Explorers: From the Great Pyramid built almost 3000 years ago with over 2million stones weighing 2.5 tons each to the Palm Islands in Dubai, built of islands that had to be constructed from rock and sandstone, to stepping out onto an oval glass ring above the Grand Canyon.
These are just a couple of amazing constructions found around the world and here are some of the greatest feats of engineering that we think are worth a mention.
It was built on artificial land and it has the largest cargo in the world where over 1million of luggage passed everyday without human touch.
There are two major waters crossing to the Airport, initially it posses a big challenge for engineers but which were solved by building an under water tunnel at about 50m below water and a double decker suspension bridge.
I have a business model to be launched but I need someone with financial capacity to partnership with.
The business idea is about security which I called Intelligence Security System
The device that will be using for this system was my own initiative and I'm already in contact with a company in China that can help in manufacturing of this device.
Actually, there are some valid points one can consider here but you also failed to give us a genuine photographs of the surface of the Earth to proof its flatness.
OLAADEGBU: Now that we know that the Gregorian calendar is the closest to Jesus' actual birth date, does that mean that the Saudis have now acknowledged and acceded to the importance of the Gregorian calendar instead of the Islamic one?
Anyone conversant with Qur'an and Hadith will realise that Muhammad was just a jealous fellow.
The Jews hold Saturday as Sabbath while Christians hold Sunday as their worship day.
The only thing Muhammad can do is to choose Friday in other counter both Jews and Christians by claiming Allah rested on Friday not Saturday or Sunday YET no Islamic state chooses Friday as their last day.
This is the same envy that made Muslims to create their own calendar to counter Gregorian calendar.
Rilwayne001: As i had promised to come up with the part 2 of my honest survey for 4evergod, now here we are. Meanwhile, this thread won't serve as an honest survey for 4evergod alone, rather to him and DoctorAlien and every other Christians out there. I hereby call on my friend Kingebukasblog to kindly follow this thread. Other Christians: parisbookaddict, oladeegbu, annunaki2, anas09, malvisguy212, plappvillemoi, winner01, albhagdadi, damogul, analice107, Emusan, true2god, truthmans2012 and others should as well follow up to see this honest survey I have for them all.
This is rather a long post and I will be updating the thread as i cannot drop the whole post all at once. Counter arguments will be entertained when I'm done with the posts.
You know the trap you would've gotten yourself into had it been you answer that's why you keep dodging my simple question.
achorladey: Oga answer the question. When terms and conditions are given you either accept or reject. The ball is in your court. You decide!!!! Remember it is not a compulsory question. Left to me that question is self explanatory enough. If you can discern enough you should still be able to seek answer to the question you asked me in my question. Discern, reason,think deep.
Now let me show you the fallacy you're trying so had to cover up by failing to provide simple Yes/No answer to my question.
Here you said
achorladey: This goes to the invited and uninvited guest, to the deep thinkers and to those who have discerning minds. Is there any difference between the ''my God'' found in John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. And ''my God'' found in John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God. A. Yes. B. No. C. Uncertain. D. Deny. Please pick the options only the question is self explanatory enough. From Jesus' statement in John 20:17, is Jesus the Almighty God. A. Yes B. No. C. Uncertain D. Deny
As we can see how you're trying harder to prove that there's a difference between the wordy of John and Jesus Christ regard the usage of my God whereas from the Greek lexicon it was the word used by both John and Jesus Christ. 17 Jesus <Iesous> saith <lego> unto her <autos>, Touch <haptomai> me <mou> not <me>; for <gar> I am <anabaino> not yet <oupo> ascended <anabaino> to <pros> my <mou> Father <pater>: but <de> go <poreuomai> to <pros> my <mou> brethren <adelphos>, and <kai> say <epo> unto them <autos>, I ascend <anabaino> unto <pros> my <mou> Father <pater>, and <kai> your <humon> Father <pater>; and <kai> to my <mou> God <theos>, and <kai> your <humon> God <theos>.
28 And <kai> Thomas <Thomas> answered <apokrinomai> and <kai> said <epo> unto him <autos>, My <mou> Lord <kurios> and <kai> my <mou> God <theos>.
Now that you can see it, who did Thomas address as my LORD and my God; Jesus or Jehovah
If both Jesus and Jehovah are addressed as my God, then how many God are there? OR Jehovah is a God like Jesus too?
achorladey: From the statement, it seems you dont really understand my question. If you cant follow the instruction attached to the question. Please look elsewhere. It is not a compulsory question Oga.
You asked questions and I said I'm ready to answer them but before I do that can you just say Yes or No to my simple question?
Very simple because the question I asked you will be used to buttress my answer to yours!
achorladey: This goes to the invited and uninvited guest, to the deep thinkers and to those who have discerning minds. Is there any difference between the ''my God'' found in John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. And ''my God'' found in John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God. A. Yes. B. No. C. Uncertain. D. Deny. Please pick the options only the question is self explanatory enough.
