₦airaland Forum

...

thegoodone13 jakama90

https://www.nairaland.com/7166252/wahala-chaos-female-nature

Webxpert2:
So you'll go and smoke now that your battery is low.

If the battery dey low, him go dey high

Uptheante:
Do you think your close female cousin will side with other women to attack & vilify you because of herd mentality?

Likely no, but the herd is not limited to attacking & vilifying.

holicupp:
unto this mountain of deep knowledge will i pitch my tent forever and ever amen

Amen..

KlausMichaelson najdorf toffyz

Hm

Martinez39s:
SMH. So gradually telling his son about female nature and women will make the little boy rabid and unruly? So the red pill is now "unproven theories that will make one disrespect one's mother"? So seizing his son's mind for the better before social media and the blue pill world fills it nonsense makes him a wuss? Just dey play.

So he should wait for the kid to find out by himself later in life? This is risky as you can't tell what his son might pass through in the hands of women, and what loss he might incur, before the boy wakes up. Besides, the son might die a bluepiller or he might discover the red pill late in life after so many mistakes if Kipaji doesn't tell him on time. The first agent to grab and fill a child's mind is one-nil up in the game; I would rather it is Kipaji than the blue pill agents and devices of the world.

In his book, The Anatomy of Female Power, Chinweizu Ibekwe mentions three powers that women use to uphold the matriarchy (blue pill society) and manipulate men. One of these powers (perhaps the most powerful) is Cradle-power.

Cradle-power is the conditioning of the male mind from a young/ripe age. As his first teacher, the mother instills societal narratives that (obviously) favor women effectively turning the male into a bluepilled sleeper agent, in turn keeping female power over men intact.

Perhaps, society seeing this 'rearing' of boys as natural whilst deeming it 'unnatural' for a man to raise his son as a 'man' (redpill) is evidence of the strength and effectiveness of cradle-power.

TheWolfen:
That shitty test don't stop. Some females seam more fond of it. I can tell you from experience that if a female had test you more than once before. They won't stop it even in marriage. Even if they knew you don't like it, They will still do it but make sure you don't find out

Thank you, comrade wey sabi. Those tests don't stop and overtime it will begin to affect the man mentally.

...

nazicartel:
This is same reason he needed a son. Because his son/s won't come online and be telling the whole world how they are feeding their father...



Every child is important.

Comrade

From the women, it's a common shaming tactic to get their way and defense mechanism for their ego when they fail ("why else would he turn me down if he wasn't gay?" )

From the men, it's a lack of self control and/or self respect as they may be unable to fathom why you wouldn't throw yourself down at the feet of a woman because they deem her 'attractive'.

Karlifate:
@ bolded.

It always amuse me, when some guys brag with banging a lady, as a way of "punishing" her for bad behavior

Foolish mentality.

LordIsaac:
Yes, eventually.... thanks.

Aight.

LordIsaac:
Happy New Year bro. I pray we get to unfold more of our potentials. Thanks.

Yes o, and many breakthroughs this year. Did you manage to finish that stuff?

@LordIsaac Happy New Year

Happy New Year thegidredpiller emmanuelbrown26 Nyascobar1414 and many breakthroughs this year.

Happy New Year and many breakthroughs fam!

Caveadullam martinez39s sozinn skepticus ubunja heartofcity12 luminouz CAPSLOCKED pansophist JESHAL emmaodet odinson1 kipaji ichidodo and other chairmen keeping this thread alive and healthy.
Please pardon the belated wishes.

TheGidRedpiller:
Read this rubbish you just typed out loud.

How do you feel?

Comrade, leave that person alone nah

@OP:
https://www.nairaland.com/7429922/peaceful-wise-ways-women#118349189

DirtyGold:
Oga Dizzyyish, I love this interesting vawulence you're creating...

If I no follow am to the end, call me baskard

On the real though, men need to start educating their sons on the imperatives of these gender issues.
Enlightened men must create time to nurture their sons rather than relegating the task to women. Too many feminized males abound nowadays!

What's tha business?

Truth.

..

Rich4god:
My mum will always say, of you want to marry from a family, first of all study the mother. Her character will tell you how good the family is. The girl child is the future mother. Is she's defiled and spoilt from a young age, then it means our tomorrows society will be in shambles.

