SkyBlue1's Posts
Nairaland Forum › SkyBlue1's Profile › SkyBlue1's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 100 pages)
ajiri avae:You make a very good arguement and to be honest it is not rocket science to think that a lot of people have interests to protect that is quite obvious so there was no need to right a novella . However i do disagree with your statement that i am seeing things from isolation. What could be isolating in the view that the house should be able to be accountable to the people they are supposed to be responsible for? Is this not the problem that has been reoccuring for too long? OBJ did this OBJ did that and meanwhile were people seriously making attempts to call him to order or hold him accountable? If this is meant to be a more liberal and serious house as opposed to the last administration then shouldn't things begin to change.I think i will need a new paragraph to address the concerns raised. I once read in a Nigerian article an adage that made me laugh and i think it is adequate enough to be used here. The adage goes like this: "when your neighbour accuses you of being a thief is no time to be caught with a lamb under the guise of - you were just playing with it". If you so strongly believe that the issue being raised was due to people trying to protect their interest (which wouldn't shock me by the way) does it then make sense that it took a good few days of beating around the bush before the claims were rebuffed after they had made headlines. Of course i did not even yet throw in the fact that the lawmakers went through the efforts of inviting the Keyamo of a guy to the house, only to focus on insulting him and asking him "who are you" without giving any convincing responses. All this took how long again? And meanwhile all the hype and speculation was building up, so if any damage was being done to the credibility of the report or whatever line you tried to argue, didn't the way the house handled the matter have a huge hand in doing so? If the house is as you claim so intent on publishing the findings of the reports and they know of all the opposition that exists against such then why act guilty to the wider Nigerian masses? If the house was infact serious about being careful, etc, isn't this the time to be as open as possible? If anything wouldn't such an ethos actually help the house and solidify its credibility even more? Why act like a thief when you are accused of being one? Sorry but as much as i will admit your arguement has good reasoning, etc, some things still stand and the house should be able to be called to answer whenever, it is part of the job description. Perhaps now is the time for certain members to start considering a career change. What an irony, the house members are being callous over the handling of a probe report into accountability and are themselves trying to be beyond such accountability. I am sorry but it is simply called being professional and the house has time after time shown that is something they are not. |
As far as i am concerned electoral reform should be on a very short list of the fundamental issues that should be addressed. I really don't see the imense difficulty we are all made to believe exists in reforming Nigeria's electoral system. The issue that should be asked is wether the government is actually willing to do such and from what we can see i think it is safe to say there is no desire by the government to have a working democracy in Nigeria. Really is not rocket science. I don't care if the results are announced withing 24hours or even 3days, as long as the people are guaranteed to have their votes count mand the results are guaranteed to reflect the will of the people. Wasn't the electoral systems one of the "key issues" yaradua said he will address once he resumed office? Do i need to go through the pains of pulling out articles and news headlines from the time just before the "elections"? Over a year later and the man called "Professor" Maurice Iwu is still in charge of INEC and still running elections. |
Has the issue ever really being about his health or about his ability to lead Nigeria? According to the article Yar Adua is claimed to be stating that he was/is fit enough to lead Nigeria effectively. It is better if this is shown rather than just said and so far nothing of the sort in terms of effective leadership has been shown or displayed. |
