Jedisco's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Jedisco's Profile › Jedisco's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 (of 211 pages)
I wonder why my posts are being hidden |
I know exactly where you can get it. Which phone are you using? |
* double post deleted * |
4llerbuntu: Wicked man, see as you just downsize their swagger, nokia go sue u o, or bribe you with one and you immediately turn into their evangelist (Naija Style)The thing with you is that though you have sworn never to touch other OSes apart from your super android, you always want to make comments about them just to look like a guru. Well your post above is the most not-so-well informed statement I've heard as far as the 808 pureview is concerned. It amazes me that you still think that the quality of a camera depends just on its MP rating. There are a host of other things involved like the sensor size, the flash, the lens, the software behind the camera, quality of recorded sound, how it zooms e.t.c. The 808 pureview doesn't have a competitor as far as smarts are concerned in almost all the above. I can give you countless examples of lower MP rated cameras (N97 with 5MP) that produces better images than higher rated ones (N86 with 8MP). Coming to the issue of size, at full 38MP resolution, the pics come out at about 10MB which is not too much for its quality. Now to what really annoyed me. It can also take pics at 3, 5 and 8MP resolution with that of 3MP being the best in quality because of the way pureview works (sorry to burst your bubble). So in summary, the 808 pureview will give you a small sized image at 3MP whose quality cannot be compared to that of any phone ever made (no matter the resolution or size) Coming to video recording, again it has no competitor. With dual recording microphones for stereo recording, full HD recording, rich recording that gives CD-like quality and looseless zoom its just too good to be compared to anyother. Its amazing that out of every other thing to attack the 808 pureview on, its its camera you've chosen. Well FYI, it has no competitor in that area. That is something that took Nokia 5 solid years to put into a phone. You may check up this link and a host of others to clear your doubts: http://www.cameradebate.com/2012/nokia-808-pureview-camera-review/ Your comparison with a DLSR is not worth a reply |
texazzpete: You saw several hundred people (out of a HUGE population) and it's 'everybody' abi?I still searching for what exactly makes it a low-end phone cos I see alot of features on the phone that no other phone has or can dream of having in the near future. |
sniperwolf: I really hate this argument between N8 and 701. The poster did not mention either of the phones. I own N8 and my cousin owns 701. I can tell that the only advantage (for an ordinary man) the 701 has over the N8 is the price.Man open your eyes to the beautiful horizon out there. Go back and read my reply to temmy and see the things I listed. I used to think 7010 was fast enough until it got the fp1 update which increased the processor speed from 1 to 1.3GHz. The first and most important feature I noticed was that it was so much smoother and faster. It got me asking myself so this is what just 300MHz can do. And please never mention it anywhere again that a 256mb ram and 687MHz symbian device runs smoothly. Even out of the box, it can't be described as smooth. The best independent review you can get on symbian fp1 on 808 is that its UI can compete with other current OSes although it still has some glitches in performance here and there. |
sniperwolf: I really hate this argument between N8 and 701. The poster did not mention either of the phones. I own N8 and my cousin owns 701. I can tell that the only advantage (for an ordinary man) the 701 has over the N8 is the price.Man open your eyes to the beautiful horizon out there. Go back and read my reply to temmy and see the things I listed. I used to think 7010 was fast enough until it got the fp1 update which increased the processor speed from 1 to 1.3GHz. The first and most important feature I noticed was that it was so much smoother and faster. It got me asking myself so this is what just 300MHz can do. And please never mention it anywhere again that a 256mb ram and 687MHz symbian device runs smoothly. Even out of the box, its laggy. The best independent review you can get on symbian fp1 on 808 is that its UI can compete with other current OSes although it still has some glitches in performance here and there. |
4peace: i pray to God this morning for you guys temmy & jedisco to get awof money and move on to another platform OS |
4peace: i pray to God this morning for you guys temmy & jedisco to get awof money and move on to another platform OSThe only other platform I'm willing to buy now is windows phone which is still awaiting wp8 and not fully available locally. Android is too similar to symbian and the only advantage I see are the currently released HD games. iphone is overpriced but lovely. I once had an apple device and I loved it but I feel like its a rip off for its price. Seriously considering it cos of the data plans but its still quite limited in functionality for now. |
