DrummaBoy's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DrummaBoy's Profile › DrummaBoy's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 93 pages)
following... |
Ukuts gp: I have been reading the links u gave here. And it was really enriching? Pls post all the links relating to tithe on this forum here for me, including the malachi 3:8-10 scam by Goshen 360 which i have not been following all this while cos of my busy schedule. I will be reading them from time to time. Cheers.The bolded is practically impossible but I will recommend one opended by OLAADEGBU some years ago that has run about 100 pages now. If you can read through it all, I am sure it will help you with you conclusions. Though you will need God's Spirit to direct you to discern the falsehood in what some are writing: https://www.nairaland.com/1189741/tithes-offering I am not aware of a Goshen expose on Malachi 3; the one I know is the one he did on Hebrew 7, which I adapted to a readable format here: https://www.nairaland.com/1319662/goshen360s-exposition-hebrew-7-abrahams Let me add to this that those of us, atleast me, who teach that tithing is not an obligation for Christians today take our position from the fact that the New Testament teach a gospel of grace and that we are no longer under law; nor are we to use grace to keep the law. Because of this position, some months ago we held a Grace Convention in which various papers on the concept of grace were presented. I invite you to look up the thread below. I have placed the various papers with their thread link next to them. You will be able to see the teachers and the papers. Pls feel free to study each one; they are a blessing (note that two teachers could not present papers but we still they can do so soon): https://www.nairaland.com/1416947/welcome-e-grace-convention-2013/1#17754058 |
OLAADEGBU: This is the right approach by believing and praying for his healing and health but the anti tithers would rather throw a pity party as if he needs one. frosbel: Healing ? what can be greater than salvation ? ![]() |
@ Gombs Hebrew 7:8 from a number of translations: And here men that die receive tithes; but there he receiveth them, of whom it is witnessed that he liveth - KJVBy looking at the verse 8 from other versions of the scripture, we see that the issue you wanted to make out of the matter of PLURAILITY is a non issue at all. It all depends on the version you are using; the plurality disappears in the NIV, for example. But let us even allow that that word was translated as plural. Do you realize that Melchizedek as King and Priest could not have collected tithes from Abraham alone. In his royal and religious capacity he would have collected tithes from other people too whether they were giving the tithes on religious or customary bases. Also, that text makes it clear that when Abraham gave his tithes, he was not the only one giving the tithe, his descendants that included Levi, Aaron and even Jesus (from the tribe of Judah) were giving tithes - thus the need to put that tithes in the plural. So my friend you have not brought out anything new by showing us that something was written in the plural. To suggest that because verse 8 read:" Furthermore, here [in the Levitical priesthood] tithes are received by men who are subject to death; while there [in the case of Melchizedek], they are received by one of whom it is testified that he lives [perpetually]" , then Jesus who is of the Order of Melchizedek is now collecting tithes from Christians, is to say something that that text never said - except, of course, on TBN. What does that text say? This is the context from which Hebrew 7:8 is taken (quoting from NIV): 1 This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him,Melchizedek is introduced in this text and his royal and religious role is defined, all in the bid to make one statement - that he resembled the Son of God; his office was in the order of Jesus. Now, another point that the writer is trying to make here is to show how great this man must have been. He was king, priest, he blessed Abraham and then Abraham gave a tenth to him - he really must have been a great man! 5 Now the law requires the descendants of Levi who become priests to collect a tenth from the people—that is, from their fellow Israelites—even though they also are descended from Abraham.Again making the point that this man Melchizedek was a great man but in the light of another revelation; his ministry is compared to that of the Levites - the Levites collected tithes and he is also seen here collecting tithes. 8 In the one case, the tenth is collected by people who die; but in the other case, by him who is declared to be living.Now while Levi collected tithes, and this man collected tithes; Levi paid a tithe to this man, through his father Abraham. So this man, Melchi and Levi cannot be on the same level. Melchizedek has to be spirituallly greater than Levi to have collected a tithe from him. Now, those of us who are not Jews cannot appreciate this statement but the Hebrews does. Like in the days of Jesus, the High Priest desending from Levi, was the highest spiritual authority in the land. If anyone could show from scripture, like the writer of Hebrew is doing, that there is a higher spiritual authority, which authority is likened to that of Jesus, then they could appreciate this man Jesus. Do not forget that the Jews did not accept our Lord's ministry and in a bid to win them to Christ, the writer here has to