₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
Are you speaking against paedophilia in Nigeria or are looking for a way to blame gays for paedophilia? Two different things. Very different.

Just wanted to remind you that without a homosexual revolution, Nigeria has done well all by itself to ingrain paedophilia in her system, culture and government. So the sooner you dissociate the two, the better for us.

Gays are not responsible for paedophilia.
Nor will giving them 'laxitude' to free living encourage paedophilia.

As for speaking out against paedophilia we are 100% in agreement on that side.

cococandy:
Well Nigeria did not need any gay agenda to legalize paedophilia did we?
Talk about leaving the log in your eye to check the speck in your neighbors eye.

FrancisTony:
I'm not in support.
I can't let my child marry a paedophile - I was just reminding you.

By the way, even your president-elect is a paedophile.

FrancisTony:
25years? Really?
Well, Paedophilia is already legal in Arab/Islamic countries.
It's legal in the Northern Nigeria.

Finally, ask Kanu Nwankwo how old his wife was, when he married her.

Superleo2:
Lmao! Could life be this pathetic that these feather-brained homophobes - I refused to use heterosexual because there are still reasonable ones - are pulling statistics from their hairy ass.
Most peadophilia cases reported on Nairaland and around the world are heterosexuals.
Most rape cases are heterosexuals.
I don't need to make-up statistics like you. It's glaring obvious.

I can attest to you that there are no gay paedophiles in Nigeria. Have you heard of any classy or educated gay man raping kids as in heterosexuals?
Most of them that engage in it are the ones that lack access to internet unlike heterosexual goats.

Ode

NAMBLA - THE north American man/boy love assoc. - is a de facto homosexual lobby. In due time this will be at the fore as well. Many are already clasming adult/child (or inter-generational love as they call it) is beneficial to and desired by children.

FrancisTony:
I meant their points and facts are the pivotal in an argument.

Any layman can use it.
So, i'm using theirs that says gays is natural.

Research, Mr.

FrancisTony:
You didn't say so but I was reminding you that it's only a psychologist that has a say on gay matter.

liquidmetall:
eiyaaa
women are coming to his aid

crackhaus,njokusboy,redoil temper justice with mercy

nickxtra:
someone's wife? For what?

Chillisauce:
I didn't even read this last comment but I liked it.
haters gonna hate.
keep it up bro.

cococandy:
My point is I told you he makes sense most of the time and you disagreed.
So I just wanted you to know that even though I think he makes sense and his conclusions generally follow from a sound premise in relation to his conclusion, I don't always agree with him 100% of the time.

@bold, how can you understand something if it doesn't make sense to you? You lost me man.
See what I'm saying?

crackhaus:
I didn't even reply that part because it would distract our argument.

Makes no sense relating racism to homosexuality, but that's by the way...

cococandy:
sorry it is kinda out of scope for you.
Because you reason 'religion and cultural' wise, your views are streamlined into not making sense of anything that doesn't play according to your beliefs and upbringing ( well now that's something very natural and common to humans too )

The moment you step out of your world and realize that there are millions of others who haven't been groomed like you, then you will understand why they would reason the way they do.
Now understanding or making sense of what they are saying is not agreement with their POV.
You can strongly disagree with them while still understanding why they have such POVs


That's just the secret.

FrancisTony:
When you say most men it seems like Nairaland family section men dominate the whole Nigeria. But, Nay!

They share the same ideology and I don't expect them to support me.
In the real world plus other Nairaland sections, I'm sure that some men share my view.

During racism time, most White folks were racist and i'm sure some were exception.
Those few would get that rejection stare from their fellow whites but only black folks agree with their view on anti-racism.
Does that mean those few white men that are anti-racism are senile?

FrancisTony:

What's homosexual? Inserting dìck inside anus.
What's heterosexual? Inserting díck inside vagina?
Your definition must be warped.
Heterosexualism and Homosexualism is an attraction towards opposite and same-sex respectively.

Without reference to religion, sex is an invention by man and how it happens is neither natural nor abnorma[/b]l.
So, are you going to tell me;
Men that fùck women through anus are abnormal?
Men that fùck women through mouth are abnormal?
Men that fùck brèast are abnormal?
Women that suck cöck or men that suck pússy are abnormal? Since it's not done through pùssy.

Fùcking through anùs or penìs is neither natural or unnatural.
[b]What's Natural is homosexual feelings.

At emboldened, that's because there is 95% percent chances they would produce abnormal kids e.g imbecilès etc.
Best is to avoid it.

cococandy:
He makes a lot of sense

braine:
Its actually ungrateful of you not to atleast thank her. You think its easy to cook? I'm sure you're not used to that too. You should thank her for every single thing she does for you, to show a sign of appreciation! Plus, she may be your wife but that doesn't make her your slave.

cococandy
Lmao

No need reading it sef. Just like and pass

Chillisauce:
How you take know? Just dey click like and share

Obiwannn:
UR POST MADE SENSE, BT WHILE SPOIL IT BY BRINGING UP HUMAN EATING TRIBE INTO IT?

logica:
...many times I read your post, I think the 5 minutes of madness is more of a gift than a curse.

Flytefalls:
She is entitled to tell her story, I truly hear her, but my problems with it lie mainly with her conclusions not the story itself.

Her final remarks are where I feel she is on an unrealistic quest for worldwide, happy family, perfection. She directs her attack to one group of people, then at the end ties another group to it. I am a child of a single parent family, should I write a letter to a federation of single parents decrying violations to my human rights because my mother and father chose to part ways? Yes, I'd have loved to have my dad with us, but is it really the same as being forced to have two dads/mums? Should we tackle the two issues (same sex and single parent) together? Yes, both may be inferior for arguments sake, but is it right to group them together, as if they were equal? This is what she alludes to, and I must disagree. Hence my criticism. I feel she cheapens her own argument

There are far more engaging, less la la land, stories out there involving children born to same sex couples (via donors) who actually have no father or mother to speak of. This woman was even lucky she knew of her father and has seen his face and heard his voice. Her story is not lessened by that fact, but it is not the most compelling.