TyroneP's Posts
Nairaland Forum › TyroneP's Profile › TyroneP's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 25 pages)
Alexgeneration:He's done his best by notifying them of her demise to rule out culpability. Hearsay is not admissible in court. She doesn't need to take the corpse to the village. Her people should come for that. It is his own decision if he will take the body to the village or attend the funeral. What they're toiling with is a criminal case in the embryo if op decides to make a move on that. |
The last may not have been heard of Yul Edochie’s decision to marry a second wife, as members of his family have distanced themselves from the new development. The actor, on his part, has maintained that marrying a second wife was one of the best decisions he has ever made in life. Recall that the actor during the week set tongues wagging on social media after he unveiled the birth of his son by his second wife, Judy Austin Muoghalu to the world. His post on Instagram instantly went viral and since then, the actor has been receiving backlashes from different quarters, with many declaring him unfit to contest for any elective position in 2023, as he’s presently preparing ahead of the general elections. Disappointed by Yul’s post, his first wife, Mary said “May God judge you both.” However, reacting to the development on his Instagram page yesterday, Yul’s elder brother, Uche said his family did not support Yul Edochie’s decision and they were shocked. According to him, Yul was advised against the marriage but he did not heed to their advice. He wrote: “So my younger brother, Yul Edochie, just married a second wife out of the blues and Nigerians are freaking out. I get it. We are all shocked. I am a low key type of guy and I have tried to mind my own business but this circus is chasing me around too. So here is my take. “I see two main problems here. His first wife Mary, a wonderful woman and my sister-in-law did not go into a relationship with my brother agreeing to be part of a polygamous marriage. That’s the first problem. So I feel for Mary. It is not fair on her. My family is not in support. This is not what we do and we are trying our best to console Mary. What else can we do? “The second issue is that Yul is not a Muslim. If he was a Muslim, no one will be talking about this. Muslims marry as many wives as they want and nobody says anything. Traditional rulers and traditionalists of sorts do the same thing too and the Nigerian constitution recognizes polygamy as a legal marital union. Maybe we should burn that bloody constitution. “We told Yul not to do it. He did it anyway. Have you ever tried controlling an adult when it comes to relationships? Good luck with that.” Uche further noted that “Yul is an adult who feels marrying a second woman is the best way to own up to his mistakes and make things right. It took a lot of courage for him to do this too. A Muslim marries two or more wives and his people throw a party. Totally normal. A Christian does the same thing and he is the worst human being alive. It is tough. “Women throw themselves at famous people so bad that it is suffocating. If the average person walks in Yul’s shoes for one year, they will get five or more women pregnant. So don’t be quick to judge if you have not lived that life. Most people will do worse. So this is Yul’s new baby with his new wife. Beautiful boy. Children are gifts from God. It is the circumstances of their birth that get us all riled up about what’s right and wrong. I wish them all luck,” Uche wrote on IG. Meanwhile, speaking in an online interview with comedian Kasboi yesterday, Yul Edochie described marrying a new wife as the best decision he has ever made in his lifetime. He said that he has always known that a day like this would come someday, adding that he didn’t need to seek his first wife’s permission to marry a new wife. According to him, the woman who doesn’t respect you will not respect you. And the one who loves you and respects you will be with you forever. On the backlashes trailing the development, the actor said everybody can’t see things the way you do. “A whole lot of people don’t know you but judge you from what they see,” he added. Yul Edochie and his first wife, May Aligwe have been married for 16 years. Their union is blessed with four children, three boys and a daughter. Source: Vanguard Newspaper |
Solofresh2:Op, you're funny. Are you really serious you want her to stop coming around? God is watching you. |
Islandlady:The jury system of court trial is what I do not like about American criminal justice system. It's really faulty. |
ibechris:He is obviously looking at legalistic approach to the issue. What you're saying is immaterial in the court of law- infact, he's not from the woman's tribe so he doesn't know the provisions of their customary practice in a case like this. In furtherance to this, the deceased was not a minor as at the time of cohabitation, she should have decided on which way to go as regards traditional wedding before agreeing if to cohabit wih him or get married to him. May her soul rest in peace. What if cases relating to stalking, intent to extort/defraud, misrepresentation of fact, threat to life or constructive possession is instituted/proven against the family? Moreover, he said he was willing to let them have the child. Op, take things easy on yourself. God be with you. |
