₦airaland Forum

franchasng:
Only a mad man will agree to date any lady in 2019 without sex.


Guys once any girl or lady tell u no sex and u agree just for agreeing sake and let's say 2 months later she insist no sex, pls dump her!


And again any girl that tell u no sex, pls don't ever spend a dime on her. In fact whenever u want to call her, flash her or use any free call mobile app and call her for free. Don't ever spend on any girl that said no sex till marriage, let her also wait till marriage before u guys can start spending anything.

I love your honesty, in fact if I was not already happily married, I would have proposed to you. I hate pretenders and hypocrites. That's one of the reason I love and married my wife. After going out with her for close to 3 weeks without initiating sex, she took the courage and asked if there was anything wrong with her or I did not find her attractive. I told her I was taking my time (in fact I had other girlfriends then).

If a guy wants a no sex before marriage relationship, then stay within your religious circle. Even though most so called religious ladies only pretent, and find sexual fulfilment elsewhere, at least people would understand you were not at fault.

Olanre05:
I like your healing process and the way you handled it with utmost maturity. Here is my take on the issue, there are two sides to a coin, you must have given her heaven and earth, make her better off what she used to look like and the likes,and there is one thing you ain't doing right which she might have spoken to you about severally and you ain't changing. Which she is getting from the other guy aside from the materialistic and monetary aspect of it...

He his not reaching her center of gravity. He has not been able to make her have leg shaking orgasm. Maybe that's what the other guy is giving that our Christian brother can't.

Imagine Teddy A hitting bam bam's center of gravity inside toilet and on national TV, and 2 years down the line, Teddy A is walking bam bam down the aisle. Imagine the amount of banging that had gone on since big brother.

Here are lovely pictures of the wedding - https://www.nairaland.com/5548344/bambam-teddy-white-wedding-pictures

Moral of the story, no sex before marriage is no guarantee of successful marriage or even that the marriage happening at all.

Rejoice5000:
yea that's the bitter truth use omo and wash ur face before u say i do.Baby mama is not a way out.

And how many baby mama will a guy need? What happens when konji begins to deal with you and baby mamas are busy with someone else? If a guy is angry because his girlfriend is cheating, why should he then accept baby mamas that will sleep with any other person she likes.

whytepawn1:
Lols... Easy dude with the tongue lashing, I think the OP was simply in a relationship with the wrong person. The girl in question is not his type period.

Forget that thing. I started life (relationship wise) with a no sex relationship, and I seriously got burnt. This girl loved me to death. She was ready to give me all her school allowance and beg for the rest of the semester. We were like 5 and six. When friends started telling me someone else was shining her Congo, I confronted her and she vehemently denied it and cried for days. Even her room mates were very angry at me for breaking their friend's heart. I fought with all my friends, telling them that they are jealous because I had the most beautiful girl in school. It was one of my friend that then set it up that I caught her red handed. Till today, I never spoke or confronted her about it. I just cried and moved on.

So when I am talking I am talking from experience. Today I am happily married for over a decade, due to that experience. I understand women better.

Respect55:
How would I be after sex in a girl I wanted to settle down with?
Anyway, I have heard u but there is actually nothing else to explain other than than what I saw.
Funny enough, she is here, following this thread too and has commented.

What do you mean by "How would I be after sex in a girl I wanted to settle down with?" So because a man wants to settle down with a lady, he should not be after sex? You guys need to study the differences between male and female psychology. If man does not make sexual advances at a lady, she can start feeling undesirable, which can make her do stupid things to gain her confidence.
Why do you think women spend hours doing make up, doing their hairs for half a day and Wear cloths that you can hardly breath in, or shoes that is very uncomfortable and most times very painful. It all to make themselves desirable to the opposite sex. How do you think she feels after going through all these troubles and pains to gain your attention, only for you to start talking biblical preaching or APC vs PDP?

Respect55:
The only thing I can remember not doing is sex because I'm a Christian. That also couldn't actually be her problem because she hadn't raised the issue after we talked about it that there would be none. What else could she possibly want?