ajiri avae:*sigh*, pardon me but i might be done with this thread for good . The continued insistence that nothing about the house's activities should be challenged because we might get "distracted" is one reasoning i continually see as laughable and i hope you don't take offence at that. I feel the huge irony here is that you seem to be the one making Keyamo bigger than he is. When i went through the thread the focus was not on Keyamo initially but on the idea of even considering that Bankole might have issues of corruption to answer and the implications of such, etc. All of a sudden the Keyamo of a person became elevated to importance by some who decided to make questions of his character the issue as opposed to wether there were any facts in his claims and allegations. That seems to me to be the typical reasoning that is one of many why progress does not seem to be made in Nigeria, always making the issues people as opposed to the issues simply being the issues.So what exactly is this whole bruhaha going to do to other "important" issues? Is there any evidence that questioning of the activities of the house will stop the results of the probes from coming out? If in fact such a flimsy excuse is passable and could be used to deter such "results" from the probe being published then what does that say about the seriousness of the probe or the seriousness of the Nigerian people for that matter? Something that could have so easily been an open and shut case if it was just dealt with immediately as should be expected, took as much time and attention, whose fault was that really? Did such non chalant attitude over the matter and silliness in the way it was handled by Bankole and co not prolong the life span of the supposed charade? The issue is not Keyamo but wether there was anything to answer for, if there wasn't why weren't the people just told so? Was that really that difficult? I am guessing every Nigerian had better go get a copy of the schedule of bills and presentation of the house of assembly and senate, so that we can work around the schedule of "important" bills and issues they have to address, right? We should also try and make sure that nothing serious or worthy of the house's attention does occur when they are too busy to be called to give account to those they are meant to be accountable to, right? Isn't that the issue? This is like trying to beg an armed robber who is going to rob you not to. If the house actually did a thourough job of investigating the power probe, etc and want to share that information or feel the conviction required by law to do so then they will. Stop trying to woo them to do the right thing and by so doing giving credibility to such lacklustre performance and behaviour the house seems to continuously exhibit. Have we all forgotten the delegation that took the issue of women's dressing to the UN? |
ajiri avae:You are providing this evidence which in a much lower scale was presented before when this thread really started going, please refer to my last post because i have stated this is not the main issue for me. Bankole should be comfortable with just letting the evidence speak for itself? Sorry but i would have to diagree with you because that to me is just more excuses for a matter that did not have to be so blown up or sensationalised knowing the very understandable distrust Nigerians habour for the government. Being quiet is in my view a very irresponsible way to act, especially since Bankole is not the head of a private organisation or some teen running an ice cream shop, he is basically the leader of the house of representatives of the federal republic of Nigeria. What does such mean? It means he is and should be completely accountable to the people. Sorry, but again i would have to say i feel you seem to be too willing to make excuses because i don't believe you would expect or accept such behaviour from leaders of other countries except in Nigeria. So why must such stand in Nigeria? Whenever anything worthy of note that gets the general populace going in "reasonable" non Nigerian countries occur, the issues are quickly addressed via a press release or something by the adequate leaders or people be it ministers or the president or prime minister himself. Nothing, not even from Bankole's lawyers, on an issue that made the national dailies? So we should expect this behaviour because it is Nigeria? Nothing at all excpet the minds of the masses who mostly don't have acess to the internet left to speculate? Is that acceptable in anyway? For all we know Yar Adua could be (though i highly doubt it) a genius with amazing plans for the country, please ask him what keeping quiet has done for him or his reputation or his standing with the people he is meant to be leading? It seems if a hurricane were to hit Nigeria and Yar Ardua came on T.V to utter something, forget actions on his path, that alone would send some into ecstasy when it should be expected in the first place as part of the job. Is this right? |
If the report is solid then over and done with, it is just a shame that such a rebuff had to come almost a week or so since the storms gathered which simply seemed to do way more damage than good for something that could so easily have been addressed. NOW WAS THAT SO DIFFICULT? |
Jakumo: |
Jakumo: |
Jakumo: |
If only these news sources could infiltrate the Nigerian populace, hopefully that would make a difference? NTA is such a farce, the last time i went through the effort of finding it to watch the 9 o' clock news segment, with everything going on in the country i felt ill at what the focus of the reports were? "The first lady gets given prize for bringing attention to cancer" or something of that sort. Meanwhile, there was a constituional review going on, a still non-active government that is being criticised of such everyday, should one continue? And that was the main headline? The worse thing that can happen is every news source or outlet turning into the joke that is 'Nigerian News stations'. The ones were the reporters don't grill anybody or speak as if to make sure that the politicians or people being questioned don't get any reasonable questions with regards to what is actually happening in the nation. "How is the wife and family?" is a question i won't be surprised being asked of Osama Bin Laden if he was captured today by an grilled by an NTA news anchor. Am i being too hard on NTA? |
