part of the creation produced by God. Rev. 1:1; 3:14, RS: “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him . . . ‘And to the angel of the church in La- odicea write: “The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning [Greek, ar·khe′] of God’s creation.”’” (KJ, Dy, CC, and NW, as well as others, read similarly.) Is that rendering correct? Some take the view that what is meant is that the Son was ‘the beginner of God’s creation,’ that he was its ‘ultimate source.’ But Liddell and Scott’s Greek-English Lexicon lists “beginning” as its first meaning of ar·khe′. (Oxford, 1968, p. 252) The logical conclusion is that the one being quoted at Revelation 3:14 is a creation, the first of God’s creations, that he had a beginning. Compare Proverbs 8:22, where, as many Bible commentators agree, the Son is referred to as wisdom personified. According to RS, NE, and JB, the one there speaking is said to be “created.”) |
OLAADEGBU:Jesus is eternal. "In the beginning was the Word." These words does not prove that jesus did not have a beggining , but proves that jesus had a beginning, just like the earth and heavens in genesis 1:1: "in the beginning , God created the heavens and earth. Was jesus created (born)? Colossians 1:15 " He is the IMAGE of the invisible God, THE .FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION" Rev 3:14 ".....the beginning of God's creation" Col. 1:15, 16, RS: “He [Jesus Christ] is the image of the invisible God, the first- born of all creation; for in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth.” In what sense is Jesus Christ “the first- born of all creation”? (1) Trinitarians say that “first-born” here means prime, most excellent, most distinguished; thus Christ would be understood to be, not part of creation, but the most distinguished in relation to those who were created. If that is so, and if the Trinity doctrine is true, why are the Father and the holy spirit not also said to be the firstborn of all creation? But the Bible applies this expression only to the Son. According to the customary meaning of “firstborn,” it indicates that Jesus is the eldest in Jehovah’s family of sons. (2) Before Colossians 1:15, the expression “the firstborn of” occurs upwards of 30 times in the Bible, and in each instance that it is applied to living creatures the same meaning applies— the firstborn is part of the group. “Thefirstborn of Israel” is one of the sons of Israel; “the firstborn of Pharaoh” is one of Pharaoh’s family; “the firstborn of beast” are themselves animals. What, then, causes some to ascribe a different meaning to it at Colossians 1:15? Is it Bible usage or is it a belief to which they already hold and for which they seek proof? Also read proverbs 8:20-31, it gives us a better understanding about who jesus was. Hebrews 1:8: RS reads: “Of the Son he says, ‘Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.’” (KJ, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, NAB have similar renderings.) However, some other translation reads: “But with reference to the Son: ‘God is your throne forever and ever.’” (AT, Mo, TC,and NWT By convey the same idea.) Which rendering is harmonious with the context? The preceding verses say that God is speaking, not that he is being addressed; and the following verse uses the expression “God, thy God,” showing that the one addressed is not the Most High God but is a worshiper of that God. Hebrews 1:8 quotes from Psalm 45:6, which originally was addressed to a human king of Israel. Obviously, the Bible writer of this psalm did not think that this human king was Almighty God. Rather, Psalm 45:6, in RS, reads “Your divine throne.” (NE says, “Your throne is like God’s throne.” JP [verse 7]: “Thy throne given of God.”) Solomon, who was possibly the king originally addressed in Psalm 45, was said to sit “upon Jehovah’s throne.” (1 Chron. 29:23, ) In harmony with the fact that God is the “throne,” or Source and Upholder of Christ’s kingship, Daniel 7:13, 14 and Luke 1:32 show that God confers such authority on him. Hebrews 1:8, 9 quotes from Psalm 45:6, 7, concerning which the Bible scholar B. F. Westcott states: “The LXX. admits of two renderings: [ho the·os′] can be taken as a vocative in both cases (Thy throne, O God, . . . therefore, O God, Thy God . . . ) or it can be taken as the subject (or the predicate) in the first case (God is Thy throne, or Thy throne is God . . . ), and in apposition to [ho the·os′ sou] in the second case (Therefore God, even Thy God . . . ). . . . It is scarcely possible that [’Elo·him′] in the original can be addressed to the king. The presumption therefore is against the belief that [ho the·os′] is a vocative in the LXX. Thus on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: God is Thy throne (or, Thy throne is God), that is ‘Thy kingdom is founded upon God, the immovable Rock.’”