₦airaland Forum

Chibuking1402:
Jungle Justice is bad and is punishable by law but gayism in Nigeria is a crime, 14 years imprisoment with hard labor...so involving the police is not cool if you want to save those girls ass otherwise the police will end up arresting and detaining them...this is Nigeria where Lesbianism is highly prohibited

You people refused to answer my pertinent question;
How will you prove to the police and the courts that the 2 girls were having sèx? Video or photo evidence, eye witness statement or forensic examination?

ambu2:
Lesson: Don't mess with spouse of an influential judge. If you do, you have your a*se whooped. If Odinkalu appeals, it could get worse. #Dilemma

Gbam. I am yet to see Peter Odili lose a court case.

I see Peter Odili like I see Trump. Even if Peter Odili shoots someone on broad street in front of the judge, he cannot lose the court case

Mrsserene:
Whether we like it or not sin does not only affect the sinners. It affects the whole community.

Are you talking about the sin of stealing by government officials or sèx between 2 consenting adults in the privacy of their bedrooms?

Chibuking1402:
....Are you not in Nigeria, are you not aware of anti gay law in Nigeria...let him call police na...they will end up arresting those girls... it's 14 years imprisonment with hard labor...this is Nigeria oga not USA...respect the law governing it...gayism is a sin condemned by God

How will the stupid anti gay law work? Who will report the crime when they are not doing it in public? How will you prove that 2 adults of the same sex sleeping naked on the same bed (in their private bedrooms) had sèx? What is the legal definition of sèx? Is it just kissing or handling of breasts or fingering? How will you prove in a court of law, beyond reasonable doub, since we are dealing with a criminal offense, that these 2 ladies about to be lynched had sèx?

grandstar:
Even though homosexuality is wrong, homophobia too is wrong.

That's their life and are accountable only to God. Those hypocrites wanting to kill them too will stand before judgment seat of God (1 Cor 6:9). Have they repented of their own sins?

Exactly. Do you now blame boko haram or ISIS wanting to lynch and behead infidels?

eni4real:
African Government is Anti-Homosexuality to the core!!!

European governments were far more anti homosexuality than African countries. They used to hang homosexuals and not just lock them up. Britain was still hanging homosexuals 150 years ago.

If your homosexuality is a sign that religion and morals was enslaving human's mind, why don't you show me any mammals that practise homosexuality in full view!!!

Don't give me an experimental animal example or one rare case reported somewhere!!!

Homosexuality is found in most animals - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals

I am talking about an everyday occurrence of a goat locasing the anus of another goat..

Or of a horse penetrating the anus of another male Horse!!

How many have you seen in your area..

Or are they afraid to come out too??

You can look here for evidence of lesbianism in female gorillas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOtDSysn2kA

eni4real:
Don't get it twisted, being pro-homosexuality is not the reason for there development in science, Technology and Politics!!!

They are better because they have better infrastructure and provided enabling environment for those infrastructure to get better up to advanced level...

They have brains who focus a lot of Research and development.. African are consumers!!!

Don't lump homosexuality to their development!!!

They are far ahead in everything even before homosexuality becomes a norm among them!!!

First stop using the term pro homosexuality, a better term would be condone homosexuality.

The liberalisation of the human mind and spirit from the shackles of religion, superstition and Illiteracy is the reason for rapid development and science. For thousands of years, humans made very little progress because new ideas and ways were rejected and even sometimes punished.

Science and development began to accelerate from the 17th century when a bold few began to question old beliefs and ideas including moral ideas.

eni4real:
I think it is African thing and religion thing!!!

It's not an African thing. Homosexuality is found in all cultures and all societies. It is as old as man itself. Homophobia is also as old as civilization. Europe was much harsher on homosexuals until a few centuries ago.

In as much as we are religious conscious and we know how holy book frown at Homosexuality, African Government will continue to ban gays!!!

Yes your holy book frowned at homosexuality, but it did not specifically ban it. It viewed adultery as a worse crime.

