fabienjoe:


That's a sign of insecurity. If this is that important to you, how do you ensure it doesn't increase after she must have started an affair with you? It can only mean one thing...you would suffocate her with jealousy and stalking..Don't dig too much into a woman's past. Live only with the secrets she's comfortable to disclose. You may not live down some of her ugly truths. So long as those remain her past and not part of her life with you, you'll be fine...Yes, you don't need to know .

The bolded is wrong. It is not within anyone's hands to determine for another what they need to know and what they don't. I can't debate this with you because you are coming from an entirely different point.

Most people ask this question for reasons that is not even related to any of the things you wrote up there.
How do you feel insecure and jealous when the relationship has not even started. Because this question comes when you start considering taking someone serious.

We all have standards. If her past is too ugly for my ears to hear, then I'm definitely not going to take her serious.

michigang:
anything under 2.5 is okay by me

What is 2.5 again

Because they see marriage as a battle. So they try to take the battle on a ground that they'll have victory easy.

No matter what you are passing through. Never do court marriage.

Omicron007:
I have heard about Body Counts before but I did not think it was that serious until I met one girl recently.
She wanted something serious between us but she said she can't date me unless my Body Count is less than 5.

For some who haven't come across the term before.
Simply put, body count is the number of people you have had sex with. It does not matter how intimate the make out was, or how much stuff you have done with someone, if there hasn't been penetration, it does not count as sex in this context.

Body count here refers only to the number of people you have had penetrative sex with.

So my question is this.
Is it necessary to know your partner's body count?
Do you know your Body Count?

I don't know why people keep repeating the bolded when it comes to questions they don't want to answer.
You ask someone a question and they will hide the answer and begins to preach necessity.

Simply tell her your body count, and answer other questions that will follow.

For me. If a girl won't disclose her body count, then we don't business. Necessity or not. Though I know she could still lie about it.

purples25:


Mr Tickles! Thank you. I love anything art, but I need money

We all need money. But we could still start off at no cost, and I might compensate you later. Not necessarily a payment

.

purples25:
My little sketch on a Real City called Nairaland ...lol.

You are really good. Wish you would do something similar for me without charging me
Or at least not charge me upfront.

I'll tell you the truth. It's late. Yes. There's not much you can do now about it. You should now focus more on self development and financial stability.
You had your chance but you didn't take it. Being very social during your university days is one of the best things you can do for yourself.

Hang out with fun, visionary, money minded guys. Especially, the non conformists. Plus a handful of fine and kind girlfriends to cuddle with.

Not having money should not stop you as you don't really need much money to live good life in campus.

Your next stop is nysc but I wouldn't advice you focussing on sexual relationships. Take it if it comes, but not devote yourself to it. Use that one year to create a better life for yourself, because post nysc can be nightmarish.

Remember to alert me when you have my spec of jeans

Fiscus105:



Executive producer is he who finance the project simple, he may not necessarily be the owner of the film

Take for example ! I as a producer of a film, might not have enough money to produce a movie, but I have friend, relative or an organization who can finance it.

If he/they put in money for the project to come out, he/they become executive producer but not the owner of the movie.


Though on many occasions, it executive producer who owns the movie and atimes they jointly own it

Okay. I was talking from experience though.
When I say the owner. I mean the person or persons who invest in the project and take the profit or loss that comes from it.
Even if they're more than one person. They all own the movie according to the amount of money they put in.

In simpler words. Let's assume a movie is a building.

The executive producer is the owner of the building. He's the one that gets to own it after completion. He may or may not know anything about construction (film making). He simply contracts a producer, and brings the money for everything.

The producer is like a contractor he is the one in charge of the constitution. He makes the quotation of the material (cast and crew), and cost estimation of the building. He's the one that employs labour and sources the materials (or entrust it to one of his employees). In fact he's simply the engine head of the whole thing. He doesn't have to be on sit (set) 24/7, but should be there most of the time to make sure the project is going as planned.

The director, usually employed by the producer and works closely with him. Is like the foreman of a construction site. He's the one that call the shots in accordance to the directive of the producer. He often hear him say "action."

