₦airaland Forum

enilove: It is not good to come to a conclusion when you do not know anything about the subject.

I was not born into a christian home or by christian parents.

I was a teenager when I realised that Muslims and Christians are not serving the same God and are heading in diff directions.

I dicided to know more about that religion I was (Islam ).Frankly speaking, you must know what you are doing in this life. I knew there is a purpose for everything in life. With reserch and question from my muslim friends I got to know that most muslims know nothing about the god they worship and are ready to take all or any lie they are fed with.

I said to myself,this Islam and Christianity are not the religion of our forefathers,so why must I worship their gods.

I also started reading the bible and made a research about it.I asked the Jehovah witness many questions.
What I got satisfied me. And I called on my Creator to show some signs regarding the right religion. I got a confirmation from God that Jesus Christ is the only way.

I then joined Deeper Life Bible Church and got born again at their former head quater at Gbagada in lagos.

If you do not ask God for the way,am afraid, you might continue in darkness and keep posting this nonsense and justifiying your actions.

You can ask your Creator to show you who He is.
He is faithful and just,He will answer you.

@bold-I'm so impressed with it!

Many christians today are just claiming there's God by faith (even on NL) not that they have real encounter with God.

I was born into christian home but initially I was so deep in science more than christianity, if not because I seek the face of God personally and got a sign from God I would have become an atheist.

[quote author=Mr knowitall.]^^^^^^^^^^^^
What is all this? you just happened to be born into a christian family...if you were born in India you would be telling me to accept...Hinduism....if you were born in Saudi Arabia you would be telling me to accept Allah....after all this you still didn't even answer my question...[/quote]Do you want to tell me that there's no christian in India?

A thread is coming soon about how people misunderstand BIBLE wait for it!

For me I do listening to non-christian songs before "I won't call it worldly song" but before I listen to any non-christian song I have to get the detail of the lyrics to know the kind of message its passing.

Recently, I don't listen to any non-christian song anymore because most of it are not passing any message across except old songs.

Uyi Iredia: @ Emusan: We all are more or less subjective. It's an inevitable part of being human. Consider the story of the elephant and the 7 blind men. The elephant is what's subjective, the blind men are subjective. The physical world is the reality. We humans interprete it in various ways at various times. I think without knowing it scientists prove God. The idea of dark energy some atheists will uncritically accept (because energy is associated with matter) while failing to note that, dark energy is an immaterial thing, of which is said CANNOT BE EMPIRICALLY percieved. That right there, isn't science the way materialists present it.

I agree with your point.

But @bold- do atheist do realise that? Remember they always present their debate as fact and they'll never agree with PARANORMAL/AFTERLIFE.

The information you read it's from Victor J. Zammit an open-minded rationalist and freethinker. All the scientists mention in this article are all open-minded they are not christians. They called Dawkins a close-minded scientist, why? because once Dawkins accept paranormal problem starts. As stated in point 5 of this article.

My argument with atheist (like I always say) is that no scientific evidence can be used to disprove the existence of God but they can hate God or claim there's no God base on their own personal view of nature but what most of them hold onto is "scientist says".

Now some atheist are rejecting EVOLUTION because it's a "theory in crisis".

Traditional, orthodox science has virtually come to a standstill. Dawkins himself also conceded to the viewers that there is a most serious crisis in orthodox science - that many science departments at universities in the UK (and around the world) are closing down, yet the acceptance of the paranormal is inversely increasing. This is because, I submit, people all over the world are themselves experiencing the paranormal – OBE’s and NDE’s, telepathy, EVP and ITC, communicating with crossed-over loved ones, accurate mediumship from highly gifted mediums andapparitions. Because of the internet, these critical evidentiary paranormal experiences are now being made public on an international level and cannot be censored any more. They have filtered into mainstream media and are rapidly becoming deeply entrenched in the world culture – they’ve become impossible to shift.

Accordingly, people have lost faith in orthodox science because orthodox science CANNOT explain what people are experiencing paranormally and spiritually.

