₦airaland Forum

AntiChristian:
How can God die?

Except the Christian God of course!

God created death!

Is there anything IMPOSSIBLE for my God?

NO, NOTHING!
He who created death can die and still be ALIVE forevermore!

Unlike Allah who commanded a mere human to do what he couldn't do and yet the man STILL couldn't do what was commanded!
Did Allah not command Mohammed to READ three consecutive times ?

Can you unequivocally tell us if Mohammed could read after Allah's commands!
CAN YOU TELL US WHY MOHAMMED COULDN'T READ EVEN AFTER BEING COMMANDED THREE GOOD TIMES to READ?

Count me out of serving a figurine god called Allah aka satan!
The god that commands his followers to do PROSTITUTION!?
Will you deny that Allah did not command Muslims to do Mutah (prostitution)?

Good morning Mr LegalWolf,
First you lied that you were under a ban. Now, you became tongue tied. It's a pity no one else will take up the indefensible case of a so-called prophet accused of STEALING!

So, for the last time


Mr LegalWolf,
The attention is of a certain so-called Prophet (Qutham aka Mohammed) who was accused of stealing a particular piece of cloth
by no other persons than his close followers and partners.

We would appreciate if you can use your kind office to defend this prophet as the evidence presented are by his friends, partners and followers. Even though Allah was present while the crime was committed, he could not say who really did the stealing but he defended this prophet by writing a testimony that “a prophet is above the act of stealing”. What made the case more interesting is that Allah himself did not personally give the testimony: the accused did on behalf of Allah.

The Prosecution was of the opinion that this prophet is the THIEF and he is LYING that a certain Allah (who was present at the time of the stealing) “sent him to absolve himself” of the crime. You were highly recommended to take up this case as a Defence for the Accused Prophet only because they say you are one of his followers.

Thank you,
TenQ


Even though I intended to copy some of the followers of this prophet, I wish that in this case, none of you respond as it is a legal issue and a Lawyer has been found: Mr LegalWolf who himself has been looking forward to when TenQ would POST to Him about Islam on Nairaland (as he assumed that TenQ had exhausted and finished spending all his ammunition like Russia against Ukraine).

Case File Introduction:
1. Mohammed the Prophet of Allah was accused of Stealing a Piece of very beautiful RED sheet/garment/cloth that was admired by many of the followers of Mohammed. Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed and by his antecedent, knew that Mohammed stole the cloth. Mohammed denied stealing the cloth but he had not a single evidence to back himself with. Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment.
2. The story was getting out of hand with everyone insisting that their prophet STOLE the Red garment that Mohammed had to call on his (fictitious) Allah to rescue him.
3. Unfortunately, not one of the followers of Mohammed had EVER seen Allah nor Jubril nor did Allah give his prophet ANY KIND of Evidence such as a MIRACLE to authenticate his prophet “Mohammed”. As of this time, ANYTHING Mohammed said Allah said was considered as being from Allah.
4. Mohammed in defending himself gave forth a revelation he said Allah gave him. The verse was recited to Mohammed’s followers in Quran 3:161

Supposed Allah’s Testimony:
Quran 3:161
وَمَا كَانَ لِنَبِیٍّ أَن یَغُلَّۚ وَمَن یَغۡلُلۡ یَأۡتِ بِمَا غَلَّ یَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِیَـٰمَةِۚ ثُمَّ تُوَفَّىٰ كُلُّ نَفۡسࣲ مَّا كَسَبَتۡ وَهُمۡ لَا یُظۡلَمُونَ ۝١
THE WORD Ghulul is PROPERLY TRANSLATED AS STEALING (Taking something that is not yours illegally and deceitfully)

Quran 3:161
It is inconceivable that a Prophet would ever misappropriate (steal) anything from the war booty. Anyone who does so will carry it with him on the Day of Resurrection. Then every soul will be paid in full what it has earned and no one will be wronged.

5. Even though the testimony should have been rejected outrightly because there was no signature of the testimony by Allah. Mohammed himself wrote the testimony on behalf of the so-called Allah and he signed the document as “Allah’s Prophet” we present you with it as the fact on ground.
6. Muslim scholars in their Hadiths and Tafsirs tried to EXPLAIN the genesis of the verse acclaimed to have been received from Allah by Mohmmed
Sunan Abu Dawud (English) 30, Hadith 3960
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:
The verse "And no Prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" was revealed about a red velvet. When it was found missing on the day of Badr, some people said; Perhaps the Messenger of Allah has taken it. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down (Quran 3:161) "And no prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" to the end of the verse

7. UP TILL TODAY, THE RED CLOTH HAS NOT BEEN FOUND!


The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red cloth in question?

Dear Mr LegalWolf,
You are required to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

I ask Muslims NOT to respond to this POST as it is for Mr LegalWolf alone as LegalWOlf requested for a POST and I promised him at least one that has to do with his profession as a Lawyer!

Evidences from Tafsirs and Translations of the Quran is presented in the next page for your perusal.

Barrister Mr LegalWolf
Your mouth is now locked up abi?
48 Hours is more than enough to come out of any partial ban. To post screen shot is even difficult because it was all a LIE as usual.

Is it that difficult responding to the questions of the prosecution?
The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

bokondogi:
Hello Nairalanders, I will appreciate your comments and advice on this post

I have been married with 2 grown up kids for more than 2 and half decades, 2 months ago my wife got in contact with one of her secondary school classmate, someone she has lost contact with since they left school 3 decades ago.

So they started calling each other, though my wife told me about him and sometimes they talked on phone in my presence but later my wife will go to her room to talk with the guy, most times in the night.

This calls always excite my wife that I could hear her laughing and I begin to get jealous and I decided to get to know what they usually talk about.

