₦airaland Forum

Bet law school nor dey award degree na.

Nasty.

And people were cheering him on fa.

Sterile men should avoid that church.

UncleSnr:
Yeah physical garden, not spiritual garden!

Ikr. The onion is just hopeless.

GooseBaba:
It's like defending oxygen, your efforts does not add or remove. But the question I have to ask.. If I said fuvk your god.. Would you be offended..?

Indeed. But we are human beings, not logic machines. Like you say, man must talk.

My brother, I couldn't care less what you say or don't say about God.

plaetton:
No one will argue that with you if you agree that it is only a postulation, a notion, a hypothesis.

Oga, I dey hail o.

We can choose to be technical about it. I will concede that it will never be the subject of a theory, and it is not even a postulation. We could not have a theory of God any more than we could have a theory of plaetton. Theories don't provide for things of that sort.

GooseBaba:
Hmmm, i thought you said god was a default state of existence.. So how does defending an abstract thought viable from a deistic perspective..?

I'm sure you know that real things cannot be abstract. I do not so much defend as discuss. If you're asking why we should discuss God at all the simple answer is because we can. God is real, electromagnetism is real, and we can talk about any one we please. If you're asking why God does not introduce himself like a normal person, then I can't give you an answer. There aren't many answers I can give you, in fact.

krattoss:
i think this is getting creeppy and am getting psycho of all these ishss

fake God of war.

"We must cultivate our garden". Lol. Indeed.

GooseBaba:
So why do you speak for it or defend it...?

Obviously because I want to. Why else?

theAtheist101:
So after 2 hours of reasoning his existence and you are very convinced that he doesn't existence, would you still ascribe a power to him?

[size=1] I think you are a theist. [/size]

If he doesn't exist he won't be constrained by reality so he can be as powerful as you imagine.

Fine, then.

theAtheist101:
At bolded, how certain are you? What tests or experiments did you carry out to arrive at your conclusion?

[size=1] At second bolded, why have you been wasting my time . Do you know Sango needs to prove to me that he has powers? [/size]

The same tests you carry out to determine that you have a mind. You reason it out.
[size=1pt]I had to yank your chain.[/size]
If you can accept that he exists, his powers are proven.

GooseBaba:
Bros, I get your point. BUT, I must ask. What is God to you.?

God is a mind or consciousness that is the default state of existence.

theAtheist101:
So who gets credit for god's existence?

All I read about deism is just a belief that tries to undermine other theists' concepts. It tries to provide a landing point for those who are finding it hard to do away with the concept of a creator; which I find nothing wrong in. It is always very hard to put aside false doctrines that one was thought from childhood.

I am not an atheist just for the sake of it, but, because I don't see any reason to believe in one.

Nobody. God just is. You might not like it, but that doesn't make it untrue.

Deism is not a landing point for anything. See how you're just being condescending anyhow.

The reasons to believe are there. You see them, you just don't agree with our interpretations of them.

[size=1pt]Dude I'm not a theist. I'm an atheist.[/size]

theAtheist101:
There you go! Why would you decide to use English language to confuse yourself? You know god, how? You just sound like a normal theist that has a vast knowledge of the dictionary, so you decide to term your belief with a new word, deism. What tests did you conduct to prove your god's existence? I know it might be hard for you to just dump the "god-theory" you were taught from childhood, but substituting it with deism is just way wrong.

Why would a god with so much power refuse not to use it to safe his imperfect creation (interpretation to my coc.k analogy)? Where did he even get his initial power? Who created him (same argument against theists)? Why is his universe design imperfect? Is he also perfect like the theist god? What of the concept of chance -- why are "the fingers" not equal?

You are not a skilled PR man, yet you decide to stand on the podium? Maybe we should suspend this argument until you get skilled or when "the masters" come to rescue you.

Which language would you have me confuse myself in?

I know God the way you know reality. I wish I could take credit for the term "deism". The proof of God's existence is everything that exists. Deism is not a substitution for theism.

God does not have to be a perfectionist.

The PR men are only needed for sugar coating. When you questioned me I didnt know you wanted the sugar coating.

GooseBaba:
I don't follow... is this aspect of God from a deistic perspective...?

theAtheist101:
Were we talking about any other?

I'm as lost as you are, GooseBaba

theAtheist101:
And how do you know this? He is capable of producing a bang, but refuses to take responsibilities that arose? Then what does he know? You make him look like a sadist! Answer all questions posed to you.

Okay then.

I know this because I know God. What responsibilities did God abdicate when there are virtually no responsibilities from an "unisex"? Not even clean up. God knows every. single. thing. I'm not the most skilled PR man, there are others that can paint the true, rosy picture.

theAtheist101:
And how do you know this? He is capable of producing a bang, but refuses to take responsibilities that arose? Then what does he know? You make him look like a sadist! Answer all questions posed to you.

Wait. Which God are we talking about?

theAtheist101:
Why would a god with coc.k refuse to fuvk?

He's omniscient. The experience of every bang is his.

theAtheist101:
Are you a theist? If yes, Which one of the books have you read? Just prescribe it to us, so we can dissect it/them.

I'm not a theist. You can try dissecting deism though.

theAtheist101:
Then educate us on such books. Why would decide to keep such a "brilliant" book, if you have found it, from us. Or are you scared we might pick holes in such book also? My guess is the book tweaked the stories of other mystical books to make it sound right to the modern man. We are waiting on you.

Lol. There is a list on Wikipedia. I'm merely telling the OP that he has lots of options; it's not just between Christianity and Atheism.

There are other religious books you can substitute the bible with. You can even be a deist or pantheist if you want. There is a world of difference between "the bible is wrong" and "there is no God". Don't confuse the two.

Yeah, but not a heavy smoker. The smell gets old.

I believe in God mode, particularly for GTA.

Little pile of crap.

When you call it "fornication", it becomes a religious matter.

God has been known to reveal match winners to his anointed. I think it is safe to thank him after the revelation has come to pass.

It has gone to the place where the holy spirit's sper.m came from.

Meaninglessness is okay. God's life has no meaning after all.

The suspension/tyres. I like fat tyres, and I love to see tall cars with fat tires and little ground clearance, like the fx35 or fx36 or x6.

davien:
You know there's trouble when an atheist trolls... Lol...

Are you an atheist?

Humans die. Jesus assumed human form. Jesus died. Go, and misunderstand no more.

malvisguy212:
good, you adress the first claimed of agnostics. You know what I notice in your post? You want to worship a God who can have a personal relationship with you, and can communicate with you the way you choose. You see my friends, in the bible we read how the prophet pray and the next verse will tell you God answer there prayer and revealed himself to them, the truth of the matter is that the God did not just straight away answer there prayer, one thing you should know is that the bible was not written as a STORY book, it was written on how human can have personal relationship with God, bible say adam HEARED the footsteps of God in the garden, what does this mean? It mean God and man were very close to each other before the fall. This is what God want from us, we should know HIM.

I don't have explanation of what happened before God began creation, but what I do know is that God is a spirit(john 4:24) spirit don't play by the rule or time of human . when you read the claimed of other gods, you will notice there claimed is similar but the different is there nature. This is not a coincidence.

. Why you dey fall hand?