The final word goes to a clairaudient medium who told me about materialist scientists anti-afterlife crusaders, “They’re disseminating darkness on a global level – and surely one day they’ll have to pay the price for that.” Yet some atheist will be ranting "Religions is the ever worse thing in human's life"


http://www.victorzammit.com/articles/dawkins77.htm

1. First, this R. Dawkins when referring to the paranormal, is expressing a personal view, NOT a scientific or empirical or objective view, because he can NEVER use science to show that the paranormal and the afterlife do not exist. RD is into conjecture and speculation. He’s into subjectivity and debunking. He’s into justification for his own personal beliefs - not in search for the truth.

2. Further, because he is a self-confessed materialist atheist and has been actively anti-paranormal, it follows that he does not and cannot perceive empirical evidence for the paranormal/afterlife with true empirical equanimity. He showed he’s deeply negatively prejudiced, "and that is a huge problem for someone who keeps on reminding the viewers he is a ‘scientist’ "– rather arrogantly implying he knows more than the paranormal empirical experts and the viewer about the paranormal.

3 . There is some misguided and erroneous assumption by this R.Dawkins that just because he is qualified in science, he is also an expert in the admissibility of evidence. WRONG! Dawkins is NOT a lawyer and accordingly, he has NO expertise in the admissibility of evidence. He often states and imputes that anything to do with the paranormal/afterlife is a personal belief or ‘superstition’ and therefore we must not accept it. WRONG! He shows he does not make critical distinctions, does not discriminate between the subjective and the objective, between the admissible and inadmissible in afterlife/paranormal evidence. Skeptical materialist scientists, including Dawkins, ought to rebut the formidable hitherto unrebutted afterlife evidence of the relatively recent SCOLE REPORT – where scientists and other professionals from Europe, UK and the US, including NASA scientists agreed that the paranormal actually happened. no scientist or skeptical debunker in eight years – not even for the allurement of a huge $1,000,000 cash prize - has been able to show the world that the objective evidence presented is not valid. Over eighteen months of weekly investigations, Dawkins buries his head in the sand pretending empirical materializations are not happening because a priori he would argue illogically, irrationally and speciously that cannot be true because there is no afterlife!
Physicists and other open-minded scientists of the ‘new science’ (those who used science to accept the paranormal) – to name just a few - such as Nobel Laureate Professor Brian Josephson, Professor Jessica Utts, Professor Alan Wolf, Dr Harold Puthoff, Professor RussellTarg, Professor Dr Ernst Senkowski, Dr Amit Goswami – Professor John Bockris, Ron Pearson (UK), Professor Archie Roy, Professor Rupert Sheldrake, Dr Claude Swanson Professors of Physics – and also some of the classic scientists such as Sir Oliver Lodge, Sir William Crookes, Sir William Barrett et al- ALL conceded after investigating that the paranormal is real – and most of them also conceded that there is an afterlife.
Now this Dawkins, has NOT rebutted any of the scientific evidence of these aforementioned scientists. He knowingly and willfully omitted to rebut the evidence because no scientist can rebut objectivity and repeatability.

4. “Where a better way to start my investigation than in a New Age fair” stated Dawkins to the viewers. Any serious, professional scientist who wants to investigate the paranormal will NOT go to a psychic fair. Why did not Dawkins try to rebut Dr Dean Radin’s highly acclaimed empirically elicited paranormal results? Why did not Dawkins deal with the plethora of other empirically accepted psi results? Why did not Dawkins deal with the classic objective afterlife evidence of Sir Oliver Lodge and Sir William Crookes which hitherto has not been rebutted? Why did not Dawkins try to debate professional psi empiricists about the paranormal who have the professional empirical afterlife knowledge to effectively deal with the closed minded skeptics such as Dawkins himsel

5 . Notwithstanding the objective, empirical psi evidence by the ‘new’ scientists to-day, Dawkins and others like him who strictly adhere to orthodox science just cannot or don't want to investigate or accept any empirical paranormal activities. Why not? First, if the empirically elicited psi evidence is accepted, it will make these materialists totally irrelevant and look rather silly and totally anachronistic. Also, the whole spectrum of reductionist orthodox science would inevitably have to be reviewed – in fact, it would become redundant overnight. The existence of non-physical energy, which a number of physicists accept, explains all paranormal activities. Accordingly, the war between orthodox science and the ‘new’ science is a fierce one and even Dawkins conceded on television that orthodox scienceis rapidly losing the war.