They later moved to chatting on WhatsApp and will be doing call at night. I noticed my wife started making sure her phone isn't within my reach, making sure she didn't leave her phone carelessly. We both know each others phone password, One day I get access to her phone and I open her whatsapp. I noticed that my wife is flirting with the guy, the guy wil be refering to my wife as his wife but my wife usually won't respond to this,
They were exchanging pictures, and admiring each others pictures.

The guy was proffesing love to my wife but wiffy won't reciprocate to this advances.
Once a while I use to check wiffy's phone for any new development, and I find out wiffy use to send both money and airtime for data to the guy (my wife is into a lucrative business and money isn't her problem).

So one day a friend of mine send me a short porn video which I showed to my wife, she requested me to forward it to her, (I was surprised by this her request because she usually frown at porn), I sent it to her on her Facebook messenger instantly, but I was suspicious of what she wanted to do with the porn video. 2 days later she called me that she wanted to send the video to a female friend of her on WhatsApp but she didn't know how to forward the video from messenger platform to whatsapp.

I now forwarded the porn video to her on WhatsApp because I was curious what she wanted to do with the porn video, lol and behold my wife forwarded the video to this guy with a vulgar comment. I can't imagine my wife using the word 'toto', I have never heard this word from her
I now find out that this guy has earlier sent to my wife a porn video which she later deleted. I was shocked by these discoveries. My wife that frowns at obscene words is now using one in a chat with a man and even exchanging porn with him.

Even some gift items I kept in the house, I discovered my wife gifted them to this guy.
After these discoveries, I confront my wife with the evidence but she find it hard to deny and she said that she didn't know what she was doing with the guy was wrong that she didn't know the implications,
She told me she did not have any sexual contact with the guy and she swear about this, but I find it hard to believe, though I didn't find any evidence of this in their chats,
I am heart broken, this is a woman I trust so much,
Though she begged me and told me she won't have contact with the guy again, but I find it hard to believe.

I plan to throw her out. Is this the best decision?

She almost crossed the final line.
Things can still be repaired at this stage.
BUT
Your wife should be ready to TOTALLY and PERMANENTLY cut off from this man. He is a BAD friend to your wife.

Moh247:




Yep, Shetima would deal ruthlessly with all enemies of Nigeria


He is not Osinbajo that keeps shut while his people get disrespeted like an ice cream seller


Shetima would never turn to an Houseboy or mere commissioner because of some yeye Cabal,

*Shetima, got Bsc in Agric Econs UniMad
*Masters in University of Ibadan
*Has 1 wife and 3 children who are all educated
*Retired as a Banking Director in ZenithBank
*8years Governor, appointing Ibos and christian in his cabinet, building and rehabilitating schools even when Boko Haram where disturbing

in the mind if Southern Bigots, all Muslims are terrorist, all Northerners are Almajiri and uneducated, everyone should laugh at you like an idiot


.

The fear is that the president seemed to programmed to die soon after by age or illness related factors

citygarden:
Why scared of the vice presidential candidate?
If you are scare of shetima you are on long thing o

The fear is that the president seemed to programmed to die soon after by age or illness related factors

Mr LegalWolf,
Are you now tongue tied?


You were to post an evidence that you were indeed banned. Not withstanding,


Is it that difficult responding to the questions of the prosecution?
The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

Watinani:
I have told you before that you only want to win an argument not to understand the facts, but don't worry I decide to play long with you

I think I've explained this. I post to make muslims apply a little more reason to their faith. To make them answer questions they would never have asked themselves so that they would know the truth that will set them free. There is no prize for winning an argument on Nairaland: is there!?

Watinani:
Talking about Why did prophet Mohammed kiss it?

According to my research, there's no guaranted point to why but Islamic scholars have said some thought regarding it as;

1. To show his respect to Prophet Abraham. According to the history, the blackstone was given to Prophet Abraham in the process of building kabaa. So the blackstone is the icon of Abraham heritage.
2. To show his longing for Mecca (Makkah). History said that hajj al wada' (farewell hajj) is the only hajj ritual ever done by prophet Muhammad, and the only occasion he ever back to Mecca after settled in Madina, whereas Prophet Muhammad had very great love to his hometown.
3. To show gratitude to Allah SWT, since Prophet Muhammad entering Mecca with glory

I believe all the three points you have raised are modern conjectures. None of the early scholars like Ibn Abbas, Al tabari, etc have any of these views.

I think the issue is that before Islam, the same stone had been revered by Idolaters without any reference to Abraham because they didn't know Abraham. Is there any evidence that the pre-islamic Arab knew Abraham? If they didn't know Abraham, how can the stone be traced to him.

Secondly, it is possible to trace the movement of Abraham from his place of birth through the desert to Mecca. There was no trade route through just because of the desert. Can you present any evidence that Abraham could have traveled to Mecca?

Thirdly, your point 2 and 3 does not require any stone for Mohammed's longing for Mecca NOR Mohammed showing gratitude to Allah for bringing him back to Mecca.

Is their evidence that pre-islamic women used to touch the black stone with the blood of their menstruations?
Is it also true that the black stone is shaped like the private part of women?

Watinani:
Can Muslims explain WHY they point to or kiss/or touch the black stone as part of their religious activities during their pilgrimage?

Because it's sunna to practice what prophet Muhammad did

Is prophet Mohammad infallible?

Can Muslims TODAY follow exactly everything Mohammed did?

Examples:
1. Mohammed erroneously received the Satanic verses
2. Mohammed coveted and took the wife of his "son" (even if you call him adopted)
3. Can you have more than four wives as a Muslim man?
4. Since Mohammed took bath in a stinking pool of water contaminated with menstrial blood, dead dogs and filth?
5. While fasting During Ramadan, can you handle your wife while she's having her period?

Has Mohammed become God that he CANNOT make mistakes?
I want to say that there are any things Mohammed did that is unlawful for you as a Muslim

Watinani:
Can Muslims explain on the contrary why the black stone may not be equivalent to Magical Charms of Idolaters ?