use an anology that they could understand - Melchizedek. There is no way one can read these texts, without a tithe prejudiced mind, and not see this. There is nothing in that text that says or can be implied to say that "Melchizedek priesthood is in the order of Christ's and so since Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek, Christians or even the Hebrews, must now pay tithes to Melchizedek or to Jesus". The truth of the matter is that NT worship is worship in the spirit. Union with Christ. The merit of our actions is found in the merit of Christ's action. If Jesus was in the loins of Abraham as a bonafide son of Judah, then Jesus paid the tithes in Abraham and he has effectively paid the tithes for us all. That is the doctrine of the NT, that everything concerning the laws of Moses and any other demand from God be it Circumcision, Sabbath, Firstfruits, Tithing, Sin offerings, etc, have been carried out by Jesus on our behalf. When we believe in Him, we identify with His righteousness and it is imputed on us. We are not under any obligation to keep these rules and regulations. All that is left of us is to follow the Spirit that commands us to walk in love. Love is giving and in this case free will giving as God established in Exodus 25 and as Paul confirmed in 2 Corinthians 9:7 11 If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood—why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?This is the conclusion of the matter: Perfection has come through Jesus and we need not submit to any other order of priesthood. In Jesus every child of God is a priest. Priest were not known to pay or give tithes, both pre and during the law, and it is not going to happen after the law. Now let me warn you before I let this matter rest because I see you Gombs as a scorner and one who loves to play to the gallery: desist from this ministry because it is a ministry of death and it earns God's wrath. Like I told Bidam in another thread (and this is not a curse or threat, I don't engage in all that kind of witchcraft) God Himself ended the levithical priesthood. Hebrews was written in about 64AD. 70 AD the Romans got tired of the intransigence of the Jews and sent Titus to destroy Jerusalem. Just as Jesus prophesied in Luke 19 and Matthew 24, Jerusalem was ransacked and destroyed. The Jews were displaced into the nations and there was no nation called Israel on earth until 1948. By the time the Jews returned to their land, while some could trace their lineage to other tribes, no one could trace his lineage to the tribe of Levi. What that implies is that no one could act as a High Priest talk less as a levite, etc. Thier complete lineage was destroyed. It makes sense bc there cannot be two high priests in the land: Jesus and another. Now, with priest and levites gone, there was no one to pay a tithe to. Check it anywhere: Jews do not pay tithe today! It is then fool hardy to find those who should know better, collecting ten percent of people's salary in the name of collecting tithes. What God Himself destroyed and ensured that the laws are changed, some are trying to restore. Do you see why you are on a collision course with something greater than yourself? I rest my case. The Yorubas have a proverb: "You only tell half truth to a sensible person; when it gets into him, it becomes whole". A word is enough for the wise. Cheers. |
@ Mr Miwerds. You have made my day. I believe a word is enough for both the wise and those who can still hear. I shall be quoting your last post on disabilities verbatim on my Facebook for my friends to read. You do not know what you just said has done for me. Again, God bless you Mark Miwerds. |
Enigma: Thanks a lot for the clarification, Mark.I share the same sentiments, Mr Miwerds, with Enigma. I just wonder how despite your disabilities you still do so well countering these errors. How do you do it? God bless you Mark Miwerds! |
Gombs:I will not bother to respond to the other things you wrote as rebuttal to my post. It is obvious to me that you love to play to the gallery, especially now that you are winning proselytes and disciples. In that one, I commend you. But I will still crave your indulgence to study Exodus 25 very closely; let me help you with some of the text again: 1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 2 Speak unto the children of Israel, that they bring me an offering: [size=20pt]of every man that giveth it willingly with his heart ye shall take my offering[/size]. 3 And this is the offering which ye shall take of them; gold, and silver, and brass, 4 And blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine linen, and goats' hair, 5 And rams' skins dyed red, and badgers' skins, and shittim wood, 6 Oil for the light, spices for anointing oil, and for sweet incense, 7 Onyx stones, and stones to be set in the ephod, and in the breastplate. 