Golpen's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Golpen's Profile › Golpen's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 21 pages)
I'm sorry, but I can't find the list or where it says muslim countries are affected on the source. Please help. |
@cleanvessel You are going against your rational logic. Don't tell me your pastor may decide to keep quiet even when God wishes to speak through him. All those that fall down at your pastors touching them are on demonic spells. Tell me a true christian don't fall on receiving annointing again. I can see that you are not ready accept my claims as I'll never also be ready to accept yours, but I think I've put my opinion here on the thread and I think that is enough. This is going to be my last post on this particular issue. |
jpiliya: I came to dis tread because I was intrested in your response to it ( does islam condone ? ) and you failed me... yes a saluted mintayo because he is responding to your oversight questions .... and if am guilty by that then you are equally as guilty for inviting me.. it shows you were as well intrested in my supporting him by inviting me to responsed side by side mintayo.I'm so sorry about the disappointment and as you can see, the thread's question has been answered, only for your fellow brethren to breed arguments afterwards. Don't mind them sha, just one slave causes the general molestation of other slaves. And mind you, I only invited you to go through the link and you refused. Sorry once again anyway. |
@cleanvessel If they don't speak in tongues as automatically as you say, it definitely means they are trained linguists. If the verse of the bible mark 16:17 tells us that speaking in tongues is an evidence that the holy spirit is talking, then the person mustn't have been speaking all by himself which renders him unconscious of what's next to say. To your questions; 1. The Qur'an wouldn't have been bigger even if the prophet Muhammad (s a w) were to still be alive. ALLAH says in t he Qur'an 5:3 and I quote; "This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion." This shows that the Qur'aan is all complete, ma sha ALLAH. 110% sure. 2. your question has been answered above. 3. I'm so sure the Qur'anic revelations are enough to take me to paradise insha ALLAH, because I'm yet to find an aspect of life which is not covered by the Qur'an. 4. Islam is not a religion of deception that you have to tell lies of NDEs. My evidence; The bible says in hebrew 9:27 " And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" . Going by this, all your fantasies about NDEs are null and false. You better stop all the fallacy and face reality. Go beyond the deception modes of your pastors telling you about currents and towers please. They are using these to blend the doctrines to fit their pockets. |
jpiliya: on whom did I try to force my stance? mind you I never discussed jesus/christianity with you or anyone on this tread .... I know fully well that I cant convict any heart on my own God does that mine is just to tell you the TRUE that s all and since this tread was not initially for that I rejected your invitation to view a certain link and comments then how am I forcing my stance on you?I'm not refering to this particular thread alone, but but every intruding posts here. Meanwhile, the offence of the criminal is minor to that who indulges him (just an idiom). You came on the thread to support your fellow so your case isn't different from his. |
Mintayo: are you advocating for my ban or what?I'm not advocating for your ban so do not fear because of your illicit act. I have contributed meaningfully but all you do is go the cunning way about it. I don't want you to ask to bring up facts from history that goes against that of the Isah(jesus) we have in our Qur'an. I'm so sure you'll go in circles again or you quote bible references I won't believe in, so keep to yourself. |
cleanvessel: @golpen |
cleanvessel: @golpenThis is where you finally displayed your flaws. If I'll agree by your theory that revelations aquired on semi-conscious manner are demonic, then your pastors speaking in tongues in your churches are casting demonic spells on you, while you humbly accept or say amen. Luke, john, mathew, mark and others giving accounts of life and deed of Jesus is rather a biography and that is no hint of revelation needed for you to know that you are replying my post here on NL. ALLAH has completed for us our Deen and has brought HIS favour upon us. That is why everything needed as guidance in our trails and endeavours through life is found in the Qur'an, with elaboration in the hadith and sunnah of the prophet Muhammad (S A W), so save your fingers for useful words. Ooookay, being current with God is the latest code of deception your pastors use in twisting the doctrines from time to time for their pockets right?...save your currents please. |