Victor James Zammit, LL.B, Ph.D., is a retired attorney of the Supreme Court of the New South Wales and the High Court of Australia. He has served as an attorney in the Local, District, and Supreme Courts in Sydney, has worked as a company-law consultant ,and lectured in Corporations Law. Also, he has worked part-time for police prosecution. In 1979, Zammit was a member of the United Nations Association of New South Wales - Human Rights Committee. In his work as a lawyer, Zammit became a 'professional skeptic' since he was never in a position to believe anyone unless the client had objective evidence to support the client's claims. Although initially suspicious of the New Age Movement for what appeared to be its blatant commercial exploitation of people's basic instinctual tendency for spiritual development, after many years as an open-minded skeptic, Zammit had a number of repeated psychic/mediumistic experiences which set him questioning, reading, and researching. Adopting a scientific criterion, he was able to select that information which could withstand and pass the many rigid tests of repeatability and objectivity. Currently, he does afterlife investigations virtually seven days a week. Zammit wrote A Lawyer Presents the Case For The Afterlife (ISBN: 0-9580115-0-, which has been translated into Italian, Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch and now is in the process of being translated into German and French. The same book has been translated into Russian and is now being sold in Russian bookshops. Since 2001, Victor Zammit has sponsored a one-million-dollar challenge to anyone in the world who can rebut the existing evidence for the afterlife. Up 'til now, no scientist, no physicist, no biologist, no psychologist, no empiricist, no skeptical debunker - no one has been able to show where, when, how, or why the evidence is invalid.

Professor Stephen Hawking EXPOSED!-By Zammit

To-day’s brief talk is to show you why this closed-minded Professor of Cosmology Prof. Stephen Hawking is deluding himself when he says there is no afterlife. He further stated in the television documentary ‘Curiosity … Who Created the Universe’ that there is no God. This professor made serious blunders and failures which I believe have completely destroyed the credibility of his anti-afterlife argument.

1. His first big BLUNDER: he FAILED to use Scientific Methodology to show why the existing evidence for the afterlife is not valid. He had to deal with EVP, ITC, NDE, OBE and MENTAL MEDIUMSHIP including the research done by the Windbridge Institute where they use PURE SCIENCE to investigate mediumship. This paranormally uninformed professor FAILED to deal with the most sensational afterlife evidence of the Cross-Correspondences, and the objective and repeatable scientific evidence of materialization – and some ten other areas of afterlife evidence this professor shows he’s totally ignorant about.

2. His second BIGGER BLUNDER: this professor FAILED to apply scientific methodology to his claim about the afterlife when he negligently came to conclusions about the evidence BEFORE he investigated! The principle involved is not dissimilar to this professor saying there are no blond haired people in the United States before he investigated. This professor allowed his closed mindedness and negative prejudices to over-ride scientific reasoning. That is a huge blunder– and something which I believe destroyed his credibility in relation to the afterlife.

3. His third BIGGEST BLUNDER is that he is presenting speculations and interpretations from speculations as science. THAT IS WRONG! THAT IS INADMISSIBLE AND UNACCAPTABLE. Lawyers and scientists will tell you that you cannot present speculations UNLESS you can independently substantiate your argument. When afterlife investigators deal with some afterlife evidence, it has to be repeated over time and space, keeping variables constant. And it has to yield the same positive results. We CAN independently substantiate the evidence we present for the afterlife.
In relation to God this professor said that because there was no ‘time’ before the big-bang – there was no God. He also said that since protons appear and disappear this shows that the universe created itself without the need for a creator.
But I say all these are just mere speculations and interpretations from speculations. In the next two to three decades other cosmologists will make other discoveries to completely invalidate Stephen Hawking’s argument against the afterlife and against the existence of God.
He is using his status as a ‘scientist’ to completely ignore the strict laws of science. That can never be accepted. So what this afterlife UNINFORMED professor stated was NOT science.
He expressed his closed minded prejudices and negativity as an atheistic layperson. Heshows he knows absolutely nothing about the afterlife - DON’T LET HIM MAKE A FOOL OF YOU!

