Lucifyre's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lucifyre's Profile › Lucifyre's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 47 pages)
shilenji:Except its search and destroy, no respawns🤭 |
We need to pay attention to mental health in this country. A lot don't even know they're schizophrenic. |
Botragelad:😏 First of, you need to sharpen your comprehensive skills to detect sacarsm better. Secondly, the man is reading to you from a play book where women where offered up to be raped instead of the men and you expect his pov not to be misogynistic?! Thirdly, yes "good christains" force everyone else to view the world through their narrow minded POVs. |
Botragelad:But according to the bible he's right. Misogyny is no thing. |
Its totally understandable why we are where we are as a nation. Very few people have sense as this thread shows. Majority of nigerians are truly daft. What abt metaphysical wives and husbands?! Retards. |
BewareOf419:Lol! the frigging irony. Do you even know what irony is you illiterate poverty indexed fvck. Then again reasoning with the anus, is what ur parents did when they decided to hv you or is it screw through the anus, i forget, pls remind me specialist?! Last i checked you were the one saying the beggars were even richer than the average citizen. So... What does that say about u?! Lord knows how much u must ve been screwed by this shit hole to reason so rabidly. Remind me to ignore obtuse morons like u, so i dont get infected to join u guys in bringing the national iq avg even lower. Retard! |
Elsueno:This is very bad advice. Not saying you re definitely wrong but there's a reason the date was put there and most items usually have a long shelf life plus its usually better to be safe than sorry. |
BewareOf419:Oh! its clearer now why your 2 last brain cells are fighting for 3rd place. Since when does the exception to the norm become the norm. You cited a singular example from 2 sources which was a trending story i remember correctly. How does that translate to most of em, comsidering the poverty index?! Pls tell me Mr anecdotal forbes who specializes in the networth of beggars. joke of a m0ron. |
😄 https://www.amazon .com/Make-Negro-Christian-Kamau-Makesi-Tehuti/dp/1411689267
|
BewareOf419:Yes yes... Cause you did an audit of their accounts and assets to come to that conclusion im sure😏 |
Obaranje:The irony is that the people spewing all this daft anecdotal beer palor gists would claim to be educated. |
SMH! The ignorant simply cant understand the things of the spirit. Saul was royalty and had basically v3xed YHVH so he was ulterly condemned. For every kill his life was shortened by 25percent till YHWH killed him the final kill after he had been killed previous kills. |
KnownUnknown:Same reason people use neon signs. To highlight the stupidity. |
SIRTee15:He just kept on embarrassing himself. Confident and ignorant, amazing combo. |
SIRTee15:The dude is ignorant and oblivious and i honestly didn't have the energy for his contradictory, all over the place discredited arguments, with youtube sources of all sources😆. Seriously! Its like arguing with a flat earther with hubris, what's the point. Not even a theist but the arguments are so absurd like picking any random bs just to solidify a claim. |
Krismas:"There is no proof that any Yeshua was crucified by the Romans for religious teachings. In fact, Gnostic scriptures like the Gospel of Barnabas claim Jesus was never crucified." First off there's substantial proof and like i said its scholarly consensus that Jesus existed and was crucified. You are free to cite renowned modern scholars who go against this grain of thought. Tacitus, Josephus, Lucian, Mara, Pliny and the Talmud are all sources used to back this claim by scholars. The gospel of Barnabas is not taken as historically reliable or used as evidence by any respected scholars as they were written at an even much later date, (about a century l8r) than the gospels which were not even valid in the 1st place and its the usual pseudepigraphy "There is no correlation between Yeshua and Jesus. Nothing connects the two." This one's just the laziest assertion here. Yeshua is Hebrew/Aramaic, the Tanakh was originally written in hebrew and when translated directly to English is Joshua, however when translated to greek as can be seen in the Septuagint is rendered Iēsous. The new testament was written in Koine greek and the name used for Jesus is Iēsous which when translated to English took the final form Jesus. From the Septuagint Yeshua/Yeoshua is Iēsous and Iēsous is Jesus. Just the trick of translation. "Jesus is a creation of the Roman Empire, a fusion of many Greek deity figures like Prometheus, Dionysius." Man you athiests spout as much ignorant nonsense as much as your opposites. The above claim is basically nonsense and ill be hard pressed to find a reputable scholar put their name behind the dross. Don't you think its ironic for the roman empire to have an agenda and yet non of the "top 20 historians" were used in carrying out that agenda, think, basically rubbishes your claim. The historians listed did not mention Jesus, but their works were not focused on the Jewish region or relatively obscure religious figures. Many historians of that time period wrote on a variety of subjects, often concentrating on political and military history of the Roman Empire. Just as biblical scholars today have areas of focus like textual crtisism, translational crtitsim, historical criticism, source criticism. Historian is not an all encompassing term. If i say I'm an engineer the next sensible question is what type. I cited those who did in my previous response and While the Testimonium Flavianum (the more extensive passage about Jesus) is partially considered to have later Christian interpolations, the reference to Jesus in relation to James in Antiquities 20.9.1 is widely regarded by scholars as authentic. Like i said its basically consensus and scholars like Bart Ehrman(my fav), Dale Allison, E.P Sanders, James Dunn, Craig Evans are amongst many who are part of this consensus view which is based on substantial evidence and rigorous