ibechris:He simply asked for a lawyer's input. Most people commenting are condemning him. Advice should be from legal aspect. Lawyers in the house should help him with this. |
Insecurity:This man has guts. Make him pay for his crimes. People should know that hard work beats talent. |
MadamVanessa:You're right about your assertions. No sane man would marry a second wife if truly the woman is excellent. We've seen cases of men cheating and for him to take on a second wife, something is going on in Yul's home that we do not understand. Let's not throw jabs at him. I do not like polygamy but most men result to that because of series of spiral verbal abuse and the need for emotional balance which he couldn't get from home. |
Insecurity:Op, the topic is misleading. There's a difference between abduction and kidnapping. And the level of severity differs. This is a case of kidnapping. |
Chiden:I understand how you feel. It's just a matter of time when you'll be independent. You can't live with her FOREVER. You live for yourself, practice self-love and engage yourself in other self development activities just to take your mind off what's going on between you and your mom. |
Kwanza:A scenario similar to this happened at NSCDC Command Headquarters then while I was on field work as a criminologist then. We didn't take the threat likely as the officer in question was detained for hours before his release and we mounted road checks closer to the command gate because he vowed to return with his friends after his release but no five O turned up. |
aminulive:The case that led to Magu's suspension is a sensitive one. He's on indefinite suspension and it may amount to gross misconduct for the PSC. In a civilised clime where things work, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) will look into it the other way round via the outcome of the case considering the severity of it and therefore recommend compulsorily retirement for him since his suspension seems indefinite. |
efficiencie:The unwritten contract might not stipulate the exact duty of what to do in all cases but the expectation is there for a housewife to do that. Husband is not an occupation because it's a patriarchal world and the definition goes way beyond the provision and protection you mentioned. The word, "livelihood" is what you're forgetting. Check my first post or you read more from other sources if my response is not satisfactory. |
efficiencie:Contract can be written or unwritten provided there is/are witnesse(s). For example, each time you go to the salon to barb, there is an obligation for you to pay before or after service which is an unwritten agreement/contract and is binding despite the absence of paperwork. A marriage certificate stands in place of agreement. The housewife occupation is one of the most problem-ridden in the economy. Being a housewife is no longer a lifetime vocation for most women these days. |
To be a housewife is to be a member of a very peculiar occupation—an occupation like no other. The nature of the duties to be performed, the method of payment, the form of supervision, the tenure system, the “market” in which the “workers” find “jobs,” and the physical hazards are all very different from the way things are in other occupations. The differences are so great that one tends not to think of a housewife as belonging to an occupation in the usual sense. It is commonly said that a housewife “doesn’t work” and that she “is unpaid.” The truth is, of course, that a housewife does work and does get recompense. Like other workers, she can quit or be fired. One dictionary defines an occupation as “an activity that serves as one’s regular source of livelihood.” Being a housewife is an activity that gets one food, clothing, and a place to live, and that certainly meets the dictionary’s definition of having an occupation. |
The act is condemnable and crime is committed in evey tribe/society. It's not a good thing to refer to a particular tribe as been bad. Even a sociological research don't work that way Irrespective of your reservations about a particular tribe. Do not engage in tribalistic comment. Internet don't forget things, you should know what to say and what not to. I hope this helps how you relate with people. Rastaramsey: |
