₦airaland Forum

Cherez:
The US has no right to ask any lawful foreigner to leave even in cases of war safe for unlawful acts.
The only Iranians detained last week are those whom are suspected to have "terrorist"(Note the stress on terrorist) ties.
See, the SW will never try that.
They can only stop entry to the barest minimum and for those living already, they can't do anything

MelesZenawi:
Detained?

This is pure fabrication and not anything true.

Nearly 200 Iranian Americans were detained at the US-Canada border

In recent days, as many as 200 people of Iranian descent, some of them US citizens, have been detained at the US-Canada border and questioned about their political views, family members, and work histories.

About 60 individuals, including American and Canadian citizens, were held for questioning about their “political views and allegiances” at the Canadian border in Blaine, Washington, on Saturday, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a nonprofit that advocates for the rights of Muslims in the US.

US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) confiscated their passports and held some of them waiting rooms for as long as 10 hours, refusing to grant them entry to the US, according to CAIR.

By Monday, as many as 140 more people of Iranian descent had been detained at the border. They were repeatedly asked about their birthplaces, family members, schooling, and work histories.

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2020/1/7/21054780/iran-trump-detain-canada-border-soleimani

Cherez:
You should be shameless at least to mention people that have proven not to be a threat by any means to you.
Even Americans & Britons you run to their places haven't asked anyone to leave. I just await the day this shit will happen, I doubt you can even try this.

NaMeAboki:
If you could read and understand, you would have notice in my 1st post where I stated under where Hisbah fell - comparing Amotekun with Hisbah is like comparing apples with oranges and smacks of ignorance.

BTW, what do you think J in JTF stood for?

Gbemishile1:
Nooo
I do not support this amotejun of a thing
The federal govt banned the forming if state security and it still stands
If the federal government should allow this amotekun of a thing,then the south east will also want to create their own security watch,with no restrictions as to who will be drafted into their security watch.worst of all is it might be hijacked by the ipobs who are clamouring for their Biafra of a thing and the federal govt doesn't want that.

NaMeAboki:
I have no cause to waste time and energy arguing with someone who is clearly driven by emotions rather than logic.
The FG has already made its declaration and given its reasons why; however, if and your leaders think otherwise, then kindly sue the AGF/FG to court to prove your case.

magicminister:
Yorubas and igbos have to unite.

We may fight and beef each other but a Yoruba man can live in the East in peace likewise an Igbo man! If my son or daughter travelled to Yoruba or Igbo states, I’ll be at peace knowing their chance of getting murdered is slim but i don’t feel the same way about the norther states!

DMerciful:
Why? Without punishment, what will stop INEC from allocating votes at will? Do you know how much taxpayers money was wasted?

DMerciful:
So why did the supreme court not punish anyone?

seunmsg:
There is nothing strange in the judgement, it was simply the judiciary correcting the wrongs perpetrated by INEC and PDP.


What I actually found strange today is the information that INEC declared Ihedioha winner after cancelling APC votes in 388 polling units. They cancelled the voice/votes of over 200,000 voters just to be able to declare Ihedioha. I’m really disturbed that it took the intervention of the Supreme Court to stop such a fraudulent move. I shiver at the thought that they almost got away with silencing the electoral choices of over 200,000 valid voters.

OYAY:
In he unanimous judgement of the seven-member panel, read by Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, the apex court agreed that results in 388 polling units were unlawfully excluded during the collation of the final governorship election result in Imo State.

Now the crux of the matter is that was there cancellation in 308 wards or not We should desist from being unnecessarily emotional!!!

“Vote due to the appellant Senator Hope Uzodinma and the APC from 388 Polling Units were wrongly excluded from scores ascribed to the appellant(to them).

“It is thereby ordered that the appellant votes from 388 Polling Units unlawfully excluded from the appellant vote declared shall be added and that the first respondent, Emeka Ihedioha, was not duly elected by a majority of lawful votes cast at the said election.”

The panel led by Justice Malami Dongondaji had in the judgment dismissed Messrs Ararume, Nwosu and Uzodinma’s petitions for lacking in merit on the grounds that they failed to prove the allegations made in their petitions.