peer review. "Gnostic accounts show that he was a pedophile, sorcerer, magus, and his so-called eucharist was his sperm which he deluded people to drink as a way of birthing his life within his followers. He was also believed to have slept with Mary Magdalene and cum in her mouth" Make your mind up, first you say he doesn't exist and reject sources that mention him as evidence, then go back to use those same sources as evidence of him existing but in a negative light. This is some dumb & extremely daft shit, not any different from theists😄. Gnostic texts are diverse and often esoteric, reflecting a wide range of beliefs. However, mainstream Gnostic texts do not support the extreme and explicit claims mentioned here. Mainstream Gnostic texts do not contain such descriptions of Jesus and you'd be hard pressed to find reputable sources supporting daft claims. These claims are basically modern fabrications or extreme misinterpretations of Gnostic symbolism. The Talmud mentions Jesus being executed for sorcery and leading Israel astray, but there are no references to the absolute nonsense of psychedelic drugs, selling children as slaves, or being a pirate. The claim you mentioned is not supported by the actual content of the Talmud. Yet another garbage source to contradict for contradiction sake. Garbage in... i wouldn't even bother with the last point because its the same nonsense as well, nonsense claims from garbage sources. Shouldn't have expected better from someone who argues the existence of Jesus as at this time. The bible contradicts itself and has been disproven on various matters by sensible evidence, it doesn't need garbage claims from garbage sources to invalidate itself. |
Krismas:The other guys point is not detailed but consice and apt. Yours is just the opposite. 1. True 2. False 3. False 4. False 5. Partly false 6. False No knowledgeable person regardless of beliefs would claim Jesus didn't exist. It's basically scholarly consensus. |
CorrectionFLuid:Bro your point was apt and clearly understood leave that ignoramus. Only thing worse than being ignorant is to be loudly confident and ignorant. Funny thing is agnosticism is exactly a middle ground contrary to what he said, nuance is lost on him. Yes gnostism and agnostism has to do with knowledge and theism and atheism has to do with belief. The agnostic does not commit to belief in God; maintains that God's existence is unknown or unknowable. The agnostic theist believes in God; maintains that God's existence is unknown or unknowable. The agnostic atheist does not believe in God; maintains that God's existence is unknown or unknowable. The theist or gnostic theist believes in God and claims to know for certain that God exists. The atheist or gnostic atheist does not believe in God and claims to know for certain that God does not exist. So i don't know what the ignoramus is all about. Agnosticism is a middle ground and yes it is better like u said. |
ReacherSaidNoth:Leave the fool. The irony's that when the daft christain falls ill he'll still go to the hospital to seek cures founded by mainly atheist and agnostics. Why not go to church, pray and leave it at that and get healed. Their god can heal selectively and randomly of which they'll still take modern medicine, but he can never provide a cure. Nonsense religions. |
KnownUnknown:😄 |
Antiislaam:Ouch! Here i thought we were becoming friends😁 but there u went getting all triggered and emotional, anyways i got time. Not surprising though its the usual m.o. Get emotional and triggered then reach in the passive aggressive bag of ad hominems, vague platitudes or stale threats of the after life, tale as old as time. Beautiful cognitive dissonance though. Which i find extremely funny and ironic cause the "divine being" u r getting defensive and worked up over usually didn't reach into that bag during his "human life", even said not to act that way talked about something called fruits of the spirit which all seems to vanish the moment you guys get triggered😄. The hypocritical "christ like" virtues and fruits of the spirit and subjective moral standards disappear into thin air like something out of the carbonaro effect. Got so triggered that u tried as much as possible to go on a tangent to deflect from and outright deny ur patriarch cause of connections to a similar nonsense religion , copied the vocab of a so called atheist(cause that's how simple u guys minds are, anyone who doesn't share in your particular brand of the nonsense cool aid is an atheist), cause urs is obviously limited and unimaginative, quite sad. You get defensive about ur religion been called nonense but do the same to your religious cousins which share the same patriarch as you, same cloth, same joke of a religion. Your religious text can be used to justify any pov or perspective you want by interpreting whichever way u deem fit and its not nonsense?! Heck you guys have interpreted your texts in more than 40,000 ways with u guys at each other's necks over who's interpretation is correct claiming the others are going to hell, and its not nonsense?! Your joke of a religion can be used to justify slavery, incest, infanticide, genocide, racism, tribalism, physical discrimination, sexism and sexual assault hypocrisy, lack of empathy and its not nonsense?! Your texts contradict itself at every turn and its not nonsense?! No homogeneity as you selective choose where to adhere to and discard in your texts depending on the denomination u belong out of the 40,000+ and its not nonsense. With texts written several decades after the events they describe by people who did not experience the events and then falsely attributed to people who did and its not nonsense?!: Original manuscripts of the texts written in a lanuage not spoken by most anymore and then lost and what you have are severally redacted, edited, compiled copies of copies of copies and its not nonsense?! You all don't even use the same bible depending on which of the sects you belong and its not nonsense?! You know what?! You are right, its not nonsense, its not just only nonsense but a hot steaming pile of shit and garbage that deludes itself as better than other similar piles of shit and a big joke. A big unfunny joke founded on hubris and indoctrination. I wonder who's the bigger fool here😄 |
