₦airaland Forum

obadiah777:

happy new year.

I am certain this messages are not from the only wise God, very frivolous predictions.

BARRISTERS: @image123



are you jesus? how do you know what jesus would say? tell us what YOU have to say!

is my response anyway suggesting that i am Jesus? Tell the op to ask Jesus, He's the head teacher of the doctrine in question.

It's not exactly a universal sin like stealing, but could be contextually or culturally wrong. Somethings are wrong but not exactly sin e.g late coming or wasting water.
Its usually considered wrong and disrespectful to cross one's legs in front of a superior. Like one may not do so in front of his boss, commander, teacher, parent or superior. My advice is that you be more conscious of your body and its language to folks around you. It's called loving others as yourself or so.

you need a passport.

hahaha, another Obadiah777 mould in the make. complete dustbin talk.

Nigeria my Nigeria, the city where God is expected to do everything for you including dishwashing. Which one is 'precipitate in', is it slang or what?
Gaining admission into university is not by fastings, that's a waste. Simply commit your way to God, ask for His guidance, and diligently fulfill the admission requirements. Improve on your academic performance and trust God. Trusting God doesn't include paying lecturer for admission as an unbeliever is rightly telling you. Trusting God doesn't include wallowing in dejection and self pity. If you can truly believe, all things are possible to you.

kjv and amplified version are not bad.

forced predictions. go and preach the gospel.

God created all humans with spirit, soul and body. Each person has a conscience and has emotions, whether you worship my fart or you don't. Natural difference is that some have it more pronounced than others. Spiritual difference is some have a map/guide others don't.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE

frosbel: appears you are confused as expected.

Next ....

we're waiting frosb, don't tell me you're keeping malice with Jesus? He'll answer you if you are not shy and you ask Him right.

frosbel: Well I know what he says, I am asking eternal torment preachers like you , lol.

direct your questions to Him. He is the chief teacher on this issue, we're awaiting your report from your interview with hell's chiefo.

direct your questions to Jesus, He is the chief teacher

truthislight: this boy, be careful, i have a very big cane to spank your bumbum.
Lol.

You are making Annony's work more difficult.

you think it is Anony's work?

v.funny

[quote author=Mr_Anony].....creeps into the room, silently takes a seat at the corner of the room........pulls out jotter and pen and observes the discussion in quietness.[/quote]international observer ba? Contribute jare, nobody don turn omni for hia.

obadiah777: YOU DO ERR. BEHIND THOSE NAMES ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBES. FOR EXAMPLE ESAU MEANS 'WASTED AWAY PIGMENTATION'. THE WHITE RACE IS ESAU. YOU ERR THINKING THE BIBLE IS THE LIFE STORY AND FAMILY TREE OF SOME PARTICULAR PERSONS GENEALOGY. THERE ARE GREAT MEN ( SUCH AS JOB, DANIEL, JEREMIAH, ISAIAH, HABBAKUK, JOEL, OBADIAH, NIMROD ETC ETC ) INTERSPERSED WITH THE NAMES OF NATIONS OF PEOPLE AS SINGLE PEOPLE ( JACOB-ISRAEL, ESAU, ADAM, ISHMAEL, AMMON, MOAB, CUSH, ETC ETC ) INTERSPERSED WITH NAMES OF LAND MASSES AS PEOPLE ( HAM, SHEM, JAPHETH, EVE, ETC ETC ).

suit yourself, deception is sweet.

[quote author=pastor prosper ]Bankole u hv come here to make a fooool of urself. So u are lucifer eyeing daddy G.o's position, so politicians don't have a right to be in church, wasn't jesus accused of hanging around with sinners? Cursed be the day u were born, tufifiakwa.[/quote]your own too much abegi, stop crying more than the bereaved. Adeboye sef no curse the Guy.

obadiah777: SAME WAY REFERENCE WAS MADE TO THE MAN ADAM AND THE MAN ESAU AND THE MAN ISRAEL. HOWEVER THEY ARE NATIONS OF PEOPLE NOT SINGLE MEN. YOU DO ERR NOT KNOWING SCRIPTURES LOLZ

Jacob and Esau were men according to the Bible. they were twins with parents(Isaac and Rebecca). They had uncles and nieces, they had jobs and they worked. They even died with specifics on their ages. You are spewing nonsense, sorry.

[quote author=Atheist:-D]Apologies. I thought you were after more questions.

You can pick any 5 you want.[/quote]that's not the 'agreement'. Tell me the five you want me to answer and stop dragging this like you don't really want an answer.

thank you, theology doesn't save us. It's grace that saves us. Theology serves its purposes in christian growth though.

okay, i said i'll come back to this. Firstly, please permit me to CLEARLY state that no man has perfect or 100% sure knowledge of the endtime events. They are shrouded in mystery and symbols and prophecy. That i agree or disagree with any view or your view(IN THIS SCOPE) is not proof that i'm your enemy or brother. Some of Jesus' disciples thought they'd be alive by the time of Christ's return, some thought John beloved would be alive until the time. Some things are just harder than others, simples. FOCUS ON THE BOLDED WITH REGARDS TO WHAT I JUST SAID.
2Pe 3:16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Heb 5:11 Of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing.