—The Epistle to the Hebrews (London, 1889), pp. 25, 26. Why does Hebrews 1:10-12 quote Psalm 102:25-27 and apply it to the Son, when the psalm says that it is addressed to God? Because the Son is the one through whom God performed the creative works there described by the psalmist. (See Colossians 1:15, 16; Proverbs 8:22, 27-30.) It should be observed in Hebrews 1:5b that a quotation is made from 2 Samuel 7:14 and applied to the Son of God. Although that text had its first application to Solomon, the later application of it to Jesus Christ does not mean that Solomon and Jesus are the same. Jesus is “greater than Solomon” and carries out a work foreshadowed by Solomon.— Luke 11:31. |
OLAADEGBU:Jesus is Theos. The usual Greek equivalent of ʼEl and ʼElo·him′ in the Septuagint translation and the word for “God” or “god” in the Christian Greek Scriptures is the·os′.( note : the word theos refer to both God and god ) Same explanation on elohim applies to theos. Believing in Christ and believing in God are not identical acts. Jesus is a god , but he is not almighty God. Almighty God is jesus God, the one who annointed jesus. |
OLAADEGBU:... Jesus is Elohim. Elohim is not a Hebrew name, its a term. Elohim is not portrayed in the Old Testament as the powerful and sovereign governor of the universe, ruling over the affairs of humankind, jehovah , who also bears the term elohim is. Among the Hebrew words that are translated “God” is ʼEl, probably meaning “Mighty One; Strong One.” ( Ge 14:18) It is used with reference to Jehovah, to other gods, and to men. It is also used extensively in the makeup of proper names, such as Elisha (meaning “God Is Salvation”) and Michael (“Who Is Like God?”). In some places ʼEl appears with the definite article (ha·ʼEl′, literally, “the God”) with reference to Jehovah, thereby distinguishing him from other gods.— Ge 46:3; 2Sa 22:31; At Isaiah 9:6 Jesus Christ is prophetically called ʼEl Gib·bohr′, “Mighty God” (not ʼEl Shad·dai′ [God Almighty], which is applied to Jehovah at Genesis 17:1). The plural form, ʼe·lim′, is used when referring to other gods, such as at Exodus 15:11(“gods”). It is also used as the plural of majesty and excellence, as in Psalm 89:6: “Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God[bi·veneh′ ʼE·lim′]?” That the plural form is used to denote a single individual here and in a number of other places is supported by the translation of ʼE·lim′ by the singular form The·os′ in the Greek Septuagint; likewise by Deus in the Latin Vulgate. The Hebrew word ʼelo·him′ (gods) appears to be from a root meaning “be strong.” ʼElo·him′ is the plural of ʼeloh′ah (god). Sometimes this plural refers to a number of gods ( Ge 31:30, 32; 35:2), but more often it is used as a plural of majesty, dignity, or excellence. ʼElo·him′ is used in the Scriptures with reference to Jehovah himself, to angels, to idol gods (singular and plural), and to men. (note: you can see that its not only to Jehovah and jesus that the term elohim is used for . According to trinity, if kesus is elohim, jehovah is elohim, angel is elohim, men is Elohim, then all are God , right?) When applying to Jehovah, ʼElo·him′ is used as a plural of majesty, dignity, or excellence. ( Ge 1:1) Regarding this, Aaron Ember wrote: “That the language of the O[ld] T[estament] has entirely given up the idea of plurality in . . . [ʼElo·him′] (as applied to the God of Israel) is especially shown by the fact that it is almost invariably construed with a singular verbal predicate, and takes a singular adjectival attribute. . . . [ʼElo·him′] must rather be explained as an intensive plural, denoting greatness and majesty, being equal to The Great God.”—The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures, Vol. XXI, 1905, p. 208. At Psalm 8:5, the angels are also referred to as ʼelo·him′, as is confirmed by Paul’s quotation of the passage at Hebrews 2:6-8. They are called beneh ha·ʼElo·him′, “sons of God” (KJ); “sons of the true God” (NW), at Genesis 6:2, 4; Job 1:6; 2:1. Lexicon in Veteris Testamenti Libros, by Koehler and Baumgartner (1958), page 134, says: “(individual) divine beings, gods.” And page 51 says: “the (single) gods,” and it cites Genesis 6:2; Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7. Hence, at Psalm 8:5 ʼelo·him′ is rendered “angels” (LXX); “godlike ones” (NW). The word ʼelo·him′ is also used when referring to idol gods. Sometimes this plural form means simply “gods.” ( Ex 12:12; 20:23) At other times it is the plural of excellence and only one god (or goddess) is referred to. However, these gods were clearly not trinities.