But the tribunal in its judgement held that the case of the petitioners was unmeritorious because they failed to call relevant witnesses and that evidence of witnesses called were based on hearsay.

The tribunal, in addition, rejected documents tendered by the petitioners in support of their claims on the grounds that those who led evidence in the documents were not the makers of the documents.

YelloweWest:
Was it only hope that got votes from 318 polling units? How did inec over look 236,000 votes?

Abeg leave this lie joor

JonDon12:
Wait One Minute; If Uzodinma Got 236k cancelled votes from those Polling Units, How many did Ihedioha Get from those. They should add those to his totals.

BecaciaBarbie:
My husband did not even peck me before He got married to me not to talk more of cuddle and sex, please pray to God to send you who He has ordained for you as that person would meet all your criteria and still wait.

calabardick:
Is it the same guy that married her?
Some of this "small introduction men" are agents of frustration. They're out there to frustrate innocent young ladies. Only a foolish woman will listen to them.

You were her destiny helper.

Olalan:
OP sorry to burst your bubble your spouse family seem irresponsible.......a grandmother following her grand child is the height of moral bankruptcy. It's time you have a rethink about your spouse and her family that's if you don't also share same moral outlook.
BTW when you both were having series of unprotected sex what where you guys expecting?

chewwie:
Did her silly grandmother get her pregnant? She should carry the pregnancy to term and leave the baby with you and move on with her life.
Is there any rule that states that she can't take her exams with pregnancy?

cooltola:
Killing an unborn child is the ultimate lack of empathy and disregard to life- the only exception to abortion is if the fetus growing is dangerous to health of the mother or rape . Forget the moral compasses or self righteousness, everyone deserves a chance for tomorrow.

Even the children who are begging or suffering are hoping for a tomorrow. The better solution is to enforce a family planning by promoting the uses of condoms or anything to prevent the fertilization of human eggs if both parties are not ready to parent. Why should an unborn child pay the penalty of death because his or her parents were busy enjoying themselves irresponsibly? The northerner leaders should address the uncontrolled population growth, try to provide jobs and abortion is not the answer.

calabardick:
I don't support abortion.
Stop calling her your fiancée to gain Favor here, she's your girlfriend.

So you want to frustrate her future with your stupid sperm? What is she abort her exams an keep the pregnancy tomorrow you start talking nonsense? If she chose to abort the pregnancy and further her studies, so be it, you can't force it on her. Her future first.

If you want a child GO AND MARRY.

seankafor:
you just nailed it all.
That's why I love those Ghanaians.. they sometimes bypass reality and pushes their patriotism to extreme irrespective of who they are dealing with..
They are ready to defend their country to the bone marrow, whether they are right or wrong. You can even atrest to that with few of them on nairaland here.

Patriotism goes beyond many things..
The way people bash the president on front page threads..sometimes I avoid comments due to the kind of hate speech been decapitated there.. it's saddening.

There is a huge difference between criticism and hate speech

sunnysmile80:
@ Pryme: Thank you for your submission. You have said it all. I like your perspective towards relationship. Your statements reflect your level of maturity. God bless you. I really don't understand how a woman would lose anything by having sex in a relationship. And the mentality of a man leaving after having sex is very wrong. If he wants to leave, he will leave with sex or no sex. Not having sex before marriage does not make the people involved in a relationship responsible or irresponsible.

It is called relationship, a romantic relationship, an erotic relationship. It is called dating. Anyone who dies not want sex before marriage should not start any dating relationship whatsoever. They should just meet each other and get married within a week or a month. That's what our forefathers and mothers usually do in the old days, they barely know each other, they just get introduced to each other and they get married. Some of them don't even live in the same location, they would meet onece and then get married.They don't pass through dating phase.Fortunately for then some of them were able to live together for the rest of their lives either successful or unsuccessfully with ether happiness or sorrow. They were full of patients and endurance that time.

But now, time and things have changed. U need to date to get to know each other, and part of what u need to know from the person you want to marry is his/her sex life.

I decide not to sound religious because I'm a realist.

If u don't want sex before marriage, then don't go into dating. Very simple .