Don't tell me that countries practising LGBT are more developed and less corrupt!!!

Tell me which country that legalize or condone homosexuality that is higher on the corruption index than Nigeria. In fact most of the world most corrupt countries are also the most religious countries.

Homosexuality is not the reason why they are ahead in Development and transparency!!!

It's one of the reasons they are ahead in Development and transparency. They are more honest and tolerant, and less hypocritical. They allow new ideas to flourish. They don't spend all their energies poking their nose into other people's business that don't concern them.

Sammyl93:
What right?

The right to the privacy of their own homes.

sulasa07:
the guy made sense from the beginning but at the end,he bleeped up.
If I were to be a lawmaker in this country,I would pass a law that anyone engaged in LGBTQ+ be sent to psychiatric asylum,after 7 yrs,they will be freed if they show no more such thing. But truth be told, Homosexuality is more common btw females coz they always compare one another from Pant to bra,to their upper layer to the bottom layer.

Illiteracy laced with religious bigotry. Homosexualism most times comes naturally, it's part of the difference in sexuality between different people. Sometimes sexuality is the battle between the male sex hormones and the female sex hormones. The dominant hormone sometimes shows in sexual behaviour and sexual preference. A woman with dominant and androgen will exhibit male tendencies and attributes, while a man with dominant estrogen will exhibit female tendencies.

Yes, some of us might find homosexuality repulsive, I don't understand why it gets to the point of lynching. How do what 2 people do in the privacy of our home affect us?
The two girls accused of lesbianism can't do more than kissing, handling and maybe fingerings. If we are so repulse at these things, then we should be equally repulse at mastubation.

The same people attempting to lynch two adults for alleged lesbianism, would not raise an eyelid at child abuse - that is an old man having sex with a 13 year old in the guise of marriage.

nelsonoba:
Britain was like the US until from the period around World War II, when most of Britain and Western Europe began throwing away their old values centred around belief in God, and they started embracing atheism. From that period onwards, the power disparity between The US and Britain began to increase. Today, the GDP of the US is more than the Combined GDP of all countries in Europe combined.

Unfortunately, we still have some idiots in Nigeria who now tell us that when societies embrace atheism and get rid of religion like has been largely done in Britain and Western Europe, that such a country would experience fast development. They forget that The US which is the most prosperous and powerful country in the history of mankind is a country where over 70% of the population still believes in God!

Then how do you use this your hypothesis to explain China. China embraced atheism and in 30 years became the second biggest economy in the world. The GDP of EU is only slightly higher than that of china.

Proudlyngwa:
This is what happens when you have a mad man as a president

Not a mad man, a mad king.

That's Donald of the house of Trump. The first of his kind, the conqueror of the Republicans, the tormentor of the Democrats, the ruler of the 50 states, the imposer of tarrifs. China, EU, Germany, UK tremble at his feet.

bayomillz14:
…insists there was miscarriage of justice

… PDP demands review of Jan 14th Supreme Court verdict

Former Gov. Emeka Ihedioha of Imo State has vowed to return to the Supreme Court to prove that Senator Hope Uzodinma was never candidate of the All Progressives Congress in the last gubernatorial election.

Recall that the apex court had ruled and affirmed Hope Uzodinma who came fourth in the March election on January 14th.

Ihedioha will be approaching the Apex Court based on the following grounds that there was miscarriage of Justice in its ruling.

Uzodinma was not an APC candidate and was not a candidate of any party in the 9th March Governorship election in Imo State based on the judgement of the same Supreme Court on 20th December 2019.

Read:
https://www.thenewsguru.com/top-story/article/ihedioha-returns-supreme-court-says-uzodinma-not-apc-candidate/

Medicine after death.
Why did Ihedioha not canverse these point at the tribunal or at the appeal court? Is Ihedioha telling us that he does not know that you cannot originate a new case or introduce new evidence at the Supreme Court.

chikason68:
To those saying wall geckos and mosquitoes bla bla bla I pity una. I ve experienced this countless times during my service year in Kano State. At a point I was afraid I might not come back from service alive. @Op, better locate a living church for prayers that's if you can't pray. This is evidence of demonic attack.