Uyi Iredia: Please state what you mean by soul.

The unseen DNA of man's spirit.

Man is made up of spirit, soul and body.

ooman: @bold: i'd rather rot in hell than lose my reasoning power.

No you won't because there's still chance for you now. Most people who has expirenced NDE in their story they say "until they have been told to remember then they will remember". You don't have power to reason until is being given to you in that instance. REV 21:5 "...... And he said unto me, write: for these words are true and faithful."

and you contradict your own bible by your second sentence, Rev 21v4 says"he will remove all their sorrows.....there will be no more ....sorrow, crying or pain.

Most anti-christian will just pick one verse and interpret it to suit themselves. Why can't you quote it from verse 3- "And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God"
this very verse together with verse 4 are talking about people in heaven not in hell. If you're in heaven you will feel joy always but in hell it's pains always.

ooman: the bold shows your ignorance, if you have seen variations in organisms, then you dont need a microscope to see evolution, that's it. it's the phenotypic expression of genetic changes and change is evolution.

Variation in organism is cause by mutations which is not what evolution is all about.
Has organism ever evolved to another organism?

I know no one, rationalist or not, in his right state of mind, that would want to find a spirit with physical calculations and fields. Their research is destroyed right from the beginning, nothing true and logical can come from it.

I've told you many times stop argue this way. How was their research is being distroyed, is there no scientific evidence or fact for it? Check the link again!

just one question: can the spirit run mad? if yes, then we have spirits, if no then we don't.

YES! People have been manipulating some people's spirit (Eleda in Yoruba "as some one's spirit) is either they do it evil or do it fortune. Anything that happen to a man it starts in the spirit realm before manifest in physical.

If I may ask;
*Is it every mad man that have brain disease?
*Why someone who doesn't drink, smoke suddenly run mad?
*Why some mad man can't be taking care off medically?

Uyi Iredia: The fact that spirit beings are represented as entities with physical attributes and can be empirically perceived makes me skeptical of the notion. Even if there is an afterlife, it will necessarily be physical. Consider that streets of gold refer to physical things.

Yes it will be physical. You can see your love one's, feel sad or happy, you can still sing e.t.c but no power of reasoning on your own and no power to control yourself because you're not the owner of your SOUL.

ooman: Emusan, you never cease to amaze me. So your spirit world is now something I can see with my microscope? Oga oo...

btw, we all know that almost all the so called scientists you list are Christian creationists. I see no reason why any atheist evolutionist would want to go into spiritual research.

and for the op, if consciousness is spirit based, why does mental diseases cause madness and other impairment?
you need to read more biology.

I've said that I will create a thread title "Where is Ooman?" man it has been a long time.

No you can't view spirit under microscope as you can't view evolution too?

Thank God this time around is "all most" not "all" are creationist. Chech the link provided Michael Roll is a rationalist and freethinker, do you think he will accomodate christian in his research?
Atheist will never try it because it's against their religion.

Get the clue about the thread human has spirit and the spirit in human exist after death including mad man.

[quote author=outc*st]Lol!!!

Who is the Olodo?

The one who opened a thread that says 'Science confirms life after death" when it is glaring that science has nothing to do with metaphysics or the one who opened the thread to reveal that it is misleading?

Don't worry man, I believe firmly in the life after and if you consider my calling you olodo as rude and uncalled for then I apologise...but c'mon man this thread screams olodo!...not you o. I am referring to some of those you quoted. [/quote]Shallom!