8 And let them make me a sanctuary; that I may dwell among them. 9 According to all that I show thee, after the pattern of the tabernacle, and the pattern of all the instruments thereof, even so shall ye make itI repeat again this is the first time God will be asking anyone in scriptures for an offering; the kind of offering that we prefer to call regular offerings or collections. The purpose of this offering was clear: to build the tabernacle. God gave this command along with the ten commandments on Sinai. Prior to this time, the offering of Cain and Abel was in that same spirit: free will offering. And based on the state of their hearts (cheerful giving) God received Abel's and not Cain. God asked Abraham to sacrifice his son: He asked for a human offering to test him and not because he was a blood thirsty God. Every other time people gave to God before Exodus 25, it was free will offering. Even the Abram giving of tithe to Melchi is better seen as a free will offering than the legalistic tithing that you and your friends are making out to be. When finally God will make a demand for an offering, he made it clear what it shall be: Free will offering. It has not changed then, it will not change now. I am stating this not for some to come after me and be saying now I am making a case for the law; No. I believe that there is a spirit and purpose for the law. It is all encompassing in the command to love God and our neighbour": this what translates to free will giving as God is demanding in the above text. And notice that the items in this giving were gold, silver, brass, etc; in other words raw cash as we have today; this God demanded for but did not itemize when he was defining his tithe. I mean to show that God never asked for Gold, Silver, Brass, etc, as tithes from Israel. Not because the Israelites didn't have these things, but because those things do not consist of what God defines as tithes, as we are told today. Leviticus 27 30 And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land, or of the fruit of the tree, is the LORD'S: it is holy unto the LORD. 31 And if a man will at all redeem ought of his tithes, he shall add thereto the fifth part thereof. 32 And concerning the tithe of the herd, or of the flock, even of whatsoever passeth under the rod, the tenth shall be holy unto the LORD. 33 He shall not search whether it be good or bad, neither shall he change it: and if he change it at all, then both it and the change thereof shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed. 34 These are the commandments, which the LORD commanded Moses for the children of Israel in mount SinaNumbers 18 20 And the LORD spake unto Aaron, Thou shalt have no inheritance in their land, neither shalt thou have any part among them: I am thy part and thine inheritance among the children of Israel. 21 And, behold, I have given the children of Levi all the tenth in Israel for an inheritance, for their service which they serve, even the service of the tabernacle of the congregation. 22 Neither must the children of Israel henceforth come nigh the tabernacle of the congregation, lest they bear sin, and die. 23 But the Levites shall do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they shall bear their iniquity: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations, that among the children of Israel they have no inheritance. 24 But the tithes of the children of Israel, which they offer as an heave offering unto the LORD, I have given to the Levites to inherit: therefore I have said unto them, Among the children of Israel they shall have no inheritance. 25 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 26 Thus speak unto the Levites, and say unto them, When ye take of the children of Israel the tithes which I have given you from them for your inheritance, then ye shall offer up an heave offering of it for the LORD, even a tenth part of the tithe.Deuteronomy 14: 22 Thou shalt truly tithe all the increase of thy seed, that the field bringeth forth year by year. 23 And thou shalt eat before the LORD thy God, in the place which he shall choose to place his name there, the tithe of thy corn, of thy wine, and of thine oil, and the firstlings of thy herds and of thy flocks; that thou mayest learn to fear the LORD thy God always. 24 And if the way be too long for thee, so that thou art not able to carry it; or if the place be too far from thee, which the LORD thy God shall choose to set his name there, when the LORD thy God hath blessed thee: 25 Then shalt thou turn it into money, and bind up the money in thine hand, and shalt go unto the place which the LORD thy God shall choose: 26 And thou shalt bestow that money for whatsoever thy soul lusteth after, for oxen, or for sheep, or for wine, or for strong drink, or for whatsoever thy soul desireth: and thou shalt eat there before the LORD thy God, and thou shalt rejoice, thou, and thine household, 27 And the Levite that is within thy gates; thou shalt not forsake him; for he hath no part nor inheritance with thee. 28 At the[b] end of three years thou shalt bring forth all the tithe of thine increase the same year, and shalt lay it up within thy gates[/b]: 29 And the Levite, (because he hath no part nor inheritance with thee,) and the stranger, and the fatherless, and the widow, which are within thy gates, shall come, and shall eat and be satisfied; that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all the work of thine hand which thou doest.Compare the items in Deuteronomy 14, Numbers 18 and Leviticus 27 with Exodus 25 and see if there is any similarity. There is none. God know his tithe, like Pastor Kun will say, what you are giving is nothing close to it. Some people have succeeded in cunning you to part forcefully with a tenth of your salary; rather than weep and growl in the bondage they have placed you in, you rather rejoice in it. It is not a new thing. It is not difficult to tithe - I know this, I did it for 15 years albiet ignorantly. It is more difficult not to tithe - standing in the liberty that God's truth brings, every time the guilt of wanting to part with 10% of my salary comes. It is called standing in the liberty wherewith Christ has made us free. It is not difficult to be religious at all. That is the reason why despite all the truth we know in Christendom today, the largest denomination still remain Roman Catholics (Even the Catholics we learnt this lie from no longer tithe). And in spite of the truth we will learn of the tithe, a majority of Pentecostals will remain in that bondage - this is what Bidam never wants to hear. |
