₦airaland Forum

IMAliyu2:
More whataboutism, Yes it's bad when the US does it aswell.

What coup? (You might want to look up what the word means)
Do You mean the protests of Yanukovych's corrupt government, where he ordered firing upon civilian protesters.
Then he got ousted, and fled to Russia.
After which Ukraine held another presidential election
After which was when Russian decided to annex Crimea, because their puppet leader got removed?

This all started because the Ukrainian parliament sided with closer ties to the EU, because they saw that being more prosperous for their country, and Putin didn't like that and got Yanukovych to go against the will of his people.

Nononsense247:
Shutup ... Those that wish and wants Tinubu to fail are enemies of this country ... Premature death shall locate them ..

budaatum:
Love Tinubu's electricity bill and student loan bill and petrol desubsidisation. If he scraps the employers wage subsidy called NYSC he will become my current god.

ErnestNc:
Since you Indirectly claim to be wise...

Where did those supposed "life forms" emanate from?

guysbewise:
Even the USA has now told schools to teach intelligent design based on how complicated the human cells are, that contrary to what was known before that now with high tech for research that we were created by an Intelligent Being.

US judge bans intelligent design from science lessons
· Victory for parents on teaching of evolution
· Theory ruled to be religion by the back door

A US federal judge today ruled that "intelligent design" - the belief that a higher power, rather than evolution, created life - cannot be mentioned in biology classes in a Pennsylvania school district.

The Dover area school board violated the constitution when it ordered that its biology curriculum must include intelligent design (ID), district judge John Jones said.

The policy, adopted in October 2004, is believed to have been the first of its kind in the country.

"The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the board who voted for the ID policy," Judge Jones wrote in his 139-page judgement.

"It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy.

"We find that the secular purposes claimed by the board amount to a pretext for the board's real purpose, which was to promote religion in the public school classroom."

The board's attorneys said members sought to improve science education by exposing students to alternatives to Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, or evolution. Intelligent-design supporters argue that it cannot fully explain the existence of complex life forms.

The district was sued by a group of 11 parents who claimed the intelligent design policy was unconstitutional and unscientific and had no place in science classrooms. They argued that intelligent design amounts to a secular repackaging of creationism, which the courts have already ruled cannot be taught in public schools.

The Dover policy required students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. The statement said Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact", has inexplicable "gaps", and refers students to ID textbook Of Pandas and People for more information.

Mr Jones said advocates of intelligent design "have bona fide and deeply held beliefs which drive their scholarly endeavours" and that he didn't believe the concept shouldn't be studied and discussed.

"Our conclusion today is that it is unconstitutional to teach ID as an alternative to evolution in a public school science classroom," he wrote.

The dispute is the latest chapter in a long-running debate over the teaching of evolution dating back to the famous 1925 Scopes monkey trial, in which Tennessee biology teacher John Scopes was fined $100 (£57) for violating a state law that forbade teaching evolution. The Tennessee supreme court reversed his conviction on the narrow ground that only a jury trial could impose a fine exceeding $50, and the law was repealed in 1967.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/dec/21/evolution.schoolsworldwide

cooooooks:
- no tariffs on food.
The biggest issue in nigeria is that the cost of living is high. We need to get the cost of feeding down immediately.

The above will have immediate positive impacts on the economy.

triplechoice:
And where did I say my mind is not part of my body?

triplechoice:
The question is ,what is the source of the human consciousness? Matter or

Answer that if you know it, and stop twisting and turning .

triplechoice:
I have done that and millions of others in the world who also subscribe to the same thing ,which they know is true, 'have also done the same before announcing it to whomever cares to listen .

triplechoice:
SMH. Why should I should I do so when I m not traned scientist.

kkins25:
In due time! haven't really read the whole of platos work myself. just youtube breakdown and summaries.

sukkot:
I hope you don't have to pay for these constant harrasments of the prophets

triplechoice:
Good .
Then provide evidence in support of your ,yes,

It must be peer reviewed ,not wikipedia articles which contains soeculatory theories .

triplechoice:
Meet with a real scientist to teach you, one on one, what both really means ,and stop depending on what you read on Wikipedia.

What is scientific evidence ,

https://theconversation.com/scientific-evidence-what-is-it-and-how-can-we-trust-it-14716

triplechoice:
So once again ,tell us ,based on what you know, has mind or consciousness emerged from matter ? Yes or no.

triplechoice:
If you cannot find what is scientifically proven , you can try the one's proven anecdotally ,to work ,pending the time it will properly investigated by scientist who may end up after all confirming it's good . If they say it's not good or toixc ,then abandoned it.

triplechoice:
Not everyone can do so doesn't mean some people aren't doing that or have done so in their own way . People can use a product base on anecdotal evidence pending the time it would be scientifically proven.

triplechoice:
And how do you know if I have not done my own reseaech concerning the things I know?

triplechoice:
These are natural abilities people are born with......

triplechoice:
Scientist use the placebo effects in drug trials ,even when they don't yet know why the brain makes it work . Why dont you go ask them to stop using it since it's not yet scientifically proven.

budaatum:
"This is just utter nonsense. If a remedy effects a cure, it has worked. And that work is the evidence of its efficacy."

triplechoice:
Too much of everything is bad.

triplechoice:
If you think my claims are not scientifically proven, ( you don't even know what that means ) then don't buy my 'herbal products '.

triplechoice:
You are yapping nonsense because you don't know the difference between anecdotal evidence and scientific evidence . And why did you not specify what remedy this time .

You want to deceive yourself . We are talking about herbal remedy which sometimes is not scientifically proven and not any other kind . Stick with that .

Gibberish and irrelevant nonsense you brought in.

I'm not interested in guess work to know how my consciousness work. If you depend on that ,goodluck .i

triplechoice:
Not everyone is properly trained to carry out scientific research concerning the things they use or consume . You didnt make any sense here.




You answered your previous comments here . There must be competence in carrying out research . Not everyone can do it .

The local woman who sells local herbal remedies lack competence to scientifically explain how what she sells work .

As long as it's not toxic, please allow her to sell her products in peace . Look elsewhere for your cure .

At least you see the sense why products manufactures should not do so .

triplechoice:
If it's not toxic and works ,without scientific validation, use it. .

This is my position.

triplechoice:
And why are you against this and don't want me to speak my truth which others who don't know about it could benefit from ?

The worst part you have not provided any reasonable alternative.

triplechoice:
There's a difference between ,'it works ' and 'what makes it to work.

triplechoice:
It's because you are unaware of what goes on within the scientific community ,you just assume that if an individual scientist or group of scientist present their own research findings for just about anything for verification, then it will be investigated immediately . Not so.