₦airaland Forum

She should stop talking and start sueing her and BBC if she's so sure of herself.

KnownUnknown:
I know what your faceless ass is spewing is absolute bullshit because it’s meaningless or it contradicts reality. “Spiritual blindness” is an example of meaningless and patently absurd things you believe. You just continue to prove how stupid people like you are. Manifest some intelligence for once on your life.

Trash.

At my age, I can differentiate between realistic experiences and illusions.

I'll ignore you because I can't see any iota of wisdom in you. We're actually enjoined to avoid conversations with fools.

KnownUnknown:
Lmao, the only thing manifesting through you is stupidity and ignorance.

You just proved to the world that you're the one manifesting the two negative traits. You can't know what a man on a faceless forum is manifesting without actively verifying his claims.

Spiritually blind people are always like that.

KnownUnknown:
There are no real miracles. You people should learn to use your freaking brains!!!

You should just take to your own advice. You can't talk like that to someone like me who have been a recipient of numerous miracles until they started manifesting through me too.

Nigercity:
She did they interview
Long time ago before tb Joshua died
Shaa
So I don't think they death has anything to do with tb Joshua

Na so. Alao, there are more than 100 people who said bad things against TB Joshua. If this study is true, then, it's a mere coincidence.

Ken4Christ:
Envy a self acclaimed prophet?

Payaseriy, no one envies a fake prophet who claimed he got born again from his mother's womb.

Righthussle:
With what I watch I doubt the man is truly dead. That thing they buried doesn't look like him.

Most probably faked his own death.

Lawag3:
I know of a man who was mad for years in Warri he got healed at RCCG parish in Warri.

He just came in into the church during an all night begging the pastor to heal him.

To cut long story short he sat the congregation the next Sunday praising God he went back to his family.

Miracles exists not all are fake.

If there are no real miracles, there'll be no fakes. The counterfeits exist because the counterfeiters are threatened by the originals.

jesusjnr2020:
How Jesus Raised My Blood Sister From The Dead

It's been a crazy past few months in my life and ministry. To the glory of God, I am reaching more souls across the globe with the Gospel of Christ than ever before.

The Word is being backed by the Power of God's Spirit, as souls are coming to repentance, the sick are being healed, the demon possessed, oppressed are being delivered.

The work of the Kingdom is well and truly advancing in this regard, however at the same time, the spiritual attacks have assumed an unprecedented level. It appears Satan is fighting back with every possible means at his disposal.

It seems not peculiar to me though, as several in this field have also expressed the same concerns, so it may have to do with the times as the world is gradually winding to a close.

A good friend of mine almost lost his life in a serious accident a day to a revival crusade he planned a few weeks after his wife survived another but with body injuries.

The amount of people I knew either directly or indirectly that have lost their lives of recent is absurd. There were at least seven of them, including some youths, which is something I have never seen the likes in my entire lifetime.

Even several unconnected persons I shared this strange occurrence with, including some of the bereaved, concurred that the amount of deaths they've heard about in a such a short space of time is unusual.

My own blood sister would have been added to that dreaded list if not for God's intervention.

She was seriously afflicted and her health deteriorated till she literally died. She was dead for over an hour until Jesus stepped into the scene. He appeared to her, held her hand and took her back to where her body was and put back her spirit into her body.

That was the only reason why she didn't remain dead as the others but it was that close.

Jesus made the difference in her life just as He used to do during His brief sojourn and ministry on this Earth.

It wouldn't have been easy at all because I have already lost one or two persons dear to me, including one of recent, but this would have topped it all because this is the one dearest to me on this earth.

It shouldn't be a coincidence though, since she was the first ever person to accept my preaching of the Words of Jesus that He commanded me to teach all men, so i am grateful to God for keeping her yet alive for His own glory.

May she continue to live to testify of His goodness until her job here on Earth is done. In Jesus name!

The Lord be praised. May His goodness continue in her life.

This is very rich!

DiamondJLove:
I dont know if you have also noticed that men of God always sing songs of d 80s,90s or even older songs.when the church choir finish singing a new generational worship song,immediately the microphone is given to the pastor,he changes the song to songs of old like "how excellent is your name oh lord","baba baba baba o","convenant keeping God,there is no one like you"etc.why is it so?