I had respected your demeanor and the way you handled the situation, until you wrote "The only thing I can remember not doing is sex because I'm a Christian". Bone that shit. A no sex relationship is no relationship, you are no more than a brother, and uncle or a close family member. I has slept in the same room with a very close cousin and she was half naked, nothing stood up, little John did not even notice. Let another non related girl try it and little John will salute like a private meeting a general.

It's sex that confirms if you have a physical and spiritual connection. If the connections are not there, the relationship is no more that a relationship with a close family member. Sexual compatibility is essential in a successful marriage.

She obviously has needs - emotional and sexual you are not meeting up to, and she is afraid to bring it up because of societal prejudices. Most women loved being touched, kissed, caressed and eventually sexed. It is essential to their psyche to feel wanted and irresistible.

A relationship is often more than just physical and material things.

Even pastors and G.Os preaching no sex before marriage know it's not ideal, and 99.9% of them do not observe it.

On job creation Obama still trump Trump.

Trump Is Falling Almost 1 Million Jobs Short Vs. Obama

Over 29 months Obama added almost 1 million more jobs than Trump

Trump entered office on January 20, 2017, and starting with February 2017 he has been President for 29 months. Total job growth during that time has been 5.613 million or 194,000 per month with those results being helped by the tax cut.

Working back from January 2017, Obama’s last month in office, there had been 6.423 million jobs added or 221,000 per month. The difference for the 29 months is 810,000 more jobs or 27,000 more per month than Trump.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2019/07/05/trump-is-falling-almost-1-million-jobs-short-vs-obama/amp/

But in terms of criminal allegations both before and after becoming president, Trump wins Obama hands down. Throughout Obamas 8 years, he had no, not even one criminal allegations against him, even by the Republican majority in congress. Trump on the other hand has so many criminal allegations, that it's impossible to count. He is accused of criminal allegations weekly, and accused of lying everyday, I would say every hour.

See the fall in unemployment rate over the last 10 years. The blue line represents Obama and the red line represents Trump.

Thegamingorca:
Finally you admit trump created a better american world. Trump is indeed the one chosen to redeem her glory from a tainted Obama administration

What do you mean "Trump is indeed the one chosen to redeem her glory from a tainted Obama administration"? You must be one of those racist birthers who is still angry a black man became president of the USA.

Tell me which economic indice Trump did better than Obama.
The capital markets much touted by Trump grew much more under Obama Than Trump

The S&P 500 Is at an All Time High—But Markets Still Performed Far Better Under Obama Than Trump
Below are graphs and analysis for each of the sectors. For those who want the quick answer, market growth was considerably stronger under Obama, but there is an important caveat. The financial crash that occurred immediately before Obama took office left markets reeling, so there was a lot of room for them to move. Also, the massive financial stimulus enabled by Congress helped drive growth.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/fortune.com/2019/11/01/trump-obama-markets-comparison-s-and-p-500-dow-nasdaq-economy/amp/

izzou:


Something that would be useful for research, dem dey shout "hit am for head"

That's the sorry state of our universities. And I am sure they have a department or animal science or zoological garden. I am surprised the students have not started casting and binding evil spirit or witch that transformed into the animal.
Our universities are better at teaching students spiritual matters that encouraging curiosity and research.

Why was Trump so obsessed with Ukraine announcing the investigation of Joe Biden even though there is no report of a crime by anyone? Because it can then be used a political weapon. Trump saw how effective Comey's announcement of criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton was just one week to the elections. It did not matter that Comey later recanted that there was nothing found on Clinton, the mere announcement did the damage, and Hillary Clinton admitted that the announcement did serious damage to her campaign. So Trump wanted to reenact the same thing with Joe Biden. He feels a mere announcement by the Ukrainian president of a criminal investigation of Hunter Biden and by extension Joe Biden is enough to damage his campaign. Hence the obsession with Burisma and fighting corruption in Ukraine.
Unfortunately for him, it backfired this time around.

