₦airaland Forum

gsalvatore: We shall see..

You can buy all the aircraft man can make but if the moles in the Army/Govt/sympathizers are not taken out then the whole thing is a fiasco.

I pray am wrong ...am hardly wrong anyway.

chynedoo says:
September 3, 2014 at 8:55 pm
And behold ‘Ye shall pray for mercy and none will be given. For on that day, the god of the terrorists was but nowhere to be seen, for they cut themselves, and tore their clothes, and fired their rust RPGs, their AA guns and shouted the name of their god. But no one answered. And the god of the sky hovered above them, its rotors whined with vengeance, its canons spoke no word but fire issued forth from his sides and burned the people of Boko for their prayer was Haram to the sound of his wrath. And he spoke to them from the belly of the sky, his wings decked in the livery of NAF.
As they ran and cried for mercy, he pursued them to their holes, in their camps, he smote them, he cut them down one after the other until there was none left to pray to the god of IEDs.
These prophecies were written in the scroll of NAF

Lordfej says:
September 3, 2014 at 8:34 pm
To be honest I really hope shekau and his goons have prepared to meet their virgins because the Airforce has decided to buy them a first class one way no return ticket

raumdeuter: Close your XBOX and go to sleep.

ayex2013: 5. Smart Watches

The new rave of the moment, everyone wants a Moto 360 or a pebble that will set you back 700-800 dollars, Money that can buy land. And all the watch will do is notify you when your phone is ringing and tell you time and weather. Alright guys, I understand the foolishness. Well done! OBO!

Source: http://www.ngtrends.com/2014/08/5-gadgets-hype-overpriced/

UrbanMystique: is god perfect? if yes, how can a perfect creature creates imperfect things? if no, what the heck is this post all about?

is science a deity? science is just the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.. anyone can venture in to science.. sheesh pick a book.


that's the beauty of science, if you donot accept big bang, you can come up with better theory after much observation and experimentation, no one is gonna roast you in hell for that.


yeah right, define religion?

man aging and dying is just a natural process to keep the world from exploding due to high population. do you need god to tell you that?


right. those that get sick dont believe in god right? how come casting doesn't work on ebola or amputees?

BTW, the bolder part has got to be the stupidest thing have ever read on nairaland, you really think science only deals with chemicals or what not? go up and read the definition of science again. sheesh i cant believe an educated person will say such a thing..
by the way, if you need your brain to cook up herbs (which is science by the way) and not cast the sickness away, why or what the heck do you need god for?


jesus healed after he accepted the zmapp, why can he just cast ebola away in jesus name? atleast jesus never healed anyone with herbs.


what exactly is this? infact you will soon come and ask me science why you poop everyday


it means the plane is yet to crash... do i have to spell everything out for you like am talking to an elementary school student?

yeah, good to know that you accept its stupi.d

slap1: OP modify that post of yours and put a disclaimer. Then call the editor of the mag and report the issue. If s/he says what you don't want to hear, SUE FOR INTELLECTUAL THEFT!

lalasticlala: d pics where from goggle.

anyway I don't know how to reach them

Ebola Cure May Have Already Been Discovered - So Why Are People Still Dying?

The cure for Ebola may have already have been developed by drugs companies, but ethical dilemmas and financial concerns are holding back hopes of a faster cure, scientists have warned.

The worst ever epidemic of the virus, which has swept West Africa, has killed more than 670 people, sparking fears Ebola could move to the UK.

Two people have now been assessed for the virus in Britain, while two American health workers - a doctor and a missionary - have been hospitalised in Liberia after contracting the disease, prompting missionary groups to evacuate non-essential personnel.

But panic grows. Jeremy Farrar, professor of Tropical medicine at the University of Oxford and director of the Wellcome Trust, claimed the mounting death toll was "unacceptable".

"It would be unethical not to acknowledge that potential new treatments could both save lives and reduce transmission in this and future outbreaks," he told the Washington Post.

"We have more than 450 deaths [now it is over 600] so far, and not a single individual has been offered anything beyond tepid sponging and 'we'll bury you nicely'," Farrar told a separate Reuters interviewer. "It's just unacceptable."

Professor Farrar is not alone in questioning whether the West is doing enough to cure a virus that has, so far, only killed people in Africa.

"Farrar is one million per cent right," said Dr Peter Walsh, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cambridge, who has studied the spread of Ebola. "There's absolutely no ethical question involved here. The question is financial and political. To license the drugs that are currently being developed will take years and years. The problem is there is no commercial market in Africa. If this was Western Europe, or North America, we would have a vaccine," he told HuffPost UK.

"There's no monetary incentive for big pharma to put a lot of resources into it. Rest assured, it would have been done if this was happening in England or the US. We would be banging down doors to get to it and get it out to people."

