₦airaland Forum

Karlifate:
Side note: Since time immemorial, men have been building a lot of somethings out of nothings. — Men build, conquer, protect & raise strong offsprings.

So, when men come together in one accord, these activities become wildfire & this is irresistible to the females with default boring lives. They'll do anything to part of it or tear it down by manipulation (the classic "if I cannot join them, I'll beat them" thingy)

They're also the crusaders of "you'll be lonely at old age" when they come across high-achieving (single) men, that doesn't want marital commitment to slow him down.

They're surprised at how a man can be alone, yet not lonely — This concept look alien to them, thereby stirring up their curiosities.

According to that popular cliché: "behind every successful man is a woman" even proves this 'attaché by force' observation right.

I've never come across "behind every successful woman is a man", even when the saying is visible to the blind & audible to the deaf.

Skepticus:
On point!

HeartofCity once made a comment on the thread saying that the Red pill should be scientifically studied on why so much of what it preaches (and also predicts) turn out to be true and fulfilled. I agree with him. It just never lies no matter how much you try to ignore or play around it.

Men by nature, are usually not bothered about what women do in their in-groups like gossiping about irrelevant things or themselves (intra-gender competition) in their gathering like sororities or hair-saloons. Ladies have told me how surprised and pleasured they are, seeing random men meeting each other in a barber shop, mechanic garage or having friendly rivalries over their favourite sport teams while sharing drinks in a bar, exchange numbers and move on while the same can't happen easily for women. One told me yesterday that men tend to be better keeper of secrets and she like other ladies I know, tend to enjoy the company of men as it is often fun of course. This may also contribute to why they invade male spaces but the innate female imperative of control and tendency towards disorder often kicks in.

A female fûck buddy of mine some years back, who got married last year was telling me (in a private chat) about how she would feed her husband a "sleepy" meal so he could not hang out with his friends on weekends. In her words "He seems very happy hanging out with them. I can't stand him being so happy without me".

"A woman's 'happiness' comes at the cost of someone else's."
- Rosemund P. Cherubin

Females' existence is solely dependent on the existence of others, that is, without (constant) external validation from others they'll just plummet into an existential crisis - the key to their happiness is always in someone else's hands, and that's why they're almost always unhappy and unfulfilled.
This combined with their self-involved and self-serving nature is a really nasty mix.

Here are some screenshots I took a while back, the first one is of a female explaining this incredibly petty, self-centered and, perhaps even, malignant trait, signature to females, from her pov; the second is a guy breaking it down in the terms of female nature.

Killbillz:
Plain simple truth.. na novice dry fall for those fables about church girls being decent

"One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived."
- Niccolo Machiavelli

jb95

..

jb95

aDEOetREGE:
Na, I am not looking for sex workers, I am looking for a borehole drilling company….

Company? Is that what they call brothels now?

A church, irrespective of denomination, is perhaps the worst place to find a wife.

When women are done with 'having fun' or "living their truth" they know where to settle in to get a man, and all they'll have to do is 'play the sanctimonious part'.

Also, where one meets her may not be relevant if she has already lost her virginity (shout out to virgin Mary!)

Also also, the women in the first and second images are wearing "bad bxtch" uniforms, so that one follow for 'wifey material'?

luminouz:
You believe that girl closed down the ashewo beer parlour thread? Lol...she is a fuqin liar. Same way she lied about Martinez editing her post. The guys on the beer parlour derailed the thread themselves!!!

The women have their pinkpill thread. We don't clamour for the closure so I don't get how e dey pepper them na

That's another interesting thing - you won't see men bothered about a female space but you'll often see women either 1.) Exhibiting their lack of self-respect and restraint by (forcefully) attempting to insert themselves where they don't belong or 2.) Attempting to tear down that space.

Funny enough, a few days before landlord came I read a post on TheRationalMale on 'Male Spaces' by Rollo. Here are some take-aways from it:

Whether this condition is an all male club or cohort (gender segregated team sports for example) or a personal state that is typically attributed only to the masculine – characteristic strength, rationality, decisiveness, risk taking, even brashness or vulgarity – the Feminine Imperative encourages women to insert themselves, and by association the Feminine Imperative itself, into masculine exclusivity. Scout Willis’ (Bruce Willis’ daughter) most recent ‘activism’ to encourage female equality by going topless in public is an example of this female-to-male parity (google it) – in an equalist utopia, if men can do it, women should be able to as well.

The goal is to be a woman in male space.