The breach of promise to marry and its legal consequences By Theophilus Orumor “Heaven has no rage like love to hatred turned, Nor hell a fury like a woman scorned.” – William Congreve, 1670-1729 The following, scary but true, recently reported incident is apt in introducing this piece : “Woman sent to jail for pouring hot oil on lover who refused to marry her… “. A 25-year-old woman identified as Victoria Alonge was on Monday sentenced to one-year in jail by a Karu Senior Magistrate court for pouring hot oil on her boyfriend, Roland Nna, because he refused to marry her. Telegraphng.com reports that Victoria was sentenced to one-year imprisonment without an option of fine after the convict admitted to the court that she committed the offence. Alonge was arraigned on a one-count charge of causing grievous harm to Nna, her boyfriend, who resides in Kurudu, Abuja. The prosecutor told the court that Alonge went to Nna’s house at about 4:30 a.m. on the fateful day and poured hot oil on him while he was asleep, resulting in grievous injury… He said she was immediately arrested by the police, after which she confessed to the crime. Njoku said that while in detention, Alonge threatened to inflict more harm on the victim. The prosecutor, however, urged the court to summarily punish the accused because she did not deny the charge brought against her. In her defence, Alonge told the court that her estranged lover dated her for over four years and promised to marry her, only for him to change his mind after falling in love with another woman in Abuja. “I did that to teach him a bitter lesson because he refused to marry me after dating me for over four years,’’ Alonge said. “He fooled me and my parents and ditched me after finding a new lover here in Abuja. I live in Lagos with my parents.” In these days of failed live -in- love affairs, heartbreaks, counter heartbreaks, jilting, eloping, dumping, etc, etc, commonly characterized in love/romantic relationships between lovers of opposite sex (in Nigerian jurisdiction), it is most apposite to consider the legal implications of the above actions which bedevils the pre marital institution in our modern day societal living. An in-depth understanding of the concept of the “promise to marry” and the legal consequences of its breach thereof would most appropriately assist us in achieving this aim. First, what is a “promise to marry”? A “promise” is defined as the manifestation of an intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified manner conveyed in such a way that another is justified in understanding that a commitment has been made; a person’s assurance that a person will or will not do something. A promise to marry is thus defined as a “betrothal”, an “engagement to be married” also termed “agreement to marry”. The promise to marry contract comes into existence by the mutual exchange of promises by the parties to marry each other. A mere convivial or romantic relationship is not enough for a court to found an agreement to marry. In the same vein as commercial contracts, a promise to marry can be oral, written or otherwise. As an oral contract, proof is determined by the same common law rules by which oral commercial contracts are judged. As a written contract, the evidence of personal letter indicating an agreement to marry is enough to establish proof. Promise to marry can be inferred from the action or conduct of the party making the promise. Any action or conduct which directly suggests promise would constitute evidence and therefore proof of promise to marry. (Dr Steve Ogan, 2008). In Aiyede vs Norman –William (1960) LLR 253, it was held that the promise to marry need not take the oral or written exchange of mutual promise. A germane criteria for a promise to marry to be legally binding apart from parties possessing the requisite legal capacity is that it must have consideration for it to be legally valid and enforceable. The evidence of consideration is the basis for establishing the existence of a contract. In a promise to marry case, the reciprocal promise of a woman to marry a man who promised to marry her is usually regarded as consideration. Other instances of consideration could include where for example a woman travels to another city/state/country to meet a man who promised to marry her! Does it include where a woman gets pregnant for her man in furtherance to the promise to marry? This is mootable! To constitute a breach of promise to marry, two elements are essential: First it must be proved to the satisfaction of the court that there was a promise to marry under the relevant law. Second, it must be shown that one party to the agreement, whether the man or the woman, has failed or refused to honour the obligation. When the above are established, the injured party may sue the other for breach of the contract and claim damages thereof, although no damages may be recovered unless his or her testimony is corroborated by some other material evidence in support of such promise in line with section 197 of the Evidence Act 2004. What constitutes material evidence is a question of law for the court to determine. The breach of promise to marry could either be in the form of non-performance or anticipatory breach. There may be non-performance where the time for performance is fixed, for example where parties agree on a particular date, the failure or refusal of one of the parties to turn up for the marriage constitutes a breach. Where no date is fixed, the