With regards to the Rapture, i think the more important thing is to be ready. Many of the first century christians hardly knew all these theology/eschatology to be saved e.g the thief on the cross and the ethiopian eunuch.

What does the latter part of Matt 24 mean?

Please, let us put it in mind that the Rapture is a brief event(twinkle of an eye) as compared to what we usually call the Second coming of Christ. The Rapture, and the Second coming are two separate events. In the rapture, there is a catching UP to meet the Lord in the air. In the second coming, there is a touch DOWN, on Mount Olives as it were and for a longer period. Please bear the differences i n mind in the reading and interpretation/context of scriptures. i say this as it is combined often and similar.
Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
This is largely talking about the Rapture, though similar can be argued for the Second Coming.
Mat 24:40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
This verse more clearly shows that the Rapture is what Christ is referring to here.

And the parables of Matt 25?

The parables of Matthew 25 focus on rewards. It teaches us that there will be rewards in Heaven based on what we have done on earth. Getting to the kingdom of Heaven is not exactly the ultimate but having good rewards.
2Jo 1:8 Look to yourselves, that we lose not those things which we have wrought, but that we receive a full reward.

God wants His children to obtain a FULL reward in Heaven, not just to get to Heaven. So many believers are complacent with being born again, there is no growth or pressing forward, or consecration. Many people want to know if they will go to hell for doing certain things. While they may not exactly go to hell, they will not get the rewards some others will get for their commitment and desire to fully obeying the Word of God with their hearts and sincerity.
1Co 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

The Matt 25 parables encourage us to go for a reward, and pictures to us that complacency can be as dangerous as entirely losing Heaven.

Why does and how does the 144000 precede the countless multitudes in heaven?

It should be noted that the 144000 are not the first humans to get to Heaven. Getting to Heaven appears to be in batches, which brings strong support for the rapture pre-tribulation team. Consider,
Rev 5:9 And they sung a new song, saying, Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation;
Here we have people from all nation and tongue, redeemed and in Heaven before the 144000. The 144000 are much touted as the human 'owners' of heaven, even though the scripture hardly records them as being in Heaven. BTW, i also believe that they will get to Heaven.

What is the meaning of the manchild being snatched up to heaven out of reach of the dragon while his brethren are left and available to have war made against them by the same dragon?

i don't fully subscribe that Revelations is fully chronological. Neither are most prophecies, whether OT or NT.
Rev 12:5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
Rev 12:13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.

Permit me, i consider myself quite simple and straight as regards my interpretation of the Revelations. Not too conspiracytheory minded oresoteric. I believe the man child is Jesus Christ and the woman is the nation of Israel.
These are my basics as regards the questions my brother. feel free to ask for clarifications.

Goshen360: ^^^ When a man is NOT praying or prophesying in church gathering, if he wears a cap.....is it against the scripture

i would answer your question, but please answer. When a man is praying or prophesying in church gathering, if he wears a cap.....is it against the scripture ?

1Sa 16:23 And it came to pass, when the evil spirit from God was upon Saul, that David took a harp, and played with his hand: so Saul was refreshed, and was well, and the evil spirit departed from him.
Jam 1:13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
Jam 1:14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
Jam 1:15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
Jam 1:16 Do not err, my beloved brethren.
Jam 1:17 Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.
Jam 1:18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.

@OP.
The James passage talks about been tempted/tested by God. God tests us for our good, for our promotion, for our strengthening. Satan tests us to make us fall. the aim/motive is the big issue and thin line between life and death here. An exam is not designed for you to fail or to repeat, or to have carry over. It is designed to confer you with a degree, a certificate, an award, a promotion. But satan doesn't test us to promote us, he tests us so that we can fall. The 1Samuel passage is not a test, it is a result of King Saul's loss of the anointing from God's Spirit. When you lose God's Spirit, it opens up room for other spirits. that the passage refers it as "from God" is indication that God permitted it, knew about it. Nothing important escapes His attention. No evil spirit, evil thing, sickness etc can happen to or jump on a child of God without His knowledge.

Col 3:16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.

honeric01: James 2 vs 3 and 5:

If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” 4 have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?

Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him?

note xfactoria's post above.
So, you consider Bankole a poor man on what basis? And i don't recall reading that Bankole was told to stand or sit on the floor?

Goshen360: ^^^ Nooooo brother. I have no issue at all with Kjv. You know from my previous post that it's my favourite and will remain. But there shouldn't be monopoly of translations to believers. There was a kweshion on my mind at the time of the thread, do you mind if I still ask now or we forget about it?

as you please.

obadiah777: THERE IS SUCH A THING CALLED 'DICHOTOMY'. LIKE HOW A WORD CAN HAVE TWO MEANINGS. NOW YOU ARE JUST BEING A SCOFFER

In this case, you are just putting up the 'dichotomy' as you wish. The scriptures are not by private interpretation. Jesus Christ made reference to the man Noah and the flood as literal events and beings.

Goshen360: Bros cool down o. Na because you said "the bible say so" na.....I called you to come explain.

you sounded particular on some issues you have/had with the kjv. the answers have already been given on this thread, let him that have ears hear.

honeric01: Don't you think what the head of RCCG did was wrong biblically?

Don't you think Bankole was jealous?