₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,861 members, 8,514,059 topics. Date: Friday, 06 November 2026 at 01:19 AM

Toggle theme

DeepSight's Posts

Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 (of 809 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 10:58pm On Dec 09, 2016
KingEbukaNaija:
So do you agree to the divinity of Christ ? Your answers will help a lot with the OP .
No I do not; but if at all he was divine, that would be only in the sense that we all are: God lives in all beings.
Christianity Etc › Re: Logical Understanding Of Trinity (elohim) - Establishing The Doctrine Of Godhead by DeepSight(m): 10:54pm On Dec 09, 2016
shadeyinka:
Weti he do you na!
Posting brain-dead inanities based on useless pagan fairy-tales he received from his white colonial master.

1 + 1 + 1 = Spiritual Idiocy and mental inferiority indeed.

Olodo rabata, useless mumu. Follow-Follow Zombie.

Clear-out of town!
Christianity Etc › Re: Logical Understanding Of Trinity (elohim) - Establishing The Doctrine Of Godhead by DeepSight(m): 9:32pm On Dec 09, 2016
GoodMuyis:
Not surprise, but expected
I said SHATTAAAPPPPP!!!
Christianity Etc › Re: Logical Understanding Of Trinity (elohim) - Establishing The Doctrine Of Godhead by DeepSight(m): 9:12pm On Dec 09, 2016
Richirich713:
Christians do say there's three, but by three they mean three persons, not three Gods.

Christianity subscribes to monotheism, there cannot be three Gods.
Christianity is Polytheistic. It is as polytheistic as can get.
Christianity Etc › Re: Logical Understanding Of Trinity (elohim) - Establishing The Doctrine Of Godhead by DeepSight(m): 9:10pm On Dec 09, 2016
GoodMuyis:
Logical Understanding of Trinity (Elohim) - Establishing the Doctrine of Godhead

1 + 1 + 1 = ?

The answer to the above depends on the perspective you turn to it and the method you decide to use. If you decide to use regular arithmetic, you will get straight answer of 3.
But not all maths problem can solve using regular arithmetic. For example 1 + 1 = 10 under binary operation and our answer canNOT be 2 because we are operating under different circumstance.

1 + 1 + 1 = ?

Under Logic Operation, Just as Computer Processor will process it, the answer would not to be equal 3 but 1. Why 1 ask seun he is a programmer too, or may be thats how Logic Operation Works.

Hence I will say understand the concept of Trinity require that You use spiritual understanding the sixthsense, not your usual thinking, no you cant, even if you are a Christian You may still not understand if you dont have the Holy Spirit to bring down the revelation to you, you can do noting but to accept it by faith. Hence you cant use carnality to understand spiritual and the gateway to spiritual Christianity is the Holy Spirit.

When you have the Holy Ghost in you, then you have more than what it takes to understand it. By this time its no longer by faith but by revelation and you get the true picture of the Godhead (Elohim)

Stay Blessed and be ye filled with the Holy Ghost Maranatha
SHATTAPPP!!!!!
Christianity Etc › Re: The Doctrine Of The Ufos by DeepSight(m): 8:28pm On Dec 09, 2016
Otem, dont you think the considerable imagination and creativity you deploy to these write ups and the time you waste therewith can be better deployed on writing literary master pieces that will imortalize you and also be commercially successful?
Pets › Re: See The Tortoise I Just Caught by DeepSight(m): 6:15pm On Dec 09, 2016
Ikem11:
I just caught this big tortoise just now
What do you mean "caught"? Is the thing a criminal?
Please let it go jaare.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 5:57pm On Dec 09, 2016
KingEbukaNaija:
Christ was not white . MrPresident1 , sukkot and so many other Christians have had disquisitions on this before . It was through the discussions I made the discovery .
We know all that; i speak generically about the fair skinned foreigner. I don't subscribe to some people's ideas that he was black though.
The point remains the same: and also the whole fairy tale was brought to you by white men and not Jews. Jews would not bother. In fact they do not believe in him.

I repeat: if it was an African tale; you would laugh your head off and even regard those telling it as ret.ards. That is the truth.
This shows a terrible inferiority complex.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 4:39pm On Dec 09, 2016
JackBizzle:
I accept the knighhood, sire!
Arise, Sir Jack, First of his name:
We name thee Lord of the Way.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 4:32pm On Dec 09, 2016
plaetton:
The above did not come from a carnal mind.
The spirit of the WORD is with you brother.
grin
I tell you! grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

Brother Bizzle, the time is nigh for your Knighthood.
Please kneel. . . .
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 4:19pm On Dec 09, 2016
JackBizzle:
WORDS ARE FOR THE SALAD! THE WORD SALAD!!!