law implies that the promise is one to marry within a reasonable time or at the request of one party. Where however, the promise is subject to a condition precedent, for example consent of parents, there can be no breach until the condition is satisfied or fulfilled. In Aiyede’s case (supra), the plaintiff’s case was dismissed as there was a condition precedent to the fulfilment of the defendant’s promise to marry, which in this case was obtaining the consent of the plaintiff’s father. The breach of promise to marry takes the form of an anticipatory breach where there is outright repudiation of obligation by a party, or by such conduct on his part that’s puts it out of his power to perform his obligation. An anticipatory breach may occur where before the contractual date for performance, a party to the contract announces his intention not to perform, which announcement the other party could treat as wrongful termination of the agreement and head to court. Anticipatory breach can also occur where one party to an agreement by his own act puts it out of his power to perform his obligation. Such is the case where a party to the contract to marry elopes and marries someone else .The case of Uso v Iketubosin [1975] WRNLR 187 depict this form. In that case, the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff in 1947. In 1957, the defendant married another woman in breach of his promise to the plaintiff. The Court held that the defendant’s act constituted a breach for which the plaintiff was entitled to damages. Interestingly, there are defences to a claim for breach of promise to marry to justify the breach. These defences come in form of general defences, which are available to general contract law such as fraud, duress or misrepresentation which could be pleaded to justify a breach of the promise to marry. For example, where a man misrepresent to a woman that he is from a very rich home and the woman, acting on that misrepresentation, promises to marry the man, a subsequent breach by the woman (who later discovers the real situation of the man) can be availed by the defence of misrepresentation! So men, stop that big talk, be real to your intended or else you get your heart broken! The other specie of defences are termed “special defences”. It may be pleaded that there are some actual moral, physical or mental infirmity in the plaintiff which makes him or her unfit for marriage. This defence presupposes that the plaintiff is suffering from some moral, physical or mental infirmity; the infirmity must be such as to render the plaintiff unfit for marriage; the infirmity must have been discovered after the contract to marry was made; and the defendant must show as a necessity, that some actual infirmity in the plaintiff exist as mere suspicion is not enough. A party who discovers after the contract to marry has been made that the intended spouse is a lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) or a hermaphrodite could perhaps plead these facts as a special defence to a claim of breach of promise to marry. What are the damages for breach of promise to marry? The quantum of damages is generally subject to the rules of remoteness i.e the damages should be that which flow directly from the breach or which are within the contemplation of the parties at the time of the promise. In this light, damages awarded by courts fall under the following categories: general damages e.g. compensation for the loss of consortium of the other party; injured feelings, wounded pride, etc ; special damages affecting property e.g for money spent or financial loss sustained by the plaintiff as a direct result of the defendant’s breach of the promise to marry; recovery of the engagement ring and presents. An interesting thing to note is that damages could also be claimed against a third party who induced the breach. Whatever be the damage claimed, one thing the court would not do is to grant an order of specific performance as no court would force any one to marry another. Incidentally, though the English courts have since moved on away from actions/claims for breach of contract to marry and while serious contentions have been made for the scrapping of this claim from our jurisprudence as same is considered as an anachronism inherited from English law (E.I.Nwogugu,1974), a number of cases, having the issue of breach of promise to marry as principal or ancillary subject matters, have recently been decided by Nigerian Courts. In Ezennah vs Atta (2004) 2 S.C.