₦airaland Forum

bukatyne:
The nothing is good enough for me.

OK. I respect that.

bukatyne:
No need for long story & waste of seun's space if I see a poster who articulates my opinions on a subject matter.

Seun's space indeed. It's no more his space than it is ours who make this forum the hottest in the continent.

You picked the post that said nothing.

bukatyne:
On point!

Bukky dear, is that all you're going to contribute to this?

Lumpyy:
Eh oga pls ignore Mr Joe joe when he mentions me!how is this thread similar to a concerned hubby asking how pregnant women feels?his wifes preggies for the first time and cant DO but Mr joe said she must be pretending and inconsiderate cos all pregnant women are HOT .and he said he was talking from experience...hahahah!
ohh sorry postmann for bothering you with a reply as am just seing your post to the link he sent u,u call people foolish for speaking dia mind?welldone sir!

Hey, I appreciate you took the time to clarify your stand without being rude.

Next time Mr joe mentions your handle I'll try to ignore him if I think he did it without a good reason. There are lots of similarities in both threads cos they bordered on women's insensitivity or self-centredness in their sexual responsibilities in matrimony.

Personally, I wonder if polygamy is the answer to women's sexual unavailability during some stages of pregnancy and postnatal.

Did I call anyone in particular foolish for speaking his mind? Even though one can actually be foolish for speaking one's mind.

You didn't bother me.

joseph1832:
I believe its time I start referring to you as 'Pastor Postmann'. LOL.

The female monikers I mentioned, showed they love it when a man kiss their ass, even when he's dying, they don't care, just as long as he continues kissing their ass, they're okay with him.

They were the ones who openly called one OP insensitive because his wife refused him sex, because she's pregnant. Even when he complained that he's become frustrated, they still say he should understand what the wife is going through and he should not disturb her for sex. Failing to even understand what he is going through...

www.nairaland.com/3101565/married-men-pregnant-wiveshow-cope

Little wonder they never learn. They keep repeating the same mistake over and over.
A man is most vulnerable when his wife is pregnant. The wise ones will look for comfortable means to meet his needs. But the foolish expects him to "understand"

joseph1832:
True that! Later, emotional beings like BellaElla and Lumpyy will start saying "he's very inconsiderate, can he not imagine how she's feeling at the moment? In this time of husband scarcity, you expect a woman not to chat with her friends about her wedding ceremony? Something that only happens once in ones life". Lol.

I don't know much about those monikers you singled out. But I know this much: a lot of contemporary women are lost, overran by fantasy and selfishness.
For a man to earn their praise, he might have condescended to a wussbag.

NigeriaKitchen:
Mobile phone and social media addiction is killing many people's relationship, marriage and even career

You know most women are so petty. To them the ceremony and the flamboyance attached to it is more real than the significance of being a married woman. So she'd rather continue in the gossip of "how did you see my wedding ceremony " than consummating her marriage.

Ls0fdk:
Here it's
Cc: naija.boiy m.uva mim.zy le.zz refi.ner postm.ann smellymou.th iamleg.end1 iykeke.lvins miss.picy thesono.fmark lay.la129 cuteh.ector kingche.ezypuff cream.ish iv.vy tosyn.e2much slyis.aac kazibl.ake lave.da donbe.nedict
Those wey never do oya come do una own

Looking innocently cute in that baby pic. And then into one all-knowing, bad-ass, handsome bloke of an adult.

mimzy:
hmmmmmm...
do you have a past life ? or do you believe in reincarnation?

Wasn't the spirit of Elijah the same spirit in John the baptist?

mimzy:
hehehehehe.... can u imagine

So it is safe to say you were born in the medieval ages

Not really. My body is of this contemporary age, but my soul is of old; from the lush foliage of a world in its youthful grace.

mimzy:
awwww. i appreciate.

You just made me smile

Where is your #ThrowBackPicture

Not yet in a digital format. _Postmann could be archaic sometimes

mimzy:
OK here we have it

cc: muv.a, smellym.outh, hurricanemimzy, evath.yst, slyisa.ac, ftbo.y, lsof.dk, postma.nn, iykek.elvins, nikkyp.earl, jadekita.na, vanq.uay, marys.meal, brainto.uch, cream.ish, firste.va, misspi.cy, raphi.e01, rexhenre.x, kin.grex1,Knightn.gale, le.zz, oya you people should come n post your throwback pics

@Mimzy, you're of the finest of seeds. Little wonder you germinated so well. That's beauty from a tender shoot to fully blossomed fruit.

Anas09:
Hey. Analice got banned. Anas09 has to come out. How have you been?

Been busy like a pendulum clock. But I'm good. Sorry about the ban. Good you had another handle that could suffice.

joey150:
hmmmmmmm...well you seem to have a point.. i think she was dead.. my thought..because she was not spoken of even in that context,she wasnt referenced as been present.

and 1 con 9:5 in my bible reads 1 Corinthians: 9. 5. Have we not power to carry about a woman, a sister, as well as the rest of the apostles, and the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas? no mention of wife...

but surely...peter himself never talked about a wife.