Do you not see that prostrating to anything other than Allah is major shirk (shirk akbar), but when Allah commanded the angels to prostrate to Adam, prostration to Adam was an act of worship to Allah, may He be exalted, and refusing to prostrate to him was an act of disbelief (kufr)?

1. Idolaters DO NOT prostrate to their charms, do they?
I have repeated it that Muslims do not worship nor now down to the black stone. I also said that the black stone is like a CHARM because of the obvious similarities.

I said:
However, it seems to me that Muslims regard the Blackstone as the Idolaters will regard their CHARMS.
What are the common things
1. Muslims don't prostrate to their charms: Just as Idolaters do not prostrate to their charms.
2. Muslims believe that the Blackstone has powers to help them (expiration of sins and testify for them on judgement day) : Just as Idolaters believe that their Chas has powers to protect them or grant them favours.
3. Muslims revere and venerate the Blackstone: just as Idolaters revere and venerate their charms.


Does the stone have the power to witness on behalf of the Muslims on judgement day?

Watinani:
Umar or Mohammed, who is WRONG about the usefulness or lack of usefulness of the Blackstone?

They're both right, what Umar means is that the stone here in this world has nothing to harm or benefit the one kissing it but Umar (AS) is kissing and touching it because it's recommended by our holy prophet Muhammad.

Prophet Muhammad means Allah will let the stone be beneficial to those who practice what prophet Muhammad did to the stone in hereafter

Both cannot be right my friend.
WHY!?
If the stone will witness for you as Muslims in FUTURE, then it is very USEFUL!
You point to or touch the stone while the stone is supposed to be ordinary, so how does it know if you are SINCERE or NOT if it is ordinary?

Your sins are committed while the stone is an ordinary stone, so, how can it be aware of your sins?

If I have a magical ring that is supposed to save my life during WAR, when does the ring become useful before, during or after the war? Does this fact change whether it is a charm of not?

Watinani:
I've told you that there are many unauthentic hadith written by Jew's and other non Muslim just cause confusion and commotion in Islam.

Listen amigo, Memoirs of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy to the Middle East or Confessions of a British Spy is a document purporting to be the account by an 18th-century British agent, Hempher, of his instrumental role in founding the conservative Islamic reform movement of Wahhabism, as part of a conspiracy to corrupt Islam. It first appeared in 1888, in Turkish, in the five-volume Mir'at al-Haramayn of Ayyub Sabri Pasha (who is thought to be the actual author by at least one scholar). It has been described as "apocryphal", a "forgery", "utter nonsense",and "an Anglophobic variation on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion". It has been widely translated and disseminated, is available on the internet, and still enjoys some currency among some individuals in the Middle East and beyond. In 2002, an Iraqi military officer recapitulated the book in a "top secret document".

Read the article here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_of_Mr._Hempher,_The_British_Spy_to_the_Middle_East

Israeli Jews dress as Muslims to defy Al-Aqsa prayer ban https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/16/israeli-jews-dress-as-muslims-to-defy-ban-on-entry-to-al-aqsa

Jews are disguising themselves as Muslims to pray on Temple Mount – report https://www.timesofisrael.com/jews-are-disguising-themselves-as-muslims-to-pray-on-temple-mount-report/

This is a very weak excuse: an extremely weak argument.
You mean that the collectors of the SAHIH HADITHS collected reports from Jews? Are you saying that Jews wrote some of your Tafsirs?

The websites you sited are ALL recent write-ups. Can you give with evidence ANY Hadith in your six Sahih books or your Tafsirs by your ancient scholars that ALL Muslims agree that they were made by Jews?

All hadiths in Sahih Hadiths books were VERIFIED before compilation weren't they? So, can you explain how Jews in particular produced the hadiths and Tafsirs.

If Christians say that some verses in the bible were corrupted by the Muslims, what would be your take(would you think it is a good argument?)

LegalWolf, what you are claiming is NOT possible on NL. You can be locked out of a section like the Religious section BUT you can't be locked out of a post. Alhaji LegalWolf, tell us another lie! LOL!

If it is, post the screenshot of your ban. The thread on "Questions Jehovah's witness cannot answer" is on this same Religious section dude.

The issue is about a so-called Messanger and prophet that was ACCUSED of STEALING!

Is there a single Messanger of God in the whole world accused of such a despicable character?



Have you noticed that you seldom answer any questions!?

Answer the question and don't run away!

LegalWolf, what you are claiming is NOT possible on NL. You can be locked out of a section like the Religious section BUT you can't be locked out of a post.

If it is, post the screenshot of your ban. The thread on Questions Jehovah's witness cannot answer is on this same Religious section dude.

The issue is about a so-called Messanger and prophet that was ACCUSED of STEALING!

Is there a single Messanger of God in the whole world accused of such a despicable character?



Answer the question and don't run away!

Two02:
https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-parliament-passes-law-banning-lgbt-propaganda-among-adults-2022-11-24/

Even though I thoroughly condemn Russia's invasion of Ukraine, on the issue of LGBT, they got it 100% correct.

Don't run away!
I've moved your digression here so that you can continue your spanking

LegalWolf:
Story!

Did you not forge facts when you claimed everyone who last saw red cloth saw it with the Prophet? Ehnnnn Potential Thief? I will aid your delusion, don't worry!

Fuccccking answer the question Don't be as lazy as the fucccking ass yhwh and forge a new thread for me, please!!!!!!!! Work for 6 days and rest on the 7th. Today is a day of work not rest, potential Thief

Don't change the topic: I've opened the post for you:
Qutham aka Mohammed was ACCUSED of STEALING a Red cloth!

Will you kindly Explain how they all came to the conclusion that Qutham aka Mohammed stole the cloth?

LegalWolf:
Story!