DEEPSIGHT 3;19

Deepsight walked amongst his disciples and preached to them- "I am the salad of life and whosoever eateth of me shall be blessed with the verbosity of spoken word". Then, his disciples asked "Is this true? Can we be blessed with the gift of the word salad?". Deepsight replied thus- "the salad is open like the gates of heaven towards its righteous communicants; it accepts whosoever believeth in its sophistry."

Then Deepsight told his disciples to start speaking in tongues. As they did, he started walking on air. And his disciples rejoiced thus "we have a great prophet that walketh on air". But then, Deepsight corrected them; "I walketh not upon the air but upon the spoken word of your saladified speaking in tongues". And his disciples rejoiced further "we have a great prophet for where Jesus walketh upon water, he walketh upon words".


And from that day Deepsight was known as the "word walker". Praised be his salad.
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

Oh my! This is sooooo funny!
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 4:15pm On Dec 09, 2016
KingEbukaNaija:
@ DeepSight

1. Christ is being seen as the Supreme of all that exists . Let's use the Logic of God and Everything : See everything as the unity of ALL that exists , a boundless whole , with God being the supreme of all that exists . For everything to exist , an all has to be eternal - this is why Christ is called the supreme qua first born i.e both the created and creator are in everything that exists but the eternal creator transcends and is before his creation . Because for IN him ,all things were created
O, you have suddenly changed the script right? He is no longer the supreme in creation as you previously said, but now the supreme of all that exists?

It will be interesting to read your further revisions as we go along.

Colossians 1 : 17
17 And he is before all things, and in him all things consist.
The writer refers to all created things.

2. If Christ is not God then why he is called a deity here :

Colossians 2:6-9
9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Godhead is Theotes in Greek and it means deity - this shows Christ is the personal and bodily manifestation of all the fullness of Deity . He is God incarnate .
This remains consistent with the Idea of God being present through Christ: and for your information: through every man and woman as well: for otherwise why is it written that ye are the temple of the Living God?

Now assuming without conceding that the verse implies that he is God, I would be very wary of taking the words of the very dubious, controversial, chauvinistic and presumptuous pharisee: Saul of Tarsus for it, over and above the transcribed words of Jesus himself which state the very opposite.

Is it not the very same murderous usurper who barged into the Christian fold and began to have doctrinal disputations even with the Apostles themselves? Be wary of such a man, I tell you.

Colossians 1:15-16
15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Here you simply repeat the obvious: that he is said to have a beginning. God has no beginning.
Nor is God begotten by anyone. Nor does God sit at the right hand of any other person.
Nor are things done by any other entity through God.

16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him
Why does it not simply say that he created all things? Why does it say that things were created by and for him?

That means Christ is actually the creator of all things - this makes him the Creator God .
Christ did not say so. He said the reverse quite emphatically.
Besides it is comical to envisage the Creator of all things kneeling and begging (someone else - who?) in the garden of Gethsemane to avoid the death on the cross if possible: and stating "nevertheless not as I will but as thou wilt".

It is comical to have the creator of all things even setting in motion a process that would lead him to incarnate into the flesh for the purpose of a propitiatory sacrifice for sins and then begin to plead with himself to avoid that fate if possible.

It is comical to speak of the creator of all things saying "My God my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

It is comical to speak of the creator of all things being tempted by one of his created beings with an offer to give him all the material wealth of the Earth.

It is comical to speak of the creator of all things begging himself to forgive mankind (Father forgive them for they know not what they do) for crucifying him after he had so planned that they should do so in order that he might forgive them. - never mind that he had begged himself to stop his own initiated plan.

This pagan idea of the Trinity is as laughable as it can get: and you would have so laughed if it were told to you as an African folk-tale. I don't know what inferiority complex forces African Christians to accept these hilarious old wives tales on account that they were brought to them by white men who enslaved them in the process. You need to wake up and stop this slavery to foreign ridiculous myths.

For your information, many many foreign legends also hold that this or that hero of theirs is Almighty God. Why you ignore them befuddles me.

