₦airaland Forum

plappville: You dey fear? No matter the interpretations, i think it is clear with this :
@Op, don't worry, we are following up, it is noted "nor to usurp authority over the man"
God will help us all to obey his words.

Goshen360: ^ ^ @ tpia, you don receive anointing to translate user I.Ds from MusKeeFrom shey? My belle don burst with laugh o . Where una dey get all these I.D formulations from sef? Huh? Wetin make we call your own I.D now? tilapia or titi-tilapia?

italo: Who is arguing with Ijawkid and Frosbel. It is better you go to a psychiatric home and speak to the people there.

But keep arguing sha, until you discover it yourself.

Just advising.

Omenuko: I very much think you need to review those passages once more...we have in Matthew 17:1-9 a discussion of Jesus and three of his apostles going to a mountain (the Mount of Transfiguration). On the mountain, Jesus begins to shine with bright rays of light. Then the prophets Moses and Elijah appear next to him and he speaks with them. Jesus is then called "Son" by a voice in the sky, assumed to be God the Father, as in the Baptism of Jesus. Following this, Jesus then warns his apostles to tell no one until he (Jesus) is risen from the dead. I don't understand how you gather that this is a vision.

In saying vision, I assume you to mean that it did not actually happen. That you believe it was a fantasy or dream of sorts. If you believe it to be a fantasy or dream, why would God show these three men, Moses and Elijah speaking with Jesus? And why would God specifically manifest this to the Peter, James and John.

Omenuko: To further reveal that this was in fact a real event Peter goes on to write about this experience in 2 Peter 1:16-18...

Omenuko: From the above Peter clearly states that he was an eyewitness to the event or majesty discussed in Matthew 17:1-9 and heard the voice of God. How can you then say it was a vision. Peter even begins this passage by saying he and others are not easily disposed to false stories, of which I would include dreams or fantasies or even visions. I'm happy you ended you post by saying you think...Because what you think is very much so contrary to the traditional interpretation of the transfiguration.

Omenuko: I see you managed to do the same the shdemidemi did. Scripture does not interpret its self. Please interpret what this means and answer my original question, namely:

So just to be clear...your argument is that Moses and Elijah are not in heaven or rather did not actually meet Jesus. Instead, are dead and have not interaction with anything or anyone (including God). Is that correct?

chukwudi44: Well if not for the crusaders frosbel would have been doing Allahu Akbar by now.I am sure he would have ended up as a suicide bomber with his maverick spirit.

Richieboyn: and I jst can't understand why u dnt have sense.

Deep Sight: Now, I charge you, as your sacred master, fall upon the next thing in skirts around you and do holy justice to her.

Ubenedictus: you will be very surprised when you see some non-christians in heaven!!

obadiah777: THANKS FOR GIVING ME THE HEADS UP. I NO DEY COME AT ALL OOOOOO. I NO WAN CHOP PYTHON

Ubenedictus: ewww!! Eyama!!! So u dey chop snake? Eww?

obadiah777: BROS I WILL NEVER EAT SNAKE. THE LORD WILL NOT ALLOW HIS OBEDIENT CHILDREN BE HUNGRY TO THE POINT WHERE THEY START EATING ABOMINABLE FOODS

obadiah777: NOPE I DONT TOUCH PORK OR RATS OR SNAILS OR SHRIMPS OR LOBSTER. THESE ARE ALL SCAVENGERS. THEY ARE PUT ON EARTH TO CLEAN THE EARTH AND THE SEA AND BALANCE THE ECOSYSTEM. THEY ARE NOT FOOD. THEY ARE THE DUSTBIN OF THE EARTH

Ubenedictus: in essence u can't answer me becos ur answer will show ur fallacy.

ooman: you ke?? i am

Calculus12: The Hateist roams nairaland like a prowling lion seeking whom to devour.

Reyginus: Lol. This kind linear philosophical equation me i no understand am o.

Boomark: I wonder how Joseph who is faithful to the law will still want to put her away because of the law he broke. it doesn't make sense.

Ubenedictus: and does dat say beads are restricted to d buddist alone?

Ubenedictus: i guess italo pasted some numbers.
As for ijawkid, i won't wait my time redebunking d arguements i already debunked.

obadiah777: WELL SHE WAS UNWEDDED ( NOT MARRIED BUT ENGAGED ) AND HAD NOT HAD S-EX. HOWEVER SCRIPTURE SAYS THE SPIRIT MOVED THEM TO DO IT. MEANING THEY BOTH GOT WEDDED ( YOU ARE MARRIED IN SEX ). HOWEVER ONLY THEM KNEW IT. THE SOCIETY DID NOT KNOW. THIS MEANS MARY IS TAINTED FOREVER. SHE WILL BE MADE A PUBLIC SPECTACLE IF THEY WENT THROUGH WITH A CEREMONY AND THEN THE PEOPLE FOUND OUT SHE WAS NOT A VIRGIN. SO THIS IS A BIG ISSUE IN A PATRIACHAL SOCIETY. SO WHAT TO DO ? HIDE HER SOMEWHERE OR GET RID OF HER OR RUN AWAY. THOSE ARE YOUR ONLY OPTIONS IF YOU DONT WANT THE PEOPLE TO DISGRACE HER. HOWEVER SOMETHING IN HIM MADE HIM STAY ( THE HOLY SPIRIT IN HIM ) AND THEY GOT THROUGH IT AND HAD MORE KIDS. A HAPPY ENDING.

Deep Sight: X - X + X = X; Therefore . : . Resolve X.

X = X.

Resolved.

Reyginus: hmmm. And X is?

Reyginus: Chai! I don suffer. Obadiah, me? +brandishes a sharp cutlass+
At op. Not only Lb, serialink, bella, Mr Anony, dilluminati, noetic , plapville, and pastormustwac.