Walsh pointed to the story of a German researcher who accidentally pricked herself with a needle containing Ebola, who was given a vaccine developed in the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg.

"She had it in her within 48 hours. We don't know, actually, if she ever did contract the disease in the first place but she never developed symptoms. But it shows how they were willing to try the vaccine, and could get it to her quickly," he said.

David Heymann, a professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who has studied Ebola since 1976, vehemently disagrees. "There are survivors of Ebola," he told Bloomberg. "Is it ethical to provide a drug when you could be causing a risk to those patients who would survive?

"It would be unethical to roll it out now, in my opinion," said Heymann, a former assistant director general at the WHO.

Dr Heinz Feldmann, an Ebola expert at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases' Laboratories in Montana, told the Canadian Press that he was being bombarded with emails asking why scientists were not pushing out any drug they could. But one colleague had persuaded him it would be a bad idea. "He said 'Anything injectable would be a disaster.'" Feldmann claimed. "He thinks the rumour that we're just spreading the disease is going to be out there before we even start. I think as bad as it sounds — and I really don't feel good about saying this — I have the feeling they have to find a way to end this one without [experimental] therapy."

Ebola is one of the world's deadliest diseases, with up to 90% of cases resulting in death. It is passed to humans through direct contact with the blood, organs or other bodily fluids of victims, meaning doctors and nurses are most at risk. Patients are often overcome by a sudden onset of fever as well as weakness, muscle pain and headaches. Vomiting, diarrhoea, rashes, kidney and liver problems follow. No vaccine or cure is currently available, but several are in development.

One of the US companies named in an informative Forbes piece on Ebola cures is BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, a small North Carolina operation, which is developing a drug called BCX4430 that has proven effective in preventing the death of monkeys were infected with a virus closely related to Ebola.

Why Are There No Drugs for Ebola Virus?
The tests took place with some funding from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at a US Army Medical Research Institute, the report into the drug published in Nature, found. All six monkeys infected with the closely-related Marburg virus, which were given the drug one to 24 hours later, were alive 30 days later. All six monkeys who were not given the drug were dead.

"Much of the only real funding now, which is mainly coming from the US department of Defence, is for bio- terror research - it had been thought that it might be used as a biochemical weapon against Americans," Walsh said.

Dr William Sheridan, BioCryst's medical director, told NPR that testing such a drug "just wouldn't make the cut at a major [pharma] company," because the disease has not yet killed a huge number of people, objectively. But he said the company wanted to develop a drug because of the mounting public health concern, and because "there is a market, and the market is the US government."

Rob Bennett, BioCryst’s vice president of investor relations and operations, told Forbes he had had a lot of interest in the drug but it had never been tested on humans. “We don’t see a path to dose patients without at least some fundamental safety data. There would be some ethical issues around that, so it’s a catch-22,” he said.

Paul Hunter, professor of Health Protection at the University of East Anglia, disagrees that there is any ethical dilemma. "As a practicing clinician, if I was given the option to help people with a drug that isn't proven, but has been shown to have at least some effect, it's unethical not to give it to them," he told HuffPost UK.

"In the midst of such a huge epidemic, one could even argue that doing a blind controlled trial would be unethical, because if you give a placebo to some people, who will most likely die, then you are depriving them of a drug that could cure them, something that could save their life.

"It can take months, years for a drug to get approval. By the time it is licensed, maybe everybody will already be dead."

The Canadian Tekmira Pharmaceuticals is also developing a drug to treat Ebola, but the trials were placed on hold earlier this month by the Food and Drug Administration, which requested additional information to ensure the drug is safe at higher doses, according to a Bloomberg report. Additional animal trials are now being conducted until at least 2015.

Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc, a San Diego company, is another company developing an antibody cocktail similar to the one tested by Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory, according to Bloomberg.

If most scientists agree that trialling even the most experimental drugs would not be unethical, why isn't it happening? Hunter claims it could be lack of supply: "There just aren't enough drugs that exist on the planet to start trying them out. It takes time to scale up what you are producing," he said.

"There also could be many issues around importing the drugs, African countries have been burned before, they've had pharma companies trying to offload totally unsuitable, banned drugs to developing nations."

Ebola Cure May Have Already Been Discovered - So Why Are People Still Dying?

The cure for Ebola may have already have been developed by drugs companies, but ethical dilemmas and financial concerns are holding back hopes of a faster cure, scientists have warned.

The worst ever epidemic of the virus, which has swept West Africa, has killed more than 670 people, sparking fears Ebola could move to the UK.

Two people have now been assessed for the virus in Britain, while two American health workers - a doctor and a missionary - have been hospitalised in Liberia after contracting the disease, prompting missionary groups to evacuate non-essential personnel.

But panic grows. Jeremy Farrar, professor of Tropical medicine at the University of Oxford and director of the Wellcome Trust, claimed the mounting death toll was "unacceptable".