That's because those were the songs they were familiar with while growing up in faith. They used those songs in individual prayers with God. The songs had great impact on their lives back then. They're not used to most new generational songs that are being song in churches today. Most of those songs of today don't even move one's spirit

oteneaaron:
You seem to be the missing the point.

I understand your admission about the "Egyptians distorting history" although you provided no evidence to support this claim.

But there are still other issues at hand.

The Bible clearly states that the children of Isreal were stuck in the Sinai desert for 40 years.

Mind you, rain has not fallen in this desert for over 11,000 years, so archaeological evidences like clothes, dead bodies, pots etc should be well preserved.

So if millions of Israelites walked through this desert, why have archaeologists not found a single strand of evidence of these Isrealites even after digging around the desert for more than 200 years?

Can you please explain why?

First, you too can attest that you have no evidence for the claims the Egyptians also made other than what they wrote about themselves.

The area has not been completely excavated. Diggings and more diggings are still ongoing. Findings could still be made in coming years. You can't draw your conclusions on an area whose archeological explorations remain inconclusive. The Israelites painted vivid images of locations and events and even mentioned powerful nations and kings. The narratives are so detailed and full of activities that you could see clearly that they were not concocted.

Of what value would it be for a people to concoct stories that they were once slaves somewhere? Of what value would it be for them to state that they were roaming a wilderness for 40yrs? What do you think they intended to achieve by telling such lies? Besides, they didn't write for the world. They wrote for themselves. To keep records of their own events. What would they gain by writing such lies for themselves? Archeology is still digging the place. These story is more than 4000 years old. How old is archeology itself?

LordReed:
Then you have your answers.

No, I already countered the flawed answers.

LordReed:
Read the OP's submissions.

I already did.

LordReed:
Where is it written that the Pharaoh perished in the sea?

Google is your friend.

oteneaaron:
That is very important question.

I honestly don't know why people feel threatened when these topics are explored.

Why can't we investigate into biblical history and chronology?

Or are they scared of what they might find out?

Even the Bible at 1 Thessalonians 5 VS 21 encourages everyone to - "Test all things..."

How can we "test all things.." when we don't take our time to do indepth research?

Makes you wonder.

🤔🤔

To do indepth research you need to go back in time and see what really happened for yourself.

All the so called archeological finds are the things the Egyptians wrote for themselves. The Israelites also have written for themselves. I have given you clues that may guide you in making comparative analysis of the conflicting stories. Now, the ball is in your court.

LordReed:
Really? So why is there no archeological evidence for this 'honest' exodus?

What pieces of evidence are you actually looking for? Archeological footprints of people marching across the Sinai Peninsula?

MaxInDHouse:
With the highlighted you have killed this thread!

When some people want to pick up arguments against God's word they don't know that lack of CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS is stupidity on its own. Whatever is written on their walls wasn't done by sincere historians but under the direction of their kings who wants their citizens to feel highly secured in their domain and pose a threat to any supposed enemy who may be planning a siege against their Cities.

So in a nutshell the invented stories has a purpose not just what really happened in the past.

Take for instance the Ọ̀yọ́ empire, this people became great right from the time of Ṣàngó the third King of Ọ̀yọ́ and they ruled for years but when the Fúlànís invaded Ọ̀yọ́ they conquered Ọ̀yọ́ and took away the crown as a sign of their victory only to face their doom when they got to Ògbómọ̀ṣọ́. The Ògbómọ̀ṣọ́ people fought, conquered the Fúlànís and returned the crown back to Ọ̀yọ́.
This STORY i heard from my late great-grandmother who is also an historian in Abẹ́òkúta but the day i told an Ọ̀yọ́ chieftain he almost turn it into a bloody fight saying it never happened not until recently when the late Aláàfin Làmídì Adéyẹmí insulted the Ṣọ̀ún of Ògbómọ̀ṣọ́ claiming the later was never a crowned prince in Yorùbá land that Ṣọ̀ún angrily responded that the crown on the Aláàfin's head belongs to him. So when journalists asked him why he uttered such a statement then he revealed exactly the story my late great-grandmother told me.
Ever since then i knew why my late great grandmother was highly respected as a great historian in Abẹ́òkúta!

From the Oyo history you shared, you nailed it.