temmy.m3:You don't need to post any picture (which is hardly authentic considering your bias) when there are loads of them online. I even provided a link. Not all games man or have you forgotten about the 1GB tintin. I take important things into perspective when making a decision and hardware which I'm never going to use is never an option. Take for example the fm radio which I hardly use now compare this to the very bright dual led flash which I use as a torch multiple times every single day. So if you ask me to forfeit one, it would definitely be the radio. Same goes to the smoothness of the device. The iphone is the most successful device today mainly because its smooth, fast and easy to use. N8 may have a good camera but that is only noticed when taking pics (which it lags heavily at) compare that to the processors of 701 which is evident in every single activity. Take a look at a quote from allaboutsymbian 'Whereas the N8 will be picked for its camera, the 701 is a monster by Symbian standards. To put it into perspective, the clunky WRT-based Nokia Social loads from scratch in 3 seconds, Web loads in one second and All About Symbian loads in under ten seconds (c.f. 18 seconds on the N8). Effectively, everything on the 701 is almost twice as fast. Moving around the UI, you get the feeling that if you could turn theme effects off (you can't!) then everything would just be 'instant'. FYI the TV out on 701 can be used for that stuff (I attached the link above) So if its down to the excellent camera and slow phone on N8 or good camera and fast phone on 701, my choice will be 701. I can do without most of the hardware features on 701 But one thing I can't do is using a 256mb ram and 687MHz phone in 2012. Forget all this trash about phones meant for different purposes that helped in killing Nokia. Even Nokia has stopped that and now release COMPLETE PHONES that that reflect their price range (not niche stuff). In summary, the only symbian phones worth the money spent on buying them and which I can use my money to buy are 701 and 808. |
@temmy I think I'm done with this and it makes no sense repeating stuff over and over again. 1. FYI I've used an AMOLED device before (N86) which I regretted ever buying. And for the screen, that of 701 is much better. After using this phone, and trying out a friends C7 which was unconvincing with Anna, I decided to move to android. But later changed when 701 was out with belle. And like I've always said, I prefer the screen of 701 to C7. Any advantage oled has over TFT is overtaken by the presence of CBD, a bright screen and much longer battery life while using it on bright pages- a very good feature for me since I do alot of browsing on my phone. Moreover, I don't know where you got that trash from that I have to use every symbian device to have an opinion of them. You should remember that symbian has little or no fragmentation. I can give you a detailed explanation of any S^3 device without even using it 2. I'm still looking for where the op mentioned N8. Please show me when you see it. Build- plastic is mainly used on the curved edges while the back is mainly steel and the front mainly the screen. Now compare this to the punched out ugly design on N8. If you want to list every hardware feature, I have no problem with that but how did you forget these: smaller more beautiful design, lighter, double ram, bright CBD screen, double processor speed, better GPU, NFC, hardware hang up and call keys, dual led flash which can be used as a torch, 600mb memory on C:, much better battery backup, better upgradeability. 3. Unless you are trying to cover facts, its no secret that the drive C: which is 256mb (with about 120mb free) on N8 is grossly inadequate and can't be increased. Now compare that with over 600mb (over 400 free) on 701. The whole net is littered with requests of N8 users asking how to increase their C: memory. And please don't come up with any trash of not installing multiple apps on C which is exactly what I do. Mind you I have about 110mb left on C: can't imagine what it would have been on N8. Maybe you should look at this link and find out how so hard it is for n8 users to free out just 45mb (and please don't say use the hacked version cos it still uses 20mb not everybody is interested in that) http://mynokiablog.com/2012/06/19/update-for-nokia-n8-microsoft-apps-v2-01-at-nokia-suite/ 4. Upgradeability- you must be joking right? Its just like a galaxy s user porting jb over and expecting thesame experience as that on SIII (when released). I've never used a cfw on my phone as it just makes it unstable. The only time I tried, I regretted it and had to reflash it with the original firmware. Moreover, how many people even bother to hack their phones talkless of downloading very large files just to flash it? So your attempt concerning leaked fp1 does not count for me. TV out- yes I don't use it but its still got it. (Although its not HDMI) http://m.youtube.com/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DWeOBADcs4p0&v=WeOBADcs4p0&gl=NG It Seems as though you don't want to read this review and the comments http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/14959_Nokia_701_vs_N8_Torpedo_vs_Gui.php I always give links so you would see I'm not making stories up but backing them with facts. |
temmy.m3:Neither did he mention N8 bro... The only symbian phone I regard as being better than 701 in all round usability is 808 (with due respect to N8s camera and E7s screen) I think we're done with this comparison. Anyway, while surfing a while ago I came across an article comparing the 701 to N8 on points they consider important (which I pretty much think represents older S^3 devices except for some subtle differences) I think they did a good job (also judging from readers comments) but for the sake of completeness and also bringing C7 and E7 into focus, let me point out some things they missed before posting theirs. - Price: Its almost 50% cheaper than the others except for C7 - Internal memory: 8GB although lower than that on the N8 and E7, it has a much better allocation between C: and E: so you hardly run out on C: which can't be increased artificially. -Upgradeability: Symbian has moved on from Belle to Belle FP1 (which is much better than Belle) and is currently awaiting FP2 (which promises more). Out of the devices listed, only 701 uses FP1 and only it would get FP2 and maybe more. The others may get something minor. -Camera: That of N8 is much better. But 701 has a 2nd gen EDoF camera which is much better than the 1st gen EDoF found on C7 and E7. It also has dual led flash that can be used as a torch. -TV Out- N8 and E7 both have the 3.5mm A/V and HDMI while C7 and 701 have only the 3.5mm A/V out option. Although this is not a feature I'm keen on. -Also only E7 has a 4 inch screen and physical keyboard. The remaining important things are covered in the review which also includes users comments. http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/14959_Nokia_701_vs_N8_Torpedo_vs_Gui.php |
