Finofaya's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Finofaya's Profile › Finofaya's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 39 pages)
UyiIredia:Actually, you can't. That claim has no place in your proof. |
UyiIredia:As long as you include life among the coded systems you refer to, premise 2 is not a fact but a conclusion. The intelligence you refer to in your premise is man's intelligence, not God's, since you are trying to prove God. Man's intelligence is not responsible for the coded system on which life is based. You cannot therefore say that all coded systems require intelligence in order to be built, if it is only man's intelligence you speak of, and call it a fact or a good premise. |
UyiIredia:We won't get anywhere if we talk past each other. I never said that it is a fact that it takes intelligence to build codes. Remember I asked you how you know that intelligence is required to build coded systems. I never got an answer so I guess you agree with the one I gave. That short story I wrote in my first post is an attempt to show you how we cannot conclude, based on observation of human intelligence, that intelligence is required to build coded systems. In order to arrive at that conclusion, you have to first propose the existence of a type of intelligence that lacks the limitation that human intelligence has. i.e. you have to propose God! Your number two premise already assumes the existence of God, by concluding that intelligence is required to make coded systems. Dude, if your proof is based on such an assumption, then it fails. I don't know what you mean when you say that your proof does not fail if I say it is based on an assumption. Is your proof now unfalsifiable? ![]() |
UyiIredia:This is a rather roundabout way of agreeing with me. If God does not need to observe coded systems first before he can make them, clearly his intelligence is nothing like ours. It is not simply a matter of IQ, but a fundamental difference in how we are able to know things. You would have to include this premise in your proof first, and then we can see whether the proof succeeds with it. |
davien: ![]() ![]() |
UyiIredia:Number two is based on an assumption. How do you know that intelligence is required to build coded systems? It's because the only other coded systems you see apart from man made ones are the natural ones, such as living systems, isn't it? However, we know that the natural coded systems existed before man's intelligence did. Any coded system that man makes would be created after the observance of such systems in nature. As such, it is man made coded systems that require man's intelligence in order to be built, and not every coded system, as you assert. This is where the mistake is made, since the intelligence which you have seen creating coded systems does not create coded systems out of thin air, but from observation of already existing similar systems. If the intelligence of God is anything like that of man, then God would also have to observe already existing coded systems in order to build his own. But then this would mean that God learns, whereas he is said to be omniscient. More importantly, it would mean that coded systems exist independently of God (this would explain his own life) and that his existence is therefore not the only necessary one. Of course you can say that God's intelligence is nothing like man's, and that will be adding another premise to your proof, in which case your proof as it stands is a failure. |
musKeeto:Lol. None taken. I hope you aren't right behind me for my woman. |
@OP. LMAO. Nice one. People just say the weirdest things in the name of God. Nobody will agree that a thief, because he wants to steal joyfully, has denied the existence of the police. However if God is involved they will agree with that and even more. Oh well. Let me get back to my fornication. |
okeke00:There are two things: Jesus is all about salvation and eternal life. The day to day business on earth is not really his thing. Political, economic, social and other struggles are not so much his business as much as spiritual struggles are. I doubt very much that national boundaries are even recognised in heaven, since they are mere arbitrary constructs used by man to emphaszie that he is not all inclusive, unlike God. The question "how has Jesus' death benefitted Nigeria" is therefore misconceived. Also, this world is merely a percusor to heaven, so by necessity it must be worse than heaven, otherwise heaven would be pointless.the killings and evil you speak of are simply an unavoidable feature of this world, according to oga Yahweh. Secondly, since the wage of sin is eternity in hell, and Jesus is clearly not spending eternity there, it is alleged that he has not actually, properly, died for our sins. Ordinarily, a person who dies for his own sins spends eternity in hell. How much more one who dies for the sins of the whole world? Three days is certainly not enough, tho we are not saying that a three day (72 hour) roasting is even advisable in the first place. So when you take this point into consideration, it becomes easier to explain why people still die for their sins even after another is said to have died for the same sins. On a more serious note, heaven is simply a poorly conceived idea. If the world said to have been created by the most powerful and all knowing and infinitely good God could not be perfect from the outset, what magic could possibly happen to make it perfect at some future point? Will God develop another infinite ability that prevents his plans from derailing? Heaven only works when you dont think about it carefully, because if you did you would see that any purported afterlife would simple be another iteration of life as we know it. Same thing, different cycle. Much like the Matrix. |
logica:Lol. And the writer insists he wasn't referring to God. Funny how fitting the play turned out to be. |
Nmeri17:If one says in his heart "la ilaha illallah", is he also a fool? |
Religion is not conscious. I don't know if unconscious things can be delusional. ![]() However, to the extent that a religion forbids adherents from examining their beliefs, it becomes a fertile ground for delusions. To be deluded is to be human tho, so everybody can take heart. |