Here is the complete story of the Burisma, Hunter Biden and Joe Biden issue.

Burisma was founded in 2002

In 2008, Obama and Biden ran and won. Hunter Biden took a job at a bank and filed to end all lobbying, to avoid conflicts.

In 2012, Viktor Shokin conducted an investigation of Burisma, for conduct between 2010 and 2012. Specifically, the Ministry of Ecology granting special permits. It ended with a fine paid to a Ukrainian lawmaker. In other words, the investigation was conducted and concluded, and seems kind of corrupt.

In 2013, Ukraine had a political revolution, followed by Russia invading Crimea in 2014.

2 years after the investigation concluded, Hunter Biden joined Burisma as a private citizen in 2014. Of course, it was questioned at the time as a potential conflict, but, nothing untoward was found. Do note: November 2014 elections gave Republicans control of House and Senate, including the committees that overlook things like this. They chose not to investigate or pursue.

In Feb 2015, Shokin is promoted to Prosecutor General of Ukraine, and gets more corrupt. The Anti-Corruption Action Center was exposing his corruption, so he had them raided... Stories of his prosecutors accepting bribes came out, and then he began firing anyone that investigated it.

Worldwide calls for his removal began. IMF, EU, EBRD, and of course, the Obama admin.

Feb 2016, his deputy resigned in protest, denouncing the corruption and lawlessness of the office.

The next day, Shokin submitted his resignation. Then, came back, and investigated the Anti-Corruption Action Center AGAIN. Protests occured, and he was officially dismissed by parliamentary votes.

In other words, for the entire time Biden was at Burisma, Shokin wasn't investigating them, and Biden was calling for an investigator that actually would investigate corruption.

This is the complete opposite of what the GOP claims, because they're spreading literal conspiracy theories.

Queentee214:
You bunch of hypocrites calling me names and saying all sorts of rubbish... Most of u are worst ....I wonder why Nigerians pretend a lot.....
Should I have lied and said no, I don't have feelings for my ex anymore...
People get insulted for speaking out about their feelings .....most of you are just pretenders...

I only asked for advice about how to move on from someone have spent years with cuz its not easy starting all over again with someone else

If u can't read and understand what the thread is about then Bleep off and stop speaking trash...

Hypocrites

Why are you getting so revved up? People are not telling you what you want to hear abi? Ok, I advice you to go back to your ex. Hope you are happy now.
You asked for advice and you are getting angry at people that gives you advice you don't like and went on counterattack.

You say it's not easy starting all over again with someone else, so you must stay with someone even if it's a toxic relationship. Couple that have married for decades still divorce and still move on. I had an aunt that has 4 children (boys) with here boyfriend and live in lover of over 15 years. As the guy refused to pay her dowery, she left him to marry another guy (although 2nd wife to a rich alhaji ). The alhaji brought dowery to our house and we collected. Later after a year, the ex boyfriend came crying to the family, saying we did him wrong.

So as you said its not easy starting all over again with someone else, jejely pack your load and go back to him and stick with him no matter the abuse.

Thegamingorca:
Sit back and watch

Sit down and watch what? You guys are worse than ISIS. You have lost all sense of reasoning. It just worship Trump like the way ISIS members worship al baghdadi.

Joe Biden cannot be impeached by congress. Yes he can be indicted or found culpable of a crime (but that means nothing ), it is only the FBI and the justice department that can prosecute him, and only a competent court that can convict him. Even if Trump is impeached and removed, it is still only a court that can convict him of any crime.

The Republicans house and senate carried out investigations of alleged Hillary Clinton's crimes for over 2 years and came out empty.

I still don't get how an alleged crime (only in the mind of Gulianni, Trump and his supporters can exonerate Trump from blackmail of Ukrainian president. If Trump actually wants to investigate alleged corruption by Hunter and Joe Biden, Rudy Gulianni is not the person to do it, it's is in the purview of FBI and the justice department to investigate crimes perpetuated by Americans. They will use official and legal channels, not rogue and illegal channels (including blackmailing another country’s president) as employed by Gulianni.