Mintayo: don't take it too hard pls.Highlighting to you what I think is your flaw is not hard on you at all. The point still remains you come into this section to breed chaos and when you get spanked on the head you lay the victim card. Your opinion has always been left to you only when you stick to your christian and eithist section provided for you by the website. I accept and even love it that Isah A S(jesus) is in my own Qur'an and I don't need that Muhammad is in the bible to confirm the authencity of my deen. Peace. |
Mintayo: you know what,i have so many links from so many islamic sites that tried to put ur prophet in d Bible and also call him d 'comforter' promised by Jesus but none is true. Mintayo: thank you sir,God bless you too.You are making me to feel that your situation is very pitiable. You went through the link and can't debunk the facts. You claim you have more questions and you can't post them. You threaten to unfollow the thread as if anybody ever forced you to follow it. You better know what you're doing!! |
jpiliya: aWhen you know that is your stance, why try to force your stance down people's throat. That is selfishly unjust. Is this thread meant for you? |
@cleanvessel I'll advice you to lightly deceive yourself. Imagine you are writing a textbook, lecturing me on what a revelation is, whereas you are locking yourself up at a corner. Is a revelation supposed to be in a narrative manner? Do you need a revelation to tell a story of what you are a witness? Is luke's account of the events that happened a revelation also? Remember he gave those accounts because plenty others have done the same luke 1:1 If God speaks to you, then you own the message for yourself, but if God is speaking through you, it is never narrative. You speak those words in a state whereby you are semi conscious and so not speaking by yourself. That is the way each true scripture has been brought down to every true prophet, not in a narrative or storytelling manner like that of the bible. I still maintain that those references made to those books in the bible and which are true can be made to by muslims, I agree. But the paulish quotes of deception and manipulations will be shut off. Does the church abide with every rule of that revelation you talk about? All it does is manipulating the flock with the rod of civilisation. That is why your pastors wives will remain head over you because their family needs money, even when the bible asks all females to keep shut in your churches. Deceive lightly yourselves I tell you. |
jpiliya: @mintayoYou better go through that link too and help him from shying away from the various questions running through his mind, that which he won't dare ask here. |
cleanvessel: @ golpenYou don't really need an authority to say 1+1=2. You can't debunk my claims of the structures of both scriptures and you claim its not authoritative. Are you telling me the torah and injeel revelation came down in a narrative form like that of your bible? According to Quran 3:113-115 -Not all of them are alike;a party of the people of the Scripture stand for the right,they recite the Verses of Allah during the hours of the night, prostrating themselves in prayer. Do you prostrate? See, the fact is that a scripture from God is not narrative, but direct and that is why I said the very few hint of the torah aand injeel found in the bible is a review, not the original. The torah was revealed to Moses and the injeel to Isah(Jesus), but we still find in the bible where people like luke had to give his own account of incidents, because several others have done the same luke 1:1. And what sense does that pass to you? The point is that the few reliable ones we can find can be made reference to, but the paulish opinions will be shut off. And YES, we do make reference to the bible, but all you do is fight the same bible because of our references. you are not even abiding completely by the bible and you want us to (You better don't say this is not authoritative). Does that work in any way? |
Mintayo: lolz...the link you gave me didnt answer the questions above,it only give rise to more questions!I know it didn't answer the question and I never promised you an answer from the link. I only wanted you to have a feel of the prove, now you tell me it didn't make you think for a moment instead, you have more questions from what is as clearly comprehensible. I'm sure if I tell you yes, Muhammed (s a w) did speak high of Isah (a s) through the revelation given to him, you'll still ask questions. You better stop deceiving yourself and go through that link with your bible at hand, maybe you'll understand more. then you can cook up your questions and let's see how light they are. |