AutoChick4U:
Last heard or saw 2019 after he traveled, friends and family didn't even know d whereabouts. Till today nothing, number unavailable so I simply stopped hoping at some point. Who knows what happened

That categorizes him more as missing. 2 years is too soon to conclude that someone must have died.
And some replies you gave people somewhat points that you may not have been married to him, maybe just his girlfriend. But let's leave it at that.

I'll advise next time you try to create a thread that both the story and the replies doesn't lack in consistency.
Otherwise, most serious minded people that could render significant help would not take you serious.

AutoChick4U:
Everything I posted is d truth.

Is the death of the dad also true?

AutoChick4U:
Well, I definitely don't think that will be an issue with me though

You might actually be doing like that, but you wouldn't know you're doing it. Unless there are other reasons that makes them leave.

Reading further. I discovered the credibility of your story is questionable, as most people have taken time to point out some inconsistencies.

It is too bad if you could lie so convincingly. And declare someone dead simply because you've not seen him for long.
Going by what I read here. It also seemed you were never even married, but simply had the child out of wedlock.

I'm beginning to doubt your story myself.

AutoChick4U:
Wow, it ain't easy at all, it weakens my very soul that all I've worked for have really gone and no way of making ends meet for now.

Do I regret bringing another being into this world? Perhaps I do when I'm down and emotionally at my lowest but I've learnt to be strong atleast for my kid. Unfortunately finding a love interest to serve as that emotional anchor ain't even easy in our society, once you tell them, faim! Its all over.

I'm probably feeling depressed but I still hope on loving and being loved. Hoping on God wiping away my silent tears, hoping on a shoulder to lean on and a listening ear. I sooo need someone to talk to.

Location is Abuja in case of any business or job connection.

Why the bolded happens is because single mom always put their child first. Sometimes unknowingly.
How would you feel being in a relationship where a child that is not even yours gets 80% of the attention.
You definitely wouldn't like to keep up with such. Right?

Your case is a bit different because the child didn't come from promiscuity. So most men will overlook that, if you will minimize how you prioritize the child in the relationship.

Your story got me. I know how it feels to provide solace for other people, but there's no one giving it when you need it so badly.

I particular love the gender balance of this thread.
Ekene diri unu n'ile.

corporateDan:
I want to upgrade my Samsung s8.


Should i go for iphone x or samsung s10 or google pixel 4xl... which one is the best among the three phones in terms of camera,display and speed

Thank you

Pixel 4XL straight

AIIyIic:


Thanks.
I know about kdp right in the early days when it was still easy to penetrate but I was seriously broke den so I couldn't go into it. I heard it's no longer as easy as it used to be.
Can it be outsourced?

The bolded is very true. I'll advise you don't start off with outsourcing. You'll end up losing money because you don't even know what to outsource and what qualities to expect. If you want to do KDP, outsourcing should come in when you've taken time to master the whole thing.
That wouldn't take more than a month or less if you are very determined. There are a lot of free and sold materials that could get you to some heights in no time. Especially if you are good at imaginative thinking.

chitransco:
we based in anambra but I don't think location will be an hindrance..if all arrangements re worked out fine...
There's no time limit bro....we will keep on maintaining nd using d Keke 4 as long as possible...

Where in anambra

Samken2:

What is KDP

It's just selling books on Amazon

AIIyIic:
Hello guys, I would love to know what online business can generate an income of 400,000# and above monthly.
The basic characteristics of such business are :

1) It should be reproducible (I.e Something you can teach someone and the person would be making a minimum of 400k/ month if the person follows the steps given)

2) Starting capital shouldn't be more than 500k

3) No Forex or Binary.. ( Maybe crypto - but with strong assurance/guarantee.)



If you do any online business with such characteristics and you're willing to show your previous earning records and and also willing to tutor me until I start getting results, please reply or send a dm.


I'll pay up to 200k for such training.