One thing is clear about the historical records of most nations in antiquity. They write only good things about themselves. You'll never see them write about their defeats in battle or their enslavement to another nation, the despicable manners of their kings or the failures of their gods. They're always conquering and never being defeated, living as lords over other nations and recording only good and favourable events in the making of their nationhood. We all know that this can only be far from the truth. Egypt's Pharaoh pursued the Israelites into the red sea and perished there but they'll narrate the events to rather show might and conquests. They actually distort their own histories to brush their national ego. All the nations are like that. No one ever gets defeated in battle except their enemies. Should anyone believe such reports? They're always one sided and narcissistic in tone.

Can the same be said of Israel? Israel has its recorded history as the Old Testaments in the Bible. They didn't write it for religious purposes initially, they were just honestly penning down their records for the coming generations of their children. They record their own failings, their own defeats, the misbehaviours of their kings, the fall of their own nation, even their enslavement and exiles by foreign powers. You'll read balanced records that do not prioritize self praise or national egoism.

So, when contrasting records made by a nation with whom Israel has some ancient involvements, whose records would you believe? I leave it to the reader to judge.

Beetunez44:
As for me i wasnt really in the world before but never knew the true nature of God until i gained admission into an institution; attending a student fellowship so with a lot of bible studies my eyes opened.

Ignore that demon called kobojunkie. He's a known demon on this platform. Don't allow him quote the scriptures upside down for you.

Explore2xmore:
If we look at the language here like that in Isaiah 48:10 states, "I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction." This language suggests that the purpose of the refining fire is to purify and renew, not to condemn and destroy.

The book of Malachi is primarily concerned with addressing the corrupt practices of the Israelites and calling them to repentance. The dreadful day is presented as a consequence of their actions, but it is also portrayed as a potential turning point for the people.

The Fuller's fire, the refining fire, the spirit of burning, etc are all judgements in the sense of chastisements. God's hands are heavy upon His children whenever they go wayward but His chastisements are all in love. To call back into order, those that are going astray.

The dreadful and terrible day is the day of judgement. Quiet different from the occasional chastisements. It's a day when all, young and old, man and woman would stand before the fiery judgement of the Lord God Almighty. It's going to be a dreadful day. That's what Malachi 4 was talking about.

Explore2xmore:
Perharps we should look again.

The judgment that is spoken of in Malachi primarily refers to the judgment on earth. Malachi warns of consequences for the people's actions and urges them to repent and return to God. The judgment that is described in the book is not necessarily a final judgment day, but rather a judgment that will have immediate repercussions on the people's lives and their relationship with God.

The judgment that is spoken of in Malachi primarily refers to the judgment on earth. Malachi warns of consequences for the people's actions and urges them to repent and return to God. The judgment that is described in the book is not necessarily a final judgment day, but rather a judgment that will have immediate repercussions on the people's lives and their relationship with God.

Malachi 3:2-3 describes the coming of the Lord as a refiner's fire, purifying the people and purging them of impurity. This imagery of purification and refinement suggests a judgment that is aimed at correcting and purifying the people, rather than condemning them to eternal damnation.

The judgment prophesied in Malachi 3 is for Israel. The dreadful day prophesied in Malachi 4 is for the world.

Explore2xmore:
What really is the great and dreadful day?

Judgement day.

SharingIsLife:
Lol Bro please how can I get this Naira symbol on my keyboard?

Long press your space bar. A list would pop up. Look down on the pop up, you'll see an option to choose Language Settings. Click on 'Language Settings' and choose a Nigerian language among them. From then on, you'll be able to type in English as well as in the language you've chosen. When you press the number key on your keypad, the key that beside your space bar that has 123 written on it, you'll see the ₦ symbol among the keys that are displayed.

FRANCISTOWN:
@FxMasterz
When Moses and Elijah appeared to Jesus.
Note that, John the Baptist already died.
John died in chapter 14 of Matthew, while Elijah and Moses appeared with Jesus in chapter 17.

Also in Mark. John the Baptist died in the sixth chapter of Mark and Elijah appeared in the 9th chapter on the mount of transfiguration.

Elijah was already a "spirit" according to you guys' bible.

You also said Moses did not die, see. Read your bible.
Deuteronomy 34:7 "And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died..."

Jude the brother of James even gave an account of what happened after Moses' death in Jude 1: 9 "Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee."

So Moses died, according to the bible stories.

