₦airaland Forum

egift:
Saraki has no business legislating for Nigerians from the docks. He resign, hire more lawyers and defend his case. Dragging the Red Chamber to shame and ridicule for his greedy quest to cling to power is unacceptable.

Nigerian politicians must learn now that "one day their "thiefry" will come to light.

if he doesn´t go peacefully he will be impeached. Its a simple thing. When people think they are too smart for their own good, they should remember that other people that know their crimes are watching them. When Saraki became senate president many people taught he was too smart. Has he not now rubbished himselve? Funny enof nigerian politicians would not have attacked him had he not rubbished APC, thereby stepping on toes on his way up there. Politics in Nigeria is a dirty game and no one is immune. Everyone can be brought down even jabadan himself. The movie I am waiting to see is the downfall of Tinubu, which is coming soon in 3D.

alrahmanonline:
I'm always suprise When people shout witch hunting, mind you, no witch is good for the society, so therefore let's continue hunting them.
#ISUPPORTWITCHHUNTING.

which witch are u hunting. The one that flyes in the night or the ones that steal from our national treasury?

moscow37d:
Fellow nairalander. I was checking out a trend on nairaland of how a guy levitated at Ikeja, that brought about people staring for hours. Later the magic was busted and It was explained that the guy actually sat on a kind of chair that you can not see even with a closer look. That now remind me of what I saw in new Delhi (India ) when I went for a course. It's a huge stone tied to a stick, and the stick is sitting on a glass cup. It amazes me a lot every time I look at this picture. And there is this question that always comes to my mind . Could this be magic or science? Though I don't believe in magic but I need someone who can scientifically proof this to me or else I believe in magic once and for all if there is no proof for it. Thank yoy all.

Science. The trick is called the floating man. It was first performed is 1800 by an Indian to amaze the British colonists

ProphetUdeme:
Carnality and Worldliness. Inasmuch as i congratulate davido on his fame and success but God is calling this young man called davido to Repent and sing the gospel and his latter end shall be more glorious than this.

U are funn6

Pinkiedearie:
Not cool...

But it happens

Oyetboy:
Here's a video of the humiliation of the Senate president earlier today at the eid praying ground, where he was disgraced and pelted with stones.....



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OquK4JE3zX0


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OquK4JE3zX0&fulldescription=1&gl=US&client=mv-google&hl=en

pls where is the saraki na? I just see old men and adults with anal hairs running around. Pls if u dont show us a video of saraki being stoned and disgraced then adonbilivit!!!

Keneking:
1. GOMBE STATE

FRN v. Adamu S. Lily & 1 OR CCT/GB/01/10
The case was called; the first accused person was deceased while the second accused person was present. Consequent on the death of the 1st accused person his name was struck out of the charge. The 2nd accused person on the other hand presented his original acknowledgement slip and was acquitted on that basis.

FRN v. Shehu Kanar & 3 ORS CCT/GB/02/10
The case was called the 1st and 4th accused persons were absent. Therefore bench warrant was issued against them. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted and the amended charge was read to them and they pleaded not guilty to the charge. The case could not go on because our witness from Gombe State office was not in court.
The case was adjourned to 5th march 2013

FRN v. Musa Toma & 1 OR CCT/GB/03/10
The case was called the 2nd accused person was absent because he was not served. The Tribunal ordered that efforts should be made to serve him.
The 1st accused was present therefore the prosecution moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted and the amended charge was read to the accused person and he pleaded not guilty to the charge. The case could not go on because our witness from Gombe State office was not in court.
The case was adjourned to 5th march 2013

FRN v. Jae Danture CCT/GB/04/10
The case was called and the accused person was absent because he is deceased. The Tribunal struck out the charge against the accused person.

FRN v. Joshua Danmallam CCT/GB/05/10
The case was called the accused was present in court. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted and the amended charge was read to him and he pleaded not guilty to the charge. In his defence he presented his original acknowledgement slip. The Tribunal therefore acquitted the accused person.

FRN v. Moses Naomi Lasar & 5 ORS CCT/GB/06/10
The case was called and all the accused persons were present and represented by J.A. Ogwuche. The defence cousel raised an objection orally on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
The case was adjourned to 6th march 2013

FRN v. Alhaji Danjuma Babayo CCT/GB/07/10
The case was called the accused person was absent because he was not served. The case was adjourned to 6th march 2013 in order that service be effected on the accused person.