I've been trying to make a post but it gets hidden after sometime. |
temmy.m3:Neither did he mention N8 bro... The only symbian phone I regard as being better to 701 in all round usability is 808 (with due respect to N8s camera and E7s screen) I think we're done with this comparison. Anyway, while surfing a while ago I came across an article comparing the 701 to N8 on points they consider important (which I pretty much think represents older S^3 devices except for some subtle differences) I think they did a good job (also judging from readers comments) but for the sake of completeness and also bringing C7 and E7 into focus, let me point out some things they missed before posting theirs. - Price: Its almost 50% cheaper than the others except for C7 - Internal memory: 8GB although lower than that on the N8 and E7, it has a much better allocation between C: and E: so you hardly run out on C: which can't be increased artificially. -Upgradeability- Symbian has moved on from Belle to Belle FP1 (which is much better than Belle) and is currently awaiting FP2 (which promises more). Out of the devices listed, only 701 uses FP1 and only it would get FP2 and maybe more. The others may get something minor. -Camera: That of N8 is much better. But 701 has a 2nd gen EDoF camera which is much better than the 1st gen EDoF found on C7 and E7. It also has dual led flash that can be used as a torch. -TV Out- N8 and E7 both have the 3.5mm A/V and HDMI while C7 and 701 have only the 3.5mm A/V out option. Although this is not a feature I'm keen on. -Also only E7 has a 4 inch screen and physical keyboard The remaining important things are covered in the review. http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/14959_Nokia_701_vs_N8_Torpedo_vs_Gui.php |
temmy.m3:This has nothing to do with love for a device I may soon stop using. I just felt like giving some input about my preference and like I remember posting 'except if your mind is made up'. This was me just just saying what my choice would be. Coming to the screen issue. The last time I checked, the most expensive and successful general phone the iphone which together with the ipad receives over 75% of smartphone profits uses a TFT screen (which obviously has sold better than all of Nokias AMOLEDs put together) There are several high-end androids that use a TFT screen. So the issue of TFT being on low end devices is false. And like I keep repeating there are several cheaper AMOLED screen devices. Moreover, I don't know where you got the idea that a great screen all depends on whether it uses TFT or AMOLED. Alot of factors are involved like: physical screen materials, screen technologies (LCD versus OLED), pixel layouts (RGB variations), brightness, color accuracy, contrast ratio, reflectance, screen size, and pixel resolution. Taking the 701 and C7(or N8) for instance most of the above are constant except for brightness (with 701 having the brightest screen on a smartphone) and reflectance which Nokias ClearBlack display more than takes care of. So all-in-all, I still prefer the screen on 701 to that on C7. As far as symbian is concerned, only E7 and 808 have better screens. Also a comparison has already been done: http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/13649_IPS_TFT_versus_AMOLED_Nokia_70.php This might also be helpful: http://www.cnet.com/8301-17918_1-57445567-85/hd-super-amoled-versus-retina-display-and-other-screens-smartphones-unlocked/ |
Its a good idea although I would prefer that women be counselled and allowed to make informed decisions. Another option is increasing the tax producers of infant formulae pay so that they could be more expensive while subsidizing it for women who cannot breastfeed. They should also be made to put a bold caption (just like that on cigarettes) stating that the mothers milk is by far the best for the infant. |
4llerbuntu: Nice try,Hahahahahahahhaha Man don't paraphrase my posts- they're patented. Or do you want another Apple vs Samsung with Sammy as the patent thief? @all Is there anyway to know if someone is using two different usernames on NL? #justasking |
I tok am. The tin don reach front page. Still no comment yet. |
texazzpete: You really have his measure.Funny enough, from my conclusive post to him I said 'it may surprise you if I told you the device I personally prefer between them' If I was to make a choice, I would also pick the S3 mainly cos of limitations which I'm not used to having on symbian. But if I was to use my money to do the purchasing, I would most definitely wait for a wp8 device. What annoys me is that alot of them think android is better for just no reason. On the symbian vs android thread, I saw really annoying posts like no capacitive touch screen, no custom roms, no talking tom app, symbian sucks and a host of other annoying reasons. I usually look at devices with an open mind. But being a lover of Nokia products, I usually don't entertain people insulting their devices without first getting their facts right. This sometimes makes me looks like I'm taking a defensive approach e.g on this thread. |