Antiislaam:loll! comprehension issues wrapped with stone cold ignorance. The so called jesus that christianity is modelled after i wonder which religion he practiced. Also i wonder which patriach his genealogy can be traced to according to matthew and luke. Even a retarded 5yr old with down syndrome knows christainity is an offshoot of Judaism( the tanakh/old testament/hebrew bible) which is traced back to Abraham through isaac like Islam is through Ishmael and that's fact. Claiming antioch as a selective tangent wouldn't change hard facts. It wouldn't also stop it from being nonsense like judaism and islam. Comprende smart one😁 |
😄😄😄 |
Antiislaam:Comprehension issues as usual. Can't see where i mentioned followers🤦🏽. Anyways to make it clear for the "smart ones". If you can trace the origins of your religion be it followers of christ, holy or unholy spirit... whatever, back to Abraham your religion is major crap, EOD! 🤭 |
Antiislaam:The Abrahamic religions are one and the same. Lot's of delusional nonsense sprinkled with violence. |
They're not gonna like this one boss😀 |
Abeg shut up! Christains and telling people how they should live their lives like ass n shit. The m0ron is decreeing and declaring blessings on people for donations but couldn't decree and declare blessings for himself. |
Its just the normal incestous relationship and misogynistic treatment of women in the fabled book of stories. She was actually his sister and it was a recrring theme or motif of women being given away as some sort of commodity. Abraham did it 2ce, Isaac did it with his cousin and wife Rebekah, Lot did it with his virgin daughters and that bleeped up tale of the levite that cut his concubine nto 12 peices after she was raped. In the case of Lot and the other guy their male guests were demanded for to be raped but they were like no, dont rape the men, rape the women instead😄. bleeped up stories. |
In Christianity, the belief that God heals is a foundational tenet. Many believers testify to miraculous recoveries, attributing their healing to divine intervention. However, this claim raises significant questions about the nature and scope of such healing. If God heals, why do we rely on human ingenuity to find actual cures for illnesses and diseases, sometimes eradicating them completely?Historically, mankind has faced numerous medical challenges, from plagues to pandemics with some like the black death, malaria wiping out a not so insignificant percentage of the population. Through rigorous scientific research and medical advancements, humans have developed vaccines, antibiotics, and treatments that have saved countless lives. For instance, smallpox, a disease that once ravaged populations, was eradicated through a global vaccination campaign led by humans, not divine intervention. Polio, too, has been nearly eliminated thanks to the relentless efforts of medical professionals and researchers. On the other hand, divine healing appears to be selective and unpredictable. Reports of miraculous recoveries are often anecdotal and lack empirical evidence. These instances can sometimes be attributed to the natural course of diseases, placebo effects, or even misdiagnosis. The randomness of these healings raises the question: if God has the power to heal, why does He do so selectively rather than providing a universal cure? Do these random healings also apply to the animals like man's medical research does, lol?! Moreover, when looking at the effectiveness of modern medicine, it becomes clear that tangible, consistent results stem from human efforts. Medical research involves understanding diseases at a molecular level, developing targeted therapies, and conducting clinical trials to ensure safety and efficacy. These systematic approaches have led to significant breakthroughs, proving that human ingenuity and perseverance are critical in combating diseases. It is also essential to see the role of probability in health outcomes. Some individuals recover from illnesses without any clear medical explanation, which can be perceived as divine intervention, some also go through these man made treatments(which btw if man didn't create, would have died like much of the population before the cure was found) and attribute the cure to divine intervention. However, statistical variations and natural recovery processes can also account for these cases. When a large number of people are ill, a few reagardless of religious belief will recover in ways that seem miraculous, but this can often be explained by chance and probability rather than divine will which explain why the divine will has never provided us v a universal cure despite our ever increasing number of prophets and pastors. They see visions but don't see the pandemics coming. They can heal the sick but can only heal a selective few with the plausible deniability of "belief and faith and prayer". Why wait on science for the cure for cancer, especially as young children who know nothing are suffering its terrible effects while undergoing awful chemotherapy, why not whisper into one of the numerous prophets the cure to malaria, aids, cardiac arrest, liver failure, ebola, stroke, diabetes, kidney disease... instead of healing a select few which ironically coincides with the scientific probabilty of those health outcomes. As we continue to face new medical challenges, it is the dedication and expertise of scientists and healthcare professionals that will lead us toward solutions, benefiting humanity as a whole not "divine healing". If the efficacy of divine healing is valid why not rely on it totally when next illness shows up at your door instead of science which contradicts the divine at every step and is dominated by atheists and agnostics that seem to have more empathy to cure all despite their beliefs. |
thesicilian:It happens mate. |
thesicilian:Guess he overrated your intelligence if u didn't get the obvious sacarsm. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 (of 47 pages)