2. ADAMAWA STATE

FRN v. Ibrahim N. Adamu & 3 ORS CCT/AD/01/09
The case was called but the all the accused persons were absent. Consequent on the above, the matter was adjourned to 7th march 2013 to enable service on the accused persons.

FRN v. Eli Gamaliel & 6 ORS CCT/AD/02/09
The case was called all the accused persons were present except the 4th and 7th accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted and the amended charge was read to them and they pleaded not guilty to the charge. The prosecution opened its case and led one witness, i.e., Mr Sufyan Ahmad in evidence and tendered one document (receipt slip) which was marked exhibit AD1.
The 4th accused person opened his defence and stated that he received form ccb1, filled and returned but was not issued with acknowledgement slip.
The 7th accused person on the other hand opened his defence and stated that he returned the form after he returned from a trip with the governor of Adamawa state and was issued with a temporary acknowledgement slip.
The Tribunal there upon invited the prosecution witness to the witness stand and requested for the declarant ID register. In the register the Tribunal discovered the names of the accused person but no date of return of the forms was recorded. The tribunal asked the prosecution witness to explain. He stated that the 7th accused person returned the form one year later but could not explain why the date of return was not recorded in the register.
At this juncture the Tribunal, without affording the prosecution the opportunity to make its final address acquitted the accused persons on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

FRN v. Jonathan Thomas CCT/AD/03/09
The case was called and the accused present. The defence Counsel Milkman Esq. applied for an adjournment to enable him file a preliminary objection. Consequent on the above the matter was adjourned to 7th march 2013.

FRN v. Mohammad Babayola CCT/AD/04/09
The case was called the accused was present but requested the Tribunal grant him an opportunity to consult and hire the services of a Counsel. Consequent on the above the Tribunal adjourned the case to 7th march 2013.

28TH NOVEMBER 2013

3. TARABA STATE

FRN v. Silas Jafta & 9 ORS CCT/TR/01/08
The case was called the 1st and 10th accused persons were present while others were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons that were absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The defence declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection. Consequently the matter was adjourned to 3rd April 2013.

FRN v. Sunday Albert & 9 ORS CCT/TR/02/08
The case was called the 3rd, 4th, 7th, 8th and 9th accused persons were present while others were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons that were absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
The defence declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 3rd April 2013.

FRN v. Sani Bamalum &1 OR CCT/TR/03/08
The case was called and the accused persons were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
Consequent on their absence, the matter was adjourned to 3rd April 2013 to enable service to be effected on them.

FRN v. Saidu Yusuf & 3 ORS CCT/TR/04/08
The case was called three of the accused persons were present one was absent because he could not be traced. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused person that was absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The defence declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 3rd April 2013.

FRN v. Alh. Mohammed Isa Lau & 6 ORS CCT/TR/05/08
The case was called and all the accused persons were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
Consequent on their absence, the matter was adjourned to 7th May 2013 to enable service to be effected on them. The defence counsel undertook to assist the Tribunal in effecting the service on the accused persons.

FRN v. Danladi Chindo &1 OR CCT/TR/06/08
The case was called and the accused persons were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
Consequent on their absence, the matter was adjourned to 7th May 2013 to enable service to be effected on them. The defence counsel undertook to assist the Tribunal in effecting the service on the accused persons.

FRN v. David W. Yusuf & 1 OR CCT/TR/07/08
The case was called all the accused persons were absent. The officers of the Taraba state office drew the attention of the prosecution to the fact that the 1st accused person is a staff of Ussa local Government as not Ibbi as contained in the charge. The prosecution therefore applied to the Tribunal for a date to enable it files a corrected charge but the Tribunal struck out the charge stating that the prosecution should prefer a fresh charge against the accused persons separately.

FRN v. Yunusa Jibrin Tau & 1 OR CCT/TR/08/08
The case was called and all the accused persons were present. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
The defense declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 7th May 2013.

FRN v. Agirah Daniel & 7 ORS CCT/TR/09/08
The case was called the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 5th accused persons were present. The 6th accused person is deceased and therefore his name was struck off the charge. While the 8th accused person is on exams leave. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons that were absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The defence declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 7th May 2013.