Most armed robbers are men, but when people see a woman into armed robbery, they will be shocked. This is because women are supposed to be sacred. They are mostly the moral keepers of the society.

That's true. The mother's character is usually a good predictor of the daughter's character.

...

Women are cunning, but when one hears of women's manipulativeness they probably see women as some kind of mastermind manipulator. In reality, this could not be further from the truth..

A woman's cunning is not too dissimilar to those of a child---simplistic and backed only by self-centered motives. A man who is relatively aware of women's manipulative nature and tactics can easily spot and thwart them from the get-go.
The 'effectiveness' of any manipulation is directly proportional to the manipulatee's 'naivety'. In order to strengthen the machiavellian nature of women and increase their chances of survival, men are generally raised to naive and oblivious to female nature.

"Females are takers; sadly, the average male believes that everything that he produces should be to gratify the material wants (not needs) of the females in his life (i.e. birthdays, holidays, anniversaries). Even though females do not know what they want, males are still trained, especially by their mothers, to be workhorses for females. Females become spoiled children when they cannot use a male; females are masters of self- indulgence…and self-delusion. In the mind of a female, it is never her fault; males are always to blame!"
- Rosemund P. Cherubin

Men are raised to be trusting and caring towards females; females are raised to be cautious of males while simply exploiting the male's conscientiousness towards them.
Men are logical... until it comes to a relationship then they become emotional; Women are emotional... until it comes to a relationship then they become logical.

Because "women can never be in a relationship that doesn't benefit them" and their nature to exploit man's naivety, women don't compromise on what they need. For example, I read a post from twitter a while ago pertaining to this subject matter. It was along the lines of:
"Marriage was originally intended for virgin women, but throughout the centuries men's standards kept dropping until any woman could get married. Women's standards for marriage is a man's ability to provide, and throughout the centuries women's standards have remained the same."

Women (and weak men) may give platitudes on this but, when dealing with a woman one party *has* to take the role of 'follower' (or with women, the role of 'mugu' ). Now, should you wish to relate with woman it's up to you --- the man --- to choose which role you're comfortable with.

"Men are 'romantics pretending to be realists' and women, vice versa."
- Rollo Tomassi

Typing..

“In everything, do to others what you would have them do to you. . . .” - Matthew 7:12

What goes around comes around.

No one gets away with anything.


Due to their solipsism, egocentrism and innate desire to have their cakes and eat it, these quotes and sayings have little (if any) meaning to a female's actions.

Females wish for a gullible, manipulable man so they can utilise him as a tool, and have their way as much as possible with little to no consequences whilst doing so --- and with the abundance of simps available --- they will likely get him. They might even convince (delude) themselves into thinking such men are "real men", "kind men" or "romantics".
Now they have conceived a son. He has come of age and is anticipating having a female in his life as a girlfriend and later wife, or maybe it's their brother who wishes for a female in his life.. Suddenly, they are uncomfortable with the very notion of their blood being a romantic or real man. This is often the basis for many Mother-in-law vs. Daughter-in-law disagreements.

Females have no qualms whatsoever with manipulating and exploiting someone's son or brother---but the moment the tables are inevitably turned it doesn't make sense anymore.

As someone once said "Females are Professional Resource Extractors". The thought of their sons/brothers being "extracted"---being a mugu---for their money, gifts, favors and/or attention is quite grating to them. But they'll gladly do the same to other people's sons or brothers.
When these men have exhausted their 'usefulness', or for some reason the extractions has come to a halt, females will then hit them with their signature "What have you ever done for me?" or "Did I force you/him to give me anything?"

How "clever" one must be to have they cake and eat it... except, no one really gets away with anything. The moment one makes the decision to have and eat their cake they've set up their investments of consequences, and in time they'll get the returns in some shape or form.
And like that, their unhappiness from these decisions, mindsets and consequences will surely seep into the lives of the men deeply involved with them.

To think that one can actually act and have no reaction, that one's actions can cause but have no effect are often the signs of narcissistic, deceptive and shallow minds, and perhaps the reason why this is a common phenomenon amongst women and an ingrained feature in their nature.