Did you not forge facts when you claimed everyone who last saw red cloth saw it with the Prophet? Ehnnnn Potential Thief? I will aid your delusion, don't worry!

Fuccccking answer the question Don't be as lazy as the fucccking ass yhwh and forge a new thread for me, please!!!!!!!! Work for 6 days and rest on the 7th. Today is a day of work not rest, potential Thief

Don't change the topic: I've opened the post for you:
Qutham aka Mohammed was ACCUSED of STEALING a Red cloth!

Will you kindly Explain how they all came to the conclusion that Qutham aka Mohammed stole the cloth?

BluntCrazeMan:
I will go straight to the point.
..
..

1. At earliest stages (Nursery, and Early Basic Stages), pupils should be tested with examinations that ascertain their motor skills, and every other basic skills and basic abilities..

2. At mid stages (Basic Classes, and Junior Collage Classes), The students should be tested with examinations that dwell more on ascertaining the strength of their retentive memories.

(2b. Then, at Senior Collage, the students should be gradually introduced to “knowledge-based examinations”, which test the residual and acquired knowledge of the students on the subject, and not necessarily what the students remember. Thus, the exams should be in forms that allow and encourage the students to give their answers in their very own words, and not necessarily the way it was presented inside the textbooks.. In fact, anybody who presents an answer similar to what was contained inside the textbooks shouldn't have any score.)

3. At later stages (Higher Institutions), the students should be tested with examinations that ascertain the “Applied Knowledge” of the students (Starting from their First Year in the Institutions). This type of examination is known as “Application-based Examination”, and it tests the “Problem-Solving Skills” of the students.
At this stage, examinations should be more of “solving” real-life situations, and the students are even allowed to use textbooks if they wish - because the answers are not even inside the textbooks to start with - the answers to such examinations are in the internal ability of the students to apply their knowledge.
For Instance, an examination that contains a “problem” that was well described, and the students were required to provide a solution to the problem based on their knowledge of the subject in question - is an “Application-based Examination”.
Thus, no two answers are supposed to be the same.




..
..
***WITH ALL THESE SAID...
Nobody can leave the Higher Institutions of learning, and still be feeling like he has absolutely nothing inside him.


It pains me deeply whenever I see University Examination Papers with Objective Questions, and such examinations would be expecting the so-called University Students to fill in the gaps or blank-spaces with the required missing words or phrases or sentences..
Meaning that, they are still testing the retentive memories of such students of higher institutions??

It even pains more when one sees a so-called “graduate” of a higher institution of learning, who doesn't even know the practicability of the course he read and graduated from.

I understand you perfectly as you are correct.

The problem in Nigeria is that there EXIST no purpose to Education by Governments in Nigeria.

Government create schools for the mere purpose of keeping children out of trouble and mischief!

Education is not targeted towards any kind of productivity!

LegalWolf:
Hey Potential Thief TenQ

When the fuccccck are you going to forge another thread? yhvh cannot be resting while you will be resting as well!!!! That is insane! One of you must be an hard worker and my guess is you (since I cannot reach him). ?

So when should be expecting another thread from you?

Lol

I've not even started you are begging for a change to a simpler/easier topic.
Are you saying that you want some MERCY from me as this is too SHAMEFUL for a Messanger of Allah!?

Answer the questions my friend!

Did I not open a TOPIC for you where Qutham aka Mohammed was ACCUSED of STEALING!?

Khai!
A whole prophet and Messanger of Allah accused of STEALING!?


Answer the Questions if you are NOT tongue tied.


LegalWolf, a great Pathological LIAR and DECEITFUL personality you are! What is so difficult in answering these SIMPLE QUESTIONS?

QUESTION:
1. Did or did not Allah command Ibrahim to do EBO/sacrifice with his son for him?
2. Is Qurban obligatory for you or not Mr LegalWolf as a Muslim?
3. Is it TRUE or FALSE that Allah prescribes for you a YEARLY EBO sacrifice like obatala worshippers with Ram, Sheep, Cows and even Carmel s etc


So Mr LegalWolf, you have to choose ONE or BOTH of the two options below that corresponds to you
a. You are you incredibly DUMB and IGNORANT of Islam
b. You are a Pathological LIAR who knows the truth but cannot help but speaks lies anytime you speak.


Why are you tongue-tied?

The prosecution demands that you answer their questions first before digressing as usual. Some people were even wondering if you had a 3rd Class in your Law school as you are prone to NOT answering questions.

LegalWolf:
LOL!


This potential Thief called TenQ doesn't cease to amaze me. I am only responding so MrCodeSolo could see how delusional the person is engaging is.

Now let us scrutinize his example, which assumes as follows:

a. The red piece of cloth got missing in someone's house (presumably a follower of the prophet)

b. The cloth got missing while the PROPHET came to the person's house (with or without his entourage)

c. [Why] will the person suggest remotely that the Prophet took it? [I would have couched this in a more logical term so as to capture the point of the potential Thief. But knowing his antecedent as a pathological liar, I would only substitute the words]

The question you should pose to the potential thief is that:

a. Whose house was the red cloth in?
b. Did the prophet enter the person's house and it got missing as your example suggests? If so, what is your evidence?
c. Who was the individual that alleged suggest that the prophet took it?

I think your religion befits you as it beclouds you from having proper mental functioning! Like, the first paragraph of your case file reeks of liessss. When we asked you evidence for the following:

Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed'

'Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment.

All we got was hulaba baba bluee bula baloooo! Haba, TenQ! Since you breathe of lies, don't you think you are destined to perish according to Proverbs 19:9 ?


Now, let me use this opportunity to address another miscellaneous point. Checked your last thread and I noticed it died ignobly on page 1 . Most people you tagged may have concluded that you are befitting for Federal Neuro-psychiatric hospital in Aro or Yaba, therefore saw no point having engagement with you. Painfully, I have come to that decision as well but let me throw this in the air:

(underline mine)

Asking for help when debating with you?? Can a wolf ask for help when tearing down a lamb? [of course, you should know exactly the reason I used lamb if you are smart ] Me ask for help with you? I only called him to see how I tear you to pieces not help? Help to do what exactly?