[quote author=dr.shrewd]those scientists are at best practicing pseudo science by allowing their impressionable sentiments to encroach and influence their scientific freedom and objectivity. the fact presented by these pseudo scientists are by and large not epistemically warranted in the scientific circle. the hypothesis they presented are fraught with facts that does not conform with the well established scientific principles. saying series of discoveries, involving mathematical equations and physical experiments, when taken together, furnish empirical evidence that makes an extremely strong case for continuing after-death survival of the human psyche is as blanket as they come. what discovery? what mathematical equations? what physical experiment? a lot of lies they say are concealed in big big grammar. these guys are quacks [/quote]That's most atheist conclusion "pseudoscientist" when you don't have fact to support your claim.

I can see there was a little membrane that covered your eyes which couldn't allow you to see clearly, people like "Michael Roll-a rationalist and freethinker, Elisa Medsu-atheist, NOBEL Josephson" when you're reading the thread (you said their quack scientist). Try to remove the membrane and check the links provided.

About the Bible you quoted Eccl 3:19 and stop the lies you're feeding yourself see verse 20-21 "20 All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again.
21 Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth?"

[quote author=outc*st]Olodo![/quote]Who should we say is 'Olodo' between you and I?

You know science can't confirm or verify metaphysics yet you went ahead and opened the thread to show your ignorance.

[quote author=dr.shrewd]the bible also make a case contrary to these acclaim researches.in ecclesiastical 9:5 the bible states: For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward. so you mean that the bible lied [/quote]Did you see any Bible quote from the thread? The purpose of creating this thread is to let you know that nature doesn't consist only matter but also spirit. Spirit do exist!

[quote author=outc*st]Science does not confirm or verify after death experience. Science deals with the physical and not metaphysics. Metaphysics is beyond the scope of science and as such it is not verifiable for now as far as science is concerned.[/quote]So once you know this, why did you open the thread? I believe the title should've distracted you not to open. The people mention at the thread are they not scientist?

The only thing you can proud of as a science student is connecting battery with a bulb yet you're spitting trash.

[quote author=outc*st]The OP is very misleading![/quote]Why can't you quote the misleading part rather than following people.

musKeeto: Calm down.

'makes an extremely strong case for' is different from 'confirms that'.. The OP is misleading.

Make una dey cool down for this section, na wa..

@bold-I hope you check the link before you conclude 'Op is misleading'.

musKeeto: The Bible also makes an extremely strong case that there's a heaven and hell.

Means what? Can't you see at the beginning of the thread that isn't about religion stuff or did you see anything religious in the thread?

Too know is a disease.

Yungwizzzy: Shey na now dem knw? Me wey dey spirit everyday.

No some never agree espectially nairaland Atheist and their father Prof. Dawkins because once they accept that spirit exist their claims is over. But now is either they agree or hold on to personal personal believe.

This research has nothing to do with religions.

A group of British scientists, including two astrophysicists, a thermodynamicist, and other professional researchers, are conducting experiments and solving complex equations that they believe furnish conclusive and irrefutable proof of human survival of bodily death.
Michael Roll, a rationalist and freethinker who heads The Campaign for Philosophical Freedom, is unofficial spokesman for the group. He has recently revealed information that could drastically alter humankind’s entire belief system regarding continuation of consciousness beyond the grave. He and his colleagues’ series of discoveries, involving mathematical equations and physical experiments, when taken together, furnish empirical evidence that makes an extremely strong case for continuing after-death survival of the human psyche.

The researchers’ premise is that certain recent mathematical discoveries, combined with results of in-depth exploration of physics and quantum mechanics, now furnish verification for many previous well-documented scientific experiments dealing with what has been previously known as “psychic phenomena.” These experiments were, and are being, conducted by various researchers from the late nineteenth century down to the present day, and all have a common thread.
http://www.channelingerik.com/science-confirms-life-after-death/

Name of scientists who confirmed afterlife
1. Naoki Yasaku, 57, is neither mystic nor quack. He is a doctor on what may well be described as the front lines. For the past 11 years he has been director of the emergency ward at Tokyo University Hospital. “I am constantly seeing things that defy scientific explanation,” he tells Shukan Gendai (March 16).
http://www.japantoday.com/mobile/view/life-after-death-yes-says-one-doctor