Gombs:There is no such thing as tithing by faith; it is nowhere stated in the whole of scripture. We share a similar faith with Abraham in that both of our faith justifies us before God only(Genesis 15:6, Romans 4:1-4) Gombs:There is only one reason for Hebrew 7 to mention tithing, Abraham, Melchizedek and Christ, in the same breadth: it is to show the greatness of Melchizedek's priesthood. A priesthood that is likened to that of Christ. If the writer could show that this priesthood is greater than that of Aaron, which the Jews saw as the highest religious figure in the land, then he could understand the greatness of Christ and their need to serve Him. This chapter does not teach that Christians should tithe. Such a conclusion can only be reached by an already pre-conceived tithe mindset. Nothing in Hebrew 7 can be stated thus: "Christians or the church should therefore tithe because Abraham gave a tithe to Melchizedek". You may help me with one verse in Hebrew 7 that can closest to that. Gombs:There is no doubt that Malachi, like many other Old Testament text, has a prophetic dimension foreshadowing the coming of Jesus. But everything the Old Testament said about Jesus was repeated in the New Testament text. Sometimes almost word for word. So we saw the prophecy on John the Baptist and the New Testament confirms this. We see things spoken about the ministry of Jesus and yes, the New Testament confirms that (although a whole lot of things you quoted here also speaks of Christ's dealing with Israel in the millenium when Jesus shall reign over the Jews by fire by force after they had refused his Kingship at his first coming. But alas, the New Testament said nothing about tithes and offering, as you will have us believe this text is saying. So the tithes and offerings aspect of this chapter is not prophetic. There is only one way to see this and that is to see it as it is: Malachi is written to the Jews with prophetic dimensions, like many other Old Testament texts; and these prophetic dimension are confirmed in the New Testament. The matter of bringing tithes and offering to the storehouse was a strictly Jewish thing and was not prophetic. The storehouse was not built by Moses but was a latter day innovation by I think Hezekiah, to store the tithes brought to the priests; and this was "tithes of tithes" brought by the Levithes to the Priests. So if there was not food in the storehouse, it was either the Jews were not paying their tithes, or the Levithes were not remiting the tithes of the tithes, or the Priest were not taking the 1% tithes to the storehouse. It is not a message to the church of Jesus! Gombs:Like I have said, a lot of things in that chapter was prophetic pointing to Christ coming and the Millennium. Others were a direct message to the Jews. The one written on Christ coming we find in the New Testament. But let me say something about God and offering, God never asked for an offering from anyone [size=16pt]until[/size] Exodus 25 under Moses. And when he did, hear Him: 1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 2 Speak unto the children of Israel, that they bring me an offering: of every man that giveth it willingly with his heart ye shall take my offering. 3 And this is the offering which ye shall take of them; gold, and silver, and brass, 4 And blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine linen, and goats' hair, 5 And rams' skins dyed red, and badgers' skins, and shittim wood, 6 Oil for the light, spices for anointing oil, and for sweet incense, 7 Onyx stones, and stones to be set in the ephod, and in the breastplate. 8 And let them make me a sanctuary; that I may dwell among them.1. We see God asking men to bring an offering to Him 2. but it must be free will - willingly from the heart 3. That offering becomes His 4. Of all that was listed, non of them were tithable commodity under Moses (tithes were strictly agric produce) 5. It was always for purpose That system has not changed till date. And that is what the law of first mention means. If were God first mentioned offering, he meant it to be free will, it has not changed till this moment: 7 Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. - 2 Corinthians 9In the New Testament no offering is taken in the church, the closest to it is a collection for suffering saints in Jerusalem. For a purpose. So if we take offering in church today, we are taking a collection, hopefully for a (verifiable and accountable) purpose too. 2. And that our faith is of Abraham, who tithed IN FAITH to a to a Priest of same order Jesus is of, an order which is eternal. Hence tithe is eternal, so is offering!Like I said in the beginning, there is no such thing as tithing by faith. We are justified by faith, yes. We walk by faith, yes. But tithing by faith is the invention of modern day fraudsters! |
Ukuts gp: still waiting for ur reply on this controversial issue on nairalandGoshen 360 has done extensive work on tithing on this forum. This is one of them, which I adapted for ease of reading: An Expose on Hebrew 7 - https://www.nairaland.com/1319662/goshen360s-exposition-hebrew-7-abrahams |