In fact, what exactly on earth have you defended? When I called you to:

1. Defend yhwh resting after work like a lazy ass god in Genesis 2:2-3, did you say anything reasonable?

2. Defend yhwh when he could not help Judah drive out the people of the plains because they had chariot fitted with iron (that is despite being with them o) as stated in Judges 1:19, did you say anything sensible? Was it not useless assumptions that is unsupported in the text that you were drawing?

3. Explain how sacrifice to yhwh is done by sprinkling blood on people in Hebrews 9:13 as you will expect of worshippers of satan, was it not baba blue hala baa bable that you muttered

4. Explained why your yhwh is such a blood thirsty demon that there cannot be forgiveness without shedding of the blood as succintly captured in Hebrews 9:22, what explanation did you give?

And you are deluded to think I will call for help in engaging someone I had to lecture on the difference between premise and conclusion. I peace out on this thread, respectfully and would watch it die a natural ignoble death. If there is a need to respond to any gibberish TenQ will spew on this thread, I will respond somewhere else not here.

But then again, it is with extreme contempt I struggle (against my will) to respond to someone who forged a statement, put it in inverted comma and attributed it to me. Someone who breathes and reeks of lies, someone who gives the impression that he is a follower of christ but does something Christ loathe - lying and forgery, someone who's native language is that of lies as purportedly captured by Yehoshua in John 8:44. Yet, he keeps shouting character assassination. The question is: can you assassinate what does not exist?

cc: Potential Thief TenQ

You seem not to get the gravity of your problem.
1. Muslims like you and followers of Mohammed accused him of STEALING a RED CLOTH
2. Your Allah felt that it was an important event worth mentioning in the Qur'an in defence of his beloved Messanger
3. The events were RECORDED in YOUR Religious Books or are you insinuating that Jews and Christians wrote the evidences?
4. Till today the Red clothing has not been found. Do you know it's whereabout?
5. The Chief EVIDENCE Allah, even though he knows who took the Red cloth kept quiet about the identity of the true THIEF. His concern was just to exonerate his Messanger. (Intelligent people believe that it is either Allah is a powerless or a Fabrication and invention of Mohammed)
6. The only one who gave evidence of innocence of Mohammed was Mohammed himself claiming that a certain Allah spoke to him with NO SINGLE EVIDENCE!

So Mr LegalWolf,
The issue is about the integrity of your client Qutham aka Mohammed. Why did it cross Muslims mind that he could be so low as to STEAL a Red clothing?

Is it that difficult responding to the questions of the prosecution?
The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

ogododo:
http://muslimrightsmuric..com/2022/11/muric-to-nigerian-muslims-avoid.html?m=1

There are Islamic universities everywhere.
You went to choose a Christian university.
You now complain that you are forced to go to church and forced not to put on hijab.

Why did you apply there in the first place?

Dtruthspeaker:
It is first a Holy Day and supposed to always be an Holy Day. A Day of Goodness and joy and play and laughter and remembrance of the goodness received from God therefore thanks giving will follow. A day of family and love and all things good.

Which is why Christ asked "which is better? To do good or to do evil.

Your "holiday" is a deceit of using The Truth to deceive and kill as lortreed does, in making people forget that

1. We have this beautiful day of joy and laughter and rest because God gave it to us.

2. Every Holy Day reminds us that God is our Ruler and therefore in Charge of our lives.

3 Every Holy Day reminds us that The Lord is Good and that He has been good to us. He is not as the wicked employers and rulers as is now proven as more and more people are now made to work from Sunday to Sunday,.

4. Every Holy Day reminds us to Fear The Lord!

So the word "holiday" is a cunning perversion from the evil, given by people like lortreed meant to lead people away from God into the Danger of the Anger God.

It would be wrong for anyone to term Sabbath as ONLY a holiday. It is FIRST a HOLY DAY before becoming a HOLIDAY! The word holiday is only useful as a modern equivalent where the citizens have a day of rest and celebrations. However for the Jews, the Sabbath is primarily a HOLY/SACRED Day to the Lord even though it can be by extension a HOLIDAY!

LegalWolf:
LOL!

I have been calling you a potential thief and an habitual liar. Let us even assume that those who come to this thread are unaware of our previous engagement. So, me calling you an habitual liar and a potential thief may be an overkill.

Now, you have introduced your case file and said:

'Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed'

'Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment.'

These are your statements not mine. Or are they not? Your rapist defending lawyer friend should have told you that defense can ask for evidence before plea, or didn't he?

So, Mr. 'Prosecution' , please tell us the source for these statements. At least, this would enable the defence cross-check the 'evidences' and give you appropriate answers to your questions. Or did you forge them too ?



Proverbs 19:9 says '.... he who breathes out lies will perish. Potential Thief TenQ , Omo, it appears you will perish according to the Bible o if the your statements above are lies, what do you think?

cc: Brother lukuluku69 this is how we play with the potential thief TenQ . Burst out his lies and forgeries, just tease him and enjoy him crumble. You are not to respond but just relax. Sorry for taking your time. Enjoy Akhi

Asking for HELP!?
Please go on!

LOL!!

You asked for it and you are being spanked mercilessly!

Unfortunately, this is not the kind of topic I'd normally have posted. But, you asked for this. This is exactly why I am not engaging other Muslims!

Have you started crying again?

What and why on earth would cause Muslims and followers of Mohammed accuse their prophet of STEALING?

MrCodeSolo:
When it was found missing on the day of Badr, some people said; Perhaps the Messenger of Allah has taken it
rumours - false accusation without facts thereby lacking any iota of evidence -
rumours with the perhaps word is not a fact.