2. Elisa Medhus, M.D. Jan 20, 2013: "As a physician with a strong science background raised by two atheists, I found it difficult to know where to start my search. I didn't even know whether there was anything to search for." [b]Again quantum science has begun to steal the show from material science (sorry, Sir Isaac), teaching us that we no longer have to rely on our five senses to hypothesize and eventually define a truth. Just because we can't see, feel, hear, taste or smell something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2495960

3. PROFESSOR ALBERT EINSTEIN - reference to the AFTERLIFE "GREAT spirits have always encountered opposition from mediocre minds." The great Einstein wrote favorably about psychic process on TELEPATHY researchin a preface he wrote of Upton Sinclair's book MENTAL RADIO. Einstein to be included in the Hall of Fame.

4. BRILLIANT PHYSICIST CONFIRMS THE EXISTENCE OF THE AFTERLIFE : author, scientist and empiricist DR Jan W. Vandersande Ph.D. has based the afterlife evidence on his own 8 year investigation. His new book, which is highly recommend, Life After Death: see Amazon.com

5. NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR BRIAN JOSEPHSON is Professor of Physics at Cambridge, Cambridge University and as ascientist he is strongly in favour of the (empirical) paranormal…' Read Prof Josephson's most insightful article…

6. physicist Dr Werhner Von Braun and lawyer Dr Victor Zammit come to the same ‘afterlife’ conclusion from totally different empirical perspectives. A most controversial international VIP physicist Dr Werhner von Braun stated that consistent with the law of physics, there has to be an afterlife because energy (‘nature’ ie, energy) cannot be destroyed. When criticizing atheist Prof Richard Dawkins some weeks ago for ignoring the critical evidence of ‘energy’ in the evolution argument - I, Victor Zammit, stated that the human species produces the highest form of energy ‘consciousness’ – and on crossing over this ‘energy consciousness’ survives. So, the 'physics perspective' and the 'legal perspective' on the relevance of 'energy' merge into one - empirically favoring the existence of the afterlife. See video: Why Professor Richard Dawkins is Wrong about the Afterl

7. AFTERLIFE COMMUNICATION: This brilliant Professor and psychic researcher has done psychic research into life after death - apparitions, children who speak of a previous life, Icelandic mediums, deathbed visions and communicating with intelligences from the afterlife.
http://www.victorzammit.com/

Most open skeptic scientists now conclude that for Dawkins to ignore AFTERLIFE aspect in his research means he's too close-minded in his belief.

Materialism has been refuted human has spirit/soul.

ayenny02: Jesus said "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."  Does that make him GOD?

There appear to be a sizable number of Christians who when reading this verse interpret it to state that Jesus is God and that no one shall enter into heaven except if they worship Jesus. 

If we were to back up a little and read from the beginning of this chapter, we would find that just before Jesus spoke these words, he said;

"In my Father's house are many mansions (dwelling places); if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a mansion (a dwelling place) for you."

John 14:2

The above statement is quite clear. It is in exact conformance to the teachings of the Qur'an. In the Qur'an we are told how God sent messengers to all tribes and nations. We are told that the basic message which was given to each of these tribes was the same: "Worship God alone and worship none else."

Some of the secondary details of this worship might differ from one tribe or nation to the next according to God's infinite wisdom and his knowledge of those people. It was made very clear to each prophet that he was not to preach to anyone but his own people. It was further made clear to this messenger's people that if they were to obey him that they would receive the reward of God. God would not hold them accountable for what any other tribe or nation did or did not do. This would continue until God's last messenger, Muhammad (pbuh) would be sent to all mankind as the seal of the prophets.

This is exactly what Jesus is saying here. He said that in God's mansion there are "many" rooms. Jesus was sent to guide to only one of them. The countless other rooms were reserved for other tribes and nations if they would obey their messengers. However, Jesus was telling his followers that they need not worry themselves about the other rooms. Anyone from among his people who wished to enter into the room which was reserved for them could only do so if they followed Jesus and obeyed his command. So Jesus confirmed that he was going to prepare "a" mansion and not "all" the mansions in "my Father's house".