Peterken05:1. Just three people, a sister, a cousin and my girl friend know that I don't believe in any God. My sister (a teen, God bless her soul, lol) finds religion hilarious, cousin doesn't care, and the gf would rather not talk about it. 2. Yes. I come off as irreligious instead to people. When I'm pressed to take a stance, I say I'm searching for God. This is true and it also seems to satisfy people a bit. 3. Yes. I prefer not to declare that I don't believe in any God. I avoid religious discussions unless I'm feeling cantankerous and want to upset, or I hear some obnoxious religious stuff. Even then I don't ask anyone not to believe in any God, instead I try to show the contradictory nature of the God idea they have, since there are some kinds of God we can simply ignore. By itself, the belief that there is a God is not an issue for me. 4. I expect opposition if it becomes general knowledge. I get a lot of flak just for laughing at spiritual matters. |
sonOfLucifer:Me either. |
It is possible, it is common even, but it is celestial treason. Lucifer is paying the price till date. The default emotion towards Yahweh should be anger, but stockholm syndrome de worry so many people. |
plaetton:Thirded! What could spritual/religious progress possibly look like? |
ebukaOtika:The car is not praise worthy. But I praised the students for you. |
ebukaOtika:None sir |
Okeikpu:The OP says a formula 1 car was built, not a car that looks like a formula 1 car. Do your research. |
oiu123:Perhaps your own end is at hand. The world will carry on without you. You see, our sins cannot have been paid for if we still have to pay for them. Besides, God does not need heaven for anything; he can achieve what he wants with man here on earth. God has ultimate control over sin and he does not have to wait to get rid of it. Whoever thinks that God will change our world obviously hasn't thought the matter through. This world will last forever or until the universe kills us, whichever comes first. ![]() |
youngice:What are you talking about? |
Abbey2sam:I'm sure you now know that they had four hundred thousand naira to work with, not N4m. We need all those things you mentioned but first we need people to take science/technology/engineering more seriously and invest substantial money in them. |
Johnnoo:Lol. Fast ke. Before you can properly appraise this car, you have to know what the specs are so that you can differentiate it from the ones our mechanics knock out in their sleep. You have to admit that the car looks unimpressive. |
@OP, That's nice, really. But let's not get ahead of ourselves here. That is not a formula 1 car, or even any sort of race car. Also, we can already manufacture or assemble vehicles in Nigeria. In fact, cars are assembled and reassembled everyday by auto mechanics without university education. Its nice that these students were able to build their own chassis tho, and possibly other parts, especially with such a tight budget. If we could get the specifications of this car so that we can know exactly what was done, that would be even better. More grease to their elbows! |
@OP, it's not every problem that God will solve. It is entirely possible that God will let you be, for reasons best known to him alone. If you can get on with you life while you wait for help, I recommend you do that. That way you won't lose on both sides. What is the thing you ask doubters to do anyway? Can you tell me? |
@OP, The bible is irrelevant as a guide to morals for anyone who is not a christian. Eg, it is irrelevant to a muslim. You have no basis to refuse any non christian marriage on biblical grounds. Non christian homosexuals are not within the jurisdiction of your bible and should not be refused marriage based on your bible. A christian homosexual is entitled to ignore any portion of the bible he finds inconvenient, just as other christians ignore the biblical injunction referred to above (1 Corinthians 14: 34-35), and many other biblical injunctions which are ignored because we are not in 3700 B.C.. |
Godditex:Is this your answer to the problem of evil? Let’s compare and contrast God and a barber, so that we can see how well your analogy works: Difference; God is omnipresent, a barber is not. If the barber were omnipresent you would not be able to go to him since he will be where you are. God, being omnipresent, is wherever the needy are so the issue of going to him does not arise. Difference; Unkempt hair does not hurt the keeper and hair can be left unkempt by choice. Suffering on the other hand is not by choice and the sufferer always wishes for an end to the suffering. Wishing for suffering to end is a form of calling on, or going to, God. Difference; God has control over the emergence of suffering whereas the barber has no control over the growth of hair. Similarity; The barber does not go about cutting people’s hair. Neither does God go about ending suffering. Similarity; A barber may refuse you a haircut and God may refuse your prayer and keep you suffering. I hope you can now see that it is only advanced blindness that can make a person see your OP and agree that it is correct. People have called on God and he has ignored them. If he was going to stop people from suffering anyway, why allow them suffer in the first place? Perhaps he wants to hear people call on him? Just face it dude: there cannot be suffering and a merciful omnipotent God in the same universe. |
peteregwu:Are you claiming to understand God? |
mumumugu:Oh. That makes it better then. As long as a miracle is involved, illegality is allowed. |
lol. Until the government came knocking, God apparently did not know that the structure was an illegal one. God allowed an illegal structure to be built and he didnt move it until the government wanted it removed. So at least we now know that God behaves like people who disregard town planning and that he was joking when he asked us to obey our government. Praise the Lord? ![]() |
The only person that you can verifiably say is present when bad behaviour takes place is a human being. I don't know about God or his twin. |
Weah96:They certainly aren't. Can't blame them tho. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 39 pages)