Although I have entertained this discussion based on biblical points, let me for once make myself clear: I would not believe this gibberish even if it was painted in red in every verse of the Bible. For I know exactly how the bible came about and I know that it is a political concoction of men.

Now let us leave this topic of the Jewish carpenter being God and address other things raised by you. You are free to worship your fellow man just because he is white, but I NEVER WILL.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 3:17pm On Dec 09, 2016
plaetton:
Naaa.
He is an olodo who serves all- you-can- eat word salads.

Man shall not live by word salads aione.
Impertinence! Impudence! Rascality! Unbridled wickedness! Insubordination on the streets of Ashkelon! Treachery on the plains of Meggido!

Now therefore, draw thee thy sword, and prepare for a duel unto the death: for no longer will I have my Holy Salad trampled upon like pearls before swine: nor will the Mighty one of Judah behold such iniquity without recompense.

Thou hast been warned.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 1:28pm On Dec 09, 2016
Not surprising, my friend.

KingEbukaNaija:
First born shows preexistence not the first to be created
Whooooops! Really, kind sir?

Let me ask you, is a being that always existed "born" at all?

Why would you say that

~ God always existed,

~ Christ is God - and yet:

~ Christ was the first born of creation?

Verse 15 : He is the image of the invisible God, the first born most supreme of all creation.
How does it escape you that you have just identified him as the most supreme of all creation?

Does that not mean that he is a created being - part of creation - only, according to you: the most supreme of it?

If a person is the most supreme of creation, how is that same person the creator?

Does the creator not stand outside of all creation: indeed transcend all creation?

When will you reflect on your words carefully and stop the patent absurdities?


Take a deep breath and pause: its not compulsory to defend and retain obvious absurdities as your conviction you know?

Remember Christ was described as the image of an invisible God.
Just as surely as the same scripture says you and I are made in the Image of God.

So what conclusion does that draw?

Now check this out

John 14:9
9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you still do not know me, Philip? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
I have told you before that every interaction with another human being is an interaction with God - more so when one is interacting with his envoy. Jesus was a messenger of God. Thus this statement of his is apt.

Note however, that the very same scripture carefully advises that no man has seen God - John 1:18 - and that the son has however made God known. This explains it all.

Now see how verse 16 logically follows verse 15 with the new translation and interpretation

Verse 16: For by him the Supreme being who is Christ , all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.
How can you even use the words "through him" and "for him" without recognizing that if something is done then it is "for" that person.

These words serve in direct contradiction to what you espouse and show God acting over and above Christ - "through him, and for him" - in the words that you quoted.

I am getting tired of you quoting things that manifestly show the opposite of what you insist they say.

Isn't God called the Supreme Being , the creator of all things , the source of all that exists ?

wink

In case you are not convinced , we can also see more verses where firstborn shows superiority and not first created

Psalm 89:20
20 I have found David, my servant;
with my holy oil I have anointed him,

Then in verse 27

Psalm 89:27
27 And I will make him the firstborn,
the highest of the kings of the earth.

Of course , we know that David isn't the eldest in his family but he was referred to as the first born- the highest of all kings on earth
What is all this please?
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 8:45am On Dec 09, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
We as human spirits have a beginning but apparently Christ does not have a beginning - this makes Him God .

And Colossians 1:15-17 shows that Christ was begotten from all eternity - God is the source of existence , the precursor of all that exists .

Colossians 1:15-17
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation.
I leave you to reconcile the words in bold and especially the words in red bold.
How you can call someone the firstborn of creation and at the same time insist that he had no beginning and is therefore God is frankly beyond me.

I hope you can see how this renders your alleged contradiction a non starter.
The contradiction that is obvious is yours and yours alone.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:53pm On Dec 08, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
Oh ... I think I get what you mean
Allahu Akbar.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:52pm On Dec 08, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
Here's the conclusion on this site :
Therefore, John 8:58 is more accurately translated as, “Truly, truly I say to you, I exist as superior in rank to Abraham’s existence.” The UBS Greek text reads, “prín Abraám genésthai egoó eimí” In other words, Jesus is telling these Jews that his rank in the kingdom of God is greater than that of their father Abraham. Once he said this, the Jews took up stones to stone him to death.
But you assented to Xenophanes' concept of Theology where he posits that no divine hierarchy exists . So if that text means that Christ has a rank in Heaven , that means you see Christ as God's subordinate . True ?
^^^ Most definitely, Jesus the Nazarene is subject and subordinate to God by far - by a great incomprehensible gap: just same as with every mortal.