1 con 9:5
King James version reads: Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

And if you must find a way to argue out the authenticity of Peter having a wife in 1con9:5, what about mat 8:14? You want to argue that one out too?

We skip denomo. Christ is the real deal.

joey150:
nah!
by conspiracy theory i meant you saying PETER WAS MARRIED and your other talks like that.

You see why I told you to go back and stay at the feet of JESUS? You're not even conversant with scriptures

Peter been married is no conspiracy. It was stated twice in the scriptures.
Mat 8:14
1 con 9:5

postmann:
Only if you had picked your choice of words to reflect that which you profess, then you wouldn't have found me.

joey150:
save your conspiracy theories. i dont believe in such.

When you uncleave yourself from the yoke of pretence, then i'll take you a tad more serious.


The second quote above gave you away.

joey150:
i dont know if you have noticed..but look around there are not many kinds of your people here. if you want to trade words this is not the place.

Only if you had picked your choice of words to reflect that which you profess, then you wouldn't have found me.

joey150:
awwwww! I'll say a prayer for you. this hate cannot emanate from a good soul

You didn't take the time to know my handle before rushing to quote me.

Save yourself from spiritual buffoonery. Go back to the feet of CHRIST and learn HIS wisdom. As for now you're tearing HIS house apart with your discrimination and spiritual hollow-mindedness.

joey150:
save your conspiracy theories. i dont believe in such.

Your points got drained like water on sandy soil, didn't it? You're diagrace to christianity. Dividing the sheep that was purchased with the precious blood of CHRIST by your mind of servitude and denominational witchcraft!

Ubenedictus:
now who is selling misinformation.

Good to know you can spell misinformation. But you mustn't stop there. You prove your point by refuting my post with scriptures.

bukatyne:
I can't quote you.

Kindly re-post so I can respond.

Thanks

quote author=bukatyne post=45597137]@postmann:

Stop feeling important

I tagged the two peeps who made me actually start the thread. They felt the culture of women looking up to their husbands as providers was obsolete.

Will get back to your epistle.

#modified:

I was actually expecting more proponents of rigid gender roles.

I think you are mixing up a househusband & a husband who is domesticated.

bukatyne:
@Tiwa: there was nothing wrong with him being a 'househusband' till he gets on his feet.

In as much as I really don't fancy talking about the lives of married couples, let me just say this; from the little I read, Blizz was the manager, getting her contracts and all that. So he was gainfully employed, however bad a manager he was notwithstanding.

But we all know the lives of celebrities. We all know the hardest test for mankind is to successfully manage wealth and fame. So I believed she forgot the Tiwa on stage was only a myth, a stage act with camera rays and lenses projecting a shadowy substance of what she isn't. She forgot she was a wife. Probably.

bukatyne:
I hate to be a parasite and what is my value if I neither contribute money nor domestics? What value was Teeblizz bringing to the table if he wasn't working and expected Tiwa twisting with Patoranking to cook for him? What was his usefulness?

He wasn't a parasite. He was her manager. Managers do a lot in managing their artists. Or maybe you were expecting him to be a Don Jazzy or make his earnings in a completely separate venture from hers.

bukatyne:
If you say that a husband is still the 'head' whether he provided or not, then it implies he is still the head househusband or not.

Was president Jonathan the head of the Ijaws even when he was president? Being arguably the richest and most influential didn't make him the head of the ijaws, rather the head was Edwin Clark.

A child may become educated and richer than his uneducated father, but he cannot usurp his father's role as the head.

And yes, a wife earning more than her husband by no means make her the head. And if you want it in a stronger phrase; women and leadership make a poor couple.

bukatyne:
Stay at home moms have more time to take care for themselves and family if they are inclined to. I am trying to understand why a wife must earn if she & hubby believes in strict gender roles.

Don't allow the modern day working settings becloud you, my dear. From the earliest of times, women have always worked and contributed in small scales to their families. From weaving to light farming. And when they inherited fortunes from their fathers, it became their husbands'.

Women contributing to the homes financially or materially has always been. But until the feminist uprising it was never seen as an avenue for authority usurpation.

bukatyne:
In the grand scheme of things, whose business is it the way my home is run?

Your husband only. And the woman is the manageress of the home. Be her the president of the Federal Republic Nigeria and her husband a stay at home, good-for-nothing retrograde.

joey150:
it is only ridiculous to you protestants. The apostles always upheld the importance of rhe church. It is because of what happened over the years that we have every tom dick and harry.holding the bible and leading people astray.
The church main aim was to unite the sheeps of christ under one flock. So that we nay become one in unity with him. That as christ being the supremen head of the church that as he promised, he would send the holy spirit to guide us in matters of truth. And always lead us to him.
Or now you doubt that peter was the first pope??

Trace your steps..you are all products of thr rebellion of martin Luther, he has set you on the path you are on now. And like it or not, the church WILL ALWAYS guide the WHOLE christianity on matters of faith.

Her teachings her supreme. And is manifest of the work of the holy spirit.. Even the compilation bible is a good evidence of that .

So agree or not,believe or not. Fact is fact. And God has promised us that nothing shall ever prevail agaisnt his church.