"It would be unethical not to acknowledge that potential new treatments could both save lives and reduce transmission in this and future outbreaks," he told the Washington Post.

"We have more than 450 deaths [now it is over 600] so far, and not a single individual has been offered anything beyond tepid sponging and 'we'll bury you nicely'," Farrar told a separate Reuters interviewer. "It's just unacceptable."

Professor Farrar is not alone in questioning whether the West is doing enough to cure a virus that has, so far, only killed people in Africa.

"Farrar is one million per cent right," said Dr Peter Walsh, a biological anthropologist at the University of Cambridge, who has studied the spread of Ebola. "There's absolutely no ethical question involved here. The question is financial and political. To license the drugs that are currently being developed will take years and years. The problem is there is no commercial market in Africa. If this was Western Europe, or North America, we would have a vaccine," he told HuffPost UK.

"There's no monetary incentive for big pharma to put a lot of resources into it. Rest assured, it would have been done if this was happening in England or the US. We would be banging down doors to get to it and get it out to people."

Walsh pointed to the story of a German researcher who accidentally pricked herself with a needle containing Ebola, who was given a vaccine developed in the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg.

"She had it in her within 48 hours. We don't know, actually, if she ever did contract the disease in the first place but she never developed symptoms. But it shows how they were willing to try the vaccine, and could get it to her quickly," he said.

David Heymann, a professor at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who has studied Ebola since 1976, vehemently disagrees. "There are survivors of Ebola," he told Bloomberg. "Is it ethical to provide a drug when you could be causing a risk to those patients who would survive?

"It would be unethical to roll it out now, in my opinion," said Heymann, a former assistant director general at the WHO.

Dr Heinz Feldmann, an Ebola expert at the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases' Laboratories in Montana, told the Canadian Press that he was being bombarded with emails asking why scientists were not pushing out any drug they could. But one colleague had persuaded him it would be a bad idea. "He said 'Anything injectable would be a disaster.'" Feldmann claimed. "He thinks the rumour that we're just spreading the disease is going to be out there before we even start. I think as bad as it sounds — and I really don't feel good about saying this — I have the feeling they have to find a way to end this one without [experimental] therapy."

Ebola is one of the world's deadliest diseases, with up to 90% of cases resulting in death. It is passed to humans through direct contact with the blood, organs or other bodily fluids of victims, meaning doctors and nurses are most at risk. Patients are often overcome by a sudden onset of fever as well as weakness, muscle pain and headaches. Vomiting, diarrhoea, rashes, kidney and liver problems follow. No vaccine or cure is currently available, but several are in development.

One of the US companies named in an informative Forbes piece on Ebola cures is BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, a small North Carolina operation, which is developing a drug called BCX4430 that has proven effective in preventing the death of monkeys were infected with a virus closely related to Ebola.

Why Are There No Drugs for Ebola Virus?
The tests took place with some funding from National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at a US Army Medical Research Institute, the report into the drug published in Nature, found. All six monkeys infected with the closely-related Marburg virus, which were given the drug one to 24 hours later, were alive 30 days later. All six monkeys who were not given the drug were dead.

"Much of the only real funding now, which is mainly coming from the US department of Defence, is for bio- terror research - it had been thought that it might be used as a biochemical weapon against Americans," Walsh said.

Dr William Sheridan, BioCryst's medical director, told NPR that testing such a drug "just wouldn't make the cut at a major [pharma] company," because the disease has not yet killed a huge number of people, objectively. But he said the company wanted to develop a drug because of the mounting public health concern, and because "there is a market, and the market is the US government."

Rob Bennett, BioCryst’s vice president of investor relations and operations, told Forbes he had had a lot of interest in the drug but it had never been tested on humans. “We don’t see a path to dose patients without at least some fundamental safety data. There would be some ethical issues around that, so it’s a catch-22,” he said.

Paul Hunter, professor of Health Protection at the University of East Anglia, disagrees that there is any ethical dilemma. "As a practicing clinician, if I was given the option to help people with a drug that isn't proven, but has been shown to have at least some effect, it's unethical not to give it to them," he told HuffPost UK.

"In the midst of such a huge epidemic, one could even argue that doing a blind controlled trial would be unethical, because if you give a placebo to some people, who will most likely die, then you are depriving them of a drug that could cure them, something that could save their life.

"It can take months, years for a drug to get approval. By the time it is licensed, maybe everybody will already be dead."

The Canadian Tekmira Pharmaceuticals is also developing a drug to treat Ebola, but the trials were placed on hold earlier this month by the Food and Drug Administration, which requested additional information to ensure the drug is safe at higher doses, according to a Bloomberg report. Additional animal trials are now being conducted until at least 2015.

Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc, a San Diego company, is another company developing an antibody cocktail similar to the one tested by Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory, according to Bloomberg.

