₦airaland Forum

Messi1:
I can't just imagine a matured woman like my mother dishing out advice that it's better for my mom to disown me. My mother complained about my behavious to her friend that i can't cook and that my behaviours are punishable with death. The woman advised her to disown me.

lhordspy:
Hearsay and propaganda. Like i said i live in the north. And the north stand with tinubu.

KnownUnknown:
Personal? No. Just saying what you wrote describes religion infested Nigeria. Look around you and read your post again.

lhordspy:
You that lives in southeast is telling me that lives in the North how the voting pattern of here is.


Kai..m

DenreleDave:
Says another crying baby

lhordspy:
Last time i checked. We already have 2 northern governors out of the 6 rogue governors who pulled out their support of Atiku.

Give examples of the bigwig northerner APC that truly decamped to PDP

KnownUnknown:
Lmao. I could have sworn you are talking about religion infested Nigeria!!

lhordspy:
Ahead of the 2023 general elections, analysis of the preliminary register reveals that six States of Lagos, Kano, Kaduna, Rivers, Katsina and Oyo have the highest registered voters.

LegalWolf:
The argument reproduced below:


And these points stated here:


Are all valid arguments. Although I am a Muslim, and would not want to delve extensively in subjective conversations like this, however, we must keep engaging delusional people like TenQ that their version of faith they so forceful push cannot stand the test of logic.

Again, while we share differ in opinion, I confess to the strength of your logic!

Righthussle:
Religion is one hundred percent man made, it was made specifically to control the minds of the poor in the society and to give them fake hope.

Ternistacle:
Is Christianity a man-made religion?
Is Christianity a man-made religion?

Christianity is a man-made religion. This is because all religion on earth is man-made.

There is no method or criteria to use in order to demonstrate the truth of any given religion (i.e., there theology). The reason is because the religions or theologies of earth are designed to be both unfalsifiable and unverifiable.

This is the reason for why there are so many conflicting religions or theologies in the world and why there are many branches within each religion. Religion is about faith and rationalization.

That is, first you accept the religion or the theology as true and after you attempt to find reasons to justify the truth of your religion or theology.

For example, Judaism and Christianity are inconsistent (e.g., God is one in person and in being vs. God is more than one in person but one in being). That is, if Judaism is true, Christianity is false but if Christianity is true, Judaism is false.

For example, Christianity and Christianity are inconsistent (e.g., Unitarian Christianity vs. Trinitarian Christianity). That is, if (U) Christianity is true, (T) Christianity is false but if (T) Christianity is true, (U) Christianity is false.

For example, Christianity and Islam are inconsistent (e.g., Jesus died for the sins of other vs. Jesus did not die for the sins of others). That is, if Christianity is true, Islam is false but if Islam is true, Christianity is false.

Religion is a tribal project and thus a man-made invention.

For example, the historical Jesus of Nazareth was a Jewish man who believed himself to be the messiah of the Jews (a person who was going to free Israel from the yoke of Rome). However, he failed to free Israel from the yoke of Rome and he was executed by Rome via crucifixion in order to make an example out of him.

This Jewish man was later made into a divine being. That is, a virgin born divine being. That is, a virgin born, dying and rising diving being. That is, a virgin born, dying and rising, sacrificial divine being. This single Jewish man become the second person of the God of the Jews that he worshiped prior to his death. (And so froth).

Studying the history of religion and of Christianity can help you understand why Christianity is in fact a man-made religion like any other religion on earth.

"When the missionaries came to Africa they had the Bible and we had the land. They said 'Let us pray.' We closed our eyes. When we opened them we had the Bible and they had the land.” Desmond Tutu

Jackanda1:
In 2014 my internet adventure and quest for knowledge exposed me to athiest ideas on nairaland. My consistency in digesting this ideas led me to resist God and his word.

Before then, i was born again and had experienced the spiritual, but some how, i started intepreting all of those as allucination and mental chemistry.

In my arogance, i took sides with man and the devil and rejected the giver of life. I can remember telling my Mum that God doesn't exist and she almost collapsed, that was how hard i fell.

Few years later, have had several spiritual attacks and demonic manifestation (that i would not discuss here) that has convinced me about the existence of the spiritual.