Further, the verse clearly states that Jesus was the "WAY" to a mansion. He did not say that he is the "DESTINATION" which would be the case if he were God. What else would we expect a prophet of God to say except "I am the 'way' to God's mercy"? That is his job. That is what a prophet does.

It is why God chose him in the first place; in order to guide to the mercy of God. This is indeed confirmed in John 10:9 where Jesus tells us that he is "the door" to "the pasture." In other words, he is the "prophet" who guides his people to "heaven" (see also Jn. 12:44). Once again, this is the message of Islam.

Finally, remember

"Not every one that says to me(Jesus); 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of my Father, who is in heaven."

Matthew.7:21

The way you interprete Bible just out of it.

What is the "will of God"?

Excuse! I take it hard with excuse to type this. Nice write up!

bigass: I noticed that when people call home during work hours or anytime they are not at home. This question always comeS up. Is there light? Are they expecting a miracle?

I don't even need to ask because we enjoy light pass GEJ in my area. Before I left for work there'll still be light if I come back I will meet light, if I open my eyes in the night light dey.

Not that Ejigbo-Ikotun road is as bad as they buttress it i.e full of portholes, but it's too narrow compare to the number of vehicles that plies the road per hour. From Pako(Isolo)-Ikotun the road needs to be widen, and goverment effort to widen the road came up about 4yrs ago before Ago-Festac road was approved which was discovered that, it will affect Prophet T.B Joshua's church. That's why government withdrew its attention on the road. People of Ejigbo-Ikotun need to enter serious prayer so that Bro. Fash can help them construct an overhead bridge that will by-pass that church but destroying Synagouge church I don't think it will work.

There's no how the book of Daniel will be dated less than 400BC. Why most skeptics attack this very book is not because it was written by human but for its accurate visions and prophecies being fulfilled in the past and right now.

Daniel 12:7 "And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he held up his right hand and his left hand unto heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever that it shall be for a time, times, and an half; and when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be finished."

In Daniel's vision, Daniel saw a man asking another man clothed in linen a quetsion about when the end shall come, then the man in linen cloth answered as quoted verse above.

Jesus's desciples came to Him privately, saying, tell us, when shall these things be? And what shall be the signs of thy coming, and of the of the world? Matt 24:3

Jesus begins to give the account of events of His coming and what shall before the earth and lastly, He said Matt 24:16 "And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for witness unto all nation; and then shall the end come."

In comparison Jesus's statement with Daniel's vision "And when he shall have accomplished to scatter the power of the Holy people 'over the world', all these things shall be finished" both give the same account of how world will end.

You have been hearing about this gospel of the true kingdom many years ago thinking Jesus is slack in His coming "Remember the power of the holy people must be scatter abroad and then end shall come".

With the fast growth in technology the "gospel of the true kingdom" has been achived more than 60%.
"Blessed is he that waiteth, and cometh to the thousand three and five and thirty days"

Are you a christain helping in spreading the "gospel of the truth" but yet your life is not in accordance with the will of God and your name is not yet in the book of life, "Remember the gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world unto all nations (so that no excuse will be made) then end shall come".

Amend you ways today!

uchkochi: INGREDIENTS OF THANKSGIVING

1. JOY; True thanksgiving must be instigated by joy; if you are not joyful then you will not be grateful. I know that you have not gotten exactly what you wanted for this month that is why you need to thank God. Look behind you, you have been traveling on road even in the air and you were not involved in any crash. Surely God has been good to you. A depressed person is no candidate for God’s blessings. Joy is a choice, please choose to be happy. When you are not happy no matter how bad things might be it will only grow worse. Depression has never generated solution anywhere. So put up a bright face. I speak joy into your life, the joy of the lord. You don’t know what you have missed carrying a straight face. You can laugh your way out of that predicament. Nothing works without joy. Being joyful is the ever winning life. Just like a fish cannot survive outside water God cannot help you without joy, so it is up to you. I see the joy of the Lord pouring afresh on you.