False accusation!

Let's assume.

If N10,700 Naira got missing in YOUR HOUSE while President Buhari came to your house with or without his entourage , will you suggest remotely that Buhari took it?

It is indeed not befitting of a President to steal!

OgaTheTop2:
Wonder shall never end

You wonder too?

A whole prophet accused of STEALING!?

What audacity Was his character that truely bad?

LegalWolf:
LOL!

I have been calling you a potential thief and an habitual liar. Let us even assume that those who come to this thread are unaware of our previous engagement. So, me calling you an habitual liar and a potential thief may be an overkill.

Now, you have introduced your case file and said:

'Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed'

'Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment.'

These are your statements not mine. Or are they not? Your rapist defending lawyer friend should have told you that defense can ask for evidence before plea, or didn't he?

So, Mr. 'Prosecution' , please tell us the source for these statements. At least, this would enable the defence cross-check the 'evidences' and give you appropriate answers to your questions. Or did you forge them too ?



Proverbs 19:9 says '.... he who breathes out lies will perish. Potential Thief TenQ , Omo, it appears you will perish according to the Bible o if the your statements above are lies, what do you think?

cc: Brother lukuluku69 this is how we play with the potential thief TenQ . Burst out his lies and forgeries, just tease him and enjoy him crumble. You are not to respond but just relax. Sorry for taking your time. Enjoy Akhi

No they didn't see it with Mohammed, they just assumed that Mohammed who never came close to it STOLE it. (Magnetic hands!?). Mohammed didn't have to come close to it. He is a prophet you know. Mohammed could have instructed Jubril to take it for him. SMH!

How did they come to such obnoxious conclusion as they NEVER accused Zaid or Ahmed or Umar or Zainab of the offence of STEALING?



Indeed it is not befitting for a self acclaimed prophet to STEAL!

Answer the Question lawyer:

The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

You are reminded to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

LegalWolf:
Modified: Potential thief TenQ

I have called you a liar on several occasions and that is the reason why I did not engage you repeatedly. Not just that, you have gone ahead to forge a statement, put it in inverted comma, and ascribed it to the innocent me.

Now, in order to defame our prophet, look at the lies you told:

(underlined mine)

CAN YOU TELL US THE SOURCE FOR THE UNDERLINED PLEASE? Wait, did they curse you with lying and forgery potential thief?


cc: Potential Thief TenQ

See page 2.


The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

You are reminded to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

LegalWolf:
This is the potential thief TenQ Now you are having the balls!.

First off, and regarding the underlined, can you answer this simple question: Can truth be character assassination? ? CAN YOU, POTENTIAL THIEF TENQ, TELL THE WORLD THAT YOU DID NOT FORGE A STATEMENT, PUT IT IN INVERTED COMMA AND ATTRIBUTED IT TO ME ? Is this something you can confidently say you did not do?

Secondly, and I have repeated countlessly, there is a moral burden on you. The Yoruba have a saying that an habitual liar is a potential thief. Isn't it? You have not given me one single reason why I should engage a potential thief like you on matters of faith, have you?


(underlined mine)

Now to your questions: I think you have a rapist defending lawyer friend who uses technicality (if I may say lying) to win cases. Is this what he told you about prosecution? That defense should find evidence? Really, Potential Thief TenQ ? Like me telling you to find evidence that Apostle Paul was inspired by God? Or is dream is not inspired by the devil? Is that something you want to find too?

I ask you: Is this all you can find? Potential Thief? Like or are there other pieces of evidence outside this? Did you consult your lawyer-friend before spewing this nonsense? And the 'prosecution' LOOOOOOOOL!!!!!!! Apart from being a potential thief, you've started clowning. LOL! Even an 100L law student would laugh at your 'evidences' and throw it to the dust bin.

Wait that reminds me: are you angry by my references to the sacrifices to yhwh? Are you triggered that yhwh is a blood sucking demon that he cannot forgive unless there is shedding of blood as mentioned in Hebrews 9:22 ? I do not have blood to give yhwh ooo but I have cassava, garri, dodo and ewa. is it something yhwh will take?

So predictable!

The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

You are reminded to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

PoliteActivist:
NOBODY keeps the whole of the 613 laws. So what does that mean?
Remember, if you break the smallest one you've broken them all

Jam 2:10:
"For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."

Because of the Seriousness of the Allegation against Mr Qutham Mohammed, the following Evidences were also attached by the Prosecution.'

Various Tafsirs and Reports by Early Muslim Scholars

1. Tafseer as-Sa'di, page 82
The word translated here as misappropriation, or taking things by stealth, from the war booty may also refer to dishonesty in any position of authority. It is haram according to scholarly consensus; in fact it is a major sin, as indicated by this verse and other texts. Allah (4g) tells us that it is not appropriate or befitting for a Prophet to misappropriate anything, because misappropriation - as is well known - is one of the gravest of sins and the most shameful behaviour. Allah protected His Prophets from committing any action that might cause shame or undermine their status, and He made them the best of people in manners and attitude, the purest in soul and the best; He made them free of any shameful deeds and made them fit to receive His message and learn His wisdom.

2. Tafisr-ibn-Kathir
(It is not for any Prophet to illegally take a part of the booty ,) was revealed in connection with a red robe that was missing from the spoils of war of Badr. Some people said that the Messenger of Allah might have taken it. When this rumor circulated, Allah sent down, (It is not for any Prophet to illegally take a part of the booty, and whosoever is deceitful with the booty, he shall bring forth on the Day of Resurrection that which he took.)
This was also recorded by Abu Dawud and At-Tirmidhi, who said "Hasan Gharib". This Ayah exonerates the Messenger of Allah of all types of deceit and treachery, be it returning what was entrusted with him, dividing the spoils of war, etc.
(The worst Ghulul (i.e. stealing) with Allah is a yard of land, that is, when you find two neighbors in a land or home and one of them illegally acquires a yard of his neighbor's land. When he does, he will be tied with it from the seven earths until the Day of Resurrection.)