FRN v. Anyigbo U.E. & 1 OR CCT/TR/10/08
The case was called the 1st accused person is deceased and therefore his name was struck out of the charge. The 2nd accused person was present. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The defense declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 8th May 2013.

FRN v. L.D. Orubuloye & 9 ORS CCT/TR/11/08
The case was called the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 8th and 10th accused persons were present. The 2nd and 9th accused persons were deceased therefore their names were struck out of the charge. While the other three accused persons were absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The amended charge was read to the accused persons and they pleaded not guilty to the charge. Consequent on their plea of not guilty the prosecution led evidence through one witness and tendered one document.
The accused persons also opened their defence stating through the 3rd accused person that they did not sign and receive form ccb1. Under cross examination it was discovered, by comparison with a letter signed by 6th accused person, that the signature on the receipt slip was that of the 6th accused person.
The Tribunal in its judgement discharged and acquitted the accused persons on the grounds of inadequate evidence to establish that accused persons actually received form ccb1 and failed to return them.

29TH NOVEMBER 2012

FRN v. Musa I. Mohammed & 4 ORS CCT/TR/12/08
The case was called and all the accused persons were present except the 5th accused person. The prosecution applied for a date to enable it file charges against the accused persons individually. But the Tribunal discharged the accused persons stating since the present charge cannot be sustained it was only fair for the accused to be discharged until a fresh charge is filed against them.

FRN v. Okonkwo Isioma CCT/TR/13/08
The case was called and the accused was in court the prosecution moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The amended charge was read to the accused person and he pleaded guilty with reasons. The accused pleaded with the Tribunal to temper justice with mercy stating that he has never been in breach of the law. In consideration of his allocutors the Tribunal warned and cautioned him not to breach the code again.
FRN v. Dahiru A. Bashir & 8 ORS CCT/TR/14/08
The case was called and all the accused persons were present except the 2nd accused person. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused person that was absent. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.

The defence declared their intention to object to the charge against the accused person on the grounds that the charge offends paragraph 1 of the 3rd schedule to CCB & T Act and section 221 of the CPC. The Tribunal ordered him to file a motion to argue his objection.
Consequently the matter was adjourned to 8th May 2013.

FRN v. Onold S. Onoja & 1 OR CCT/TR/15/08
The case was called the 1st accused person is deceased therefore the charge was stuck out against him. The 2nd accused person is sick. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused person and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused person that was absent.
Consequent on the absence on the grounds of ill health, the matter was adjourned to 8th May 2013.

FRN v. Sabo Y. Saidu & 3 ORS CCT/TR/16/08
The case was called the 1st accused person is deceased therefore his name was struck out of the charge. The 4th accused person was present while others were absent. The prosecution moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The amended charge was read to the accused person who pleaded guilty to the charge. The Tribunal however cautioned the accused person and urged him to be law abiding.

FRN v. Collins Ogedegbe CCT/TR/17/08
The case was called the accused was present the prosecution moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted. The amended charge was read to the accused person and he pleaded not guilty to the charge on the grounds that he declared his assets in 2001 and was not due to declare in 2004. In support of his claim he presented his acknowledgement slip. On this premise the Tribunal acquitted the accused person.

FRN v. Bala Ahmadu Ajiduke & 4 ORS CCT/TR/18/08
The case was called the 3rd and 5th accused persons are deceased therefore the charge was struck off against them.
The others were absent because they were not served. John Okezie and M. Oleka announced their appearance for the accused persons and urged the Tribunal to excuse the personal appearance of the accused persons. The prosecution thereafter moved an application to amend the charge to read 90 days in conformity with paragraph 11(1) of the 5th schedule to the 1999 constitution as amended. The application was granted.
Consequent on their absence, the matter was adjourned to 8th May 2013 to enable service to be effected on them.