Ukuts gp: I thought that tithe is only collected on a monthly basis before.On this forum the debate on tithing is very intense and there may not be a more debated topic than it here. I will implore you to your research and study. I was helped to make my conclusions on tithing with this thread: https://www.nairaland.com/1239719/questions-frosbel-tithing When you have the time you could read through it and come to your own conclusion to, albiet prayerfully. I recommend this online book with it also: http://tekoapublishing.com/books/tithing/index.html So study, like a Berean brethren, to show yourself approved unto God. Cheers. |
Pastor Kun: If you want to quote me, quote me in proper context and not out of context. My stance on tithes is very clear , I have no problem with believers giving any percentage of their income be it 1% or 100% and labelling it whatever they like whether tithe, offering seed or whatever. What I have a very big problem with is fraudulently manipulating the word of God to extort 10% on believers income on a consistent basis and labelling it as God's tithe. As long as believers are taught in clear terms that they are not required to tithe as christians, I won't have a problem with any preacher who persuades his congregation to set aside any percentage/proportion of their income they choose for the work of the gospel.this also is my position. The air of compulsion placed on giving called tithe. The beuty of the discuss here is that after is said and debated on tithing here on NL, protithers like Bidam, Alwaystrue,Image and Ihedinobi agree that tithing should not be by compulsion too! |
@ frosble, I sent u an email but got no reply. Did U see it? |
Pastor olu, frosbel is not JW. As much as we are called to PROPAGATE the gospel we must also PRSESERVE it, if not there will be no gospel truth to teqch anymore. I understand ur concern and i likd ur first post here but i beleive frosbel is not out of line. @ frosbel, there are things we can shar to propagate the gopsel and there ia a world of wisdom in Olu words. BTW Pastor Olu I owe frosbel a lot in helping me to see d fraud in tithng so indeed his work here is bearing fruts. Cheers. |
The very fact that no one definition fits tithing as practiced today is the leading reason why tithing today is not scriptural. God defined His tithe in Leviticus 27. When the Jews paid it, there was no confusion about it. It was 10% of agric produce from the sacred land of Israel to be given to Levites. |
Bidam: May be you have a problem with comprehension. If the Abrahamic covenant does not apply to you. It applies to me as heir of the promises of God.And i still stand by what i wrote with scriptures to validate it.end of discussion. I believe I have made my point! |
Bidam:Thank God you accept Christ is our passover; no more debate on that Bidam:This is what you said in response to Christembassey christemmbassey:you responded Bidam: Of cos i understand why your crew will click like to this error..Instead of correcting you, they will be happy to see you wallow in ignorance of scripture.SMH! Set of gnostics folks!!!Christembassey said we are not under Abraham's covenant but you said no we are. Why deny your own words now? Compare Abrahamic covenant is foundational to understanding both the NT and OT and every other covenants is as a result of the outworking of this covenant which is not obsolete but in effect till dateU just said now, with [size=16pt]Under the New Covenant, the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant are valid, and Abraham is our spiritual father[/size], as it were.[/b]you said before now Do they means same thing? From d first quote, if Abraham's covenant is still operating, are you not saying d new covenant is same as Abraham's? |
ayoku777: You believe Jesus came to add grace to the law, not replace it. You sugarcoat with semantics, but its clear from scripture. The law said love the Lord with all your heart and soul. Paul needed to have done this to be blameless. Yet he counted it as dung.It may not have bin put in those words but I think John's admonisions in his epistles was all about loving our neighbour. But it doesn't detract from your point that Jesus did not come to add grace to d law; rather he came to replace it. |
ayoku777: @AlwaystrueI heartily endorse this gospel of the kingdom! |
Bidam: I guess you wanna now turn this peaceful thread into a tithe fighting argument. The Abrahamic covenant wasn't ratified by circumcision as you erroneously posted but by animal sacrifices in Gen 15. Circumcision was just a SIGN of the covenant.So if d Abrahamic covenant was ratified by animal sacrifices, is the New Covenant also ratified with animal sacrifice ? My debate with you is that d Abrahamic covenant is not d same as d New Covenant. And your post has proved that. As for tithing, we can never avoid it: all discusses on matters of covenants still boils down to that practice. It is an old covenant practice not binding on NT Christians under d New Covenant. |
shdemidemi: @drummaboyThank you Demi. It is much appreciated. I put up a new paper on "Heaven". I trust you will find time to read it. |
electronic_mails_4me@yahoo.com |