And this idea of women believing that when they don't receive money from a man then they are not expected to have sex with him is absurd. I believe only prostitutes engage in sex in exchange for money.

Some women may decide not to have sex before marriage because they are not sure if the man will stay with them in case of unexpected pregnancy, then use condom or other preventive measures. Simple. But this idea of no sex before marriage is unreasonable.

You kiss and curdle a man and u said no sex before marriage? That's called pre-intimacy , as for as I am concerned by kissing and curdling you have started making love with him already.

You are just lucky that the man is inexperience/amateur, if you engaged in a pre-intimacy with an experienced man you won't be able to resist the rest of the package. In fact you will be the one that will UnCloth yourself by yourself ; you will even be the one the will UnCloth him. But I guess the man in not experienced enough as to know how to make a woman lost control in ecstasy.

Brightgem:
If you yourself had any dignity, any common sense, any self respect, any values, any parental teachings, any good guidance, then you would have understood my post on one hand and on the other hand you would have not stooped low to use MIA KHALIFA as an example.

But I don't blame you, this generation doesn't know how to define success, that's why you can use pornstars or a scammer as an example of success.

90% of people don't have sense, as a friend of mine said.

You lack decency or intellectual capacity to hold a discussion with me. So dey your lane of pornstars abeg. This is my final exchange with you.

KingEzo:
Hello Nairalander,

please I need your advice. I am 31 years and my fiancee is 29 years and we have been dating for the past four years.

She discovered that she's pregnant on new year's eve. We discussed the issue throughout the new year and we agreed to keep the pregnancy that she's going to write her nursing Council exam later. I told her that she should give me some time so that I can go and discuss with my parents and organize introduction then do the engagement in a little way but she said her mom won't be happy with her that she needs to do big wedding because she's the first child of her mom.

She later told me that she's going to inform her parents before taking any step. To my surprise she called me this evening that she is going to terminate the pregnancy because her family has been raining insults on her since she got home.

She said her grandma is even coming to the city with her so that she can terminate the baby. But I told her that I didn't support it that I can't terminate pregnancy, I told her that she can write the council exam after delivery but she insisted.

Sir-Ma should I support this their action?

Brightgem:
Abeg stand your ground. It's not any body's bloody business whether you are virgin or not.

Is that even a man, if he can't be disciplined with the thing in the middle of his legs? Or you think giving him sex will keep him? you'll look back and wonder what happened when he still leaves you, you'll be more heart brokened.

Pls keep your dignity and let the manipulator leave. You no do be you no do. Sex with a man that's not your husband means you are ready to lose your dignity. Those who don't agree, argue with your ancestors.

pryme:
No you did not,
Its obvious he now wants sex and you don't.
Call off the relationship.
If you still want the relationship be prepared to have sex with him.

No need to complicate things.
It is what it is.

franzis:
Sex or no sex , a guy who wants to stay will stay and the one that wants to leave would leave ...

Dpharisee:
Igbos are not castigating the Yoruba nation for this laudable move, imagine the reaction when Igbos established BSS few years ago to protect their communities.
Restructuring means that all regions should be allowed to have state Police and not this proxy security outfits

9jahotblog:
OPERATION AMOTEKUN: Things You Need To Know About the New Western Security Scheme

1. Each state donated 20 vehicles each, making 120 Amotekun vehicles. The vehicles would be dispatched to the respective states.

2. The headquarters will be at Ibadan, Oyo State.

3. The size of the troops would be determined by what each of the six states had capacity for and based on the level of
security threat.

4. Every state government will fund the troops in its state. It is the capacity of a state that will determine the size of troops it needs.


5. The idea behind Operation Amotekun is in a bid to localizing policing Salary of personnel will not be below the minimum wage.

6. Their operation will be seamless. If something is happening near the Oyo border, the Ogun Amotekun can cross into Oyo
and vice versa.

falopey:
The report was made to their gullible citizens just to save face and after they had already signaled to American troops through Iraqi government that their base would be bombed that night. Then all American troops evacuated before the bomb.

However, Iran has to tell some lies to its people to pacify them of course