Thanks

KDP can give you that amount and even more without exhausting half of the capital you quoted. But will take a couple of months to get there.
I wouldn't be teaching you because I may not have the chance, as I'm grinding on mine.
Contact the likes of Helioshay and mk82 maybe they'd be willing to mentor you. Avoid some people that will come and claim heaven and earth just to take your money.

Talking about crypto. The market is insanely unpredictable to guarantee such monthly returns. Best bet is if you are willing to hold for long in case predictions fail. I'll recommend you look more towards Algo and Sol family. There lies more gems of tomorrow.

20th February

C505:
Please anyone with used external hard drive

I've got 2 terabyte that I rarely use

Kobojunkie:
How can you know they are in accordance to God's Will when you don't even know what God's Will says?

Jesus Christ is God's Will and Law. He is God's New Covenant agreement that God offers to individuals who are willing to accept and live by His Word. Jesus Christ is the very Word out of God's mouth and God's Law in the Kingdom of God.

Knowledge of any other parts of the Bible is meaningless if you don't know the Truth of God, the teachings and commandments of Jesus Christ, as written of in the Gospel books, the standard by which everything else you read is meant to be weighed and processed against.

Okay. Is there any part of the bible where Christ did not condemned romantic relationship, or did he practice it himself?

Kobojunkie:
1. Sin is disobedience of God's commandment and the ones who sinned against God were Adam and Eve.

The serpent did not sow any seed of disobedience, he inserted himself between God's Law and man, putting himself in God's place over man. This is what your church doctrines and committees do, they insert themselves between God's Law and man..

2. Exactly. The New Covenant Law of God, Jesus Christ is the agreement between God and man. In the Kingdom of God Jesus Christ declared that He alone is Teacher, Shepherd/Guide, Master/Head, Leader/Authority, Helper, Counselor, Comforter etc., over each one who belongs to Him. He condemned anyone who would set themselves in anyway above anyone who belongs to Him. He condemns the having of 2 masters/heads meaning those who follow Him submit only to Him and Him alone. So yes, your clergymen a not of Him.

3. I said every Church, not just yours. The Church which belongs to Jesus Christ is not of this world and is built by Jesus Christ on His Law, the Truth of God. Your churches however, are built by the hands of your pastors and mogs atop a foundation strewn with the doctrines and traditions of men which Jesus Christ warned were lies that drew men away from the Truth of God - Matthew 15 vs 1 - 14 - surely you understand how that which is against God can never be of God.

Let me get you clearly. Are you saying every other part of the bible that wasn't Jesus' exact words should be ignored?
Because I know most part of the bible are written by men, and are in accordance to God's will.

Kobojunkie:
1. This man's personal desires are between him and God. And not your business nor mine nor your churches many committees.

What your church committees committee is akin to what the serpent did in the garden of Eden...insert itself between God and man and assuming the role of interpretation of God's Law to man. That is the main sin for which the serpent was punished for in the garden of Eden.

Your committee adds its own rules in to God's Law when it inserts itself between God and man carrying out God's commandment. That is a sin.

And those who submit to the interpretation of God's Law given them by your committee, or any other committee or man, also commit sin against God in much the same way that Adam and Eve did by listening to the serpent instead of God directly.

2. He clearly declared that his faith, like that of many of you who also submit to and obey the doctrines and traditions of your churches is in your churches and the pastors and not in Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ said you cannot have two masters. The one who is Master over you is the one you submit to and obey. The OP already confessed to the church being his master since he states he has been submitting to and obeying the doctrines and traditions of his church and the pastors since childhood. So I am not certain what you are here to deny in this.

3. Jesus Christ, God's New Covenant, never said any of that to you. He told His followers instead that when a man lusts after a woman in his heart, he has committed adultery ...sin. Jesus Christ never said that it is when you engage in what you term as unholy sexual acts that you have sinned. Ofcourse, the reason you don't know this is between you submit and obey church doctrines and traditions, rather than to the teachings and commandments of Jesus Christ, the standard by which those who claim to be of Him will be judged.