Alwaystrue: The Old ConvenantThere is a problem here: first you say that in the Old Covenant: "i].Their doing was by human strength which is weak for they could not even will themselves to do good by flesh.[/i]" (empahsis mine) Then you proceed to say about the New Covenant: "In the New Convenant the [b]Holy Spirit is poured out to all who agree to do and be obedient by BELIEF in Jesus Christ thus agreeing to do God's will but in this case, it is God who works in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure[/b]" (Emphasis mine) Apparently, from what you have written, there is no difference btw the Old and the New. Both of them are carried by human effort and if going by you definition of human effort, the New Testament will also produce "weakness". This will probably have been better stated as The Old Covenant carried the element of Man's effort, which was weak and could not produce the kind of result God wanted; however, the New Testament is wholely and solely dependent on what God's does; man may respond to it by his weak efforts but the glory of the New Covenant is that man depends totally on God's effort. That is why the New Covenant carries more glory (2 Cor 3). |
I needed to state my position so that my response to what other have written can be better appreciated. Bidam:This is not particularly correct. I had shown you in another thread that the Abrahamic Covenant can only be likened to the New Covenant in Christ in the sense that both of them were accessed by faith (alone). The Abrahamic covenant was ratified by physical Circumcision (Genesis 17); The New Testament is ratified by Jesus blood. If the covenant is the same as the Abrahamic covenant, we would need physical circumcision. Paul wrote in the Galatians that you refered to that we do not come into the New Covenant by physical circumcision. So with all due respect, sir, you are wrong in this: The Abrahamic covenant is not the New Covenant. You need not take such a position all in the bid to justify tithing like Abraham. (just in case that is the reason you are propagating this error). |
The text below is taken from my blog: http://www.yesufu..com/2013/10/the-gospel-of-jesus-christ-part-5.html, The Gospel of Jesus Christ (Part 5): Today, the church is again weighed down by laws but not necessarily the laws of Moses but our inability to distinguish the Old Testament from the New. The church today takes much of it examples for Christian doctrine and practice from the Old Testament rather than the New. Thus, the priestly order of Aaron has been conveniently converted to a league of Men of God. Rather than submit to the admonition of Jesus that says we are all brethren (Matthew 23: , we find it easier to have ordained Pastors and Bishops, who hold such authority in the church and cannot be questioned but must be revered. Any tendency to question these men, we are referred quickly to the Old Testament again were God placed a curse on those who dared challenge Moses: “touch not my anointed and do my prophets no harm”. We forget quickly that the people of God in the New Testament have been made priests and kings unto God (Revelation 1:6). This fascination with the Old Testament extends to the church’s preoccupation with buildings. The temple in Jerusalem was the symbol of the Jewish religion. Today, the church building occupies an equal place of relevance. And regardless of the cost of building and maintaining it, the church building has become our symbol of religion too. It is this Old Testament mentality that informs tithes and offerings collected in church services; thanksgiving; child and property dedication; Sabbath observance; full time ministry; mass choir; anniversary celebrations, a queer belief that God dwells in church buildings and a host of other similar practices. None of these can be traced to the New Testament churches led by the apostles of the lamb. Paul’s contention with the Judaizers of his time was not just because they practiced circumcision but because he was trying to ensure that the gospel and the church life that will emerge from its preaching will not be adulterated and thereby loose its potency. God meant for the church to be distinct from Israel and that distinction is not to be confused. Paul preached the doctrine of dispensations (Ephesians 1:9; 3:1-11). 9 Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself (Ephesians 1) 1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel:... (Ephesians 3) 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; (Hebrew 1) 11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. 12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. (Galatians 1) A mystery doctrine that teaches that even though God never changes, He has instituted certain changes all through human history to bring about His eternal purpose of redeeming humanity to Himself. This doctrine is a mystery in the sense that it was not revealed to Old Testament Israel but to the apostles of the Lamb, who in turn taught it to the church through their epistles: and therefore the distinction between the Old and the New Testaments. We have three dispensations that can be subdivided into two each. These are the Theocratic, Christocentric and Eschatological dispensations. The theocratic dispensation can be subdivided into the age of the gentiles and the age of Israel. The age of the gentiles will range from the time of Adam and Even, through Abraham and up till the time the nation of Israel came out of Egypt. The age of Israel will be from the time the laws were given through Moses until the time Jesus was born. Then we come into the Christocentric dispensation that can be divided into the Hypostatic Union and the Church age. The hypostatic