You superstitious theists are something else, you think up some really senseless beliefs.
I thought demons were supposed to be powerful spirits with really serious spiritual powers. So you mean to tell me that demons use all these powers to only cause a few scratches on the surface of your skin, that will readily disappear within a few days? And you need special deliverance in a living church to get rid of small the small scratches.

I have noticed a few one in a while. I simply ignored them as it did not cause any discomfort or pain, and tend to disappear in a couple of days.

gidgiddy:
It is you Nigerians who are talking about war, the Biafran agitators are talking about referendum.

The Biafran agitators can talk about referendum or anything else, they don't have the authority to achieve it. It is only the people with authority (political and traditional leaders) that can achieve it. A referendum has to first be inserted into our constitution before it can be considered.

The way forward is to allow the rule of law prevail. The Biafran agitators have been granted the right to agitate and protest for a separate state under extant laws. Whether their agitation will amount to anything is their business not yours, so stop drinking panadol over another person's headache

Please quote the extant laws that granted the right to agitate and protest for a separate state.

As at the time Ojukwu went to Aburi in January 1967, Nigeria had 4 Regions, the four Regions had resource control and fiscal responsibility, which are the basis of true federalism. The four Regions even had their own British Ambassadors. At Aburi, Ojukwu secured even more powers for the Regions by getting Regional Armies. All 4 Regions now had its own military force, which virtually turned Nigeria into a confederation of 4 powerful Regions and a weak centre in Lagos. This ensured that no Region could dominate another.

Debating with you guys is an exercise in lies and falsehood. You call what is clearly black, white.

At the time Ojukwu went to Aburi in Ghana, General Ironsi had converted the 4 autonomous regions into 4 unitary states under a military head of State. Decree 34 of 1966 was called the unification decree.

The accord of establishing 4 regional armies is impractical. A country cannot have regional armies. The minute a region has an army, it becomes an independent country. A confederation of states has one military and not seperated armies.

All that was required of Gowon was to return to Nigeria, conduct a constitutional conference or adopt the constitution Nigeria was operating before the Military came, conduct elections and return to the Barracks.

How would Gowon have conducted a constitutional conference on the eve of a war? A constitutional conference cannot be held in a day or even a few months. Most constitution conferences take years.

How do you expect the military to go back to the Barracks in the aftermath of the political upheavals caused by the January 1966 coup and the July counter coup, where military and political leaders of both sides has been murdered, and the igbo civilians that had been murdered in the north? Besides, that option was never discussed at Aburi.

But Gowon and his fellow Northerners simply did not like a system that ensured equity. They needed to do away with the ever powerful Regions and make the centre strong so as to control Nigeria. So Gowon did exactly that by enacting decree 14 that abolished the 4 Regions, replaced them with 12 weak states, and gave the centre so much powers. They only thing Gowon and his Northern cohorts never counted on was that Ojukwu and his people were not going to take it lying low like other Regions. The only options left for Ojukwu was to either accept decree 14, which other cowardly Regions did, or break from the system and fight for independence. It may not have worked out for Ojukwu and the Eastern Region but no apology for fighting for freedom in the face of enslavement. Thats what great people do

Thrash. It was General Ironsi's decree 34 that removed powers from the regions and concentrated it at the centre. Gowon simply built on what Ironsi created. He converted the 4 states created by Ironsi to 12 states.

When people talk about Ironsi's decree 34, I laugh. Despite Decree 34, the 4 Regions maintained their borders, enjoyed resource control and fiscal responsibility. But nobody wants to talk about Gowons decree 14 that was a hundred times worse, and took all of these things away. The only reason some people talk about decree 34 is because it was an Igbo man who enacted it, had it been a Northerner, those who talk about it would not.