Double posts please. |
The solution to the issue at hand here is looking into the structure of both books. 1. The bible is a collection of events and revelation from different people as witnesses and prophets, while the Qur'an is a complete revelation to just one prophet (Muhammad saw). 2. The bible is written in the third person singular (first person in cases of quotes though), while the Qur'an is wriiten in completely first person singular. In view of these, like I have always put it, the bible is a compilation of references and reviews from the previous books (torah and the gospel), but not the real them, stories from different witnesses bringing forth contradictions and of course some fabrications to blend it up. If Allah requests that references be made from the previous books; 1. The bible is not the book referred to as previous. The torah and injeel is not the bible, though the bible contains a little review of them. 2. The little review as it is in the bible can still be referred to, provided it is authentic from the several unsuitable parts. That is why we can make references backing some islamic proofs from the bible, such as the coming of Muhammad (s a w), but what we get is our xtians fighting these proves in their own book. |
The solution to the issue at hand here is looking into the structure of both books. 1. The bible is a collection of events and revelation from different people as witnesses and prophets, while the Qur'an is a complete revelation to just one prophet (Muhammad saw). 2. The bible is written in the third person singular (first person in cases of quotes though), while the Qur'an is wriiten in completely first person singular. In view of these, like I have always put it, the bible is a compilation of references and reviews from the previous books (torah and the gospel), but not the real them, stories from different witnesses bringing forth contradictions and of course some fabrications to blend it up. If Allah requests that references be made from the previous books; 1. The bible is not the book referred to as previous. The torah and injeel is not the bible, though the bible contains a little review of them. 2. The little review as it is in the bible can still be referred to, provided it is authentic from the several unsuitable parts. That is why we can make references backing some islamic proofs from the bible, such as the coming of Muhammad (s a w), but what we get is our xtians fighting these proves in their own book. |
Mintayo: lols.I'm very busy to answer your questions myself here...but not to worry, I have tried to help you a bit here; www.islamicity.com/mosque/muhammad_bible.htm . Hope it helps. |
truthman2012: Thank you for your remarks. One's adversary cannot kill a fat animal.Yes!!! ![]() truthman2012: Thank you for your remarks. One's adversary cannot kill a fat animal.Yes!!! |
truthman2012: golpen,That is the problem I foresee we'll have with you. Why can't you simply agree that you got your answer from him on that. Instead, you say he TRIED. Secondly, I have studied you to be a lazy reader (though long posts are mostly too boring, I admit) therefore, I perceive your research level is very slow. All your claims are from your anti-islam sites, which means you won't be able to defend your claims, hence you'll always disagree on every point given. In view of these, I'm not sure we need any of your points here. I'm sorry, thanks. |
tpia@:I'm not sure you mean she should praise unclad acts because unclad people gave her a prize. Giving her a prize doesn't mean that they may be confused in their dressing senses. It is no sentiment ma'am, but fact!!! |
omoh50: A Priceless Quote from a true muslimaSimple analogy... Ma sha Allah!!! |
truthman2012: @opSir truthman2012... I'm thinking that you've resumed from the break I asked you to take with the grand kids ![]() truthman2012: @opSir truthman2012... I'm thinking that you've resumed from the break I asked you to take with the grand kids ... You are welcome anyway. Hope lanrexlan's answer is sufficient, so go and answer your own ray mcblue test and help your people instead of standing the risk of being called dubious by your approaches... |
I still always fail to understand why everything in islam is a problem to your souls...even if it is 320 virgins, what is your problem about that? No one is forcing 1000 virgins on you, but you are here relishing on the sensation with ironical expression. BTW, hypertension is real... |