TheShopKeeper:
...Lindsey Graham letter to Secretary Mike Pompeo requesting for documents to VP Biden, Hunter Biden and other Obama administration officials linked to Ukraine...

...Most people will find this letter interesting because the Republicans have known about Hunter Biden's Directorship at Burisma since 2014...but didn't make it a big issue then...They would have however used this against Joe Biden in 2016 if he had declared his intention for the presidency...that didn't happen...the unfortunate victim was Hillary Clinton whom the Republicans grilled over a period of time about her knowledge Benghazi attack in Libya...also issues about Hillary using a private server to send sensitive emails...were used against her...

...Now that Joe Biden is considered a a viable opponent to Trump...the Republicans are looking for ways to trash his electable credentials...(not that Biden is everybody's choice)...

Ayam not understanding the Republicans again. Do they want to impeach Hunter or Joe Biden? What concerns and alleged wrong wrong doing of Hunter Biden in 2014, with allegations that Trump's tried to blackmail a new Ukrainian president to announce a criminal investigation on Hunter Biden, and then tie it somehow to Joe Biden.
What exactly is the alleged crime of Hunter Biden, that he sat on the board of a company that was alleged to be corrupt? Was he the one that carried out the corrupt act?

Then what is the crime of Joe Biden? That he called for the firing of a prosecutor because he was accused of shielding corrupt officials by UK and the EU? If Joe Biden had carried out a rogue operation like the one trump did, don't you think many officers in the state department and the whole Ukraine diplomatic corps would have cried foul.

What i don't understand about the accusations is that, was it Burisma that is accused of crime, the owner, Hunter Biden or all the board members of Burisma that is accused by the Republicans.

According to Republicans, Burisma is the only and most corrupt company in Ukraine and Ukraine is the only and most corrupt country in the whole world. Russia, India, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and even Nigeria is corrupt free. Trump and Republicans are only interested in Ukraine

Thegamingorca:
Ag4ee the democrats were too eager. The whistleblower was a dumbass.


If Giuliani carried the will of the president and didn't communicate that to sondland and crew and still couldn't communicate that to the ukrañians then it didn't happen as no evidence can materialize that fact.

We at not in the minds of trump or guiliani to say what dey meant to discuss or tie the aids with. This is what the gops are saying. There are no facts to point fingers at trump that a crime was committed or was in the process of being committed. No evidence mentioning Biden whatsoever. That's why this fart is a witchhunt

So also giving credence to the fact that the hearing is a hoax. Had it been that Giuliani conveyed the message(which we think trump may have told him) then we may have to consider the impeachment hearing.

If you have been following Gulianni's interviews, all his focus was the investigation of Burisma Biden's and Ukrainian interference in the 2016 elections in support of Hillary. Trump told everyone involved with Ukraine to talk to Gulianni in relation to his dealings with Ukraine.

Sondland also said Gulianni made it clear to them (the 3 amigos) that everything (white house visit and the release of aids) is dependent on the investigations. Infact sondland and his colleagues wrote out a draft of the speech promising the investigations into Burisma Bidens and election interference with Zelensky's staff. Sondland also told Zelensky to look Trump in the eye and assured him he will announce the investigations when the meet in Warsaw (Trump never made it to Warsaw)

All the diplomats involved with Ukraine knew aids were tied to announcement of investigations, all the staff of the state department knew that aids were tied to announcement of investigations. The only people that could not and can never see that aids were tied to announcement of investigations are Trump's worshippers and the Republicans.
Same thing with Russian interference in the 2016 elections, all the 17 intelligence organisations, all the diplomats involved with Russian and Ukraine, all the state department officers, all agreed it was Russia that interfered with the 2016 elections. But somehow Trump was able to get his worshippers to believe it was Ukraine.

TruthinAction:
Only people with flat head believes that the earth is flat. Secondly, they are jobless. The sun is spherical, the moon is spherical, other planets view with telescopes are all spherical. Ariel pictures taken from the outer space shows the earth is spherical. But flat head people believes otherwise. I think they just want to keep themselves busy.