As to hierarchy, in case you mistook me, I meant I see no hierarchy within the Godhead as it is ONE.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:45pm On Dec 08, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
I mean this smiley
I think you should stop posting this very dangerous image, which poses potentially serious threats to world peace especially on this board.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:43pm On Dec 08, 2016
plaetton:
It's similar to asking you if you describe yourself as a non-clown or an un-insane person. It presumes that both tendencies are the default states.
No it is not. And you know that.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:42pm On Dec 08, 2016
^^^ I hold that view Rael or no: I do not derive that view from Rael. Just referencing.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:36pm On Dec 08, 2016
plaetton:
Drowning a poor dumb lad
He is not a dumb lad: he is merely too deeply steeped in his doctrine to even see what is written in scripture. It happens to many Christians. They reject scripture outright in favour of their doctrine all the time. It's quite normal.

in a poodle of word-salads is not only a fight, but an unfair one.

Shame on you , Depardo.
smiley
For the salad is the word. . . . and most meet and right to refresh the soul and mind. . . .
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:34pm On Dec 08, 2016
plaetton:
Likewise, to say that I am IRRELIGIOUS is to presume that being religious is a natural default state,.. which it is not.
undecided
No, it doesn't presume that: how does it?

Being irreligious is just that: not subscribing to any religion. It in no way insinuates any suggestion of accepting that being religious is a default state.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:31pm On Dec 08, 2016
[Deep Sight:]

Secondly I also mentioned to you that it is a host of gods that embarked on this experiment of Earth and Man. Not the ultimate almighty God who is responsible for all reality and existence. The "Elohim." were a race of a higher intelligence that created the Earth and Man. This is the real reason for those plurals you see, but this may be going too far for you.
You may choose to interest yourself in this as some preliminary reading as per the Elohim.

http://hubpages.com/religion-philosophy/elohim-race-et

If it looks like gibberish to you, don't worry, just scratch it. We can revisit it another day.
But you should note that there are a great many pointers in the Old testament to the likelihood that the Elohim were really a race of super intelligent extra-terrestrial creators.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 2:13pm On Dec 08, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
I believe I'm putting up a good fight grin
There is no fight here o, nah gentle brotherly sharing of views, howbeit we very naturally have different views.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m):
KingEbukasBlog:
One more thing before we continue sir

Explain these verses please

John 8:58
58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”
This verse is an indication that he existed in eternity before Abraham's earthly sojourn, no?

You should see here that there are different perceptions of the correct translation of that verse:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ego_eimi

Although attempts have been made to insist that it is a claim that he was God, this is not so. The wording only shows that he says that he exists in eternity before any earthly Abraham, and indeed before any earthly being.

Now let me ask you: how does this make him God? Do you not know that many beings exist in eternity before any earthly Abraham and before any earthly being? Do you not know that you and I count among these as well?

This does not translate to being God, especially when taken together with all of his other statements in reference to God, many of which I listed for you which you insisted meant the direct opposite of what they clearly said.

Light research should show you that the words "I am" there, at all events could read "I exist" or "I have been".

Capitalizing those words is not something that exists in the texts but is only done by some translators.

See contrary and extensive views and interpretation of the verse here -

http://bibleanswerstand.org/before.htm

You should read carefully the arguments out forward here as well -

http://bibleq.net/answer/447/

See also Islamic objections -
http://www.answering-christianity.com/iam.htm

You can thus see that there are different views on the rendition of that verse. For me, it is reasonable to stick with the rendition which aligns with all of Jesus' words - and those words incontrovertibly show that he is not God.

Most striking in this regard is the prayer in the garden of Gethsemane - which perhaps I will touch upon in a different post. For that prayer showed the possibility of a dichotomy of wills between Jesus and God where he says "nevertheless not as I will but as thou wilt". The whole prayer in Gethsemane is enough to end this discussion on its own.

Genesis 1:26
26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:

Genesis 11:7
7 Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.

Genesis 3:22
22 Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, to know good and evil.

I just really want to know what you think about them . Thanks
I have told you that the plural used here is no ground for the Trinity. In the first place there is the common plural of royalty, which is often used for an all encompassing being such as God (and even for earthly sovereigns). The Quoran for example always uses the plural of royalty in referring to Allah. This does not mean that it is not very strictly monotheistic.