The Moses and Elijah that appeared to the bible Jesus were spirits.

Also it is important to know that, whenever Elijah appeared. There was always a Jezebel who wanted to kill him.
It happened in 1kings chapter 18-19
Since she couldn't kill Elijah.

When Elijah came back as John the Baptist. The spirit of Jezebel also reappeared as herodias (another case of reincarnation in the bible that people don't know about)

Jesus himself said John the Baptist was Elijah, so why the stress?

Jesus saying John the Baptist was Elijah is prophetic language. Please read my recent response to Explore2xmore. I explained it in the context of Jerusalem being Sodom and Egypt.

Yeah Moses probably died. I didn't say emphatically that he did not die. The statement was a probability. I had said "Moses like Elijah probably did not die." It was a statement of probability. In the light of what Jude said about the disputation on the body of Moses. We can further establish that Moses probably didn't die. His physical body became a bone of contention only because it was still alive. The physical body is useless after death. Its destination is the grave. Neither God, Angels nor Satan are concerned about the body of a dead man. The body that could be contended for by Satan is a living body because that one has a destination beyond the grave. These are all probabilities because God never revealed what happened to Moses on the top of Pisgah in Mount Nebo. He simply disappeared. It is reasonable for the people of his days to think that he died and that God had buried him. God never said that to anybody. We are not perfect in knowledge. A day will come when every mystery shall be uncovered.

The Jezebel appearance wherever Elijah appeared could be taken as a mere deduction. The idea of Herodias being John's Jezebel is not theologically grounded enough to paint John as Elijah. Most times, when you carry the prophetic mantle of somebody, you would experience similar life events like that individual whose mantle you're carrying. The same travails, tribulations and vagaries of life happen to you. Compare Elijah's ministry with that of Elisha, the similarities are even more pronounced than John's. Elijah is not John. John is not a reincarnation of Elijah.

Explore2xmore:
Quite a good submission however where then do you place the statement of Jesus?

Mark 9:13
But I tell you, Elijah has come, and they have done to him everything they wished, just as it is written about him."

Matthew 17:10-13
10 The disciples asked him, “Why then do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?”

11 Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. 12 But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” 13 Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist.

The Lord Jesus was speaking in prophetic language there. The clarification of that statement is found in Luke 1:17.

Prophetically, there are two events associated with Elijah. Both events were mentioned in the book of Malachi 4:5-6:

"5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord:

6 And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse."

The real Elijah would accomplish verse 5 as prophesied in the book of Revelation. In the book of Revelation, Elijah was not seen "turning the hearts of the children to their fathers." He was busy commanding fire and prophesying. He was shutting the heavens. He
and Moses appeared on the scene suddenly prophesying and doing mighty and dreadful deeds. They didn't have time to turn the hearts of the children to the fathers.

John accomplished verse 6 as the "voice of one crying in the wilderness, make straight the path of the Lord." He performed this task in the spirit of Elijah. Under the same anointing that Elijah carried So, he is spiritually called Elijah. Someone in the spiritual mantle of Elijah (John the Baptist) is prophetically called Elijah but he is not physically Elijah. The real Elijah comes at the close of the age.

For example, let's look at a similar prophetic language about Jerusalem.

Revelation 11:8:
"[8] And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified."

You can see that the city referred to here is clearly Jerusalem. It was spiritually called Sodom and Egypt. That does not make Jerusalem Sodom or Egypt. It's a prophetic language. This prophecy is already fulfilled in our own days. Sodomy means Gayism - Homosexuality. LGBTQ things. These are things for which Israel is known today. John accurately named Israel Sodom spiritually. That does not make Israel Sodom geographically or otherwise. Egypt means a departure from the true God. A breaking of the divine covenant. This is already clear. Those guys who call themselves Israelites today don't know God. Today's Israel is spiritually Sodom and Egypt.Israel is not Egypt geographically or other wise. The same way John was spiritually Elijah but not physically Elijah.

As Jerusalem is not physically Sodom, so also John is not physically Elijah. The spirit of Sodom is upon Jerusalem just as the spirit of Elijah was upon John. However, they are two distinct individuals.