ajiri avae:Sorry, but again it seems you are missing the issue here. You seem to be so quick to make assumptions, where did anyone say that the double VAT goes into Bankole's pocket? Please do point out or highlight when this occured because i never witnessed such. I am still surprised that you are still latching on to this idea that Keyamo should be ignored because there are "important" things going on in the house and the members of the house now suddenly care about hiding possible ills. Constitution review? Isn't there already a constituion review going on in the house now? What have you heard about it? How many weeks has this been going on? Isn't the constituion review an "important" issue? So what "distraction" has there been that has stopped the reps from releasing details or progress on what some (like me) see as a very public and national matter? Is this constituion not going to be used by all Nigerians? Sorry but i think you are more willing than i am to receive excuses for anything. The FOI bill has not been passed and with a lot of things that you could have possibly seen as "distractions" that were occuring, i never forgot about it because it mattered to me, it was always in the back of my mind and the dates of its presentation back to the house were always on my mind. Again permit me to be so bold but you now saying that Nigerians are going to forget things because they are going to be "distracted" seems a tad farcical. So what should happen then? Fiscal irresponsibility should not be challenged because we feel we might get distracted? Issues of possible national interest should not be challenged so that we don't forget that there is a Niger Delta crises or a "probe" on the matter just like there seems to be one on every other single issue? Just listening to what seems like another endless excuse is quite infuriating because it seems we are all now saying nobody in Nigeria should ask questions of the house or if they are doing it they should check the house's timetable so that they don't "distract" the populace. What is so difficult about Nigerian leaders and responding to allegations or questions? So Bankole now giving a consice response or even asking his lawyers to do this is what is going to stop what has been happening since Nigeria's conception from happening in terms of blatant disregard by people in power for everyone else? How long has the Niger Delta probe been going on? If anyone has had more of an efffect in making this into a "distraction" is it Keyamo who made such allegations or Bankole who has refused to just respond to them and get on with his job and by so doing raised eye brows of suspicion? Instead of just dealing so decisively with the issue and getting back to the "important" things the onus now lies on online spectators to do give viable responses and defences? Please you don't know about me so i hope you won't be so bold as to assume i am not interested in the Niger Delta probe, especially when you consider i was also initially watching it until i felt the whole thing started proving to be a circus of show and tell with no seeming action. The issue is simple, someone has provided information and asked questions about some issues, the onus is simply left on the leaders to respond appropriately, simple as. Is that so difficult or is that what is going to be the stumbling block of all other "important" bills? If at all anything is going to get people emotional do you really believe it will be another case of a Nigerian house of reps corruption scandal? What is getting me irritated is non-answering of questions when it could all be so simply and swiftly done. Are the "elected" members now above redress? So why make the issue about anything else other than what it is? You apparently addressed the issues of the cars (which i did not see in your text) but please don't point it out to me because someone else addressed this issue earlier you and i don't think this is the main point or issue here. If a lawyer can be shot down for asking questions of the reps who are meant to be a more realistic representative of the people on a national scale then what hope has the common man got in getting answers? This i can ssure you will not distract me from a lot of things the house are or in most cases aren't doing, so please don't speak for me . Thanks |