(Pt II) pg 75, the Supreme Court gave an expository on the concept of breach of promise to marry thus: “Two elements are necessary to constitute a breach of agreement or promise of marriage. First, the party jilted must prove to the satisfaction of the court that there was in fact, a promise to marry under the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1990, or under Islamic law or under customary law, on the part of the other sex. Second, the party, reneging has really, and as a matter of fact, failed or refused to keep to the agreement of marriage…. Marriage is regarded as a very sacred institution both in our jurisprudence and in our sociology. Accordingly, an agreement to enter into a marriage should leave nobody in doubt as to the real intention of the parties to enter into a marriage.” In Mabamije vs Otto (2016) LPELR 26058(SC) the case of Ms. Mabamije was that Mr. Otto breached his promise to marry her, and for that reason she claimed a whopping N20 million as damages as well as an order to compel Mr. Otto to perfect/complete all marriage arrangements earlier made by him! Mr. Otto in his Statement of Defence denied this allegation and stated that Ms. Mabamije had in an earlier suit, namely Suit No. W/61/2000 also filed at the High Court, Warri claimed the same reliefs against him. Mr. Otto further asserted that following the intervention of OAN Overseas Agency (Nig.) Ltd, a company in which he was managing director, the said suit was withdrawn by Ms. Mabamjje after that Company had fulfilled certain conditions laid down by her. The condition was that OAN Overseas Agency (Nig.) Ltd should furnish the apartment of Ms. Mabamije with some named amenities and on the basis of which she discontinued the earlier suit instituted against Mr. Otto. This was never denied. In fact, Ms. Mabamije did not file a Counter Affidavit to contravene the Affidavit Support of the Motion to dismiss her suit on the ground of estoppel. One of the defences of Mr. Otto was that Ms. Mabamije should have been estopped from further litigating on the subject matter having been satisfied on same in an earlier claim. The facts of estoppel were specifically pleaded by Mr. Otto in his Statement of Defence as well as the Affidavit support of the Motion dated the 7th of February 2001 in which he sought to dismiss the suit. The High Court dismissed the Motion holding among others that the principle of estoppel had not been established. Mr. Otto being dissatisfied with the said ruling of the High Court, Warri appealed to the Court of Appeal, Benin Division, which allowed the appeal on the ground that the Appellant herein was estopped from instituting the present suit. Aggrieved, Ms Mabamije appealed to Supreme Court which court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal and dismissed the Appellant’s appeal. As anachronistic as the claim for breach of promise to marry may seem to be in modern day reality, in the absence of any law abhorring such claims, the law still exists and should be resorted to where there is a genuine need. So ladies, the next time your fiancé chose to move on, or elope with another woman, don’t give him the hot oil treatment, for that could easily land you in jail. Sue him instead! Orumor is a Lagos based lawyer. |
According to report of a sociological research I read online few weeks ago that was conducted by a financial institution in the US, most married women prefer to have one of their kids or family members as next of kin instead of their husbands which is the expected traditional practice. A lady I know very well used my laptop to apply for her masters degree programme, her husband is sponsoring the programme but when it was time to fill her next of kin, she used her younger brother, she only used her husband as one of her refrees. Some women are badt |
Hustle harder and hustle smarter. And when I say smarter, you'll need to practice excellent and unwavering work ethics to get desired results. OlasunkanmiSM: |
Hustlers Ambition- 50 Cent Magnificent- Rick Ross Rich Town- 50 Cent I'm the man- 50 Cent Wonderful- Ja Rule... The list is endless TAMSNigeria: |
Yea, you're right. Mental Capacity Legislation in some countries considers 16 years as legal age and irrespective of what s/he might have done in the commission or omission relating to crime, s/he will be punished. Any child above 18 is totally responsible for his or her own actions. |
Shellsploit: |
Just how desperate are you to have a child? After exploring all avenues available to you medically, are you willing to seek outside help? Like natural insemination? Artificial insemination is when donor sperm is introduced into the female vagina with the hope that the patient would eventually get pregnant. This method is resorted to when the male partner’s sperm counts are too low to father a child – or they are just blanks. All over the world, a lot of women are playing God by sneakily seeking the help of a virile man to help them get the much longed-for child. These days, however, with infidelity being condoned, some men have come out to support their wives in their quest to get pregnant, to the extent of agreeing to Natural insemination (NI). One of such women recently quoted in a foreign press alleged that: “My husband knows what he wants to know. We have conceived through natural insemination and had sex with more than one donor over a few months. There is no doubt that it is emotionally charged and my husband found it difficult. Also, the sex with someone other than my husband is surprisingly enjoyable, sexy and kinky and if we are going, to be