FRANCISTOWN:
@Explore2xmore
@FxMasterz
@SIRTee15
@MightySparrow
@MaxInDHouse

I'll be speaking according to the bible.
John the Baptist was infact the reincarnation of Elijah.
Let's walk thru the bible together.
What happens when a man dies?
His earthly body returns back to the ground.
It is impossible to ascend into heaven with your earthly body.
For God himself said this to the first man who inherited death.

In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread till thou return to the earth, out of which thou wast taken: for dust thou art, and into dust thou shalt return. Gen 3:19

When Enoch was taken up to heaven, he was not taken with his earthly body, likewise Elijah

Apostle Paul better explained this in

Phil3: 21 He will take our weak mortal bodies and change them into glorious bodies like his own, using the same power with which he will bring everything under his control.

The earthly body cannot survive in heaven.
So Enoch and Elijah must have been given a new body just as Paul explained.

Now about reincarnation.
See what the dictionary says:
•A rebirth of a soul, in a physical life form, such as a body.
Since Elijah was taken into heaven without his earthly body. It is reasonable to say he was a soul.
Now in Malachi 4:5 Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD:

John was the only prophet that was sent just before Jesus.

Even Jesus confirmed that indeed John the Baptist was a prophet in Luke 7:28 For I say unto you, Among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist...

Luke 1:17 "And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah..."

Simply put, the spirit of Elijah in a new earthly body.
And Jesus really said it clearly in

Mat 11:14:
"And if you will receive it, this is Elijah, which was for to come."

Mat 17:11-13:
"And Jesus answered and said to them, Elijah truly shall first come, and restore all things. But I say to you, That Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but have done to him whatever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. Then the disciples understood that he spoke to them of John the Baptist."

When Elijah was taken to heaven, he was given a different body, so, he had to enter a new earthly body which can only happen by birth. Hence, reincarnation

All this lengthy talk can be rendered heretic by one simple scripture -The two appearances Jesus had on the Mount of Transfiguration.

Moses and Elijah appeared to Jesus on the Mount of Transfiguration. The same Elijah that appeared to Jesus cannot be the same John the Baptist.

Truly, flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God. That does not mean flesh and blood cannot appear there. Moses like Elijah probably never died too. His grave was never found. There's high tendency that their reappearance at the end of time as prophesied in the book of Revelation was to accomplish the shedding off of the flesh so that they, in their spirit bodies can inherit the Kingdom of God.

Malachi 4:5 refers to the reappearance of Elijah before the coming of the dreadful day of the Lord. The dreadful day of the Lord is still future. It is a day of judgement. The first coming of Christ was not dreadful. It was for the salvation of souls. You can bear me witness that there was nothing dreadful about it. In the book of revelation, just immediately after Moses and Elijah (The two witnesses) were taken up after their ressurection, the dreadful judgement of the Lord began upon the earth. That's the day Malachi was talking about.

John himself testified that "He was the voice of one crying in the wilderness" - John 1:23. Re-echoing an earlier prophecy of Isaiah about him.

"This is Elijah that was to come..." Is a prophetic language. It should not be taken literally. The literal meaning of those words was given at John's birth in Luke 1:17.

Being in the spirit of Elijah is not the same as being Elijah. The anointing or mantle of Elijah was upon him to deliver his fiery message of repentance to Israel. This is a similar event as the one recorded of Elisha after the mantle of Elijah fell on him on the other side of Jordan. The sons of the prophet looking at Elisha from afar off reported: "The spirit of Elijah doth rest upon Elisha". Elisha did not become Elijah at that point but he operated in the spirit of Elijah. John was not a reincarnation of Elijah. He was a distinct spirit with the zeal, fervour and anointing of Elijah.

Explore2xmore:
There appears some verses in the Bible that say reincarnation doesn't occur.
Hebrews 9:27 - "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment

Yet Jesus is said to say Elijah had come but wasn't recognised. Matthew 11:10-14.

Where was Elijah said to have come?

Then he is also said to come again at the end of the world.


Attn: Fxmasterz,SirTee15,Malcom1x,Maximdhouse,Mightysparrow,MrPrevailer,Tenq and all who can shed light and knowledge about this.

Christianity does not believe in reincarnation.

Elijah never died. He was taken up in a chariot of fire. So a reappearance of this prophet does not qualify as a reincarnation.

But actually, Jesus was not referring to John in that statement of His as the very same Elijah but rather, His reference to John as being Elijah was a reference to the same anointing and fiery spirit that Elijah carried.