'One Nigeria' is a joke

Please tell me how decree 14 took away resource control that decree 34 had not already taken away. I don't know how someone can support decree 34 but criticize decree 14. It doesn't make sense.

kettykings:
(i) A military committee comprising representatives of the regions should meet to take statistics of arms and ammunition in the country. Unallocated stores of arms and ammunition held in the country should be shared equitably between the various commands in the federation.

How many arms and ammunition had already been allocated and the number allocated?
Who commands the various commands of the federation, aka the commander in chief, or was each region expected to have its own military?

(ii) The Army should be reorganized in order to restore discipline and confidence, Specifically,

Who will do the reorganisation and using what criteria?

a. the army should be governed by the Supreme Military Council which would be chaired by a Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and the Head of the Federal Military Government;

How is this different from what was already existing?

b. Area Commands under Area Commanders and corresponding to existing Regions should be created.

The regions will be under the control of area Commanders

c. During the period of the military goverment, Military Governors should have control over Area Commands, for internal security

Military Governors will control area Commanders again, is this not duplication?

d. A military headquarters, comprising equal representation from the regions and headed by a Chief of Staff, should be established.

More duplication of duties. Maybe I should be saying quadriplication

e. A Lagos Garrison, including Ikeja Barracks, should be created.

(iii) In accordance with the decision of August 9, 1966, Army personnel of
Northern Nigerian origin should return to the North from the West. In order to meet the security needs of the West, a crash programme of recruitment and training is necessary but the details should be examined after the Military Committee has finished their work.

What concerns Ojukwu with the west. Never knew the west were invited to Ghana to discuss the aburi according.

(iv) The Supreme Military Council should deal with all matters of policy including promotion to top executive posts in the Armed Forces and the Police.

(v) The legislative and executive authority of the federal Military
Government should be referred for determination, provided that, where a
meeting was not possible, such a matter must be referred to the Military
Governors for their comments and concurrence.

Continuation of Power greed by the military, which led to the conflict in the first place. The Military officers abrogation executive and legislative powers to themselves. As I always believed the 1966 conflicts were about power grabs by the military and within the military, the civilians were only unfortunate to be caught in the middle.

(vi) Appontments to the Diplomatic and consular posts as well as to superscale posts in the Federal Public Service and equivalent posts in the Federal Corporations must be approved by the Supreme Military Council.

(vii) With a view to promoting mutual confidence, all decrees or provisions of decrees passed since January 15, 1966, which detracted from the previous powers and positions of the Regional Governments should be repealed. Law officers of the Federation should meet in Benin on January 14, 1967, and list all the decrees or provisions of Decrees concerned, so that they may be repealed not later than January 21, 1967, if possible.

Confusion galore. Since the constitution had been suspended and the regions converted to states by general Ironsi, how would Nigeria be governed if all previous decrees were repealed?

ajl:
Technically, he can't sell the property on his own to repay the loan. Except if he negotiate with the bank to sell on his behalf and then the bank recover their part of the money plus interest and will leave the remaining for him. I really don't trust Nigerian banks. They will wish that nothing goes back to him.

You are right. Banks are like criminal organizations.
One other suggestions is to borrow the money from their rich uncle who gave him N2 million without it affecting him much. He could borrow the 3 million + interest and then work out repayment terms with the uncle.

ajl:
People giving their property documents to another individual to use as collateral for a bank loan happens often. And it's also common that debtors refuse to pay back the loan leading banks to pursue foreclosure of the bank through a court of law. Likewise, the 2nd party that own the property often head to the court to file a claim against the bank to release the document. I have run into cases like this.

You are probably one of the parties to the agreement with the bank. The best option you have now to prevent the bank from foreclosing or garnishing your property is for you to repay the loan plus interest. The other option is for you to get a lawyer to look for loopholes in the agreement, which I doubt there would be any because banks are pretty smart in covering their "asses". More so, 2nd option will cost you money as you have to pay the lawyer. Additionally if you loose, you may have to pay damages to the bank aside from the loan and (20% - 25%) interest. This damages is often the defendants (i.e. bank) legal cost.

