₦airaland Forum

ageraGT:
The only thing a woman is loyal to is her feelings. Give her a different feeling good or bad and you have her at your finger tips.

In other words, a woman is most loyal to herself than any other person. I'd be damned if that doesn't also apply to men.

Nice!

How come I've never heard of this? I thought the airport was also owned by VINCI airports incorporation headed by Nicolas Notebaert.

You want sex, they want money. The society is bad, everyone.

maasoap:
You overlooked the first hate-filled comment from your fellow tribesman and attacked the second comment. Well done o

And you assume I must have been reading comments on this thread to have come across the one I quoted, right? You don't know me. You don't know my tribe. You don't know what I stand for. But you'd gladly fill in the gaps with your assumptions cause that's how narrow minded you all are on this app. Apparently, you only see things in black and white. To you, it's all about the herd and anyone that tries to correct y'all must be on the opposite side. Go ahead and wallow in your tribalism while blaming the old leaders for your woes. Posterity will judge everyone of you destroying this country.

Throwback:
Sanwo-Olu has always been a very cool, friendly and approachable guy.

This makes him an easy prey for those whose agenda it is to destroy anything that stands in their way to inflict anarchy and chaos on Lagos State.

Is there ever a thread you guys don't into a tribal war ground?

CondenseMilk:


Oya find x in the equation

$200=∆§π√4(©⁸)*{√π}*[©]+(x°¢|8%^).

I've seen it!!!

You hid it in-between ( and °

In bold below:
$200=∆§π√4(©⁸)*{√π}*[©]+(X°¢|8%^).

Martha was my favorite subject.

fergie001:
1) Seun alleged that the officer tried to kill him and his family members and that he has proof to back up his claim.

2) He did not state what led to his faceoff with the officer.

Hhmm... Are these two statements not contradictory? He didn't give the full details or the sequence of events up to the point where he eventually slapped the officer, but he stated that the officer's attempt at unaliving him and his family was what led to the altercation. But I get it, the claim that the officer attempted to murder him and his family is funny and vague. He wanted to kill you all and you just slapped him, and said "don't do it again", he said sorry and then you forgave him? That's a rather odd story. He'll need to explain how things progressed into him hitting the uniform man.

Why is this an issue though? The kid doesn't live with them. He'd probably never identify himself by that name. Grannies giving a child thier own name is a way of establishing bond. What's the point of giving him the name of they're not allowed to call him by it? The name mustn't be native. All families are not the same. Some Grannies pick thier preferred name from the Bible. Don't let let someone from a totally different background use their situation to judge yours. I can see the first commenter is already planting ideas into your head. You gave your child a name, and your wife's family calls him by something else, you feel challenged. You feel it's a violation of your authority as the father? I could be wrong, but at the risk of sounding too assumptious, I'd say that's an extremely fragile ego, and I fear it reflects on other aspects of your life too.

You won't see them saying "fear men". If it was a lady, the entire thread would have turned into a women bashing party.

Ever8090:
Ok...make this people rest already.....

.
They are minding thier business. You should tell bloggers to rest.

People very far away are happy living together and you are in your room somewhere in Oshodi crying? I'll never understand homophobia.

Sad news. I hope the family gets justice.

Going through the front page and I can hardly see any comment saying "fear men", "that gender", etc. We're all calling out the man in question. Let's learn to extend such courtesy to women.

Hahaha.... interesting. Sure they won't bribe the chief priests?

He was reading from a book in his hands. When you take a picture of someone looking down at something, it always comes off as if they're sleeping. We've been on the internet long enough to know this. So why don't we leave the banners and focus on the arguments from both sides?

Lol... we, Nigerians, like to make everything about us. Where do y'all want him to sit? Between the king and the queen? Everyone in that section were dignitaries just like him. So I say he was sitting amongst his peers.

OP, you want to contest? Lol.

Like someone has already answered, it's hereditary monarchy. While it's possible for a person of color to become a king/queen, it's very unlikely that would happen.

The video and the write-up don't seem to agree.

Yemmysworld91:
Scholars in the house your attention is needed

O'clock = of the clock (an expression from old English).

Soft skills you can learn to earn money? You probably mean digital skills, bro.

advanceDNA:
I never said she should go and have sex at 14 to know who she is...u seem to like to rush from from A to z...i said she isnt ready to put a label on her feelings because tgey may just be media influenced.....

.. if these kickoff teenagers arent ready for sex or even undertand it, just as 4-8 year olds are not....
whats the difference between what u are doing now trying establishing sexual orietation for her and what lgbt folks are doing calling children gay becos of innocent feelings noticed among children of 4-8 years olds??

I didn't say that you said she should go and have sex. I also don't care what LGBTQ folks are doing. All these things you're saying are not necessary unless you just want to pick up other things to argue about and that's a straw man's argument.

This was your question:

"is she having sex already that she now knows and has come to the conclusion its women she likes to fvck??"

And I'm saying this question invariably implies one has to have sex to know the gender they're into, and that's not necessarily the case cause a lot of teens know thier sexuality even without ever having sex. It's a simple submission with a definit premise. So how did I jump from A to Z?

advanceDNA:
U dont know how i figured myself out...so dont run into conclusions....i experienced a lot of feelings and experimented with different pple while i was at her age...
.. sexual attraction can be a tornado for a lot of people in the beginning.......thats why i dont think a 14year girl old should start placing a label on something she just started feeling and doesnt undertand....girls?? Girls that can kiss boys today and kiss girls tomorrow ... na them confuse pass

Again, going back to your first comment, that sexuality can be a certain way for some people doesn't mean she needs to be having sex to know her sexuality. That's the point I am making. You might say she's too young know (this is arguable cause I have worked with gay teens. They had never had sex but thier sexuality wasn't up for debate), but asking if she's having sex already to have known she's into women implies that she first needs to have sex to know. And that's not only a wrong assumption but a dangerous one. That's all I'm saying. I'm not invalidating the experience of others.

advanceDNA:
And and many pple get attracted to women but and get to the sex and realize its not flowing..and thats when start to realize they might be gay...
..sometimes pple get to the sex before they know the real deal...