The cover story is the same trope the Feminine Imperative (and its social arm, feminism) always finds useful; the never ending push towards gender equalism. The practice however reveals the push into male space serves two purposes – social control and male oversight.

Social control is the easier of the two to grasp. Even when changing the rules of an all-male game to accommodate a lack of genuine female interest in a male endeavor, it fundamentally alters the nature of that game.

An easy example of this would be NASCAR’s embracing a driver like Danica Patrick. It’s not that she’s an exceptional driver, and I can’t vouch for her genuine passion for NASCAR, but the social control she represents is that she is the first woman to (dubiously) be taken seriously in the nominally all-male space of NASCAR drivers. The goal has been achieved, all that’s left now is female oversight of this male space.

The second purpose in the goal of female inclusion into male space is really a policing of the thought dynamics and attitudes of the men in that space. When women are allowed access to the locker room the dynamic of the locker room changes. The locker room can take many different shapes: the workplace environment, the sports team, the group of all-male coders, the primarily male scientific community, the ‘boys club’, the group of gamer nerds at the local game store, even strip clubs and the sanctuary you think your ‘man cave’ is – the context is one of women inserting themselves into male space in order to enforce the dictates of feminine social primacy.

Shebi earlier someone here mentioned that once women are allowed into this space one will start hearing "a real redpiller..."

One of the most threatening aspects of conventional masculinity for the Feminine Imperative is the cooperative potential of male bonding. When only men comprise an in-group, team building, common purpose and a masculine-primary environment tend to define that group. I would argue that the modern insertion of feminine influence into all male spaces is a concerted effort to limit this bonding and unity in favor of a feminine-primary ‘correctness’.

This limitation may not be directly influenced by a present female; often all that’s needed to foster feminine-primary correctness is a feminine-identifying male in the in-group (anonymous White Knight), or even just a prevailing attitude of not wanting to offend the suspicions that other in-group men may subscribe to this feminine-identifying influence for fear it may get back to a woman they perceive may have authority.

Even the most well meaning of women involved (however peripherally) in the manosphere are still motivated by their innate security needs – and those hypergamous security needs imply a want for certainty and control. As such the psychological influence of the Feminine Imperative will always be a predominant motivator in their participation in this all male space. This leads women to a want to sanitize Game to fit the purposes of the imperative, as well as oversee the thought processes of the men who come to participate in it.

@OP:

https://www.nairaland.com/7166252/wahala-chaos-female-nature#113575657

snthesis

Long time, comrade

Fredoh:

This OP has some serious wisdom. It’s so succinctly put that even the women cannot deny it!
I’ve always asked this question “Do women really love men?”
As the saying goes, a man is only “loved” on the condition that he provides.
OP has pointed out many things that I have personally observed!

They can't, but they know men love them. They also know men want reciprocal love so they echo and mimick men's declaration of love and signs of affection.

"Men are romantics pretending to be realists, and women are realists pretending to be romantics." - Rollo Tomassi (paraphrased)

luminouz:
You know exactly what's up.

Don't worry, they will go.😁😁😁


N.B: you see that one wey tag landlord as 'nice soft guy'. Classic manipulation.

When I read that "soft guy" line something immediately felt off, and that's when I remembered..

A general rule of thumb is, whenever a woman "compliments" a man or when women unanimously praise a man, that man should probably take a step back and ask himself "Am I being a mumu?" then do some (deep) introspection on his words or actions.

What makes this manipulation quite interesting is that it's not just a subtle, quick and easy way to get the man to do what they want by playing on his ego, but also to condition him to keep doing what they want with praises e.g. "a real man".
Other examples include being referred to as a "soft guy", "husband material" or statements like "your wife go enjoy o", as opposed to "your wife go suffer" when you don't act like a mumu.

Likewise, when a woman (or women) urge a man to do something by hyping him he should ask himself what he has to gain, what the womæn has/have to gain then check who's really getting the short end of the stick.

"One of the most useful factors in the conditioning of a man is praise. Its effect is better and much more lasting than say, sex, as it may be continued throughout a man's life. Furthermore, if praise is applied in the correct dosage, a woman will never need to scold. Any man who is accustomed to a conditional dosage of praise will interpret its absence as displeasure."
- Esther Vilar, The Manipulated Man, 1971

Regex:
Na to know whether I go begin find another landlord.

Regex:
You sure?

Landlord say he no go "evict" tenants, why you dey ask "you sure?"

advanceDNA:
Vawulence only... Peace is not allowed

Vawulence is not the answer.. but life is multiple choice.