Secondly I also mentioned to you that it is a host of gods that embarked on this experiment of Earth and Man. Not the ultimate almighty God who is responsible for all reality and existence. The "Elohim." were a race of a higher intelligence that created the Earth and Man. This is the real reason for those plurals you see, but this may be going too far for you.

For now, just understand that the plural of royalty is normal for a deity or sovereign. It is used as such in the Quoran in reference to Allah all the time.
Christianity Etc › Re: For Deepsight :- True Esoteric Knowledge Of God Possessed By Humans by DeepSight(m): 3:26am On Dec 08, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
Sir . You didn't pay attention to the commas . "For There is One God" - this is certain . "And one Mediator of God and Mankind " - this then explains Christ's role in the Trinity
Christ said this as a demigod , of course The Father who is fully divine is greater than He is .
Christ's role as the mediator of God and mankind is stated then Christ as God Himself who came to earth to save man is seen here as God's subordinate because of his new nature as man .
Christ as the Son and God as The Father .
Christ never said he was not good nor did he deny his divinity here . He just wanted them to know that God is good . And that He as God is good too as seen in John 10:11
John 10:11
11 I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep.
KingEbukasBlog:
Christ will voluntarily become subject to the Father though they are equals when he comes to reign on earth .



The bible's use of "The Son" is to show Christ's willful submission to co-equal , his father , as a subaltern - a subordinate , lower status - because He is now of human nature or demigod whichever one you chose . And his human nature precluded full divinity like His Father , God , so he has to pray to God , give thanks to God , make requests to God . Its all about humility . Its about showing his qualities which includes wisdom and understanding that he needs to live a life worthy of emulation . And of course to fulfill his mission as a good shepherd who loves his sheep and is willing to lay his life for them .



Christ sitting as God's right hand here shows that He is equal in power and authority as The Father and has the power and authority to subdue His enemies



"Only Begotten" here refers to Christ's incarnation in human flesh through the Holy Spirit . That means there is no one who had gone through this process and there will never be anyone who will incarnate as human as Christ did . Christ is unique , He is as divine as The Father , He is God who manifested in human flesh ergo Yahweh is His Father .




That's the trinity showing Oneness . There is one God - Yahweh , Yeshua and Ruach Hakodesh
It is really benumbing how you have taken each verse and happily, and with conviction, ascribed to it the direct opposite of what it says. I would have been shocked by what you have laid out had I not been already used to such from Christians for many years now. I can only hope that someday you will return to read all your own responses to these verses and see for yourself how you have assaulted them and turned them on their heads in a bid to force the Trinity into existence.

However from experience I also know that such a day is not likely to ever come.
Therefore I leave this matter of the Trinity to you and your desire: Christ did not claim to be God: and if you can look at pointed verses where he makes that clear and still show that you have no regard for his words by almost calling him a liar and twisting his words to the exact opposite: then let this matter of the Trinity rest: I would have delved further to explain this or that point: but what you have made of these verses shows me that that would be futile.

For even if he said point blank: "I am not God:" (which he virtually did severally) it is obvious you would reply that that was him in the flesh form speaking only: or something of the sort.

I do hope you know that your claims blaspheme the God you claim to serve though.

Let us therefore discuss other areas of interest as may pertain to your thread.
Christianity Etc › Re: Xenophanes' Criticism Of Anthropomorphism Vs The Triune Nature of God by DeepSight(m): 8:36pm On Dec 07, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
No sir . Christ was smart enough to circumvent the Pharisees' accusations of blasphemy . 'Ye are gods' as used in Psalm 82:6 denotes authority of judges , kings etc . These people are seen as gods among men because they are influential and powerful since they are men who are in authority . So Christ is just saying that if those who are in authority were referred to as "gods" , why can't he who was sent by God to men be referred as God's Son too .

I remember that I explained Psalm 82 to someone who thought that Yahweh was one of the lesser gods of the Jews and the Most High is the Supreme God . And the assembly in that chapter was the meeting of gods or deities .
Well you are yet to show me where Christ claimed to be God and i have shown you twenty verses that explicitly deny same.