The point is that, i regret my actions and i wish to get back with God, but it seems difficult. My sin consciousness is death, the bible no longer makes sense, i have prayed and cried, but on the inside it feels dead and i know i have not been accepted.

I Know the Holy Spirit left me when i started resisting God. Is there hope?

LegalWolf:
LOL! You have dropped several lies in just a couple of days...so which of your post did I edit and substitute? Why are you not heeding yhwh's instructions, do you want to perish?

LegalWolf:
LOL! I don't want you to perish pretty boy . I don't want you to incur yhwh's wrath and that is why I am offering you the opportunity to retract. You lied that I fabricated an evidence and I am asking you that are the premises (evidence) I referenced fabricated? . Why do you ALWAYS lie?



Now look at what I said:

(underline mine).

Does that look like an admission to you? What does the underline mean? CLEARLY I NOTICED YOU WAS LYING BUT DID NOT WANT TO TAKE YOU UP ON THAT AT THE TIME Was our engagement on:
1. Whether Muslims look for fulfilment of prophecy of the prophet in the book of John; or
2. Whether the book of john is that of divine creation?
3. Did I ever for once require convincing or disputed that Muslims did not look for prophecy in other books?

So why 1 would be your conclusion baffles me till this day! This is kindergarten logic TenQ and even a mor0n should not pursue this line of argument. I have always assumed you do not suffer any infirmity of the mind in any form but..............!!!!

Finally, I would not back off from your mentions. Not at all You were the one who mentioned me first in the very few times we engaged and so you must provide answers to my questions. UNLESS AND UNTILL YOU SHOW PROOF, I will keep pulling you out on this forum that you are a shameless, ignoble and morally bankrupt liar not worthy to be engaged. And that will extend to any conversation you have with anybody on any section.

LegalWolf:
LOL!

I once told sixfiguresmart that I hate engaging liars (like you both) because it is a rabbit hole. I mean, they cannot help it. They do not lie because it is in their interest BUT IT IS THEIR NATURE .

First off, in defending the indefensible, you are still lying again!!!!. You claim I fabricated evidence BUT THE EVIDENCE OF YOUR CLAIMS/ARGUMENTS ARE THE TWO PREMISES . Or are you saying you did not say/imply these two premises? Pretty boy LOL! you went to University for God sake and you of all people should know that in an argument, premises are the pieces of evidence (or reasons) to support a conclusion (the ultimate thing you are trying to prove or convince your audience). Did they know teach you this school? I have asked you repeatedly, what school did you finish from?



Secondly, let me remind you what our beloved Apostle Paul was alleged to have said (of course, purportedly 'inspired' by yhwh:

But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger ... all who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law ... Romans 2: 8 - 12. Pretty boy, Why reject the Truth and Lie? Or do you want to perish?

Mide70:
Please I need your opinion on this issue.

Though before I got married I discovered my mother inlaw calls all her daughters both married and unmarried everyday (only 3 ladies no boys) and they fear her to the bone.

At times every morning and night just to talk to them but I believe when they get married they need privacy and respect but this is not the case for my mother-in-law and I detest such act.

Mind you I'm not against call or trying to break the bond but I believe this is marriage. I'm looking for a way to stop all that

I'm I wrong or right to take that step ?

LegalWolf:
LOL! Remember Proverbs 16: 16 - 17 that one of the six things yhwh hates is a lying tongue... And a fundamental commandment is not to bear false witness. So, point out to my lie please!!! Our pretty boy, why are you lying? Do you want yhwh to detest you?

LegalWolf:
Proof?

LegalWolf:
Although he may be a war criminal, yhwh bears me witness that I have always been after the truth and not winning argument. If I say you lie, the evidence is there.

- Did you not claim injil is ALL the books of the Christians?

-Did you not contradict yourself that it is a term used by Arab Christians to refer to their first four books? So which lie have I told?

you made two false claims that are untrue with the intent to deceive!!!! . I’ll pursue you all over this forum until you acknowledge you are a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt being not worthy to be engaged.

Cc: NNTR
sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
Your emotional outbursts won’t help you, my cute little pretty boy . You keep claiming I have been bursted. Pretty boy just one credible evidence would shut me up. I was not the one who said Injil is ALL the books of the Christians AND the first four books of the Christians at the same time.