A prophecy about John in Luke 1:17 will bring clarity to the matter.

"And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the parents to their children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous—to make ready a people prepared for the Lord.”

Shoodboi:
They will soon claim it was Hamas, watch them. In the same Jerusalem where there are no Palestinians. The same Jerusalem fully controlled by Israel. The same Jerusalem where Israel has soldiers and tanks all over. Watch them, they will soon say it was Hamas. They've even identified the shooters as Palestinians. How did they know the dead men are Palestinians? Dead people o.

Hamas has claimed responsibility!

EMILO2STAY:
you said islam also fits those descriptions of the antichrist in the bible but it does not. lol every thing you listed there I have addressed in the post you quoted my guy it seems you have comprehension problem.

it seems you are now seeking clarification like you want to learn ok.


1. daniel 7 gives an insight into what the beast is and that is a kingdom with a
man ruling and sitted in top position. if you agree this kingdom / system is already in existence then you also know that the man ruling there is the eyes and mouth of that little horn the same as the man of sin. this system is refered to as the beast in bible
prophecy because it took over from the fourth beast and used its political
power. the beast is not a person per say but a political power how many times do i have to prove that with scripture?


2.this beast described by John in revelation is nothing but the office of the
papacy as proven by the bible and history, which is still same as mystery babylon. this babylonian system as at the time of johns revelation was "not" in existence but is to
" to come. meaning the babylonian system was in existed before johns times during time of of babylonian empire and as at the time of the revelation is not in existence becuase babylon is no more but is to come in the near future through the papacy who have assimilated the babylonian pagan culture through rome because the priests of
babylon ran to rome at the fall of babylon and they ran to a place called
pagamos in rome which the bible called the sit of satan. rome incooperated
this practices into there religious system and that is how the vatican got it.
now do you understand why it is called mystery babylon?
remember the son of perdition which paul spoke of? it is same thing as this beast who will also go into perdition. perdition means destined for destruction by the Lord.


3.the scripture means indeed that the numerical equivalent of his name is 666. now you need to understand that the word name does not necessarily imply literal name but what he stands for or acts, or claims to be ,.. in otherwords his title which he wears on his crown . take for example Exodus 34:14 "For you shall worship no other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous..

4 it is you who think otherwise. john started by saying "as you have heard that antichrist is coming" he was referring to the same thing paul was saying in 2 thessalonians 2. and then went on to say that many antichrists have come already meaning there are many people who have corrupted the gospel as at his time. the catholic church foundation goes back to the time of the apostles with a man known as simon the sorcerer. these people are same people who are part of the fallen ,the apostasia that shall usher in the man of sin. so john is not saying somthing different at all he is still referring to the antichrist and its system because john still spoke of a falling away and a revealing of the apostate church when he said " that they might be manifest that they where not of us. this is the apostasia. when this apostate church is set up it will have a man as its head. every organization do that.


5. you sound like a child. is this the kind of person that stands in front of people to preach? christianity was spreading all over the world. john was not adressing a hebrew and greek audience, he was adressing every beliver in christ irreective of nationality.

paul himself took the gospel to rome. rome was the capitial of civilization then just as america is now. the gospel was spreading to rome faster than any place and so rome was not left out. the roman numerals equally serve as letters. you no go school? i(1) ,ii (2), iii(3), iv(4), v(5) and so on and so forth. in does days they understood that when the antichrist comes his name in any letter will have a numerical equivalent of 666 in this case it has to be the roman numerals because rome is the fourth kingdom and the papacy has been identified as the little horn.
why would one look at greek or hebrew language for 666 , is the antichrist said to arise from greece or jerusalem ? you dont know your bible.

Please it's okay. I don't think you fit into my space. Constantly saying what I never said and presenting yourself as though you're in a fight.

I need intelligent and and mature presentations. Thanks for your time.

EMILO2STAY:
you clearly made an assumption when there is no need or reason to, the fact is that you said it. why are you dragging unnecessarily.

It was not an assertion. It was a question of whether you're JW or not.

EMILO2STAY:
oga leave matter you directly put words in my mouth when my monica never made such statement . the fact is it is what you said and i have shown it to you. so leave matter

I know you'll remain obstinate without minding the clarifications. I addressed it for the record and not purposely for you.