Reminder from your friendly neighbourhood Nairalander:

1.) Nigeria has the second highest rate of paternity fraud on the planet. At least 1 in 3 men are raising someone else's spawn (because she pinned it on him to get his commitment, had a fling with an ex, was aroused by the taboo of it, resents her man, etc.)

2.) Paternity tests are quite accessible and relatively cheap (compared to years or decades of financially AND emotionally investing in another man's offspring).

3.) As a man, the thought of leaving your hard-earned everything to someone else's seed after living under the lifelong, fiendish deception of your "Significant Other" is grating. Don't let that thought be reality.
Paternity tests gives you actual scientific evidence and assurance (i.e. peace of mind) that your child(ren) belong to you. "She wouldn't do that" or "The child has my nose" is not definitive proof.

4.) If you haven't as a Nigerian man, married to a Nigerian woman, in Nigeria, sought out DNA tests for your kids nor have any intention to.. then, chances are you've lost guard (pls refer to point 1.)

chuksdev anunakeeh

burp18:
This is why some women should not be allowed to work. I bet you're closer to and having better conversation with Mr A than your own husband. Women are emotional beings and they easily overreact. Only a matter of time before you have a small issue with yourman and you run to Mr A because he's the one who understands you.

"[...] If after your first meeting you establish physical contact with her, and both of you are not distant from each other, you can easily create that sexual vibe. It is, for this reason, women especially married women should not be allowed to work in men's spaces because any man in that space that creates that sexual vibe in her, will fvck her. Women are emotional, once you create positive emotion via physical contact she will soon succumb except otherwise.
- Caveadullam, @baba_cave

Well, Friendly Reminder that:

1.) Nigeria has the second highest rate of paternity fraud on the planet. At least 1 in 3 men are raising someone else's spawn (because she pinned it on him to get his commitment, had a fling with an ex, was aroused by the taboo of it, resents her man, etc.)

2.) Paternity tests are quite accessible and relatively cheap (compared to years or decades of financially AND emotionally investing in another man's offspring).

3.) As a man, the thought of leaving your hard-earned everything to someone else's seed after living under the lifelong, fiendish deception of your "Significant Other" is grating. Don't let that thought be reality.
Paternity tests gives you actual scientific evidence and assurance (i.e. peace of mind) that your child(ren) belong to you. "She wouldn't do that" or "The child has my nose" is not definitive proof.

4.) If you haven't as a Nigerian man, married to a Nigerian woman, in Nigeria, sought out DNA tests for your kids nor have any intention to.. then, chances are you've lost guard (pls refer to point 1.)

emmaphy22:
Any idea on how and where to swap it for another one by adding money

Nah but you could check game stores in your area.

Your console has an infamous issue common with fat models. Though people thought the problem originated from the motherboard and could be fixed with heat, it's actually from the Nec/tokin capacitors Sony used in making the fat models.

It's one of those issues that will come back eventually after you fix it.
My personal advice is, that 10k wey you go use fix am just add 15/20k and get a neatly used PS3 slim (wouldn't recommend super slim cuz it's not really ideal for running hacked games compared to the Slim) or if cash dey just get new slim.
Also, if you're going for the Slim maybe get later generation (not first generation) because it has a smaller processor that generates less heat > less overheating.

...

Autobot05:
Comrade the content of your topic says otherwise

.. .

..

Autobot05:

Comrade, vawulence is prohibited in this place oh

Friendly Reminder that:

1.) Nigeria has the second highest rate of paternity fraud on the planet. At least 1 in 3 men are raising someone else's spawn (because she pinned it on him to get his commitment, had a fling with an ex, was aroused by the taboo of it, resents her man, etc.)

2.) Paternity tests are quite accessible and relatively cheap (compared to years or decades of financially AND emotionally investing in another man's offspring).

3.) As a man, the thought of leaving your hard-earned everything to someone else's seed after living under the lifelong, fiendish deception of your "Significant Other" is grating. Don't let that thought be reality.
Paternity tests gives you actual scientific evidence and assurance (i.e. peace of mind) that your child(ren) belong to you. "She wouldn't do that" or "The child has my nose" is not definitive proof.

4.) If you haven't as a Nigerian man, married to a Nigerian woman, in Nigeria, sought out DNA tests for your kids nor have any intention to.. then, chances are you've lost guard (pls refer to point 1.)

rb

OP I would suggest you focus solely on your masters, and read this thread:

https://www.nairaland.com/7166252/wahala-chaos-female-nature#113559648

...