You did and having given you opportunity to correct yourself, you still keep insisting on your lies! Are you here to win an argument of you are after the truth? Or you are selective with the Truth to believe?

Is the book of John of divine creation or not? Neither head or tail of your answer we do not know. You want to use reference to Injil to strengthen your claim shameless liar !

Bring credible evidence that Injil is ALL the Christians and you’re yarning dust. Bring evidence that it is the first four books of Arab Christians and you cannot. Can’t you Christians do without lying?

cc: sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
LOL!

Pretty boy . It’s not by shouting Liar up and down like a senseless bulldog. I call you a LIAR and if I’m asked for my evidence, I will say:

1. You said that Injil is ALL the books of the Christians.

2. When logic failed, you claimed the first four books (not book) of the Arab Christians is Injil (Gospel) .

3. These two statements cannot be true at the same time. In fact both are false. .

4. Even the reference you provided translated Injil as Any of the Four books… not the first four books as you shamelessly lied.

My Pretty boy TenQ, is all that have said not true? Are your claims in 1 and 2 not false? So why are you lying? Are you not after the Truth and not to win an argument again?

LegalWolf:
PART ONE OF TWO
Pretty Boyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!! Welcome back TenQ. We have missed you. And how is your rapist defending lawyer friend ? Hope you guys still discuss about other rape cases and how client matters? Huh? Now to the meat of the matter.

You have essentially done three things, in my opinion. Rambled to save your reputation as a liar with weak evidence, challenged my reputation (without proof) and rehashed a couple of questions (some of which you lied you have asked me before, others I have answered while others are completely irrelevant to our discussion). I will address them.

YOUR REPUTATION

These were your words pretty boy

(underline mine).

Further you said:

(underline mine)

Both statements cannot be true at the same time, pretty boy . In fact, both statements are untrue and you know it. This is my evidence and that makes it intentional that you are a liar! Now let us examine the piece of evidence you cited.



First of, you have basically shot yourself in the foot. Although the 'gospel' in English is not what we are debating. However, and as you correctly cited, the Gospel (which is the direct translation is injil in Arabic) is ANY of the four biblical narratives TenQ. Key word here is ANY not the FIRST FOUR BOOKS or ALL THE BOOKS. According to your sources, Injil is any of four books. Any means one of not ALL of. You went to University Mr. TenQ and I should not be teaching this. Therefore, YOU LIED BY ASSERTING AS A FACT THAT INJIL IS A TERM FOR THE FIRST FOUR BOOKS OF ARAB CHRISTIAN'S BIBLE

On the second witness (i.e., website of crescent project) Barrister TenQ your evidence are contradictory. One of your sources claims Injil is any of four books, the other made an outlandish claim that it is what the Christians know as the New Testament. So one of it must be false and CERTAINLY it is the Crescent Project. The reason is because it is not as authoritative as Cambridge I cited, neither is it a dictionary. Also, it is a review (or probably summary) of a book we have not read. So, why would you be citing hearsay (opinion by someone summarizing a book you have not read yourself) as authoritative source for Injil?

Summary
- You made a claim that Injil is ALL the books of the Christians. I acknowledge you cited an outlandish reference (which called Injil the New Testament) for this which another reference of your contradicts.

- You made a claim that Injil is a term for the first four books of the Christians. You HAVE NOT PROVIDED A SINGLE REFERENCE FOR THIS!!!!. IN FACT, YOUR REFERENCE UNEQUIVOCALLY states that it is ANY of the four gospels. . Therefore, Injil is a book/gospel and not the New Testament.

- Both statements are lies which you know. INJIL IS NEITHER THE NEW TESTAMENT NOR THE FIRST FOUR BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT BUT JUST A BOOK. SO WHY ARE YOU LYING?

LegalWolf:
PART TWO OF TWO.

You have been asking me to answer your questions. yhwh bears me with witness that I will answer your questions. Each and everyone of them. But not when your reputation at stake TenQ. Are these not the questions?

TenQ.
LOL! I will give you a one liner or at most three liners to it. Everyone of them. But your character is in question TenQ. Remember you said something along the line that religion is everything man do to please God! Is your god yhwh please with you lying to win an argument? If you can lie in one breadth that injeel is All the Books of the Christian and in another, claim it is the first four books of the christian, what gives us the confidence you would not lie again?

