₦airaland Forum

Melap:
Don't be angry are you truely the person with all this monikers. All the things said about you on that thread deleted this evening and the other one of before is it true? I no want fight I am asking as an observer on two of those threads.

I couldn't have been the owner of all those monikers and more as they have always erroneously alleged. Aside from my once main moniker (Lordko) which they bribed a MOD to ban unjustly for telling them bitter truths in the cause of defending the defenseless, I don't own any of the other monikers they have appropriated to me. Also, aside from the fact that they almost live for my attention (yes, it is like a blood tonic to them), they have always intentionally appropriated every moniker that seems to promote fairness or views but hardly comment on threads to me with an ulterior intention to have a MOD to ban me once I respond to defend myself.

Emmanuel Macron was largely able to achieve his feat because the majority of the French voters are independent-minded and, by extension, believe in politics of principle and conviction; unfortunately, the same cannot be said about the majority of the voters in this clime.

Anyway, 2023 is pregnant, let's see what it will deliver; I see what my associate, Sen. Roy Blunt (U.S. Senator of Missouri), told me a few months ago coming to fruition come 2023.

Magnoliaa:
Rest with your faux praises and stop trying to paint what is not again.

If you have nothing more to contribute to the OP, then you and I are done.

I can see you reveling covertly from my magnanimous benevolence, your overt denial notwithstanding. So, let me call it a quit at this juncture, having jolted the OP to reality.

Be a good lady, bye-bye!

Magnoliaa:
I am not crying. Just exposing your antics for what they are... stay on the topic or don't say nothing at all.

Men feel threatened by successful women for reasons that have nothing to do with your "they are damaged goods" drivel.

The good thing about your rashness is that it doesn't emanate from bitterness and misandry but purely due to your love for fairness, even though you do seem lost at some point due to peer pressure. So, your momentary failings are always easily excusable, lol.

Magnoliaa:
This post made no sense. Try again.

Why do you always, always link two uncorrelated things and think you've presented something logical?

Babe did not even mention feminists or our lack of mans thereof.

Mango Mango head, you want to cry abi! Well, my submission won't make sense to anyone with a low IQ, lol.

Yes, some men are unjustifiably intimidated by richer and more successful women and abhor having them as wives because of their inferiority complex or accumulated misinformation. That, however, does not invalidate the fact that hypocritically crass, haughty, and opportunistic lots among you (which is prevalent among you wannabe feminists and wannabe pro-women) are being abhorred and avoided by self-conquered men not because they feel intimidated by your success (or lack of it), but because they see no need wasting time on damaged products. A damaged woman is not worth being put up with unless one wants to game her.

JovialJune:
Smh!!! Someone decided to appreciate your kind gesture by assisting you with house chores knowing your wife is not around, and all your mind went to is sex? What is wrong with some of you men sef? Must your thoughts always be what is between your legs?

If you know you are sex starved and can't control yourself when she comes, tell her off straight, don't assume and accuse her baselessly, na church mind she wan use help you.

Any sensible person would see that her offer is unnecessary with a sinister connotation, even though the story itself is fictitious. Anyway, elusion of sense is rampant these days, so you are not alone, Lol.

Munzy14:
A case of telling her see what you miss...

We live in a world many ladies place value on material stuffs more than on humans..

Good you are in cool business terms with her sha..Regardless.

With your obvious lack of mental and ethical worthiness, I wonder why any sensible lady will not place a value on material things when dealing with you as a shortcut to sieve you out quickly and position herself for able men since you are also wretched in that regard. Don't go and find a way to be useful to yourself; instead, continue constituting a nuisance everywhere.

One major hallmark of an unworthy man is his delight in petty gossips and incitements, the obvious things you personify. Better don't bother replying to me but instead direct such if possible to small-minded elements like you; else, I might change my mind and heavily descend on you.

Bumpkin!