If the loan amount is truly N3 million, I will advise that you look for the money to repay yourself because you are like a guarantor for the loan.

For some reasons, I think the loan is more than N3 million because what reasonable individual use a house of higher value as collateral for a mere N3 million loan. Doesn't make sense.

An example of such court case is attached where an individual is challenging the bank claim to such property.

This is a free professional advice. Try and offset the loan to stop the interest rate from catching up with the value of your house. In business you must learn to cut your losses.

After paying back the loan, you can sue him for your loss, or recover as much as possible from his assets.

stagger:
Women have a lot of intuition. You need to listen more to your wife.

You are about to lose your house. You better take very tough but necessary actions with your cousin. Get a lawyer and take over his business by force, if you have to. DO it at gunpoint, if you have to.

I once gave a loan to my first cousin. This is 2 years and he has not paid and stopped taking my calls. Relations are the most heartless people ever. You can help them from a distance, but never commit yourself into a loan arrangement or anything of the sort.

This is the best advice so far. Get a lawyer and sue your cousin for all his assets including the company. I just hope there is actually a company he is using to do business. Since you did not enter into a formal agreement on what happens if he defaults, it might complicate issues.

You also need to liase with the bank to know exactly how much is owed and the interest rate. It might be better to sell the property to offset the debt and make use of the balance. I am sure your house is worth more than N3 million. This still doesn't stop you from suing for the balance.

lovchalice:
really, we dated for three months before having sex. And my dear you are not better than me in anyway. Before I dated him I've been celibate for 6yrs. Wonder how many girls can boast of that. Besides I'm not complaining, I'm only saying he won't go unpunished. For me I'm happy and eagerly expecting. And I've made sure not to ask him for anything cos he will never be a father to my child. He is not qualified to

I really admire your strength and independence. You decided to keep and care baby, irrespective of the father's cowardice. Although you make an error of judgement, no one should judge you. You can still go on to achieve great things and even find true love.
I am sure the stupid boy will come begging in the future after seeing how good you and the baby is doing.

Having said that, you cannot condemn others who made the same mistake and took a different path.

lovchalice:
well in my case it was someone that have been disturbing me for friendship and when I turned him down, he proposed marriage. When pregnancy set in stories started. Tell me, can he go Scot free

He disturbed you for friendship and you turned him down, only to open your legs for him once he mentioned marriage.

My sister, there is a sequence leading to marriage. First you must like each other, then love each other, then engagement to involve the 2 families and then finally marriage. You may decide to have sex pre or post marriage, but sex should never be a condition for marriage.

He can definitely go scot free, as he only has responsibility for the baby if you decide to born it. You should even be glad he did not marry by force, as he definitely was never in love with you. He would have made your life a living hell.

Exodora:
Why should he impregnant her if he has no intention of marrying her.Who will now marry baggage/second material, you?

So a woman's only value is the whole between her legs, and having a baby (within or outside marriage) devalues her as a human being?

I have seen many many ladies became much more successful after a first failed marriage with multiple children.

purples25:
Lol i am a Muslim that is not very religious at all. Funny enough i am starting to like religion. You know why? Those old testament times, you could not use a woman and throw it in her face like the way especially black men are doing now. It is actually the women that are suffering in this new age. Who presses for the sex? Mostly the man. They decieve and insist and demand to no end, you are only denying the truth if you oppose to that. All i think is that the woman should not suffer alone. If she has to suffer a stigma for the rest of her life, society must join that man in too.

You know what freedom has done to men? They impregnate a girl and go laughing all round town and posting on social media. Do you know that men BRAG about it. They CELEBRATE it. All the boldness coming from where? A man will sleep with a woman in the same room with his own manhood and in that same room he will give her an ugly look and judgement as thought he is not the one that just slept with her.