Centurion101:
I write this story to encourage people to always help if they are in a position to do so, especially is the situation is dire. What goes around comes around and you might just find yourself in a situation where you Will need help from strangers and hope they help you too.

AntiChristian:
Seems you just learnt logic. You'll come to a thread with a different topic and start your own topic under it. What kind of logic is that?

There's no contradictory statement in Islam. We have the explanations. Whoever is ignorant and is waiting for a non existent holy ghost to teach him will be ignorant forever!

Same nonsense! But we know Allah is not one and three like your Gods.

He can't die like your God.

He is too great to be born vaginally like you to become a human and start suffering like an animal!

He is too great to require a parent to protect and feed him.

Allah does not arose like a drunken warrior as described in psalm. All the best names and attributes are his!

AntiChristian:
At least we know Allah is just one!

LegalWolf:
Pretty Boy

I sure have not forgotten our last conversation. Got a role in the UK and trying to complete my tier-II visa. Also finalizing all my outstanding matters at the office. As you may tell, I have not had time to post as that is really taking my time. I know you have missed me.... and I have missed you and sixfiguresmart too. .. Our pretty boy!!!

To the matter at hand, why should I even bother to explain to you when you are a liar?



Did I get quoting you correctly? If I did, this is the best thing to ever happen to me as I will go ahead and demonstrate why you are an ignoble, morally bankrupt and despicable liar and why no one should ever trust you!

LegalWolf:
PART TWO OF THREE

Is Injeel ALL the Books of the Christians
Remember, the pretty boy asked me for the meaning of Injil and asked me cite references. This is what I told him:



The second link I shared from Cambridge translates injil as one of the four books of the Christians and not ALL the books of the Christians. Same thing with the other Arabic dictionary. In subsequent posts (which I do not want to bore you with), I provided link to an Arabic Quran which translated Injil to Gospel. All these were pointed out to TenQ but guess what he said:



LOL! You can see the dumb logic pervasive in his argument. When I pressed him further, and that what he intends to ask me if I had told him the answer is irrelevant. He has asked me a question and I have given him an answer with references. To my knowledge, he has not said Cambridge dictionary is wrong or the Arabic bible I provided translating Injil to 'gospel' is wrong. So, he should concede that my references are authoritative. (Of course, every litigation lawyer who knows his onions are clear on what exactly I want to do there ). Now hear what our pretty boy said:

(underline mine)

You will notice that Injil is not more ALL the books of the Christians but the first four books. LOL! But in logical terms, we do not have an idea which of the first four books. However, down that same post, he gave us a hint when he posed the following question:

. (underline mine)

Now we are clear on the first four books that:
a. Is a Term
b. (this term called Injeel is) used by Arab Christians;
c. For the first four books of their bible (which is Mark, Matthew, Luke and John).

AGAIN, this is a lie. Please help me beg TenQ to just cite one reference where the underline quote is true. Arab Christians cannot call ALL their Books and the First Four of their Books Injil at the same time. That contradicts commonsense TenQ. He has responded to my posts here:

and
.

Readers could go ahead and check these posts but I reckon it is meaningless to the meaning of Injil and whether it is a book or compilation of books. But wait, TenQ I am not too sure as I think you have modified your answer. There were some points you made that you clearly shot yourself on the foot but cannot find it.


Summary

- Till date, pretty boy has not faulted Cambridge Dictionary's interpretation of Injil as one of the four books of Christians.
- Till date, he has not shown evidence that Injil is a Term for the first four books of Arab Christians
- Pretty boy claims Injil is All the books of the Christians. This is false! The Acts of Apostles, the Epistles to the Hebrew and the other Pauline Epistles are not 'Injil'
- Pretty boy said that the first four books (not book) of Arab Christians is called Injil (Gospel) [not gospels!] and that is clearly false as well.
- Both statements cannot be true at the same time. But they can be false and each of them is false.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
PART THREE OF THREE

Finally, all I need to show here is that TenQ has the intent to deceive with his false statement. Please remember that the context of our conversation is whether the Book of John (and in extension, the NT) is of divine creation. If I can prove that Injil is a gospel, and not a compilation of books, the implication that follows is:
- The Quran made reference to Injil
- Unlike the Torah, Injil is a book
- The book of John is just one book, so also is Matthew, Luke, and Mark
- If we accept the book of John as Injil, then automatically, the other three cannot be Injil.
- In any event, the NT cannot be the Injil God asked us to believe in.