CASES CONCLUDED: Arguments on Preliminary objections raised in most of the major cases were concluded and they were adjourned for ruling as shown

Below:-

(a) FRN VS Musa Mubeen - 16/1/2013 for Ruling
(b) FRN VS Dauda Ashigye - 23/1/2013 for Ruling
(c) FRN VS Yakubu Musa - 6/2/2013 for Ruling
(d) FRN VS Willie Siyanbola - 6/2/2013 for Ruling
(e) FRN VS Nathaniel Odediram - 27/2/2013 for Ruling

Source: http://www.codeofconductbureau.gov.ng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=88&Itemid=85
Retrieved: 21 September 2015

lalasticlala

pls what was the outcome of all those cases. If it was adjourned to 2013 for ruling. What was the outcome?

keenness:
I bet you bro you cannot live even average of all the character that man listed above by flesh.. You should watch your ways and draw nearer to your God. You can not be living above those characters and still find it difficult to go to church....

maybe, probably bros but I bet u that I am way nearer to God than u can ever be. Need I remind u that nearness to God is a personal thing that no pastor or man can quantify. The bible says be not the judge less yourself be judged. Careful what u say bros cos even the devil knew his scriptures when he tempted Jesus on the mountain.

zanga420:
if u say u have, what do we say to the aspect of lust (the flesh) or are those sexscapedes fiction? Not judging tho

am glad u said fiction and I rest my case. Its what writers do, we make u believe that even the devil does not exist.

ceometromedia:
[img]http://4.bp..com/-ZZwcm6UNrbQ/Vf4Q9nIeQiI/AAAAAAAGn5g/Lw-iaOQYzUk/s1600/unnamed.jpg[/img]
According to www.metronaija.com reader in kaduna,who sent us this.

Virgin Mary appeared in Nissi village in Kaduna south yesterday and this is the shadow"

http://www.metronaija.com/2015/09/photo-virgin-mary-appeared-in-kaduna.html

cc: lalasticlala ishilove

Git outa hear

starlingslimnet:
The phrase "Spiritual maturity" seems to many Christains a non-attainable feat while many have been doctrinated to believe "Spiritual maturity" can only be attained by the G.O's and "they"are mean't to be Spiritual reta'rds like the Galatians. Be it as it may,whatever it is,is totally unscriptural; a siege made to limit your full usage of your right as a Christain (A disciple of Christ).Spiritual maturity is attainable and you can grow into it in few days. But first we must understand what Spiritual maturity means.

Contrary to what we have in the churches, Spiritual maturity is not a 'journey' requiring scores of years but a journey requiring simple 'Faith' in Christ. Spiritual maturity is a long maintained state of Spirit supremacy over all things that makes you "you." In saying what makes you,you I mean things that makes you a Spiritual reta'rd.

And If you are have "perfect" control over the areas listed below then you are Spiritually matured by the Standard of Christ irrespective of what your church teaches.

1. Anger: Anger brought down the great prophet Moses and caused him to be the one of the many who sees with their eyes but taste not with their mouth.Anger is a great hindrance to your growth into Spiritual maturity. To become a Spiritual giant in the Spiritual realm you need to subject anger. Remember no one heard a word of anger in his mouth.

2. Flesh: Talk about the fall of Samson flesh caused it in form of lust. The flesh is not the only hinderance as believed but one of the many hindrances to Spiritual maturity, quick and deadly.You must subject your flesh in all it's form.

3. Appetite: "How art the mighty fallen." Esau lost his birthright to appetite. The right to give birth to the natiom of Israel: for God has promised Isaac "To your seed" and Esau was the fist born; rightful heir but he lost it. Your appetite might hinder you from growing into Spiritual maturity.

4. Tongue: What brought plague upon the Israelites? Tongue.What brought leprosy on Miriam? Tongue. Need I to say anything more on Tongue? You have to subject and control

5. Jealousy: An inbuilt trait present in every single individual. Bad when supreme good when subjected.Spiritual maturity requires you to control your innate jealousy.

6. Feelings And Emotions: Seems a major problem among Christain youths.But if you don't control your feelings and emotions your feelings and emotions will control you and when it does you can never attain Spiritual maturity.

7. Thoughts And Imagination: When you have such a past like I had, thoughts and imagination becomes a great hindrance to your Spiritual growth into maturity.Notwithstanding, you have to have control over them and that is why there is number eight.

8. Heart: "Out of the heart comes......." The Bible admonish us to guard our heart. The ability to gaurd your heart is Spiritual maturity. What comes in and goes out,who comes in and goes out must always be under your control.

Seems hard,didn't it? But not when the Holy Spirit is involved. Remember by strength shall no man prevail even to say,you don't have power over your inner though you may do to some extent over your outer and these problems are inner. Not by power, nor by might but by my Spirit says the Lord.Remember, what the heart can conceive a man can achieve. Trust the Spirit and see if all these altogether will not be evident in your life.