Matthew: 16. 18. And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven.

And here Christ encourages us to listen to the church.
Matthew: 18. 17. And if he will not hear them: tell the church. And if he will not hear the church, let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.

If you will not hear the church let him be to thee as the heathen and publican.

Happy Sunday friend.

You peddle misapprehensions like hotdogs. May it bemuse you to know that I'm catholic, born and raised. But that's as far as our similarly goes.

You wear your denominational insignia with ignorance. Peter was not catholic and neither was apostle Paul.

Jerusalem and other Jewish sites are the true places for Christian pilgrimage, not Rome.
The seat of the council of elders which Peter was head was in JERUSALEM NOT IN ROME.
PETER MARRIED AND HAD A WIFE. your Pope and priest don't marry
Peter was no priest but a disciple who did apostolic and missionary works.
Your Pope and church patterned their ministries after the priests of old before the time of CHRIST.



You accuse the pentecostal movement of rebellion but I think you have a mind of servitude.

I long left christian threads because of your likes. I don't argue scriptures.

I'll leave you with this:

John said unto HIM, TEACHER, we saw someone casting out demons in your NAME, and we tried to stop him, because he was not following us.

But JESUS said, do not try to stop him, for no one who does a mighty work in my name will be able soon afterward to speak evil of me. For the one who is not against us is for us. Mark 9:38-40.

joey150:
educate me about the "unofficial churches" .
you people never cease to amaze me.

all the hate and the church still has nore faithfuls than all your denominations put together.

remember what Jesus said,nothing shall prevail against it.
not even the trying 16th century when the devil entered the church,and through the best way to destroy it was from within.

anyway educate me still. am always open to new ideas.

Is Christianity a religion of numbers?

Was the declaration CHRIST made on Peter meant for the Catholic Church or for Christianity in general?

Or are you standing on the ridiculous claim by the church that the Pope is the direct successor of Peter?
Hmmm! Look, focus on salvation and save yourself from denominational bondage.

Mamatee07:
If she forgot her role as a husband clearly he forgot his as a husband in Nigeria managers are usually paid 10% yet she was paying him 40% because she appreciated his part in building her career. Is that not enough for a decent human being yet he went ahead to steal her money how can any wife have respect for such a man She had to fire him rather than let him ruin her with debt plus since he was taking money from people saying Tiwa will perform to things she never agreed to. She would have found herself in in legal mess very soon
So a man who earned 40% of a star lik Tiwa's earning for many years had no savings to pay anything for his own child's birth What does that say about such a man. This had nothing with wanting him to be like Don Jazzy but wanting him to be a responsible man. Teebillz had enough opportunity to leverage on a big client like Tiwa and build other stars but no he thought he had found a cash cow.

You cannot call yourself a head when you've deliberately shunned your responsibility. You Nigerian like picking Bible passage that suit you. Is it not the Bible that says a man that does not provide for his family is worse than an infidel

So Tiwa should be the one to hustle, pay all the bills including the house he lived in, everything for the baby , bringing home the bacon, breast feeding, taking care of the baby and yet the man couldn't cook himself the said bacon!

Nobody will be happy to carry all the responsibility in a marriage. Why not kuku.say the truth and be a single parent. Its like a housewife who still expects the husband to come and cook when he gets back from work for her while she sat at home all day. In this case Teebillz was the housewife

And you forgot to say where you're from. Botswana?
You also forgot to say which scripture I made reference to in my post.

Even if you're not religious, do you have a custom? Will you get married according to your custom and perform a church wedding.

If the customary and religious role bequeathed to a husband doesn't suit your "enlightened" perception, then you may opt for a court marriage only.

But engaging in a church and customary marriage then deviating from its tenets on which stood your bond and vows is hypocrisy.

nasha1:
I am sorry but i cant help it when a grown up man (educated) reasons like this,then i cant help it.
postmann ur attention is needed.

Hmmm! Let those wallowing in their ignorance remain in their delusions if it helps them feel better.

analice107:
Yea, I know. the Ops wanted or is still trying to stick it into the Bible, like Islam is trying very hard to stick muhammed inside the Bible, they fail at every attempt

You're right. We have people who are more faithful to their denominations than they are to CHRIST.

mimzy:
Ha lol. You should relax at home today. Good morning

Something like that. Good morning, the Queen in waiting.

joey150:
there may be? nobody is gambling with anything here, am not telling people to hope on purgatory. if you Read from the first page.. you get the bigger picture i am painting here.

you all are quick to forget the catholic church was the one and only church,the first christian church. whose traditions where passed unto by the apostles.
for you to say its just a mere catholic doctrine is a very big understatement. even at that,there are still clues all over the bible to point out that a place indeed exists. even if we as catholics do not know all that goes on there.
cheers man!

You might want to spare me those fallacious claims. The Catholic Church was just the first organised church associated with the Roman government. If you read your bible well, you'd see clearly that Apostle Paul set up many small churches across Asia and Greece and appointed leaders therein. These Churches existed long before the catholic church. And Rome was still a pagan nation then.