3. Maarif-Ul-Quran
The verse translated as, 'And it is not (conceivable) for a prophet to misappropriate the spoils - 161', has a particular back-ground of its revelation. As a corollary, the problem of 'Ghulul', that is, misappropriation in the spoils, comes into focus.
Misappropriation in the spoils: A sin which cannot be ascribed to any prophet by any stretch of imagination:
The background, as narrated by al-Tirmidhi, is that from the spoils collected in the battle of Badr. Some people said that the sheet may have been, perhaps, taken by the Holy Prophet . If those who said that were hypocrites, the source speaks for itself. May be, this came from a less-initiated
Muslim thinking that the Holy Prophet had the right to do that. Thereupon, this verse was revealed which said that ghulul is a great sin to be punished severely on Doomsday and that the very thought of linking this sin to a prophet is an ugly audacity, for prophets are free of all sins.
The word, ghulul is also used in the absolute sense for khiyanah, a breach of trust, (misappropriation, pilferage and stealing).


Various Translations of the Quran 3:161 in English language

[The Monotheist Group] (2013 Edition)
It was not for any prophet to embezzle, and he who embezzles will be brought with what he has embezzled on the Day of Resurrection, then every soul will be given what it has earned without being wronged.

Aisha Bewley
No Prophet would ever be guilty of misappropriation. Those who misappropriate will arrive on the Day of Rising with what they have misappropriated. Then every self will be paid in full for what it earned. They will not be wronged.

Ali Ünal
It is not conceivable that a Prophet defrauds; and whoever defrauds (by stealing from public property or war-gains) will come with what he gained by his fraud on the Day of Resurrection. Then every soul shall be repaid in full what it has earned (while in the world), and they will not be wronged

Umm Muhammad (Sahih International)
It is not [attributable] to any prophet that he would act unfaithfully [in regard to war booty]. And whoever betrays, [taking unlawfully], will come with what he took on the Day of Resurrection. Then will every soul be [fully] compensated for what it earned, and they will not be wronged

[The Monotheist Group] (2011 Edition)
It was not for any prophet that he should embezzle, and he who embezzles will be brought with what he has embezzled on the Day of Resurrection, then every soul will be given what it has earned without being wronged

Abdel Haleem
It is inconceivable that a prophet would ever dishonestly take something from the battle gains. Anyone who does so will carry it with him on the Day of Resurrection, when each soul will be fully repaid for what it has done: no one will be wronged

Abdul Majid Daryabadi
It is not the part of a prophet to hide anything away: whosoever hideth anything away, he shall bring forth on the Day of Resurrection that which he had hidden away; then shall each one be repaid in full that which he hath earned, and they shall not be wronged

Muhammad Taqi Usmani
It is not conceivable from a prophet to misappropriate the spoils. Whoever misappropriates shall bring forth, on Doomsday, what he misappropriated. Then, everybody shall be paid, in full, for what he has earned, and they shall not be wronged

T.B.Irving
No prophet should hold back anything; and anyone who defrauds [someone else] will bring along whatever he has been withholding on Resurrection Day. Then every soul will be repaid for whatever it has earned, and they will not be harmed.

Abdul Hye
It is not (conceivable) for a prophet that he defrauds (take booty illegally) and he who defrauds will bring forth what he has defrauded on the Day of Resurrection. Then every person shall be fully compensated what he has earned, and they shall not be dealt unjustly.

The Clear Quran, Dr. Mustafa Khattab
It is not appropriate for a prophet to illegally withhold spoils of war. And whoever does so, it will be held against them on the Day of Judgment. Then every soul will be paid in full for what it has done, and none will be wronged.

M. M. Pickthall
It is not for any prophet to embezzle. Whoso embezzleth will bring what he embezzled with him on the Day of Resurrection. Then every soul will be paid in full what it hath earned; and they will not be wronged



I'm sure Mr LegalWolf can see that all these words are not fit for a prophet of God, however we still find it unthinkable that such an accusation was made against the greatest prophet of Islam.



The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf Again:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red Cloth in Question?

You are reminded to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

Mr LegalWolf,
The attention is of a certain so-called Prophet (Qutham aka Mohammed) who was accused of stealing a particular piece of cloth
by no other persons than his close followers and partners.

We would appreciate if you can use your kind office to defend this prophet as the evidence presented are by his friends, partners and followers. Even though Allah was present while the crime was committed, he could not say who really did the stealing but he defended this prophet by writing a testimony that “a prophet is above the act of stealing”. What made the case more interesting is that Allah himself did not personally give the testimony: the accused did on behalf of Allah.

The Prosecution was of the opinion that this prophet is the THIEF and he is LYING that a certain Allah (who was present at the time of the stealing) “sent him to absolve himself” of the crime. You were highly recommended to take up this case as a Defence for the Accused Prophet only because they say you are one of his followers.

Thank you,
TenQ


Even though I intended to copy some of the followers of this prophet, I wish that in this case, none of you respond as it is a legal issue and a Lawyer has been found: Mr LegalWolf who himself has been looking forward to when TenQ would POST to Him about Islam on Nairaland (as he assumed that TenQ had exhausted and finished spending all his ammunition like Russia against Ukraine).