If that is the case then I must be spiritually over mature although I rarely go to church. Still I think u mean to say those qualities are for disciplined people

TonyeBarcanista:
I am not a fan and has never been a fan of Senate President Olubukola Saraki (I don't hate him either). I don't dislike him because he's a fulaniman/Yorubaman neither do I dislike him because he's a member of the ruling All Progressive Congress. It is a fact that I am an admirer of Senator Rabiu Kwankwaso despite his affiliation to the APC and his fulani ancestry. The point is that neither partisanship nor ethnicity can influence my likeness or otherwise for any individual or politician.

Prior to the March 28 election, I vehemently opposed Saraki's bid to the Senate. My position was (and still remains) that Senator Saraki be made to face justice on alleged crimes against Kwara people and depositors of the defunct Societe Generale Bank. Unfortunately, the APC shouted that he was a change agent and brought him to the Senate. In a twist of event, the same APC started shouting that he was unfit to be elected into the highest office in the National Assembly even after bringing him to the Senate. Some of us threw our weight behind Saraki's bid not because we sincerely wanted him but because we had to send a message to the APC and others that "you can't anoint a person of questionable integrity as a Catholic cardinal when it favors you and turn around to say the person is unfit to be the pope because it doesn't favor you" (sincere apologies to the catholics).

Since his exit from the seat of power in Kwara state there has been shocking revelations detailing Senator Saraki's role in the alleged looting of Kwara state treasury coupled with the police report that detailed his alleged role in the looting of Societe Generale Bank along with some members of his family; his father the late Sola Saraki and sister Gbemisola were indicted. The alleged actions of Saraki and his cohorts led to the collapse of SGB, of which lots of innocent and hardworking Nigerians lost their means of livelihood.

When the report of his alleged false declaration of asset before the Code of Conduct Bureau(CCB) came to the limelight, my position was that he should be prosecuted before the Code of Conduct Tribunal(CCT). When it was reported that the CCB was to kick start his prosecution today (18/09/2015), I so welcomed it. I believe that irrespective of political affiliation we must support the fight against corruption as long as it follows proper channel. Nigerians of good conscience must back this move by the federal government through CCB.

The "social media" defence that Saraki tried to put up by whipping political sentiment is lame. Neither Facebook, Twitter, Nairaland nor any mainstream media is a court of law. Saraki should explain himself to the Judge instead. The argument by some of his supporters that it was a 2003 offence is also lame. Criminal offence has no expiry date as long as it hasn't been cleared by a court of competent jurisdiction.

It is on record that Saraki is not the first former Governor to be tried by CCB. Ex-Lagos state Governor Bola Tinubu was also tried by CCB on allegation of operating foreign account while he was governor of Lagos state. A charge that he was acquitted of in 2012. Saraki is also not the first senate president to be tried. A former senate president Adolphus Wabara was arrested and tried along with 4 other Senators and 3 Representatives on allegation of receiving N50million bribe from then education minister Fabian Osuji in April 2005. He resigned and faced his crime, but was acquitted in 2010 on technical ground. Saraki is not the first Senator either.

I believe that moral and social justice demand that Nigerians of good conscience support the move of CCB on behalf of the Kwara people and all victims of his alleged loot. Not just for only Saraki but to all those that have cases to answer. The federal government of Nigeria has done well in this regard.



May God Bless Us All

1 million likes. By the way we shall see if he will be prosecuted. I doubt it but we are watching Buhari and his cohorts. They should better do the right thing. Prosecute every prosecutables

buki5:
http://citypeople.com.ng/i/p-square-peters-wife-wizkids-girlfriend-tania-are-blood-sisters/

pls who cares

bishopoliver:
And that is how Aunty Bimbo is 40 and still single

this should be laminated and pasted on her gate

jimi4us:
All the commenters above me have no economic knowledge so lets forgive them for their ignorance. As for the writer, let's all pray for his soul. That's all.

And U would want to take it that u know shey? Who is deceiving who? Ur ignorance speaks volume already. If u have information give it, if not 4 ever hold ur peace.