That cage society put women in, you see that cage, i wish men will be inside it too.

The problem with the current generation is that the lack a knowledge of history. They only listen to and regurgitate what others in authority tells them, instead of taking the time and effort to learn how things were in the past.

Today is the best times in the history of mankind, for women, in terms of liberty and freedom. Just a few centuries ago, women were property, property of their parents, husband's, uncle's and other family members. They were given away (more like traded off as soon as they attain puberty. They had absolutely no say in who they marry. Virginity was a priced asset to the girl's family when negotiating for bride price.

In the olden days women were exploited by men and they had no right to complain. During the constant wars, young women of the defeated tribes were sex slaves, the old women were actual slaves. So many bastards were born with no known fathers.

Most world's religions seem to enforce that system, that a woman is private property. She should not be permitted to be seen, talked to, associate with others who don't own her. Till today ultra religious societies and organization's still operate that way, especially the Christian and muslim religions.

Now, women can marry who they like, have sèx with whomsoever they choose, go to school, pursue a career, vote and even preach at the alter.

I still find it amazing that some women long for the horrible sordid past. Well, it's called the Stockholm syndrome.

vincentjk:
In most cases nothing like "come I want to marry you"

They're just two people who are deceiving themselves on loving one another just to have sex and get intimate. They both enjoyed the sex so why forcing the pregnancy of the dude when it wasn't rape??

These are religious fundamentalists who want to impose mosaic and Sharia laws on the country.

The only problem is that these moral laws are hypocritical. The states that practice sharia has the highest number of unwanted and uncared for children roaming the streets.

purples25:
The man that killed his wife is also in a mess for life now, so yes, he did not escape. You must enter that marriage, if you kill her, you will still be in a mess for life, just as you left that woman with a stain for life.

Same way she is suffering for life is the same way the guy must be tied down for life too. Nonsense, are you boys babies? You want to go scot free

I am appalled that you happiness in the whole story is that the man is receiving punishment for having pre marital sèx for killing his forced wife and the baby.

You religious fundamentalists are just after punishments. You want to punish the woman with forced pregnancy and delivery to punish the woman for having pre marital sèx, you want to punish the man with forced marriage as a punishment for having pre marital sex, you want to punish the child with abandonment because the parents commited sin of pre marital sèx.
Maybe you guys should liase with your Muslim counterparts and impose sharia, so you can stone to death sinners of pre marital sèx ( including the baby.

Unplanned pregnancy should be the business of the couple's involved and their families, and not the business of some religious fundamentalists.

captain247:
You didn't get the picture as related to the topic. If the man marries the lady he impregnated will there be an illegitimate child??
Illegitimacy has been abolished so does that give men right to pregnate girls as they desire and claim they don't want to marry them?

Men don't go around having sèx with women with the intention of impregnating them. Most just want to have sèx. The unwanted pregnancy is usually a consequence of carelessness by both parties.

Besides the illegitimacy abolished is legitimate right to inheritance not childs right of identity, dignity, origin and self-actualization.

First it depends on culture. Many cultures in southern Nigeria like the Yorubas and many Niger delta tribes don't have illegitimate children. Once it can be proven that a man fathers a child, the child is accorded some rights as a son/ daughter. It's the igbos that the legitimate/illegitimate child dichotomy is practiced.
Besides, inheritance rights is only valid if the man dies interstate, whereby inheritance is subject to customary law. If the man writes a will, then he can will his properties to anyone he likes.

If the man is not ready for marriage let him stay clear that is the point.

Not practicable. Men are marrying later because of financial stability. You want a man to remain virgin until his late 30's or even 40's, when his hormones starts fighting with him from his teens? The man physiology is not built that way.

It's because of all this abortion still takes place of which is also against the law 14yrs jail term. And likewise tradition too do not support having child outside of wedlock, in that case the girl will then suffer alone.