Case File Introduction:
1. Mohammed the Prophet of Allah was accused of Stealing a Piece of very beautiful RED sheet/garment/cloth that was admired by many of the followers of Mohammed. Everyone who last saw the cloth saw it with Mohammed and by his antecedent, knew that Mohammed stole the cloth. Mohammed denied stealing the cloth but he had not a single evidence to back himself with. Those who saw him amongst his followers kept insisting that their Prophet STOLE the garment.
2. The story was getting out of hand with everyone insisting that their prophet STOLE the Red garment that Mohammed had to call on his (fictitious) Allah to rescue him.
3. Unfortunately, not one of the followers of Mohammed had EVER seen Allah nor Jubril nor did Allah give his prophet ANY KIND of Evidence such as a MIRACLE to authenticate his prophet “Mohammed”. As of this time, ANYTHING Mohammed said Allah said was considered as being from Allah.
4. Mohammed in defending himself gave forth a revelation he said Allah gave him. The verse was recited to Mohammed’s followers in Quran 3:161

Supposed Allah’s Testimony:
Quran 3:161
وَمَا كَانَ لِنَبِیٍّ أَن یَغُلَّۚ وَمَن یَغۡلُلۡ یَأۡتِ بِمَا غَلَّ یَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِیَـٰمَةِۚ ثُمَّ تُوَفَّىٰ كُلُّ نَفۡسࣲ مَّا كَسَبَتۡ وَهُمۡ لَا یُظۡلَمُونَ ۝١
THE WORD Ghulul is PROPERLY TRANSLATED AS STEALING (Taking something that is not yours illegally and deceitfully)

Quran 3:161
It is inconceivable that a Prophet would ever misappropriate (steal) anything from the war booty. Anyone who does so will carry it with him on the Day of Resurrection. Then every soul will be paid in full what it has earned and no one will be wronged.

5. Even though the testimony should have been rejected outrightly because there was no signature of the testimony by Allah. Mohammed himself wrote the testimony on behalf of the so-called Allah and he signed the document as “Allah’s Prophet” we present you with it as the fact on ground.
6. Muslim scholars in their Hadiths and Tafsirs tried to EXPLAIN the genesis of the verse acclaimed to have been received from Allah by Mohmmed
Sunan Abu Dawud (English) 30, Hadith 3960
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:
The verse "And no Prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" was revealed about a red velvet. When it was found missing on the day of Badr, some people said; Perhaps the Messenger of Allah has taken it. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down (Quran 3:161) "And no prophet could (ever) be false to his trust" to the end of the verse

7. UP TILL TODAY, THE RED CLOTH HAS NOT BEEN FOUND!


The Questions of the Prosecution to Mr LegalWolf:
1. Can you please find any EVIDENCE that Mohammed was actually truly speaking for Allah?
2. If Allah is All-knowing and Mohammed is his prophet, can you please EXPLAIN why didn’t he say WHO stole the garment (as the case would have been permanently resolved)?
3. Why is it that the followers of Mohammed could even think or imagine that their prophet could even condescend so low to STEALING of anything?
4. Is there any prophet of God that has ever been accused of such despicable low-life acts like STEALING or FLIRTING with their son’s wife? (It was reported that some verses were also claimed to have been revealed about this despicable act with Zainab to defend Mr Qutham aka Mohammed)
5. Where is this Red cloth in question?

Dear Mr LegalWolf,
You are required to respond to these Question rather than your usual resort to character assassination and slander ALL in an attempt of dodging answering the Questions.

I ask Muslims NOT to respond to this POST as it is for Mr LegalWolf alone as LegalWOlf requested for a POST and I promised him at least one that has to do with his profession as a Lawyer!

Evidences from Tafsirs and Translations of the Quran is presented in the next page for your perusal.

Dtruthspeaker:
The Bible specifically said "Holy Day"!

And Not holiday.

I also agree with you on this!
It is first a Holy Day before its a Holiday!

PoliteActivist:
More deceptive, circular talk.
Simple:
From creation God ordained one day as day of rest. If that day is Saturday, why do we observe it on Sundays??

Which day is Sabbath was the Question!
I've answered: Sabbath is not just one day. It means DAY of REST or in modern language PUBLIC HOLIDAY ! Are the four classes of Sabbath I mentioned a Fabrication? If not,

I ask, do you keep the WHOLE of the Sabbath law?
Jam 2:10:
"For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."

So, again I ask:
Do you keep the WHOLE of the Sabbath law?

If you don't, I have a word for you

Mat 7:5:
"You hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of your own eye; and then shall you see clearly to cast out the mote out of your brother's eye."

Preach the Sabbath only AFTER you have kept the whole law of the Sabbath my dear!

Pwettylinda:
Pls mod help me push this to the right section

A friend of mine sent me a package using USPS (United States Postal services). And he sent me the tracking number.

The package arrived Nigeria with 5 days, the tracking status shows it is with the customs.

Custom processing

This is about 10 days after arrival, status still says custom processing.

Confused right now, how do I get the items.

How long does custom processing takes?
And what does it mean

Help pls....running out of patience

Nigerian customs can be a pain.
They are probably computing the duty you have to pay AND for a flimsy reason like having a phone in the package, you'll get the estimate according to their valuation.

The other reasons may be if you have imported contrabands such as
1. Prohibited Materials
2. Incriminating materials
3. Restricted materials

If not , check if your email address is correct as they will mail you through USPS.

Finally,Mail USPS, they will sort the problem out for you.

PoliteActivist:
Read the heading of this thread again. The discussion is which DAY does the 4th commandment say.
NOT what I obey or don't obey!

Which day is Sabbath was the Question!
I've answered: Sabbath is not just one day. It means DAY of REST or in modern language PUBLIC HOLIDAY ! Are the four classes of Sabbath I mentioned a Fabrication? If not,

I ask, do you keep the WHOLE of the Sabbath law?
Jam 2:10:
"For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all."

So, again I ask:
Do you keep the WHOLE of the Sabbath law?

If you don't, I have a word for you

Mat 7:5:
"You hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of your own eye; and then shall you see clearly to cast out the mote out of your brother's eye."

Preach the Sabbath only AFTER you have kept the whole law of the Sabbath my dear!

Wisdom is profitable to direct.
SMH!