Is it that you speak truth whilst scripture speaks lies?
Christianity Etc › Re: Xenophanes' Criticism Of Anthropomorphism Vs The Triune Nature of God by DeepSight(m): 8:14pm On Dec 07, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
You are playing a dangerous game here grin

So you saying the will and power of God is personified as the Holy Ghost ?
That is what the bible it as. The Holy Ghost is not a distinct person anymore than your words or aura are distinct persons from you. They are not. These are forces that emanate from you. Such is the Holy Ghost in relation to God. It simply refers to the power emanated from God.
Christianity Etc › Re: Xenophanes' Criticism Of Anthropomorphism Vs The Triune Nature of God by DeepSight(m): 7:49pm On Dec 07, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
@ DeepSight

Aha !

Mark 3:28-29
28 Verily I say unto you, All sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme:

29 But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation.

Why did Christ say that whoever blasphemes against the Holy Ghost will never be forgiven ? Doesn't this show that the Holy Spirit is a different person ? But blasphemy against God the Father and Son can be forgiven - this shows these three are different but are One .
No this refers to one who works directly against the will and power of God...
Christianity Etc › Re: Xenophanes' Criticism Of Anthropomorphism Vs The Triune Nature of God by DeepSight(m): 4:16pm On Dec 06, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
1. God is: beyond human morality

2. God does not resemble human form

3. God cannot die or be born ie . God is divine thus eternal

4. No divine hierarchy exists

5. God does not intervene in human affairs.
I agree.

However the last point may need to be understood with a birds eye view of things.
Christianity Etc › Re: Xenophanes' Criticism Of Anthropomorphism Vs The Triune Nature of God by DeepSight(m): 4:14pm On Dec 06, 2016
KingEbukasBlog:
But Take a look at this :

-
-
-

Triune God of Christianity

Before considering if we will actually be able to see God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, we need to establish that they are three Persons. Without delving too deeply into the doctrine of the Trinity, we need to understand that the Father is not the same Person as the Son, the Son is not the same Person as the Holy Spirit and the Holy Spirit is not the same Person as the Father. They are not three Gods. They are three distinct Persons, yet they are all the one God. Each has a will, can speak, can love, etc., and these are demonstrations of personhood. They are in absolute perfect harmony consisting of one substance. They are coeternal, coequal and co-powerful. If any one of the three were removed, there would be no God.

God The Father : So in heaven, there are three Persons. But will we be able to actually see them? Revelation 4:3-6 gives us a description of heaven and the throne that is occupied by God and by the Lamb: “the one sitting there had the appearance of jasper and carnelian… a rainbow resembling an emerald encircled the throne. Before the throne… a sea of glass, clear as crystal.” Since God dwells in “unapproachable light” and is one “whom no one has seen or can see” (1 Timothy 6:16), God is described in terms of the reflected brilliance of precious stones. First Corinthians 2:9 says, “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him.” Because of God’s holiness, it may be that we will never be able to look upon His face, but again, this is speculation.

God The Son : Revelation 5:6 tells us that in heaven, the Lamb stands in the center of the throne and there are descriptions of Him clothed in brilliant white. Since the Lamb represents Christ Jesus, and we know that human eyes have beheld Him after His resurrection and glorification, it seems reasonable to conclude that in heaven, we will be able to look upon our Lord and Savior.

God The Holy Spirit : The Holy Spirit, by the very nature of His being, is able to move at will and take various forms. When Jesus was baptized, the Holy Spirit descended on Him in the form of a dove (Matthew 3:13-17). At Pentecost, the Holy Spirit was accompanied by a loud rushing noise and was seen as tongues of fire (Acts 2:1-4). It may not be possible to see the Holy Spirit unless He chooses to manifest Himself in some form, but that is speculation.

Mere mortals do not have the ability to grasp the wonders of heaven—it is entirely beyond our comprehension. Whatever heaven is like, it will far exceed our wildest imaginings! All we know is that we will be worshiping our great God and full of wonder that He died to save sinners.

https://gotquestions.org/see-Trinity-heaven.html
https://www.nairaland.com/490515/holy-spirit-personal-sentient-being
Christianity Etc › Re: Do You Have Any Questions About God , The Bible Or Christianity? Bring Them Here by DeepSight(m): 12:40am On Dec 05, 2016
4kings:
Can you share what you understand or see that normal people don't?
Odd stuff. Like the little beastly creature that men really are.
And when I am really in the zone: spirit beings and other worlds. However I cannot go into this here: perhaps by email.

Most people only consider such talk as psychosis.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 (of 809 pages)