— 1Sa 5:7b (Dagon); 1Ki 11:5 (“goddess” Ashtoreth); Da 1:2b (Marduk). At Psalm 82:1, 6, ʼelo·him′ is used of men, human judges in Israel. Jesus quoted from this Psalm at John 10:34, 35. They were gods in their capacity as representatives of and spokesmen for Jehovah. Similarly Moses was told that he was to serve as “God” to Aaron and to Pharaoh.— Ex 4:16, ftn; 7:1. In many places in the Scriptures ʼElo·him′ is also found preceded by the definite article ha. ( Ge 5:22) Concerning the use of ha·ʼElo·him′, F. Zorell says: “In the Holy Scriptures especially the one true God, Jahve, is designated by this word; . . . ‘Jahve is the [one true] God’ De 4:35; 4:39; Jos 22:34; 2Sa 7:28; 1Ki 8:60 etc.”—Lexicon Hebraicum Veteris Testamenti, Rome, 1984, p. 54; brackets his. |
paulGrundy:Been think say u say u where once part of them , u no remember their teachings again? |
[/b] OLAADEGBU: [b]Jesus is Kurios. The New Testament Greek equivalent of the Old Testament Hebrew name Yahweh is Kurios. Used of God, Kurios carries the idea of a sovereign being who exercises absolute authority. The word is translated Lord in English translations of the Bible. THE AFFIRMATION THAT “JESUS IS LORD” (KURIOS) IN THE NEW TESTAMENT CONSTITUTES A CLEAR AFFIRMATION THAT JESUS IS YAHWEH. To an early Christian accustomed to reading the Old Testament, the word Lord, when used of Jesus, would point to His identification with the God of the Old Testament (Yahweh). Hence, the affirmation that “Jesus is Lord” (Kurios) in the New Testament constitutes a clear affirmation that Jesus is Yahweh, as is the case in passages like Romans 10:9, 1 Corinthians 12:3, and Philippians 2:5–11./Kurios does[b]not[/b] carry the idea of a sovereign being who exercises absolute authority. The New Testament Greek equivalent of the Old Testament Hebrew name Yahweh is not Kurios.. Kurios (κύριος) is a Greek word translating to "lord, master". It is notably the LXX translation of Adonai, the Biblical Hebrew title "my lord" given to YHWH and is also the original name of God translated as "lord" in the New Testament. ( the reason why lord is used in bible translation has been explained in previous posts. Kurios is Greek word for lord while adonai is Hebrew word for lord). In Ancient Greece, a woman could not enter into a contract herself and arrangements were made by her guardian or Kurios. For an unmarried woman the Kurios would be her father, and if dead, brothers an uncle or relative would be the Kurios. In some cases, when reading the Hebrew Bible the Jews would substitute Adonai (my Lord) for the Tetragrammaton (the written representation of the Name of God), and they may have also substituted Kurios when reading to a Greek audience (as in the Septuagint translation). Origen refers to both practices in his commentary on Psalms (2.2).[2] The practice was due to the desire not to overuse the name of God. “Kyrios.” This Greek word is an adjective, signifying the possessing of power (ky′ros) or authority, and it is also used as a noun. It appears in each book of the Christian Greek Scriptures except Titus and the letters of John. The term corresponds to the Hebrew ʼA·dhohn′. As God’s created Son and Servant, Jesus Christ properly addresses his Father and God ( Joh 20:17) as “Lord” (ʼAdho·nai′ or Ky ′ri·os), the One having superior power and authority, his Head. ( Mt 11:25; 1Co 11:3) As the one exalted to his Father’s right hand, Jesus is “Lord of lords” as respects all except his Father, God the Almighty.