They are religious cracking heads, who feels they have to defend a book written by bronze age men with their lives and sanity.

Their arguments are asinine, and very stupid. Read their Facebook page to see the extent of their insanity.
https://free.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2047271225351753&id=265383883540505&_rdc=1&_rdr

https://free.facebook.com/FlatEarthToday/?refid=52&_ft_=mf_story_key.2047271225351753%3Atop_level_post_id.2047271225351753%3Atl_objid.2047271225351753%3Acontent_owner_id_new.265383883540505%3Athrowback_story_fbid.2047271225351753%3Apage_id.265383883540505%3Astory_location.9%3Astory_attachment_style.share%3Apage_insights.%7B%22265383883540505%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A265383883540505%2C%22actor_id%22%3A265383883540505%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A1%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A0%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A266%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1545591152%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B2047271225351753%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A9%2C%22targets%22%3A%5B%7B%22actor_id%22%3A265383883540505%2C%22page_id%22%3A265383883540505%2C%22post_id%22%3A2047271225351753%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22share_id%22%3A0%7D%5D%7D%2C%22199098633470668%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A199098633470668%2C%22actor_id%22%3A265383883540505%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A0%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A0%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntStatusCreationStory%22%2C%22role%22%3A16%2C%22sl%22%3A9%7D%7D&__tn__=C-R

Thegamingorca:
This is a testimony from sondland he has completely exonerated himself from the issue by saying his side of the story. He called trump after the whistleblower released smoke and trump told him exactly what he said today.
This isn't about what trump might have been trying to cover up presumably from the whistleblower complaint rather its about what trump said.

Not once in previous calls with trump did he tie aids to the investigations
Or tie the Biden's into the aids. For over 5months lol

It is very obvious Trump knew he is about to be caught and the house has opened investigations as a result of the whistleblower.
Sondland never asked about a quid pro quo. Sondland asked what do you want from Ukraine, and Trump said "I want nothing! I want no quid pro quo! I just want Zelensky to do the right thing, to do what he ran on"
First Trump answers were off, Sondland never mentioned quid pro quo. He simply wanted instructions from Trump. Secondly, he contradicted himself in the same sentence. He said I want nothing, then immediately said I want him to do what he ran on. That itself is a want. Zelensky obviously ran on hundreds of promises as politicians do. It's the Ukrainian that should demand Zelensky do what he ran on and not Trump.
Finally, Trump had only two calls with Zelensky, the first one was a congratulatory call immediately after he won the elections, and the second one was when he asked for a favour.

Trump did tie the investigations of Burisma Biden to the aids, not directly, but through Rudy Gulianni. When he tells Zelensky to talk to Gulianni, it means Gulianni will tell you my demands.

What of men that wear wrapper, or men that wear skirts the call kilt? Will they enter heaven?

Nickisindigo:
baba it's her own personal image me sef shock when I heard, so I can't use my own picture because it was taken by somebody else

It's more complex than that. It depends on the agreements and relationship between the photographer and Kim kardashian. Any other photographer without permission from Kim cannot take a photo of Kim and claim to own the rights.

I had a neighbour who had a very beautiful daughter. The daughter was used for banner adverts that was pasted all over Ikorodu, without the permission of the parents. The mother stormed the school threatening to sue. Omo after consulting the school lawyer, see begging. Eventually, the school agreed to waive the next session's school fees as compensation.

It seems most Nigerians don't know their rights.

Nickisindigo:
in the US she can't win this case

If it was in the US that your pictures was used for advertising or campaign without your permission, you will be millionaire.

brainworkng:
If your picture is not on copyright. Then you don't have a case.

False. You image is your copyright. No one can use it without your permission, else corporate sponsors would not be paying BBNAIJA contestants millions just to use their posters and pictures.

maryjames9:
Why she no start from 45 billion? Common 45 million. Chai. That is an insult to Saraki and Atiku.

helinues:
Shishi she no go see collect.