union is the time when Jesus was born, through his earthly ministry and up till the time he died on the cross. It called hypostatic union because of the unique union of the God-man found in Jesus Christ. It also represent a unique time in the dealings of God with humanity when grace and law operated at the same time. The time of Jesus must be seen as a separate dispensation because that is the only time in history when God dwelt amongst men and it is the dispensation that makes other dispensation relevant. Then we come into the church age, which is the dispensation were we live in the present time. It ranges from the time Jesus died on the cross up till the time when the church will be taken away in rapture. This dispensation is not characterized by the laws of Moses but solely by grace. The teachings of the apostles, particularly that of Paul, are what theologians like to call Church Age doctrines. These doctrines are particularly designed to be taught to the church: for the equipping and perfecting of the saints until we all come to the full measure of maturity in Christ Jesus (Ephesians 4:12-13, 2 Timothy 3:16-17). After rapture there shall be the eschatological dispensation that is subdivided into the time of tribulation and the millennial rule of Christ. When we understand dispensations, then we can understand the seeming discrepancies in the teachings of Paul and Jesus Christ. Jesus operated in a time of law and grace. He fulfilled the law and bequeathed its righteous requirement to the church. Paul taught that the church is no longer under the laws of Moses but under a new law that commands us to love God and men. |
ayoku777: Yeah, thats exactly the heresis that is not being addressed. That the covenant has changed from old to new but the terms and law of the old is still what is being used under the new. That couldn't be farther from the truth.I ENDORSE this message of the Kingdom |
annyplenty: What does it mean to live a holy life?Holiness is step 2 in this gopel matter. Step 1 is grasping the truth of grace as demi is explining to U. When grace comes holiness is easy. I invite u to study a 5 seiries paper on christ gospel on my blog and i how u will compreehnd these truth better. Holiness is God's grace working through human effort unto all good works. |
OLAADEGBU: If their questions aren't related to the topic of the OP then it is good for the garbage bin.Impressive dodging technique! |
Happy Birthday Pastor Bakare |
OLAADEGBU: READ Luke 22, John 13 (Jn 13:2) and find out what the key moment was for Judas Iscariot. If I were you I will guard my heart with all diligence, because not all thoughts are your own.My guy leave matter of DrummaBoy and Pastor Kun for Matthias and answer the questions posed at you and stop fooling yourself: Enigma: debosky: You can add that question to the growing list, including explaining how 'If you don't give your tithes to God, God will take it from you'. |
OLAADEGBU: The same way Judas attacked the "oyel" the woman used in anointing the Lord in the pretense that he had the interest of the poor at heart.^^^ Wow, with that picture... OLAADEGBU has seen the light! Hallelujah!! |
[size=16pt]A Q & A SESSION ON TITHING[/size] Q: Good day. Your article “I Cannot Afford to be a Christians” (http://www.yesufu..com/2013/09/i-cannot-afford-to-be-christian.html) has generated some controversies. Can we say from that article that you are asking Christians to no longer give a tithe of their income to their local churches? A: No. Q: So what were you trying to say, in summary, from that article? A: That article is simply an evangelistic message to non-Christians to reconsider the gospel of Jesus again. I was saying in that article that salvation is fully paid for by God for all men and to partake of it we are called to believe in Christ; Only. Now, as an addendum to the whole discourse, I brought in the issue of tithing; showing that tithing is one example, among others, in which modern organized churches have succeeded in discrediting this free salvation of Jesus; giving the impression that one is not a good Christian except the individual pays a tithe of his income. My grouse is with the word “pay”. Q: So you are saying that Christians must not be asked to pay tithe, although they could give their tithe? A: Exactly. Q: Is there is difference between the word pay and give? A: Plenty. The word pay denotes fulfilling an obligation; or meeting a prescribed requirement; or attaining the demands of a law. The word give denotes free will: a freedom to do as one purposes in one heart. The Old Testament clearly shows that the law required the children of Israel to pay tithe to the Levithical order (Numbers 18:21). The New Testament does not teach anywhere that Christians must pay tithes and offering. The scriptures show clearly that giving in the New Testament is simply free will and not obligatory or by necessity (1 Corinthians 9:7). Q: How then did the concept of paying tithes and giving offering come into the church? A: It came from a wrong interpretation and application of biblical truths. Most Christians today, following Paul’s revelation, accept that the laws of Moses has been abolished in the New Testament (Hebrew 7:12, 2 Corinthians 3:7, Galatians 3:24-27); they agree that Christians are not to pay tithes according to Moses’ injunction but they insist that we must follow the example of Abraham, who is the father of our faith, when he gave a tenth of the war spoils to Melchizedek. They say