LocalChamp:
No Greek gift from J.P. Morgan
Posted By: Sam Omatseye on: September 14, 2015

Recently, the international mogul JP Morgan decided to delist Nigeria from its government bonds. The reason is that the new Central Bank regime on foreign exchange transactions does not favour its own light of good capitalism. It has created a set of chain reactions and the stock market has turned a little giddy.

But I am happy the CBN is not yielding to the shark of a bank.

J.P. Morgan and its types come from a culture of due process and transparency. But it is a bank that knows how to trick governments and naïve citizens. Was it not the same bank that was fined close to $20 billion for a series of unethical and unprofessional conduct? It paid a major role in swindling Americans in the mortgage scandal a few years ago, and paid $13 billion in fines. It also paid $1 billion over the “London Whale scandal” and $6 billion over the manipulation of a felon called Bruno Iksil. It paid $2 billion for allowing Berne Madoff swindle innocent American investors. It was in cahoots with companies, such as Goldman Sachs to tease Greece into its crisis by crafting a system to hide its debt while profiting by it. Now, Greece is suffering alone. If JP Morgan cannot live with transparency in Nigeria, we can live without their geeks. We abhor another Greek gift

http://thenationonlineng.net/no-greek-gift-from-j-p-morgan/

I agree completely

StealthIdeals:
So, I sud bone as e dey form manager ova me?

U beta close ya mouth cos u don't know how the manager got his job.

Twaci:
She could be rocking a c-string panties.

Allow that bushman that posted this trash and the bush moderator that moved it to front page

rozayx5:
At least three persons were confirmed killed while others sustained injuries when the Joint Task Force (Operation Pulo Shield), engaged suspected militants in a gun duel in Delta State, The Cable reports.

The commander of the force, Alani Okunlola, disclosed this in Warri during a press briefing on Thursday.

Parading a suspect allegedly arrested with various arms and ammunition, Okunlola said the operation took place in Benigboye community of Burutu Local Government Area of the state on September 5.

He said, “My men raided a militant camp in Benigboye. On sighting the troops, the suspects opened fire which led to a gun battle that lasted for 30 minutes before they fled the camp. In the follow up operation on September 6, my troops, on getting information on the hideout of the suspected militants that attacked Odimodi community, launched a search operation and apprehended one Ebiwame Lamia.”

Okunola added that during preliminary investigation, Lamia confessed that he was in the camp during the previous raid.

He quoted Lamia as saying that three persons died in the gun battle while some escaped with bullet wounds.

The commander said the JTF was in search of the fleeing suspects and urged the people to assist the troops with useful information that could lead to their arrest.

He listed weapons recovered from the camp to include medium machine gun, AK 47, light machine gun and AK 47 automatic rifle.

Okunola added that other weapons recovered were SMG, G3 riffles, one single barrel gun, and Improvised Explosive Device and an identity card.

He said the recovered arms and ammunition were in the custody of his men. The suspect, who claimed to be 17 years old, told reporters that he was a cook in the camp of the militants.

http://www.punchng.com/news/soldiers-militants-clash-claims-three-in-delta/

and it starts again.........

MR moon magic circus. Can anyone find the pictures and post a link of the theme song

Hozil92:
I and my girl have been dating for the past 6 years. It's kind of platonic relationship. Sex is not involve. Only kissing and all that. We broke up due to the fact that I can't endure it again. As you all know ' body no be firewood'. Since then she dated like two other guys. Early last year, she pleaded that we should get back together which I agreed on the basis that she have to give me the password to all her social network accounts which she did. All the same, the relationship still fell. After some months, I realized that I've missed something, so I threw away my pride and went back to beg her which after some time she agreed. Now the problem is she said she wants me but also claim to be in love with the other guy. She even uses the guy's pix as her whatsapp display pics. I really love this girl sincerely but it seems she is using me as a backup in case the other guy misbehave. My question is, should I stick around till she break up with the guy of find my way. Note that we still talk and she do come to my school at times to visit me.

Jamb question. Stay there nau make one small gal dey play piano for ya head. U no go commot after all there are many fishes in the sea

EggovinMma:
Women don't dis virgin themselves. Most of you want to test drive, so most of you should be ready to marry non virgins.


Yes oooo . Nothing goes for nothing in ALL relationship.

Who still cares about virginity these days. Abeg move joor

slightlyMad:
there was this guy wearing a tattered socks with holes the last time i travelled to PH

...and so wat