Again, you cannot live in submission to the rules of men and at the same time belong to God.... it is impossible. Jesus Christ made this very clear to His followers when He declared that in the Kingdom of God, He alone is Teacher, Master/Head, Shepherd, Leader and authority, Guide, Helper etc., to each and every one who belongs to Him. He condemned all hope who would try to sit in His place over any of those who belongs to Him. So, you may think you are in a position better than the Op is in, but the Truth of God does not lie.

...hmm. you are looking at this from a point I don't understand, or you just didn't understand the op. And I alsofind it shocking you compared this to what the serpent did in the garden.
The serpent sowing seed of disobedience, but the church committee sows seed of obedience. How are they the same.

You keep saying they come between him and God, but I still don't see how. Does the bolded mean that having clergymen in the church is like a man trying to play the role of God?
The young man obeys for the fear of God, the committee doesn't monitor anyone.

You say my church? I'm not a deeper life member. Not even a member of any new generation pentecostal church.

fotadmowmend:

That is the problem! Right and wrong! How do we know what is wrong or right? What is right in your view might be wrong in my own view and that is the essence of liberty and tolerance. No one can always be right!

For we can not actually come to a unanimous decision of right and wrong, that's why we have sets of rules to align a set of people with similar views. These rules has been well eroded by westernization in the name of liberty and tolerance. America will only remember tolerance and liberty when trying to propagate their ideology.
There's never true liberty and tolerance anywhere. It's just one of those flamboyant tags used by the western world to spread weakness and decadence.

fotadmowmend:

US lost a war or humanity lost a war? The United State of America is fighting the war that the UN ought to be at the front line. The whole world must come together the stop terrorism and any form of religious juntalism

Which humanity are you talking about. The world should come together to stop westernization double standards, and the blurring of the lines that separate right and wrong.

Kastonkastroll:
Talibans might be some radical islamic group but these latest propaganda by U.S media is becoming boring. America, you lost the war. I know is shameful but you guys should move on jare.

Don't mind those people. They'll always want to paint a bad image of anything they don't like. That has been their tactics ever since.
They're masters at showing only one side of the coin.

Kobojunkie:
1. I didn't say anything about romantic relationships either as that choice is left to individuals by God as well. The only guide given us by God is Jesus Christ, God's very own New Covenant Law in the Kingdom of God.

Every other doctrine that attempts to add to the teachings and commandments of Jesus Christ are lies that deceive people away from doing exactly as God commands of them , rendering their worship of God meaningless and God's power of no effect in their lives. These lies opens them up to be deceived as used by the enemy instead. .

2. His faith has been in church doctrines and traditions and not in living in continual submission and obedience to the direct teachings and commandments of Jesus Christ and so it has been in vain - Jesus Christ decreed it so in Matthew 15 vs 1 - 14

3. Wrong, by inserting the ruling of men between God's Law and individuals, God's Word of violated and so sin is committed. It is against God for any man or committe of men to insert themselves between God and his own.

1. Going by the context of what op said. One can deduce he's after a romantic that will ultimately turn relationship. That's not what God wants.
He can't say there is no female he talks with in his neighborhood, or female church members that call him brother and likes being around him. Of course, there is. And he might even be good friends with a few.

They didn't add or remove anything from the teachings of the bible. They never told him the rule is in the bible. It's just a guiding rule separate on its own, to help people follow the path of holiness. Which is what God wants us to do.
Okay, do you know it's possible that the op would have had an insanely high immorality score at his age if not for the rule.

2. No. His faith is not in doctrine and traditions, but in God. He wouldn't even be in the church in the first place, and won't observe those rules if not that he's trying to obey him maker.
It was his faith in Him that brought and kept him in church for 35yrs. If not he would have left long ago because the church won't do anything.

As for the verse you quoted. Christ was talking about traditions of men that has almost no bearing with God's will. It's not in the same category with the one the op talks of.

3. Again, they didn't insert anything to God's commandment. God said we shouldn't engage in unholy affair with the opposite sex, and their rule said the man should not get the chance of getting involved in such affair. For the fear that he might fall into sin.
How does this two rules conflict again?

It just seems like the op is not enjoying what he's got. Maybe the desire to feel among and join the crowd is slowly getting at him