But on the other hand, if TenQ can show that Injil is used by Arab Christians pre-islam to refer to ALL their books or the first four of their books, his claims is strengthened.

However, I did tell him before he made the assertion that Injil translates as Gospel and even offered him the opportunity to backtrack. I made this repeatedly on several occasions and he still carried on with his lies. Moreover, he always cite references to sources (including Quran and hadith) but he did not when he made those two lies. And even at that, we are still begging him to show us clearly just one authoritative references for his two lies. This clearly shows an intent to deceive me in order to strengthen his argument.

Until he shows us that Injil (not its plural form) is a term used by Arab Christians for their first four books (not book) or ALL their books (not book). then he is an ignoble, shameless and worthless liar that you should not bother to engage.

He has made references to Torah being five books. I have never responded to that Since:
1. It is my opinion that he is incompetent on Judaism.
2. And even if he is not, Torah is not in issue/dispute here. You are alleging that the book of John (not Torah or any of the 5 books of Torah) and NT is of divine creation. So on what basis should I be discussing Torah which is irrelevant to the conversation?

When he cited the hadith of the prophet enforcing the Torah against a Jew (not Muslim), I did not respond to that. That is irrelevant to the discourse!

There are other places he has lied and when I have the time, I will pull that up.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
Hey our Pretty Boy TenQ (for those I mention, I enjoy calling this guy pretty as I think he is actually pretty. LOL!)

PART ONE OF THREE

My purpose in this thread is a very simple one - to irrefutably show that our pretty handsome boy called TenQ is nothing but a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt and despicable LIAR and not worthy to be interacted with. Let me explain:

PRELUDE
The context is a very long one and I won't want to bore you all with details. To my mind, it may be necessary BUT not sufficient to prove that our pretty boy is a liar. In other words, it is okay to know the context but not too fundamental. The key points to bear in mind are:
a. I have insinuated in one of our previous arguments that the book of John (and the entire New Testament) can NEVER be a product of Divine Being (or even intelligent human). In fact, that is the immediate context to our current engagement.

b. Pretty boy claims otherwise. He has made copious references to the Quran where Allah (SWT) enjoined us to believe in the scriptures revealed before the Quran and specifically to Injil and the Torah. He has also cited an hadith where the prophet (pbuh) enforced the Torah.

c. These Quranic verses he quoted, I did not dispute. But I assert that the correct translation of Injil is 'Gospel' (not Gospels). This is very fundamental to know as it clearly shows how dubious our pretty boy is.

d. It goes without saying that if Injil is correctly translated as 'Gospel' (one book), and the New Testament is a collection of Gospels (because in truth, it is made up of 4 Gospels, some incoherently and poorly articulated epistles and the Acts of the apostles), THEN THE NEW TESTAMENT CAN NEVER BE THE INJIL ALLAH ENJOINED MUSLIMS TO HAVE FAITH IN' .

e. This is just pure logic, a subject matter our pretty boy apparently struggles to grasp.

SETTING OUT THE ARGUMENT

This is where it gets interesting. Pretty boy asked me the following:



Down the same argument, he followed it with the following question and assertions.

(underlined mine).

Please you all remember that our pretty boy TenQ claims Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians. Not One, Not Four but All the Books of the Christians.

DID PRETTY BOY SHAMELESS LIED ?

But pretty boy's statement cannot be true. And as I will point out repeatedly in my next post (quoting myself this time and one or two references to pretty boy ).

Let me remind us the definition of a lie which goes thus:

'to say or write something that is not true in order to deceive someone'. Reference - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lie
In order words, to tell a lie,
a. You must have said something which is untrue; and
b. There is an intent to deceive someone.

I will prove before heaven and earth that these two are clearly present and pretty boy loves lying. And he is shameless at it!

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
PART THREE OF THREE

Finally, all I need to show here is that TenQ has the intent to deceive with his false statement. Please remember that the context of our conversation is whether the Book of John (and in extension, the NT) is of divine creation. If I can prove that Injil is a gospel, and not a compilation of books, the implication that follows is:
- The Quran made reference to Injil
- Unlike the Torah, Injil is a book
- The book of John is just one book, so also is Matthew, Luke, and Mark
- If we accept the book of John as Injil, then automatically, the other three cannot be Injil.
- In any event, the NT cannot be the Injil God asked us to believe in.