Pdp that are still nursing their injuries

In a sane country you cannot use the image of a person without their express permission. That's an infringement on their rights and sometimes a crime.

In Nigeria we have a big man syndrome, that allows the elite to exploit the poor, with fellow poor and helpless masses cheering on.

Anduku:
Vindman basically admitted he’s the source for the whistle-blower. He says he told someone in the intel community about the call. Schiff interjects and claims he’ll reveal the whistleblower.

Nunes: Did you discuss the July 25 call or July 26 call with anyone outside the White House?

Vindman: George Kent, and someone in the intelligence community I'm not going to name.

Schiff interrupts to "protect the whistleblower."

Recall that Vindman testified under oath last month that he didn't know who the whistleblower is. Vindman lied last month!! This dude committed a crime

With the hundreds of crimes commited by Trump including lying to Muller, it is this one you can latch on. Trump's hold on you guys is uncanny, it's magical or even jujucal. Anyone that says anything against trump or that he does not like is attacked.

For your information, whistleblowers are protected by law. So he is legally not allowed to supply the name of the whistleblower, assuming he even admits he knows the whistleblower.

EMILO2STAY:
and your too blind to see I was talking about the both. Both theories are dealing with motion. It is you who is ignorant after studying all your so called physics text books and yet can't identify relativity when you see one.

Let me state it again, Einstein theory of relativity provides that motion is relative to the observer( general relativity) I. e from the perspective of the sun, the earth is moving and from the perspective of the earth the sun is moving. Also it provides that when one is falling it can be said that the person is not falling but the ground is rising to meet with a person when he jumps. from this theory how can one establish which is which?. What are the experiments conducted to prove gravity or relativity? If not mathematics, how does mathematics prove relativity or gravity?

If this is what a person upholding as proof for gravity then that person is only insulting his mentality.

Einstein never conducted any experiment to prove his theories, all were based on convulated mathematical models. He was a fraud who plagiarized the works of other scientist. Poincare was the one who first espoused that e=mc2 not Einstein. So as you can see I can very well educate you in this field. And pls don't shy away from the other questions as I see your doing so.

Face palm. I am ashamed on your behalf. What you stated above is newtonian mechanics, more like the third law of motion, which states action and reaction are always equal and opposite. It nothing to do at all with Einstein's laws of relativity.

I have never heard such rubbish as this in my whole life; " Einstein theory of relativity provides that motion is relative to the observer". The very basis of special relativity is that the speed of light within a vacuum is the same no matter the speed of the observer.

I am tired of discussing stupid jibberish. It's like arguing with a 6 year old child.
Signing off.

Anduku:
Williams says that no mention of withholding aid was made by Pence on his meeting with Zelensky.

Williams also says that Pence assured Zelensky that they supported him and that their concerns revolved around getting other EU countries to contribute more.

Both Vindman and Williams both admitted they have no knowledge of why aid was held, nor why it was later released.9


Vindman says he cannot remember any Ukrainian official ever mentioning any pressure to do any investigations

Cult worshipper, this impeachment is not about pence, it is about Trump. No one is accusing pence of witholding aid to investigate his political opponents or colluding with Trump.

Vindman and Williams are called only to testify on what they know and not to give their opinion. Even if they offer their opinion, it will be irrelevant. It is only the opinion of the house members that matter for now.

Anduku:
Just Watching a Democrats and media conspiracy theory get totally destroyed by two of Adam Schiff's own witnesses.

Jennifer Williams says the call transcript is "substantively correct," and Alexander Vindman said it is "very accurate."

All those conspiracy theories about the implicating details not being included in the transcript and it being put on a secure server to avoid leaks is bullocks!

Trump worshipper, the whole impeachment inquiry is not about the call. It's about Trump's blackmail and quid pro quo of President Zelensky to investigate (look for dirt) on the Joe Biden. It is alleged to have been happening before and after the call.
Many concerned public officers had reported the irregularities to white house council, even before the whistleblower came out with his allegations.