Such an alacritous person deserves commendation than condemnation; you need more of her type around for your betterment and advancement, provided that she's right with her observation and regardless of how unpalatable it might seem to you and anyone who takes delight in being put on a pedestal. Those who put you on a pedestal can't be that alacritous, and in them, you have frenemies with or without knowing.

An average man's poor concept of respect has always been the bane of his progress.

Balderdash! Granted that the women in your family and those close to you in general are from weak ethical leanings, citing your submission, but they are not standard - you don't have to agree with me. Some of us have always seen and had the best of them. Of course, perfection is out of the equation, something that hypocrites do expect from others, forgetting that it is an exclusive preserve of the creator of the universe.

There are women from strong ethical leanings who, whether successful materially or not, are embodiments of diligence and peacefully relatable with self-conquered men. In fact, even the termagants you said full your family, they are still malleable with the right potions.

A woman, regardless of her stratum and ethical leanings, is always easily malleable if, as a man, you know your way around life.

No. However, when a wife (or a husband if it's vice versa) who has a mentality where materialism takes precedence over spirituality has more money than her husband, especially a feeble-minded husband, she won't have much regard for him.

It always boils down to the mentality in particular and ethical leanings in general of the parties involved.

From the connotation of his message, he bailed out after he got tired of being a submissive husband - nay, he got tired of using disingenuousness and servility to maintain and sustain the relationship - wannabe modern man.

2005, while carrying out a project for Gold & Silver Reserve Inc. (owners of E-gold) for the Nigerian market.

The only issues I see here are the fact that from the connotation of your submission and her supposed intensed pleading to you for approval, the story seems false, or for the benefit of a doubt, assuming that it's real, she has a deep-seated sinister motive with her actions so far.

Ordinarily, as unpalatable as it may sound, I would have said, don't go and kill yourself for nothing because 99% of married women are susceptible or at one point have always had meetups with their exes, prospects, and admirers without their husbands' knowledge talk more of having their consents, whether something sinister has always happened in such meetups is irrelevant at this point, so there is nothing new here. Unless one is naive or chooses to be disingenuous, these things are undeniable happenings every moment and everywhere.

Not like men are better, though; frankly, provided that there is sincerely nothing sinister about the meetup from the meeting parties, I don't see anything wrong in it.

Felimax:
May God help us! Many women are the reason behind their predicament.

It is very easy to write off your husband but keeping the pace becomes the main issue.

If she has where to go why look if he will call her after a month?

He gives her only #200, now you know the value of not having a father figure around. You think everything is money!

Rubbish!

Keep quiet, this isn't a case of the woman being like a jezebel - the fact that she left with the kids while he was away notwithstanding. In fact, I don't want to believe that it's the same OP you read and dropped this nauseating comment I have read; if it's, something must be wrong with you for trying to justify the man's callous and cruel actions in general under any guise.

No matter how irritating a woman becomes to her husband after her initial physical/material objects of attraction become unappealing to him as it usually is in most scenarios, I wager this is the unpronounced happening in this scenario, he still ought not to be found wanting in sincerely catering for his family to the best of his ability and always being courteous to them - something this man has failed to do.

This is Bel Air Mansion in Los Angeles, and it doesn't belong to her.

He can't be disqualified for not attending primary and secondary schools given that he already has a higher qualification - a first degree and his claim in this regard is genuine. And yes, it has always been possible to obtain a degree without attending primary and secondary schools, especially in the past.

He can, however, be disqualified for perjury, citing the contradictions in the two separate affidavits. A good lawyer, not necessarily a SAN, will secure victory against him regardless of the flaws in the legal system in the country.

Why not? - provided that it's strictly and centered on "Should The Woman Pay Rent If Husband Is Not Financially Stable?"

If he has, however, always been of the mindset and school of thought that promote sharing every bill equally, rather than each volitionally, intuitively, and selflessly doing what is necessary at any given time, even in his moment of abundance just because of some ideological nonsense he practices, if I were her, I would definitely not pay, but if I do, it will simply be because I want to.