But on the other hand, if TenQ can show that Injil is used by Arab Christians pre-islam to refer to ALL their books or the first four of their books, his claims is strengthened.

However, I did tell him before he made the assertion that Injil translates as Gospel and even offered him the opportunity to backtrack. I made this repeatedly on several occasions and he still carried on with his lies. Moreover, he always cite references to sources (including Quran and hadith) but he did not when he made those two lies. And even at that, we are still begging him to show us clearly just one authoritative references for his two lies. This clearly shows an intent to deceive me in order to strengthen his argument.

Until he shows us that Injil (not its plural form) is a term used by Arab Christians for their first four books (not book) or ALL their books (not book). then he is an ignoble, shameless and worthless liar that you should not bother to engage.

He has made references to Torah being five books. I have never responded to that Since:
1. It is my opinion that he is incompetent on Judaism.
2. And even if he is not, Torah is not in issue/dispute here. You are alleging that the book of John (not Torah or any of the 5 books of Torah) and NT is of divine creation. So on what basis should I be discussing Torah which is irrelevant to the conversation?

When he cited the hadith of the prophet enforcing the Torah against a Jew (not Muslim), I did not respond to that. That is irrelevant to the discourse!

There are other places he has lied and when I have the time, I will pull that up.

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart

LegalWolf:
Hey our Pretty Boy TenQ (for those I mention, I enjoy calling this guy pretty as I think he is actually pretty. LOL!)

PART ONE OF THREE

My purpose in this thread is a very simple one - to irrefutably show that our pretty handsome boy called TenQ is nothing but a shameless, ignoble, morally bankrupt and despicable LIAR and not worthy to be interacted with. Let me explain:

PRELUDE
The context is a very long one and I won't want to bore you all with details. To my mind, it may be necessary BUT not sufficient to prove that our pretty boy is a liar. In other words, it is okay to know the context but not too fundamental. The key points to bear in mind are:
a. I have insinuated in one of our previous arguments that the book of John (and the entire New Testament) can NEVER be a product of Divine Being (or even intelligent human). In fact, that is the immediate context to our current engagement.

b. Pretty boy claims otherwise. He has made copious references to the Quran where Allah (SWT) enjoined us to believe in the scriptures revealed before the Quran and specifically to Injil and the Torah. He has also cited an hadith where the prophet (pbuh) enforced the Torah.

c. These Quranic verses he quoted, I did not dispute. But I assert that the correct translation of Injil is 'Gospel' (not Gospels). This is very fundamental to know as it clearly shows how dubious our pretty boy is.

d. It goes without saying that if Injil is correctly translated as 'Gospel' (one book), and the New Testament is a collection of Gospels (because in truth, it is made up of 4 Gospels, some incoherently and poorly articulated epistles and the Acts of the apostles), THEN THE NEW TESTAMENT CAN NEVER BE THE INJIL ALLAH ENJOINED MUSLIMS TO HAVE FAITH IN' .

e. This is just pure logic, a subject matter our pretty boy apparently struggles to grasp.

SETTING OUT THE ARGUMENT

This is where it gets interesting. Pretty boy asked me the following:



Down the same argument, he followed it with the following question and assertions.

(underlined mine).

Please you all remember that our pretty boy TenQ claims Injeel is ALL the books of the Christians. Not One, Not Four but All the Books of the Christians.

DID PRETTY BOY SHAMELESS LIED ?

But pretty boy's statement cannot be true. And as I will point out repeatedly in my next post (quoting myself this time and one or two references to pretty boy ).

Let me remind us the definition of a lie which goes thus:

'to say or write something that is not true in order to deceive someone'. Reference - https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/lie
In order words, to tell a lie,
a. You must have said something which is untrue; and
b. There is an intent to deceive someone.

I will prove before heaven and earth that these two are clearly present and pretty boy loves lying. And he is shameless at it!

cc: Ya Ikhwan (at copied) I just want to copy you all to know the kind of characters and shameless person you are engaging with!
AntiChristian
Fawaz050
Haekymbahd
gaskiyamagana


Spectators:
NNTR
Sixfiguresmart