EMILO2STAY:
there is no single experiment that has proven relativity. why will newtons definition be over taken by Einsteins definition if newtons definition of gravity was true. This is a clear indicator that all this gravity stuff was just made up in their heads. If what newton stated was a fact then their is no way it will be over taken by Einstien's, You lack common sense and uphold theories as fact.

Einsteins theory of relativity provides that motion is relative. I. e from the perspective of the earth the sun is moving but from the perspective of the sun the earth is moving. So you can see that with this theory there is no way to establish which is actually moving.
And let me educate you the theory of relativity was proven wrong by George sagnac and Einstein was exposed as a fraud.
So the theory of relativity you hold unto is nothing but a fraudulent hocus pocus with no proof and an insult to any body with a brain in their heads

More display of ignorance.
Einstein propounded 2 theories of relativity. Law of special relativity was the first which dealt with the speed of light and eventually lead to the famous equation E=MC²

The second theory was the law of General relativity. This dealt with Gravity and its relation to other forces of nature.

Educate me on the laws of relativity when you have absolutely no idea of what they entail. Did you even do physics in your Senior secondary school? because the way you yap nonsense, it seems you have never opened a physics textbook in your life.

OpenYourEyes1:
I do not doubt this. Wish I could do the experiment myself or probably be in that chamber in a pressure suit or something.

That's the laziness of ignorant but arrogant religionists. They don't perform any experiment, but wait for scientists to spend billions to prove their theories, and then look for the stupidest excuse to disregard the whole experiment.

What's so difficult for flat earthers to build a vacuum chamber, and then throw down a lead ball and a feather together and prove that the lead ball will fall faster than the feather.

He is here making the absurd collusion that because this experiment was shown in slow motion, therefore it is wrong. This is a fall of a few seconds. If the fall was shown in real time, he would still say, he could not see it because it is too fast, and then demand it should be shown in slow motion.

This dropping of objects in a vacuum had been done many of times, and the results had always been the same.

See this experiment of trying to fly a drone in a vacuum. The drone cannot fly in a vacuum because air is needed by the propellers to oppose gravity. Same thing like air is needed by the falling feathers to oppose gravity and therefore fall slowly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8-pxkaipcg

EMILO2STAY:
you who have an idea of what your talking about, pls can you show us an experiment demonstrating the gravitational pull of massive objects producing bigger dents so as to make less massive object get attracted to the more massive objects.
So newtons idea of gravity is to be discarded, it now wirinets idea of gravity.

You are so ignorant, and yet don't acknowledge it. I really feel sorry for you guys. You live in a cocoon of ignorance.
Newtons definition of gravity had been overtaken by Einstein definition in his law of general relativity over 100 years ago, and you are not even aware.

Einstein explained exactly what gravity is in his law of general relativity and numerous observations and experiments since then had proved him right.

kkins25:
gravity as a force does not exist. gravity is not a force.

Yes in the strictest sense, gravity is not exactly a force pulling on objects. It's a dent in the space-time continuum. The more massive objects produces bigger dents, making less massive objects move or roll towards the more massive ones.
People are still stuck to newton's idea of gravity being a force between to objects.

OpenYourEyes1:
Nice video.

My observation:

The gentleman in the video said this at the end of the video: "so he concluded, they weren't"

I guess he meant that the feather & ball didn't really fall.
I think that kind of contradicts the whole idea of "object falling in dent" theory of gravity. He's probably assuming that the falling objects are floating in the fabric of space/vacuum.

All the video showed is that gravity is independent of mass, assuming all other factors constant. All objects on earth fall at the rate of 9.81m/s irrespective of size or mass.

It's the air resistance that oppose gravity that made the feathers fall shower outside a vacuum.

OpenYourEyes1:
What do you think is responsible for objects of different mass falling at thesame time in a real vacuum? Eg feather and stone in a vacuum... What do think?

You made good points with your previous arguments. I learned alot from them

Good points, where? Please show me the good points. He have absolutely no idea of what he is talking about.