— Re 17:14; 19:15, 16; compare 1Co 15:27, 28. Its use in place of the divine name. During the second or third century of the Common Era, the scribes substituted the words Ky′ri·os (Lord) and The·os′ (God) for the divine name, Jehovah, in copies of the Greek Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Other translations, such as the Latin Vulgate, the Douay Version (based on the Vulgate), and the King James Version, as well as numerous modern translations (NE, AT, RS, NIV, TEV, NAB), followed a similar practice. The divine name was replaced by the terms “God” and “Lord,” generally in all-capital letters in English to indicate the substitution for the Tetragrammaton, or divine name. In departing from this practice, the translation committee of the American Standard Version of 1901 stated: “The American Revisers, after a careful consideration, were brought to the unanimous conviction that a Jewish superstition, which regarded the Divine Name as too sacred to be uttered, ought no longer to dominate in the English or any other version of the Old Testament, as it fortunately does not in the numerous versions made by modern missionaries. . . . This personal name [Jehovah], with its wealth of sacred associations, is now restored to the place in the sacred text to which it has an unquestionable claim.”—AS preface, p. iv. A number of translations since then (An, JB [English and French], NC, BC [both in Spanish], and others) have consistently rendered the Tetragrammaton as “Yahweh” or have used a similar form If trinitarians believe that jesus is kurios, then he is God because God is refered to as kurios , then everybody referred to as kurios is God , right? . |
OLAADEGBU:I have waited for answers to my questions, no answers up till now, I will go and post replies as promised while still hoping ull answer my questions(unlike some others) jesus is not jehovah/yaweh. Jesus did not ascribe the name jehovah/yaweh to himself. The name jehovah has been ascribed to God long before exodus . He causes to become/i am who I am / I am what I am/he causes to be/ I shall prove to be what I shall prove to be /I Will Become whatsoever I please.” coveys to us the meaning of that name and who the person behind that name is .(this will be explained further in subsequent posts.) Jehovah/yaweh Definition: The personal name of the only true God. His own self- designation. Jehovah is the Creator and, rightfully, the Sovereign Ruler of the universe. “Jehovah”/ "yaweh is translated from the Hebrew Tetragrammaton, יהוה, which means “He Causes to Become.” /I AM who I I AM, These four Hebrew letters are represented in many languages by the letters JHVH or YHWH. Where is God’s name found in Bible translations that are commonly used today? The New English Bible: The name Jehovah appears at Exodus 3:15; 6:3. See also Genesis 22:14; Exodus 17:15; Judges 6:24; Ezekiel 48:35. This and other translations use “Jehovah” in several places. why are they not consistent in using it at every place where the Tetragrammaton appears in the Hebrew text(old testament)? This is the reason why. Revised Standard Version: A footnote on Exodus 3:15 says: “The word LORD when spelled with capital letters, stands for the divine name, YHWH.” Today’s English Version: A footnote on Exodus 6:3 states: “THE LORD: . . . Where the Hebrew text has Yahweh, traditionally transliterated as Jehovah, this translation employs LORD with capital letters, following a usage which is widespread in English versions.” King James Version: The name Jehovah is found at Exodus 6:3; Psalm 83:18; Isaiah 12:2; 26:4. See also Genesis 22:14; Exodus 17:15; Judges 6:24. American Standard Version: The name Jehovah is used consistently in the Hebrew Scriptures in this translation, beginning with Genesis 2:4. Douay Version: A footnote on Exodus 6:3 says: “My name Adonai. The name, which is in the Hebrew text, is that most proper name of God, which signifieth his eternal, self- existing being, (Exod. 3, 14, Ex 3:14) which the Jews out of reverence never pronounce; but, instead of it, whenever it occurs in the Bible, they read Adonai, which signifies the Lord; and, therefore, they put the points or vowels, which belong to the name Adonai, to the four letters of that other ineffable name, Jod, He, Vau, He. Hence some moderns have framed the name of Jehovah, unknown to all the ancients, whether Jews or Christians; for the true pronunciation of the name, which is in the Hebrew text, by long disuse is now quite lost.” (It is interesting that The Catholic Encyclopedia [1913, Vol. VIII, p. 329] states: “Jehovah, the proper name of God in the Old Testament; hence the Jews called it the name by excellence, the great name, the only name.”) The Holy Bible translated by Ronald A. Knox: The name Yahweh is found in footnotes at Exodus 3:14 and Ex 6:3. The Jerusalem Bible: The Tetragrammaton is translated Yahweh, starting with its first occurrence, at Genesis 2:4. New World Translation: The name Jehovah is used in both the Hebrew and the Christian Greek Scriptures in this translation, appearing 7,210 times. An American Translation: At Exodus 3:15 and Ex 6:3 the name Yahweh