ajiri avae:If i may be so bold please permit me to adress you freely. You claim that the timing of these allegations are to serve as a means of distracting people's attention from some important bills or schedules in the house. From looking at the history of things even in a very short while, hinging this alleged "diversion" as irresponsible because you feel it is getting in the way of serious business is to me laughable. You really think the members of the house care what dirty laundry is aired in public when they have no regards for the populace given that they pick themselves and not the people? What became of Etteh gate and the investigations? Was there some serious diversion that stopped that from being a total farce of an investigation that resulted in no one in jail? What about the FOI bill that kept on being shot down? Did the house require a "diversion" to show their blatant disregard for the feelings of the people? What about the whole power probe fiasco? What has become of it? What about electoral reforms? Have the so called "powers that be" ever gotten scared of a backlash from Nigerians that want to choose their own leaders? How many committees are presently in the house and what have they achieved? And now, all of a sudden the house gives a damn about the feelings of the people as to divert their attention from a so called "important" bill or delegation as a means of sweeping it under the carpet? Are we not talking of Nigeria here? Everyone knows the election was a fraud, what did people do about it when the courts said it wasn't and was all fine and nice? Was there any need to create a "diversion" in order to deliver such blatant injustice in public? The elections of the president of a whole country, evidence upon evidence was delivered and it was all swept under the carpet with the most flimsy of reasons given, while one of the judges was missing during the verdict and of course the appointment of one of the judges to higher position not too long before the verdict was given, ALL IN THE PUBLIC EYE, and it is now that shame will be felt by public office holders? Very amusing indeed. Do you really think the reps will be scared to do what they want when they are well aware of the famous non chalant and dare i say cowardly behaviour of Nigerians who can take anything without complaining or demanding better while showcasing a classic behaviour of all noise and no action? Crimes upon crimes have been committed everyday in public and worse has been inflicted on the Nigerian populace and nothing has made them take to the streets, and it is what would have happened in the coming weeks that would have changed things? When will the psyche all change and when will people get mad at the real source of the crimes? At current do you really believe that if the presido peed on the Nigerian public they will do anything? Isn't Iyabo still a senator? Isn't Etteh still a member of the house of reps? LOL. |
bioye:I agree with you on the last statement, but you do have to admit that this is not about what partains with state governments, ministers etc. The main issue is wether the fact that inspite of the cars costing so and so, there were questionable practises involved i.e. inflation of contracts, double VAT, paying for more expensive models while what was actually received was a cheaper version and hence wasn't what was paid for. In an essence, fiscal responsibility. It is afterall Nigerians that are paying for this lifestyle. It is not even about the obscene oppulence and spleandour that Nigerians pay the speakers and members for while the ordinary man suffers untold hardship, but wether even with all this oppulence there was fiscal irresponsibility, questionable practices and to coin a phrase "no due process" involved. The issue is corruption after all, isn't it? So should the eye be turned and all ignored because the spotlight is not on the state and federal ministries? |
bioye:Sorry to dissapoint you but i am not "out to get you" or out to "get" anyone that holds a view contrary to mine. I don't see how i twisted your words, I just thought the reasons given as a possible defence for Bankole were weak and flimsy when a more to the point one like you just gave could have sufficed. I was aware of the fact that the budget was signed by the house etc, etc as somebody candidly pointed out earlier on in the thread, that was a debate and I saw this as a possible rebuff. However, to come back with defence like "people are out to get Bankole" just seemed to me to be completely unecessary and shifting the whole issue. What is so difficult with rebuffing claims? And when the lawyer the article refers to went to the house of assembly why were explanations not given? He was invited by the house i might add, the effort was made, and all for what? Just so that he could be shown by the house members that they are immune to redress and too exalted to be questioned? What was the point of inviting the lawyer and taking time out to see him (while all of this was apparently aired of course), if it was simply about using the opportunity to do big manism and ask "who are you"? It is disgusting, foolish and irresponsible and a waste of time. What is the difficulty "appointed" leaders have with answering questions and being accountable to the people they should be accountable to? And as it seems apparent on this thread some people are also guilty of thesame. Making the issue about feuds and what not as opposed to the factual information available and presented. |