From Jesus' statement in John 20:17, is Jesus the Almighty God. A. Yes B. No. C. Uncertain D. Deny
Let me start with you with this question.
Do you now accept that Thomas called Jesus my God and Jesus accepted it?
johnw74: [size=12]Paul the apostle when speaking of the Father, said that he "dwells in unapproachable light no man has seen or can see."
1Ti 6:16 Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.
Let me even shock you, so that you can see how perverted these Jehovah Witnesses are.
Do you know that JWs believed that 1 Timothy 6:16 was talking about Jesus Christ
Yet they can still say Jesus Christ is a created being and not God.
Wilgrea7: well the bitter truth is that, we're still pointing fingers... we as Christians don't even know for sure... there are certain people/group of people who “seem" to have fulfilled the prophecy.. meaning, Christians have a way of twisting these prophecies to suit someone so that they can label them the Antichrist.. the current guesses over the years have been
*emperor Nero * the roman catholic church/pope * Islam *Obama *UN etc
we're just pointing fingers... we don't really know for sure
prettyboi1989: if u need more clarification about how astronauts land from space u need to read up stuffs about the international space station, how it was built, how astronauts were transported back and forth the station to earth then u will get a vivid understanding of how rockets and space capsules work. u only need to read to gain more knowledge and not sit on ur assumptions backed by zero facts. A rocket is needed to beat the gravitational pull/force of the earth. once in space the rocket disintegrates. anything in space floats and it will require less power than that used to enter to traverse the space.
Imaging using Space station and Moon as an example.
International Space Stations are about 249-250 miles to the Earth, then compare it to Moon of about 238,900 miles.
Exosphere is at 435 miles away from Earth's surface, which means Space stations are still within Earth atmosphere.
Do you think from Moon to Earth is just a free fall?
Febup: Watch how they make their way back from the international space station and they have been going to the space station none stop since they started.
But why have no one gone back to the moon since 1972? This is the BIG question
Space stations are FEW kilometers away from earth you can't compare it with the distance of the Moon to earth.
Again, the Rocket that supposed to transport them to the Moon said to pass through a very high RAY called Van belt at HIGH Speed, please can the equipment used to pass through the ray move at the speed of a rocket to escape such contact?
Again, why would they need a rocket to pass through this ray but on their way back only to use capsule?
prettyboi1989: did u ever care to look up the components of a rocket? theres always a space re-entry capsule that is built in the rocket. this is what helps astronauts return to earth
Just listen to yourself, does this space capsule has the shooting power that a rocket had?
Or you think from Moon to earth is a free fall why would the need rocket to travel into space but only to come back with capsule
In your previous post, you tried to proof something with this
prettyboi1989: are u sure about that? cos usa launched explorer 1 satellite in 1958, then landed on the moon in 1969. its the job of a rocket to take payloads into space and it disintegrates once it leaves the earths orbit. surely if a rocket could launch a the first us satellite, ow come u doubting the moon landing?
The questions that remain unanswered are, how did they made their way back to the earth? Where was the rocket that took them back built?
It's easy to launch things into space but have you ever wondered how those things can find their way back to the earth?
plaetton: That is exactly the point where you keep showing your stark ignorance. Science does not mandate every single person to keep reinventing the wheel.
Then who ask you to reinvent the wheel of any science You keep chanting ignorance whereas you're the one displaying it here.
Once a scientific idea goes through the scientific method, the empirical method, it is generally accepted , until is refuted, again using the same standard empirical methods.
How does this answer the question I ask?
We go to school to learn lessons, empirically vetted lessons that others are passing to us. If you don't understand that, then perhaps you in particular left something behind in your evolutionary transition to homo sapien sapien.
That's what I'm saying, you learn it not that you yourself practicalized it.
Again, by asking such daft questions, you have obviously never been to a science lab, talkless of doing experiments.
Imaging, using secondary school Lab experience as a yard stick to explain the vast universe yet saying I asked a daft question. Did you do more than mixing two chemical together
Anyone with a benefit of modern education Should have at least performed lab experiments on the basic , fundamental ideas of science. If you didn't, sorry. Don't blame the atheist.
SMH...please can you tell me how you perform the experiment that tells you that Man evolved from ape from your secondary school Lab
Blame your government that allows Stone-age religious Bullshytes from every corner of the middle East to take priority over basic science education in Nigerian schools.
Ok, I will! But don't forget to praise the government who allows your science teacher to assist you in carrying out that great experiment that tells you how the first life evolved in your secondary school Lab.
plaetton: The books were written based on things that have been observed, experimented upon, tested and analyzed using standard, universally accepted methods.
Ahhahh
Observe, experimented, tested and analyzed by you or who?
Besides, you talk about universally accepted methods! Who are the people who defined these methods and made them acceptable
Image123: Why do you think the OP is an apostate? He made some valid points IMHO. Stop threatening and either ignore or address his points. Is threatening a gift of righteousness or a fruit of the spirit?
That's the way they're being wired...instead of addressing the points he raised they start to tag him an apostate.