is used, followed by “the LORD” in brackets. The Bible in Living English, S. T. Byington: The name Jehovah is used throughout the Hebrew Scriptures. The Emphatic Diaglott, Benjamin Wilson: The name Jehovah is found at Matthew 21:9 and in 17 other places in this translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures. Why do many Bible translations not use the personal name of God or use it only a few times? The preface of the Revised Standard Version explains: “For two reasons the Committee has returned to the more familiar usage of the King James Version: (1) the word ‘Jehovah’ does not accurately represent any form of the Name ever used in Hebrew; and (2) the use of any proper name for the one and only God, as though there were other gods from whom he had to be distinguished, was discontinued in Judaism before the Christian era and is entirely inappropriate for the universal faith of the Christian Church.” (Thus their own view of what is appropriate has been relied on as the basis for removing from the Holy Bible the personal name of its Divine Author, whose name appears in the original Hebrew more often than any other name or any title. They admittedly follow the example of the adherents of Judaism, of whom Jesus said: You have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition.”— Matt. 15:6.) True Christians have a commission from Jesus Christ to make disciples of people of all nations. When teaching these people, how would it be possible to identify the true God as different from the false gods of the nations? Only by using His personal name, as the Bible itself does.— Matt. 28:19, 20; 1 Cor. 8:5, 6. Ex. 3:15: “God said . . . to Moses: ‘This is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, “Jehovah the God of your forefathers . . . has sent me to you.” This is my name to time indefinite, and this is the memorial of me to generation after generation.’”(Gods name will never change) Isa. 12:4: “Give thanks to Jehovah, you people! Call upon his name. Make known among the peoples his dealings. Make mention that his name is put on high.” Ezek. 38:17, 23: “This is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said, ‘ . . . And I shall certainly magnify myself and sanctify myself and make myself known before the eyes of many nations; and they will have to know that I am Jehovah.’” Mal. 3:16: “Those in fear of Jehovah spoke with one another, each one with his companion, and Jehovah kept paying attention and listening. And a book of remembrance began to be written up before him for those in fear of Jehovah and for those thinking upon his name.” John 17:26: “[Jesus prayed to his Father:] I have made your name known to them [his followers] and will make it known, in order that the love with which you loved me may be in them and I in union with them.” (note: this shows jesus is a seperate person from jehovah, moreover the union jesus had with humans call for a serious explanation from those who believe in trinity) Acts 15:14: “Symeon has related thoroughly how God for the first time turned his attention to the nations to take out of them a people for his name.” Is Jehovah jesus? Matt. 4:10: “Jesus said to him: ‘Go away, Satan! For it is written, “It is Jehovah [“the Lord,” king James version and others] your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.”’” (Jesus was obviously not saying that he himself was to be worshiped.) John 8:54: “Jesus answered [the Jews]: ‘If I glorify myself, my glory is nothing. It is my Father that glorifies me, he who you say is your God.’” (The Hebrew Scriptures clearly identify Jehovah as the God that the Jews professed to worship. Jesus said, not hat he himself was Jehovah, but that Jehovah was his Father. Jesus here made it very clear that he and his Father were distinct individuals.) Ps. 110:1: “The utterance of Jehovah to my [David’s] Lord is: ‘Sit at my right hand until I place your enemies as a stool for your feet.’” (At Matthew 22:41-45, Jesus explained that he himself was David’s “Lord,” referred to in this psalm. So Jesus is not Jehovah but is the one to whom Jehovah’s words were here directed.) Phil. 2:9-11: “For this very reason also God exalted him [Jesus Christ] to a superior position and kindly gave him the name that is above every other name,(note: jesus did not have the name ascribed to here, but was giving,) so that in the name of Jesus every knee should bend of those in heaven and those on earth and those under the ground, and every tongue should openly acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father.(note: to the glory of who? The father. Jesus is not the father. Notice that Jesus Christ is here shown to be different from God the Father and subject to Him.) Jesus used God’s name. In prayer, Jesus told Jehovah: “I have made your name known to them [Jesus’ disciples] and will make it known.” Why did Jesus make the divine name known to his disciples? He continued: “In order that the love with which you [God] loved me may be in them and I in union with them.”—John 17:26. Jesus is not jehovah, jesus is not the father, jesus is not the one true God. The father is the one true God and god of jesus. |