honest, it’s cheating. We accepted all that and it worked for us. I wouldn’t have done it any other way. I agreed that my husband is wonderful and I will love him and be grateful to him forever, for giving us this opportunity to have a proper family. “But natural insemination is how I wanted to make our baby. Bottles, tubes, and syringes are just not what I wanted to be involved with when I became pregnant. I don’t judge anyone. It is just not what I wanted. We’re not swingers. I could never cope with my husband doing what I did, which is what makes him even more wonderful. But our sex life is not the point here. I wanted to get pregnant and I loved doing it. The whole process was fun, sexy and memorable. I am sorry if that makes me a harlot but there are no two ways about it. I did feel more fertile when dressed up, having sex all night and feeling satisfied in the morning. We don’t have any secrets. “My husband knows what he wants to know and can ask anything. For what it is worth, he took me shopping for the underwear”. And if you are curious about how any man involved in such an emotionally volatile arrangement feels, here is a 32-year-old male’s view: “Insemination can be perfectly ok in a relationship, if both agree on it. I am a 32-year-old man. My wife is 27 and we have been married for three years. We are happy parents of a little girl who just celebrated her first birthday. My sperm count is very low and we had to use a donor. Natural insemination was the right method for us. We both think artificial insemination is much too clinical. “This meant I was going to let my wife have sex with other men. And actually, I am ok with that. Of course, I don’t like the thought of her enjoying sex with other men. But since I’m unable to do my part, I think it is my duty to step aside and be grateful that another man will help us out. And if my wife gets some pleasure out of this arrangement then I think she deserves it, considering that she is the one who has to be pregnant for nine months and give birth. We ended up using two donors and after three months, my wife became pregnant. In about a year or so we will start looking for donors for our second child and we plan to use natural insemination again. Of course, those ‘donors’ don’t know they’re being used, as far as they know, they’re just having extramarital sex! “I completely understand why some people don’t want to use (NI) but today we are the parents of an absolutely wonderful little girl and that is all that matters – My wife has been kind enough not to tell me if our donors were better lovers than me. But I know she really enjoyed having sex with them. And I am very much aware there is a potential risk here. “This has encouraged me to try to be a better husband for her. I make a much bigger effort now to pay attention to her feelings and needs than I used to. We probably want two more children so there will be much more donor sex for her in the future. But I’m not worried. We think that going through with NI has only made our relationship stronger. I am so very happy that she was willing to do this to give us a baby. And she is happy that I trusted her enough to let her conceive a baby the way she wanted.” https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/04/how-far-are-you-willing-to-go-to-get-your-wife-pregnant-2/ |
Just how desperate are you to have a child? After exploring all avenues available to you medically, are you willing to seek outside help? Like natural insemination? Artificial insemination is when donor sperm is introduced into the female vagina with the hope that the patient would eventually get pregnant. This method is resorted to when the male partner’s sperm counts are too low to father a child – or they are just blanks. All over the world, a lot of women are playing God by sneakily seeking the help of a virile man to help them get the much longed-for child. These days, however, with infidelity being condoned, some men have come out to support their wives in their quest to get pregnant, to the extent of agreeing to Natural insemination (NI). One of such women recently quoted in a foreign press alleged that: “My husband knows what he wants to know. We have conceived through natural insemination and had sex with more than one donor over a few months. There is no doubt that it is emotionally charged and my husband found it difficult. Also, the sex with someone other than my husband is surprisingly enjoyable, sexy and kinky and if we are going, to be honest, it’s cheating. We accepted all that and it worked for us. I wouldn’t have done it any other way. I agreed that my husband is wonderful and I will love him and be grateful to him forever, for giving us this opportunity to have a proper family. “But natural insemination is how I wanted to make our baby. Bottles, tubes, and syringes are just not what I wanted to be involved with when I became pregnant. I don’t judge anyone. It is just not what I wanted. We’re not swingers. I could never cope with my husband doing what I did, which is what makes him