This may soon get to the front page. Let me leave before it starts @puskin why are your fingers itching? Mine is already sore |
***double post deleted*** |
4llerbuntu: seriously like HOW OLD ARE YOU?Shiittt!!! Whats it between you and tex that you see his shadow in everyone?? Where did you and him start having this issue. Moreover I ended my issue with you just before he reappeared. If you have issues with him, approach him and solve it like a man. Its no point denying that this thread was turned to a debate by you and your likes. Afterall she was asking me to accept defeat. Atleast if this was to be done again, you would be more careful with your statements. Your point was that lumia 900 is so much below S3 in every single aspect that a comparison was not necessary My point was that none represents a better or more powerful device conclusively and that they both have their pros and cons. The best device depends on ones preference. However, if you want to do a comparison first get your facts right. Putting up a poll is of no use cos you and your likes easily outnumber me- people who believe android is the best at everything. Afterall some of you have called lumia a feature phone. It would be just like what we had on the symbian vs android thread where we were just about 4. This thread is for independent minds to make a decision. |
joanana: Accepting defeat is not a crime oooThere is on defeat here. My points are clearly written for all to see. And like I told you before, I've never lost a phone argument cos I don't make blind ones. All my posts on this thread are undisputable facts. The bottom line is that people should limit their phone arguments to their points of interest not claiming to be a guru in everything when Infact they're pathetically blank. Next time he will think well before joining issues with me cos even if I was comparing a BB with him, I will still make him end up thesame way. Its not the device, its the know-how |
4peace: Let me know not-so-popular ones so i can give the descriptionMainly the ones that have not been talked on before like SMSSpreaderFREE sms to fi1e SKydrive10 HPePrint Melon PDF Scanner CAM2facebook filMark LiveStation_Symbian3_Phase1 Mobile_TV Emanuele Colombo Duktov5.01 The Vitamin Photo Browser HandyBlacklist Talking time timer pro power calculator |
4llerbuntu: hehehe, this has to be the strangest debate ever.Since you're never going to use a lumia is best you refrain from discussions concerning it. Lumia 900 hasn't been released in Nigeria. So if you're in Nigeria its very very unlikely you have even seen this device (which is evident from your claim of lack of Youtube and angry birds apps). I will take it that you've neither seen it or have you ever been interested. I have always answered questions directly. Also I don't depend on any single review to make my decision. But if you're looking for one that rates lumia favourably, almost everyone I've seen does that. I referred to symbian to make you see that no os has it all or is even close to that yet. If you have issues with tex sort it out. That our views coincide here does not mean I know the guy. Moreover, I've not used any of his quotes in replying you. I'm really encountering him for the 1st time here and from my posts I'm far from a starter. FYI Nokia has never said they're dropping symbian. Accenture will continue its development until atleast 2016 and maybe more. Lastly, it may surprise you if I told you the device I personally prefer between them. If we were to switch roles, I would dismiss this in a single post (just like I'm about to do). I like people being truthful and straight and knowledgeable when making such comparisons. Your best point about a device shouldn't necessarily be about looking for faults in its rivals but rather showing its strong points If you're still looking for strong points of lumia, maybe you should consider these: -Looks: especially when its the most beautiful smartie and has won several awards to that effect. -OS: especially when its amazingly beautiful, easy to use and really fast and smooth. App and game support: especially when it has the best exclusive apps that cannot be duplicated on others like Nokia maps and xbox live support. -Price: especially when it offers so much for so little. -Practical hardware: especially when it offers the best outdoor readability by a very wide margin. In summary, you may see one as the most powerful, the other as the best for you or one of them as being the most powerful and the best. Its all about what you want and consider useful in a device. |
Ozegbe: have been looking for that today app and cant find it and also the hear and write uses internet connection.I came across it today while looking for something else. I had almost forgotten until I saw your post. It was made by offscreen so you can check their list of apps for it. Like apps also include: History (also written in Qt) and Birthdate. |
I noticed sometime ago that meebible also has support for native Nigerian languages. The Last time I saw Efik, Yoruba and Igbo. Also, the supported language and versions keep growing. All you have to do is just change the language to the preferred one and download for offline reading- All for free. Here are some screenshots of the Igbo version
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 (of 211 pages)
) and then added 10k to the money and picked up a Galaxy S III. That's #Winning.
Dont forget dsame screen run your games o.
but as i v always said, all recent Nokia devices have their specific purposes, at least to me and consodering the lil' experiences i had with them