bioye:Yes, that definately means there is nothing to answer. That is it people, the simple facts highlighted above is all the evidence needed to show that 380 cars were not bought at inflated prices with no discount and double VAT. Bankole has enemies and has not allowed some people to chop therefore it means the car fiasco never happened. WOW!!! See how we like to dodge the issues? Did it happen or not? How difficult a question is that and shouldn't that be the real issue? |
Taking time to actually read through this post after ignoring it for so long was quite interesting. It is so disheartening the levels people are willing to descend to in order to defend possible corruption, every single time. It just screams slave mentality that a guy is being shot down for asking questions. This fear or reasoning whereby we see anyone who asks questions of accountability and running of government of supposed "elected" officials as being audacious is ridiculous. First of all it was wether he made up the information or not. Things have progressed and it turns out the information is actually factual with regards to cars being bought with no discount and possibly inflated contracts, etc. Then it becomes, because he is from the south. Please don't speak for me. I am not a northerner and i welcome a ploy to expose corruption and evils because wether it is being exposed by the north or whatever does not change the fact that corruption is corruption and it is tearing the country apart and holding it back. Peter Odilli stole a lot of money, so did Alams, so did Ibori, the fact that it was apparently (although i don't see this) exposed by northerners does not make what they did fictional, does it? Does it also make what they did right? Amazing! This should really have been a simple matter of answering the questions and responding to the allegations with satisfactory answers; come on, IS THAT SO DIFFICULT? If he is innocent then what is the big deal with responding to these allegations? The mere fact that people want to make the motives of Keyamo the issue when the issue should be wether or not there is something to answer for is discouraging. Who cares if Keyamo's hand is dirty or not? Is there any honour among thieves? If it will take the back stabbing and two facing of the thieves which will result in the self destruction and self implosion of the cabal in question then so be it!! |
1luvkipsus:I just really don't even know how to even begin to respond to this sort of reasoning or statement. Who cares who the lawyer Keyamo wants to be like? Is that the issue at stake? Does wether or not he want to be like anybody automatically make his allegations null and void and lacking in substance? WOW! Is it so easy for us to lose sight of issues? Is that why Nigeria seems to keep on slipping backwards? Someone just said the house has something to answer in terms of corruption and accountability and instead of people to look at the substance and possible implications of such some are more interested in who the lawyer wants to be like? WOW. Talk about attacking a man who is telling you your house is on fire because you don't like the smell of his cologne; while your house continues to burn |
@subice you won't get any arguements from me on that issue. PDP does indeed seem to be one of the greatest threats to a non existent democracy in a nation whereby to simply question the reps is seen as being audacious |
Kobojunkie:LOL, so you even remember that song sef? ![]() |
Jakumo:You really should think about applying for Okiro's position. I am gradually getting convinced that you are the person needed to put back order in the Nigerian police force and streamline it to make "offering collection" more effective and orderly. Your idea about "thanksgiving per highway" is pretty innovative and will definately reduce the bureacracy involved in "tax collection", send it to the appropriate authorities for consideration. ![]() |
[quote author=ife-eco-06 link=topic=187436.msg2995433#msg2995433 date=1225008760]Not a bad idea. But I doubt its practicability.[/quote]LOL, i just have to asume that was sarcasm of some sort for the sake of my sanity. How long did it take the federal government to move completely from lagos to abuja? Well people, i guess with such an idea you really just have to forget about a performing government of any sort whatsoever. With a federal government that would be spending most of each tenure making preparations to relocate this will definately translate to wider spread development, right? So this rotation, what is the time period for each cycle? How many states are there in Nigeria again? 36? So even if the cycle is every year that means development will come to each state every 35 years. A very brilliant and amazing plan. Turn by turn, so each state can start counting down the years till it is its turn to chop their own according to the poster therefore develop, right? 'Corruption, inflated contracts, ghana-must-go politiking, etc, and hence "development" coming to a state near you'. The state governments are just for show and governors are ceremonial figureheads that are just there to 'keep up appearances' in their flashy cars and massive personal spending courtesy of state funds while the citizens of each state wait for their turn to develop and after their cycle try hard to bear the withdrawal symptoms of this so called "development". States that don't have constant power supply, good roads, employment, etc (i.e. almost all states), better hope your state is not the last to be chosen if not forget about such for another 35 years. Amazing plan, why didn't someone think of this before? |