[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=28603871]This are the questions again I asked : 1)what is a God. (what do u understand by the term God) 2) what do you understand by the term Christ) 3) can you qoute and explain to us proverbs 8: 20 to 31 4) is the person jesus the same as the person father? |
OLAADEGBU:Sir, I'm going to discuss some of the assertions you made on jesus and his attributes, but can u first of All answer the questions I asked you ? Pls do answer them , so that we can have a better understanding of trinity . Moreover , some , if not all of the attributes you claim jesus had have been debunked in previous replies to you. You have refused to comment on the scriptures used to debunk your claim and have become evasive. I will repeat some of those sriptures and add more, but first of all , answer the 4 questions I asked please |
Syncan:Thanks for answering my post . question, Is the person of jesus the same as the father.? Ur answer no. Mr oladeegbu, is this statement true? Is there any verse that says jesus is jehovah , or are u attributing jesus is also called jehovah because of ur belief that jesus is God ? |
OLAADEGBU:Sir, we are having a discussion on these thread. If I want to show u something from the bible or any book , I post (sometimes, copy and paste ) it here for all to see. Pls dnt direct me to a link. If you want to show, tell me anything , or u want to answer my question , post it here So that everyone will see. I'm not the one to start searching for answers to the questions I asked you, if you really want to answer the questions , you will post the answers for us to see. You should know most of the people reading this thread are searching for the thruth, and anybody ready to try and speak the truth must be ready to take time and post the truth. Dnt direct us to any link . I asked for simple questions , pls answer in ur own words or in words you believe in . We have been having discussion with someone who we believe has a different understanding of trinity when compared to yours, hence we are asking questions to clarify the differences first, before we go into the main discussion . |
OLAADEGBU:Sir , pls dnt be angry , I ask questions so that I can have a better understanding of ur belief. I refer to someone else post because what he said about trinity is different from what you are saying about trinity. So if I or anyone is to belief in trinity, we have to know which of the statements on trinity is true, is it your or his?. Hence, the effort in trying to bring him into the topic to state his own side. Now to the issue on the question I asked . I asked : 1)what is a God. (what do u understand by the term God) 2) what do you understand by the term Christ) 3) can you qoute and explain to us proverbs 8: 20 to 31 You answered: Questions, questions and more questions. When will you come to the knowledge of the truth? God is the uncreated infinite Creator of all things. Let me start you off on Isaiah 43:10 "You are my witnesses, says the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that you may know and believe me, and understand that I am He: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour " (Isaiah 43:10-11). How does a creature become a God? Please educate us My comment : Sir, on question (1) above, I asked what a God is , as both secular and biblical sources have made mention of many Gods, so that y I asked the question "what is a god" ? Y are they called Gods. By ur answer u can see you have not answered question (1). You have not answered question (2 ) You have not answered question (3) also. Sorry pls, there is a 4th question (4) is jesus the father? What I mean is that the person called the father, is he also the person called the son? When you answer this questions , I will have a better understanding of ur view of trinity. Then I can be able to comment on your posts |