that Melchizedek is a type of Christ and for Abraham to give tithes to Melchizedek, Jesus is Melchizedek and we should give tithes to Christ through the church he has ordained on earth. Q: But that makes perfect sense. So what do you have against Abraham’s tithing and the call for Christians to imitate him by tithing too? A: Now let's understand the main issue at hand here. The wrong interpretation and application of biblical truth that I mentioned above is the fact that in regards to tithing, the church uses Abraham as an example on one hand but calls believers to tithe according to the law of Moses, on the other hand. When ministers ask people to tithe they use the Malachi 3:8-10 scripture to cajole people to pay their tithes or a curse will come on them, forgetting quickly that there would never had been a Malachi 3 if there had not been a Leviticus 27 and Numbers 18. I am saying in effect we cannot say we are not under Moses’ laws but resort to Moses laws to lay justification to a doctrine and practice in the church. If we must follow Abraham’s example, we must tithe as Abraham tithed; but if we must follow Moses’ law, we must obey the law to the letter and not just take one law out of the 613 laws God gave Israel through Moses, and leave the rest (Galatians 5:3; James 2:10) . And in addition to this if we were to follow Abraham example by imitating everything he did: Christians will go to war; Christians will sleep with their house maids; Christians will circumcise their children on the eight day; Chrisitians will lie; etc. It is Abraham's faith in God that brought about his justification (Genesis 15:6) we are called to imitate and not every minute detail of his life (Galatians 3:6-9). Q: But you still have not answered the question I asked: Why should Christian not tithe like their father in the faith, Abraham, did. A: To understand Abraham’s tithing, we must resort to two scriptures: Genesis 14 and Hebrew 7. The first thing we see from that scripture is that Abram, not yet Abraham at that time, gave a tithe and not pay a tithe to Melchizedek. So if Christians must tithe following Abram’s example, it must be free will giving and not obligatory payment. Also, we see that Abram did not give this tithe to curry a blessing from Melchizedek, as we are made to believe when we are told to tithe so as to open the heavens over our finances, according to Malachi 3. Rather he gave a tithe after he had been blessed by Melchizedek (Genesis 14:20). So his giving was a kind of thanksgiving offering or gratitude – the same way Christians can come forward to thank God for a deliverance, blessing or safety with an offering. Thus, rather than being an obligatory paying, we see this as an example of free will offering of thanksgiving. Abram, in this story, gave a tithe of war spoils. It is nowhere recorded that he gave a tithe of his possessions to Melchizedek; even though he made reference to his wealth in that passage of scriptures (v.22- 23). We see from this example that Abraham’s tithing was a once-for-all event; and not a weekly or monthly duty. Now, other translations of scripture, other than the KJV, translated the word “tithe” in v.20 as tenth. This they did not because the two words differ but to distinguish this particular tithe or tenth from the religious tithe or tenth that God will require of Israel to give to the Levites under Moses later (Leviticus 27, Number 18). Many bible scholars, including those who agree and disagree with tithing today, accept that what Abraham did was in keeping with the custom of that age: were Kings and Priests were given ten percent of spoils obtained from the war front. Abraham was simply following an established custom and thus the tithe he gave here cannot be seen as a religious tithe (like we would find under Moses) but a customary tithe. Christians do not go to war today; and even if they did and obtained war spoils, we see from Scriptures that God either regarded war spoils as an abomination (Joshua 6:17-18) or gave specific instructions in regards to how to use them (Joshua 6:19; Numbers 31:25-30). God has never demanded a tithe from war spoils. For the conclusion of the Q and A session see http://www.yesufu..com/2013/09/q-session-on-tithing_12.html |
gold_dealer: If you believe in paying tithe, do you have any motive for paying or just following the biblical instruction. AlsoBest response so far: tpacalipse: I believed in it and I paid before. Then I stopped believing in it and refused to pay. Guess what? I have never seen any changes in anything. I progress gradually just as it used to be when I was paying. Though I still pay some kinds of money in church these days, even sometimes if what I pay is 10 percent of my income, I will never call it tithe.Second "best" response so far: joe4christ: I was once a committed tither, but my eyes later seen ''we'en'' now i dont, and i've never been so blessed and favoured.Worst response: Cele-pope:My response: Stay tuned! |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (of 93 pages)

, we find it easier to have ordained Pastors and Bishops, who hold such authority in the church and cannot be questioned but must be revered. Any tendency to question these men, we are referred quickly to the Old Testament again were God placed a curse on those who dared challenge Moses: “touch not my anointed and do my prophets no harm”. We forget quickly that the people of God in the New Testament have been made priests and kings unto God (Revelation 1:6).