If most scientists agree that trialling even the most experimental drugs would not be unethical, why isn't it happening? Hunter claims it could be lack of supply: "There just aren't enough drugs that exist on the planet to start trying them out. It takes time to scale up what you are producing," he said.

"There also could be many issues around importing the drugs, African countries have been burned before, they've had pharma companies trying to offload totally unsuitable, banned drugs to developing nations."

eddiebruk: Abi na because of the MOON wey he hurry announce say them say, say the truth and be free, bunch of confusionist

colossus2: Garri is a local name.
Cassava Flakes is its english name

ichidodo: [color=#1980BC] A copy cat technology culled from the US Patriot Missile System...Isrealis aren't that smart..... [/color]

asala1: pls what site are u streaming from

bigtt76: Pls wat app you using to stream?

mascot87: #Team flavour Ada ADA

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20121006155033AAJl2I7
How to track hackers | eHow.co.uk
... Type the following command into the DOS prompt (without quotation marks): "netstat --a." This will open a routine known as Netstat, which will quickly identify all connections into and out of your computer.
http://www.ehow.co.uk/how_4621489_track-hackers.html

How do the police track computors? - Yahoo! Answers
... 2.Type the following command into the DOS prompt (without quotation marks): "netstat --a." This will open a routine known as Netstat, which will quickly identify all connections into and out of your computer.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091204131910AAkweGH

How to Track Hackers | eHow.com
... Type the following command into the DOS prompt (without quotation marks): "netstat --a." This will open a routine known as Netstat, which will quickly identify all connections into and out of your computer.
http://www.ehow.com/how_4621489_track-hackers.html


wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_red_herring_in_english


wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_the_idiom_'red-herring_'_mean

4everGod1: [b]See small boy mikey so you have woken up. Is it google that is now your friend? hahahaha see liar claiming SEO. FYI you missed one you got the wrong guy on ng.linkedin.com. I hope when and if you locate my pics you can self-service off to them in peace. The phone numbers you pasted up there are all over NL as i advertise a lot in the property forum so you no be wiz there. Even my 6yr old kid dey search google and locate me anytime he wants.

Ima Mike you know say you small but here is the fun part, i have been adviced not to let you in on what i want to do but just to go ahead and do it and guess what, that is wise council. I am done with my Honeypot and just running some tests right now. I know you have no clue what a Honeypot is or what its capable of but let me help you, its like the nuclear bomb of the WWW.

I will give you an expo on how i will get you cold and i will do this because you are not a hacker or even close to being one and i know you cannot stop me.


FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW HOW I WILL GET FXSERVANT2012, I WILL GIVE YOU A VERY SIMPLE APPROACH TO IT. NOTE THIS IS NOT THE ONLY WAY BUT FX IS TOO SIMPLE TO GET SO I WILL USE THE SIMPLEST METHOD. FEEL FREE TO ASK ME ANY QUESTION YOU LIKE FX IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW YOU WOULD BE CAUGHT AND EXPOSED.


I will type the following command into the DOS prompt (without quotation marks): "netstat --a." This will open a routine known as Netstat, which will quickly identify all connections into and out of my computer. Typing "netstat --a" will produce a string of information that identifies my IP address, the port my computer is using for the connection, the "foreign address" of the machine I are connected to, the port that machine is using, and also the status of the connection.


I then Identify what other Netstat commands are available to me by typing "netstat ?", without the question marks. This should show me what commands are available in my version of Netstat. Typical commands include --a, -e, -n, -p proto, -r and --s. I could also combine multiple commands at once.


I will then Combine two commands to refine my search. First, i will use the command that identifies all connections and listening ports, which is usually "-a." Second, find the command that lists the information in numerical form, which is usually "-n." Type the command into the DOS prompt as "netstat --an." Note that you may need to change the "a" or "n" to something else, if they are identified differently in your version of Netstat.


I would then Search for additional Internet activity. I should only have one connection, using one port. If a hacker has gained access to my system, an additional port will be in use. Running the command from the previous step will allow me to see what IP address the hacker is using, the hacker's hostname and the port number he is connecting through. It is possible to shut down the port and block the IP address, but for the moment, let's trace down who is gaining access to the computer and track what they are doing.


Run a trace route on the information I have obtained about the hacker. This affords me an idea of where the individual is located and what ISP he is using to connect to the Internet. Run the trace route by returning to the DOS prompt and typing "tracert ip address/hostname." Remove the quotation marks and replace "ip address" and "hostname" with the relevant information that was gathered in the previous step. Trace route will then trace the path of the connection, including any servers the connect must pass through before reaching me.


I will then Print out the information about the intrusion, then use my firewall to block the port and IP address used by the hacker and then make my way to your location for a one on one.

FX Just in case you feel you cannot be caught because you are not connected to my pc, you forget you have logged into NL and so have I. Need i say more?[/b]