How do u describe bisexual pple...
How do u describe people who fvck animals
Heck!! How do u describe all these gay men with wives having erecrion with women and birthing children but are actually gay....

Yes, I know some people figured out their sexuality after attempting sex. That's not thr bone of contention. You asked if she was having sex to have known she was gay. And I said she doesn't need to be having sex to know. That these other people you mentioned had to have sex to know thier orientation does mean the girl in question had to have had sex to know. It's not necessarily the case cause many people knew they were gay years before thier first sexual experience. Some gay men people have never had sex before due to religious reasons. Even bisexual people don't necessarily need to have sex to know their orientation. They know just like you know you're straight even without having sex.

advanceDNA:
...is she having sex already that she now knows and has come to the conclusion its women she likes to fvck?? All these small children seff

She just entered teen years ...all she's doing is playing to the script of the movies and media content they watch these days, there by trying to put a label on what she doesnt even understand but what she's seeing.......its media influence and the doctored lgbt manipulation that is everywhere these days

I remeber my neighbors kid that used to say he has super powers like henry danger... u need to see how he gets serious about it...

dont tell her parents..they will just demonize her......let her figure herself out as her hormones start to rage.......but let her know she's not ready or mature for sex yet.... So there is no point sexually boxing or labelling herself based on any media content as her life just started ..... she should explore, process and engage things as they unravel in the real world with boys and girls

I agree with many things you said, but I just wanted to point out that she doesn't need to be having sex to know the gender she's sexually and emotionally attracted to. Many gay people figured out they were different between the ages of 11 to 14. They just couldn't talk about it.

Failure2019:
This food na for your dog abi you day watch your weight??

Bro, but why?

The answer is simple: investment maturity target.

leroi01:
It is none of HR's business.

Await orders from above.

Or... You suspend the gateman until investigations are complete. ( This gives you breathing space )

It's not HR business, await orders from above. Who says HR cannot be above? You forget that HR extends all the way to the top of the organization where you have the HR director who only reports to the managing director or the board.

CondenseMilk:
You are still repeating the word " career "

It doesn't exist oga!

Just do what will serve humans and get some money

Education is mainly for exposure and higher reasoning ability

Lol... you make it look like doing what serves human and having a career are mutually exclusive. Career is just an English word for the dedication you give to a specific thing that serves human. It's not even about education. It's about dedication to a domain. Just like some people are passionate about football, some people have spent their lives advancing in a specific domain, sharpening thier skills, contributing to the domain and making both a name and money for themselves while at it. When such a person comes online to ask questions like the OP, it is for like-minded people to answer.

NoahHadNoArk:
No hanging…….it’s miles ahead of any device I ever used. Certainly worth the hype and noise..

I think the problem is that people compare iPhones with cheap devices that run Android. High end Samsung phones (which are mostly more expensive than iPhones) have no business with lagging. I use an iPhone and a Samsung phone. None has ever lagged. I personally prefer Android cause it's more user friendly and I do not have any other Apple device that would have highlighted the benefits of using an assembly of Apple products. I personally believe it's a matter of preference.

This is not a very useful report though. When you express the earnings of different countries in one currency, you get an almost useless result.

Saving this thread for later.

WriterrNig:
All 🇨🇳 CHINESE electric buses. For those always asking what China has done for Africa.

No to start an argument, sir, but in my opinion, when you buy goods and services from a vendor, the vendor has not done anything for you. In fact, you're the one helping the vendor's business. So except these busses were donated, I really don't think they count as what China has done for Africa. Using chinese construction companies is way cost effective than any other alternative, but we pay for every drop of sweat. When we talk about what a country has done for another, I believe it should be in terms of investments and humanitarian aids and maybe military support. The US and the EU still remain the biggest source of humanitarian aids in Africa. The UK is Nigeria's biggest source of foreign direct investment. China is only trying to rise to the second position in recent times. Yes, China has the resources to overtake other countries in terms of new FDI's in Nigeria at some point, but that doesn't undermine western investments in the country. And considering the fact that FDI's inevitably expose a country to foreign influence, some might argue that the influence of a democratic nation is far more bearable.

Just an opinion.

SpecialAdviser:
I am proposing that the UN makes it mandatory for every country to save your citizens and war countries citizens to the ration of at least 7:2

Well, that's far more theoretical than practical. The UN can't even mandate countries to evacuate thier own citizens let alone those of the host countries. Will they provide the resources? Are the citizens of the host/waring country doing anything for these other countries to warrantee such entitlement? You take thier labor/human capital, thier money (for those schooling abroad), etc. and you still want them to be responsible for your own citizens when you start a civil war? How nah?

There's absolutely no justification for imposing such a heavy duty on other countries. Like I already said in my post, foreigners and the hosts have a symbiotic relationship. So the foreigners' home countries do not owe the hosts anything. Nigeria do not owe Canada anything because some Nigerians decided to move to Canada and Canada decided to accept them because of the benefits they hope to get from it. It is unfair to tell Nigeria, the country suffering from extreme brain drain in this case, to evacuate Canadians if one province in Canada decides to fight other provinces. It's simply not justifiable. If Nigeria decides to help, it should be out of charity. In the case of civil war (an internal war started by the people of the country themselves), it is absolutely illogical to force other countries to evacuate your citizens. That's not even equitable given the disparity in their economic situations of these other countries.

Policies/laws are based on reasoning, my bro. In this case, there's no reason to put such a policy in place.