Whether marriage or not abortion will still take place. I have many gynecologists as friends, and they tell me that married couples carry out as much abortions than single ladies, especially the rich ones. Many married couples don't want to have more children and see abortions as the last resort of preventing unwanted babies.
Abortion laws just like the bigamy laws are unenforceable. It is impractical for police to be policing private hospitals and other places to arrest doctors, women and nurses carrying out abortions.

chigoizie7:
NO.

One, it was consensual.

He didn’t rape her.


He never promised her marriage.


If the result of their affair is pregnancy, they can deliberate on it. If they want to marry, fine. If they do not, they should forget it.

A pregnancy should not be the basis of marriage. Forcing a guy into marriage because of a pregnancy never works out in the long run.

Childish and juvenile suggestion. When even divorce rate among couples who start out professing everlasting love is about 50%, you are talking about forced marriage. The marriage will not last beyond the second year.

What happens if the guy is "2face" or "whiz kid" like and give up to 3 girls belle, he should marry all 3 of them?

What if the guy is jobless and lives with his parents or family member, he brings a wife home? Who will care and provide for the child and mother?

The suggestion is even illegal anyway. You cannot sign a marriage contract under duress.

franchasng:
AkwaIbom people fought on the side of Biafra.


Go and read history young man.


Vice President of Biafra then was a man from AkwaIbom state; Colonel Philip Effiong.

The second in command to my father who was a commander of one Biafra military battalion that defended Portharcourt before it fell to Federal Troops was an AkwaIbom man, they also had lots of soldiers from today Rivers state and Bayelsa States.

Stop twisting history for fun young man.

Many communities from Niger Delta fought on the side of Biafra. It was mostly Ijaws and some other tribes in Niger Delta that joined Nigerian side and mostly because they were angry that after Ojukwu and Aguiyi Ironsi stopped Major Jasper Adaka Boro from leading Ijaw Nation he codenamed Niger Delta to secede from Nigeria, that why do they now want to secede, which to me, they were right.

Colonel E.A Etuk (one of Nigeria's finest soldiers) was from Calabar, he held Owerri for 8 months.

Colonel Victor Banjo was a Yoruba man, he led the capture of the mid west and the invasion of Ore.

There were many easterners that fought on the side of Nigeria and vice versa. That's the nature of war. People take sides for different reasons.

In the citation of FFK's achievements, the person handling the church of Satan did not add some other major achievements. Like;
Former Yaba left inmate and Current coke user.

garfield1:
A unanimous decision given same day they heard the appeal simply means they were right,it was an easy case.if the decision was not unanimous like in osun,we can then find faults

That's what I am saying, most presidential election judgements are usually split decisions, with one or two dissenting views, but to have an unanimous decision of seven judges from different tribes is extra ordinary. I believe hope Uzodinma and his lawyers must have done their homework well.
The courts are not about what is right or wrong, it's about what you can prove.

9jaRealist:
Hope you were holding a mirror when you wrote that...
You would do well to INFORM yourself that only a decision was issued but the written judgment itself will follow later. SMH

Meanwhile, the Court has created the following UGLY precedents:
(1) ended up validating more votes than the number of registered/accredited voters;
(2) decided that all of the votes in 388 polling units were cast for only 1 candidate/party;
(3) ignored its own precedents that proof must be made for each individual polling unit; and
(4) replaced the findings of fact by the fact trier (the tribunal) without conducting a fact hearing.

For the avoidance of any doubt, I think of both of the PDP and the APC as merely two sides of the SAME criminal enterprise...
I also acknowledge the Supreme Court’s decision is final, but nonetheless let’s not deceive ourselves: the decision was GARBAGE!
>

Me, I no know book as I am not learned , but I can use my common sense.

Yes the verdict looks and sounds perverse, but are you arguing over an unanimous decision by all seven supreme Court judges? The highest legal minds in the land? To make matters worse, non of the 16 supreme Court justices has disagreed with the judgement, either from North east, West or south.

Don't you think there must be some merits in their judgements?