nuzo:@nuzo, while the fear for the increase in armed robberies is quite a valid and understandable one , i think you are stating this making the assumption that the only way to battle armed robbers is through check points. I am afraid i will have to disagree with you since armed robbers have also been known to rob people using the guise of checkpoints as well. Checkpoints in this case i assume is the whole culture of blocking the road and collecting money. The police can still have a presence on the roads via patrol, stationed groups, etc, can't they? Won't this also be an even more effective means of combating armed robbery since they won't be predictably sationed while armed robbers carry out their activities? Also i think you are making the assumption that the fundamental reasons the police have been using checkpoints for the past years has been as a means to combat armed robbery, you assume that such has been the intent as opposed to just collecting money. Guess you haven't heard of police officers who mount check points (i.e. road blocks if we are being blunt), only to run inside bush to quickly change into civillian outfits in record time i might add when the real "men of the highway" arrive? |
Very welcoming news, now it is in the hands of the citizens to act, but will they? Also what are the avenues present for reporting such illegal checkpoints? Is this just going to be a case again whereby there are laws; everyone breaks them; you report the defaulters; nothing happens; business as usual? Isn't taking of "thanksgiving" by police officers at check points illegal? Yet they do it, where do you report that? When you do are you even taken seriously? If there is a proper avenue for discipline of such illegalities then it is indeed a very welcome development. The Nigerian Police force is yet another Nigerian failed institution that needs reorientation and open heart surgery. |
QuotaSyste:People like me? So who exactly am i? Is this just trying to make a mountain of assumptions when you don't even know the first thing about me so that you can easily fit me into a category to justify your arguements or reasoning? When have i ever said i am not in support of federalism? You know what? I won't indulge you any further, have a nice day. |
All of this criticm of course ignoring what seems to be the fact that it just seems a lazy man's approach to development. |
annyplenty:So government is the only way to bring development? Is washington more "developed" than New York? Perhaps a good idea would be asking people to focus on developing the area they are in instead of waiting for government to reach them, which to me just sounds like a euphemism for national cake sharing? |
inquisitiv:This is a tad amusing, i don't think the issue at all in Nigeria is people knowing that they are from different ethnic groups. The issue is whether that interest is fundamentally placed above the interest of the nation and fairness. It is easy to say that people who are ethnically biased in all arguements and reasoning are illiterates, just as it is easy to say hitler was an illiterate and evil for doing what he did, but we all know he wasn't the former. It is almost as funny as when people talk of being colour blind. Does that mean we should all live in the illusion that everybody in the world is one colour? I don't think so. The issue is how this affects one's judgement, actions, etc and if it has what can be argued as a negative impact. One of the things i love about Nigeria is the diversity, such diversity that can be seen from things like the mash pot of slangs used in pidgin that is borrowed from different languages, the huge variety in cuisine, the different cultures, etc. In one expression, it is rich and so textural. The issue is if what a lot of people have seen as a means of seperating the country can be used to bind it together. I for one have always seen the diversity as a possible bond, Nigeria is one of the few truly multiethnic places in this world. Lagos as a city has people from all over the country of different languages living together, interacting etc, so does Port Harcourt and some other cities in the country. This is something that does not even truely exist in places like london that claim to be multi ethnic whereby you have the pakistanis living in one community, the blacks in the other, etc, and the further division in these places as well as the tiff between scotland and england or the english and the french. While New York is arguably more integrated, it still does not get up to the degree seen in some Nigerian cities. The point i am trying to make is, i hope this so called tribal blindness does not mean blindness to the richness. This is an issue that does not have to be divisive. We might be different but still habour common national goals. If the nation was functioning properly, i.e employment available, healthy economy, security, good governance, etc, do you think such sentiments will still be soo rampant? Perhaps if Nigerians actually believed in Nigeria then the national interest and the interest of everyone else on the national scale could then naturally take greater precedence. So perhaps instead of forcing everyone to be "tribally blind" the issue would be making people believe in Nigeria again. |