Ray McBlue: In a corporeal world, standing on the earth, the Sun seems to move, in fact, Quran actually believed that the Sun sets in a muddy spring.Now you're making me to feel that your argument is based on your personal interpretation. If you call this a symbolic representation crap, then the earlier you agreed to was just a numerical summation crap too. I don't know how more to convince you, so I'd better be off on this particular case, if you keep making up some symbolic vocabulary on an issue simple english would have solved...thanks. |
Ray McBlue: Lol! I knew that, but it takes the Sun 225 million years to complete a full orbit, which makes it extremely slow. Not all astronomers agree with the theory, btw.1. Thank God you knew that and you're agreeing to the fact, but yes it is very slow. VERY SLOW still remains it does. If some astronomers don't agree to the theory, it scientifically renders it hypothetical which only first has to be confirmed in the scientific world. The Qur'an maintain its stance. 2. I'll like to deny that the Qur'an claims we have day and night because they orbit. According to your posts, your are assuming that stance because 'day and night' occurs concurrently with 'moon and sun' orbiting in many verses of the Qur'an... But this is it (my thought though)... The Qur'an possesses several values, which includes the scientific (as you'd confirm @least in some areas) and poetic or do I call it literary...the occurrence of 'day and night' with that of 'moon and sun' is mostly as a satisfaction of the literary value portrait. Just like you hear in several limericks or lyrics; "wherever I GO, whatever I SEE". The two words 'go' and 'see' occur together mostly in the english literary genre but it doesn't mean that going always determines seeing. Therefore, in the arabic context, which is the best point of view, it suits the literary portrait and not the scientific. Thanks. |
Ray McBlue: Quran 36: 40 It is not for Sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night@ur 4st paragraph, I think you're wrong somewhere sire...the sun sure orbits, therefore the Qur'an is right. Please check www.universetoday.com/18028/sun-orbit/. @d second, I wish explain more also, but let's see if I come up with a better way then I'll get back to you. @3rd...exactly. |
Ray McBlue: Are you now equating your carpentry prowess with the confusions in those verses? |
Ray McBlue: Are you now equating your carpentry prowess with the confusions in those verses?The point is his carpentry prowess is an illustration to the fact that all those verse you quoted still boils down to the facet that everything was within six days(periods). 1. The heavens and the earth was made in six days (periods). 10:3 2. The earth in two days (period). 41:9 3. Within four days(periods), HE had the earth, mountains, nourishment, blessings and all. 41:10 4. HE completed them (heavens), in two days(periods) Summation of all makes six(6) days(periods)...thank you. |
harmeenart: A question for my brothersIn fact, I'd better go for someone like that, but the problem is that ladies like that don't always want to marry a male with inferior knowledge. #dontknowwhy |
jpiliya: is christianity a standard for you to practice true islam? if christianity is a wrong religion why are you compareing it with islam? if (FALSE) christians practice juju and the rest is it a justification for you and muslims to behave in a similar manner? mind you am not compareing islam with christianity, christians also have their faults (in tonnes)...and here/now is NOT for comparison. suleiman and others acted in ignorance ..... many muslims today are deluded in such ignorance of the TRUE islamic teaches you can compare the ratio of ONE knowledgeable (principal) to MANY ignorant (students) what am saying is correcting these ills and many such will save people the misconceptions about islamI don't want to start questioning your comprehensive capacity, but I already sensed that my style may be too complex for you to understand, therefore, I'll be simple this time. I'm definitely not comparing christianity with islam, get what I'm putting across. If you agree with me that the same thing you accuse muslims of is also 'in tonnes' in christianity, then why has only the muslim case caught your fancy that much?. That is not even where I'm heading for, but I mean when a fellow christian has a fault, you attach the fault to the christian alone. Whereas, in a muslim's case, you are fast to crest the fault as islamic. We have worst pastors and even cannibalistic christians too, but no one has ever stigmatised christianity with their faults and that is hypocrisy. Yes suleiman and others acted in ignorance and it has been corrected, any other way round is bigotic! And in fact, nothing practical can be done, no matter how frustration grips your heart. |

... You are welcome anyway. Hope lanrexlan's answer is sufficient, so go and answer your own ray mcblue test and help your people instead of standing the risk of being called dubious by your approaches...