even more wonderful. But our sex life is not the point here. I wanted to get pregnant and I loved doing it. The whole process was fun, sexy and memorable. I am sorry if that makes me a harlot but there are no two ways about it. I did feel more fertile when dressed up, having sex all night and feeling satisfied in the morning. We don’t have any secrets. “My husband knows what he wants to know and can ask anything. For what it is worth, he took me shopping for the underwear”. And if you are curious about how any man involved in such an emotionally volatile arrangement feels, here is a 32-year-old male’s view: “Insemination can be perfectly ok in a relationship, if both agree on it. I am a 32-year-old man. My wife is 27 and we have been married for three years. We are happy parents of a little girl who just celebrated her first birthday. My sperm count is very low and we had to use a donor. Natural insemination was the right method for us. We both think artificial insemination is much too clinical. “This meant I was going to let my wife have sex with other men. And actually, I am ok with that. Of course, I don’t like the thought of her enjoying sex with other men. But since I’m unable to do my part, I think it is my duty to step aside and be grateful that another man will help us out. And if my wife gets some pleasure out of this arrangement then I think she deserves it, considering that she is the one who has to be pregnant for nine months and give birth. We ended up using two donors and after three months, my wife became pregnant. In about a year or so we will start looking for donors for our second child and we plan to use natural insemination again. Of course, those ‘donors’ don’t know they’re being used, as far as they know, they’re just having extramarital sex! “I completely understand why some people don’t want to use (NI) but today we are the parents of an absolutely wonderful little girl and that is all that matters – My wife has been kind enough not to tell me if our donors were better lovers than me. But I know she really enjoyed having sex with them. And I am very much aware there is a potential risk here. “This has encouraged me to try to be a better husband for her. I make a much bigger effort now to pay attention to her feelings and needs than I used to. We probably want two more children so there will be much more donor sex for her in the future. But I’m not worried. We think that going through with NI has only made our relationship stronger. I am so very happy that she was willing to do this to give us a baby. And she is happy that I trusted her enough to let her conceive a baby the way she wanted.” https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/04/how-far-are-you-willing-to-go-to-get-your-wife-pregnant-2/ |
It's not just about Netflix movies only. I noticed in the movie "Spartacus" several years ago. The western world are promoting the ideology of what exist in their society. It's a norm in their community for such relationship to exist. Morningblues: |
Shit happens everywhere and everyday. Loving the wrong woman could get you killed. I pray a better woman find herself in your arms. One more thing, KEEP YOUR EYES PEELED WHEN IT COMES TO LOVE MATTERS. YoungThug14: |
According to research, the vagina is a very “elastic” organ, says Christine O’Connor, MD, director of adolescent gynecology and well women care at Mercy Medical Center in Baltimore. It is small enough to hold a tampon in place, but can expand enough to pass a child through. This is because the walls of the vagina are similar to those of the stomach, they have rugae, meaning they fold together to collapse when unused, then expand when necessary. “It doesn’t stay one particular size,” O’Connor says. “It changes to accommodate whatever is going on at that time.” The most commonly used measurements regarding the size of vaginas come from Masters and Johnson’s work from the 1960s. They looked at 100 women who had never been pregnant and found that vagina lengths, unstimulated, range from 2.75 inches to about 3¼ inches. When a woman is aroused, it increased to 4.25 inches to 4.75 inches. Regardless of how long the vagina is, the area that is thought to be important for most women’s sexual response is the outer one-third. So how does length relate to sexual satisfaction? No one seems to know for sure. Tarnay says the main issues he sees women have is discomfort during sex. This typically occurs if the vagina is too short or tight or they have a prolapse, where the uterus, bladder , or other organs fall out of place, typically after childbirth . Op, there's no supplement/drugs that can increase the length of your V-door. Gimmeballs: |
Google Pixel Eyanbahose: |
They're both powerful, the clear distinct between them are the offices they hold in ancient times. Alaafin is the political leader of the Yorubas while Ooni is the spiritual leader of the Yorubas. moscobabs: |
Traditional Mythology Princeton92: |
MYSTERY BITCH Omicron007: |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (of 25 pages)