Big B1:Mr BigB1 i hope you don't take offence at this but you are yet to actually link your reasons to a feasible conclusion as to why IBB is the only person out of a country of over 140million who is capable of leading the country after he left it in the state it was. Your continuous dodging of this issue simply does not make it invalid. So you are saying what? That if i can't name a single federal government project since the era i assume you refer to, that validates IBB? Why don't you add this to a list of questions you are yet to answer - how many genuine leaders have been voted into power since the era in question if ever through a fair election? It is like saying IBB is validated because Abacha was bad. I am really trying to connect the dots of your arguement but to no avail. Perhaps you might want to enlighten us or is this just futile? |
Big B1:LOL, i really am not breaking sweat or raising my blood pressure over IBB; trust me. There are other things i deem more worthy of that, sorry . I still think that using the old "what have you done lately" is dodgning the real question on this thread which is, what did IBB do for the country when he had the chance? What makes him worthy of that opportunity again when considering the nation really doesn't need or want his help considering people aren't even sure of the kind of "help" he has to offer seeing that he has "helped" before. Do you think we should continue depriving other people of the chance to "help" as well? Is IBB the only man in a country of over 140million that can provide this "help"? If he isn't then why one earth given the fact that he has led before and was considered by many a disaster do you still want this IBB's special brand of "help"?I believe everyone has the chance to make a difference in their own way and that one man can change the world. However when you consider the fact that not everyone is president of a nation everyday and given the opportunity to achieve this with less strife, then your point just makes one wonder what exactly you are getting at if it is not just dodgning the issue. What does "what i have done for the nation lately" make IBB the right man for Nigeria at this time? Still trying to find the connection. Does it make him less of a planet sized risk that is completely unecessary? Without your full disclosure on some personal information you might be privy to which everyone else does not have that makes you think IBB is THE right man you might just have to accept that peopledon't see thesame. |
Big B1:So the hope of the nation should ride on a retired general's urge to seek redemption in the eyes of the people? All sounds very self indulgent and selfish to be honest. How do you actually know it won't be worse and what would he be able to actually offer that many other people who might not even be in public life won't be able to? Just because he is IBB? He has a lot to lose? Like what? Won't his existing riches still be waiting for him if he does not even use the opportunity to get richer? I assumed you couldn't have been talking about him losing his non-existent respect in Nigeria, right? Nigeria is not all about IBB and how he feels or if he feels remorse, using that as an excuse as to why you feel 'he would be good this time around' is something i find amusing. Please, Nigeria is not all about IBB or stopping all cars moving in a city so that he can cross the street. |
LOOOL ![]() Kudos, Nigeria is going green. I am sure some people will now come and run their mouth on this thread without praising the innitiative. I hope this does not force the price of chalk up because certainly more airports are going to want to follow this lead, LOL. |
OBVIOUS:? ? ? Sorry, don't get the point you are trying to make. Italy houses a lot of Nigerian prostitutes and that makes it worse than Nigeria? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 (of 100 pages)
. However i do disagree with your statement that i am seeing things from isolation. What could be isolating in the view that the house should be able to be accountable to the people they are supposed to be responsible for? Is this not the problem that has been reoccuring for too long? OBJ did this OBJ did that and meanwhile were people seriously making attempts to call him to order or hold him accountable? If this is meant to be a more liberal and serious house as opposed to the last administration then shouldn't things begin to change.