There is nothing wrong in marrying a feminist, provided that she is not a misandrist and does not delight in cruelty in general. You will, however, have a problem having a healthy relationship with a woman of substance that is not a misandrist and does not delight in cruelty in general whether or not she is a feminist if your concept of the proverbial wife material/submissive wife is a woman who is servile to you.

In summary, as a man, a sane and self-conquered man, your main concern when choosing a woman for something serious should be the kind of mentality she possesses and her ethical leanings in general rather than the ideological tag she wears.

If this price scares you, I wonder what you will do about The Gold Leaf Bread, which costs approximately $120.70 per loaf.

[quote author=Mickykarim post=114064026][/quote]Ordinary quoting someone correctly; you can't. Anyway, I said it; you are a typical bumpkin. Now scram and direct your further mention to small-minded elements like you before I change my mind and descent heavily on you.

Mickykarim:
You simply trying to BREAK your own home by bringing this to the public square that does not possess the requisite for THOUGHTFULNESS. A field occupied and filled with the BRAINLESS. Including, people without the EXPERIENCE for this. Some of them might not have either a HOME WIFE and or UNMARRIED. They do not know what a home is and its DEFINITION.

YOU ARE COURTING MORE TROUBLE MY FRIEND.

Go resolve whatever is going wrongly in your home with your wife. Desist from bringing your dirty linen into the public. According to you you have endured and managed this well all this while.

TOLERANCE WITH ENDURANCE, MY FRIEND.

Wish you well as you continue to understand your wife with RESOLUTION to keep your FAMILY.

The way bumpkins like you are always quick to project your inadequacies on the general public is both funny and irritating.

@OP, you've been doing your best truly. The problem is that you've been using servility to maintain and sustain your relationship with your wife from the inception, thus aiding her self-absorption and small-mindedness in general. If not that you obviously lack grit, I would have said, gather some guts and jolt her to reasonableness through action.

Servility is as bad as unjust cruelty, say no to both of them.

A very wack and inhumane philosophy. Personally, I learned to always relate with people based on their individual merits without undermining my philosophy.

cococandy:
Elon musk is not a good person.

Regardless of how you feel about gay/transgender issues, don’t let it be the reason you root for him.
Even if he raised an army of nuns and priests who never go against what’s considered traditionally normal, he will still not be a person to root for.

If you of the old, both online and offline, especially during the time you were using your deactivated old moniker that started with "L" before 2014 on this forum, can transform to a bit somehow good person you seem to have become now, Elon Musk, not conceding to your assertion and aspersion here that he is a bad person, therefore has a chance of becoming even a saint anytime.

I can never be caught doubting the inevitability of change with all that I have seen and witnessed in the cause of life in all spheres so far.

Be wise, not nice, and be maverick gentle, not neither just gentle nor unjust cruel.

I won't be surprised if it is his refusal to always put you on a pedestal that has always been the main cause of his supposed disrespect towards you - check well - because most Nigerians have a poor concept of respect and love. To you lots, being always put on a pedestal equates to being respected or loved, which is balderdash. And that, by extension, is one of the reasons most people have frenemies than they can realistically imagine among family members, friends, companions, etc.

You lots that always expect and appreciate others putting you on a pedestal, and vice versa, always prompt them to be showing you the false good side of themselves, something a maverick can't be caught doing. I guess your little brother might be a fellow maverick.

In summary, eschew the mentality of having your brother putting you on a pedestal under any guise and strive to be conscientious always; then, compare your relationship with him after two-three months of going through this route. If nothing changes for good after this period, it means that your brother isn't healthy.

Obi is partially right; what's true is that the majority of politicians in Nigeria suffer from delusions of grandeur, not outright lunacy. And those who originally do not suffer from delusions of grandeur have always been forced to embrace the display of those who do; this is so because the majority of the masses have always been addicted to the people who suffer from delusions of grandeur. This isn't even restricted to politics alone; more so, it doesn't happen only in Nigeria, even though it's more prevalent in Nigeria.