2. PRAISE; the bible says in psalms 67 vs.5. Let the people praise thee let all the people praise thee so shall the earth yield her increase. You only reap your financial harvest through praise. Thanksgiving is generated via praise. Oh! How is wish you will see the importance of thanksgiving. When you praise God you commit God to raise you higher than where you are. You are long overdue for your harvest, its time to engage the sickle of praise. I thank my God because i know that you finally know what to do. Rejoice right where you are, begin to praise God from the depth of your heart. i see God changing your level.

3. OFFERINGS; for your thanksgiving to be complete you need an offering. Look at what psalms 96 vs. 8 says. Give unto the lord the glory due unto His name: bring an offering and come into His courts... When you thank God with an offering you send your seed to go ahead to speak in your favor. Your offering speaks for you when trouble comes. God remembers your offering and your burnt sacrifices. PSALMS 20

This is the last time you will ever be stranded; don’t just read this message, practice it. Thank God for bringing this message your way in a time where the internet has been used for immoral activities like scams and many more anomalies, you could save some one’s life by forwarding this message to your friends. Tell them that this message is coming from Nigeria where people around the world feel is corrupt. Tell them that a whole lot of people are not corrupt .Good news is arising from Nigeria. Jesus is Lord. BB PIN IS 2739F228

Nice write up, I love that point one seriously.

Red Cross anthem:
we are members of the r..e..d cross
we shall never go astray,
with the seven principles of IFRC (International Red Cross),
Direct and guide our ways.

Humanity
Impartiality
Neutrality
Independence
Voluntary service
Unity
Universality

MASSOB pls don't spoil Red cross for us.

If the acronyms is deceiving them, they should look at the full meaning very well "Oodua peoples congress" It's an unregister party under INEC but allow to function.

mazaje: Stop copying and pasting the works of theologians that pose as scientist. . .All the materials you copy from answers in genesis are non scientific but pseudo scientific. . .

Please how many evolutions have you witness? Yet you believe in evolution you haven't observed with your eyes.

But the theologians have brain pass our genius who claim earth's atmosphere was formed in the presence of the Sun.

mazaje: Your god has already lied, read the creation accounts in the bible, it says and you agree that the earth was created before then sun. . .That is a LIE. . .The sun was in existence before the earth was formed, in fact the sun was very instrumental in the formation of all the planets in the solar system, without the sun there wioll be no earth or any of the planets in the solar system. . .We know how other solar systems are formed and the sun always comes first. . .We have images from hubble, kepler and other space observatories. . .

Well you're still looking at the Bible base on human's fallacious statements.

Now I will grant you four things and let's look maybe your clains are still right.
1. No oxygen in early atmosphere
2. Some organisms can survive without oxygen
3. Life was created in the ocean
4. Absence of ozone will not wipe out all lives.
look at this chain very well:
Ozone<---plants(oxygen)<---plants organisms<---**<---cells<---**<---primodal gem(amino acids)<---water<---atmosphere<---oxygen & hydrogen<---*****.
This chart simply means Ozone was formed through the oxygen plants organisms released, and plants organisms formed from many cells; NOTE: a link is missing there "which is how cells organized themselves to form LIFE-NOBODY KNOWS" then cells was formed in primodal gem(amino acids); NOTE: "how amino acids gathered together to form cell(s) it's still a mystery", amino acid formed in water, water form from oxygen & hydrogen, and atmosphere formed from water
The first lie, you claim life has been in existence when the whole earth was covered with ice, whereas atheist scientist prove that when earth was cooling and atmosphere begins to form but the gravity of the was not strong enough to hold the atmosphere it falls down which gives rapid cooling to earth's surface after that LIFE begins.

Second lie, if there was no oxygen in the atmosphere WATER could not form: "water contains Hydrogen & Oxygen" and if water did not form primodal gem won't start and LIFE won't exist.

Third lie, if oxygen wasn't in atmosphere Ozone won't exist (which reflects most harmful rays away from reaching the earth) and earth's surface will remain HOT forever and no life will exist.
Who is right between MOSES and CSOMOLOGIST?

If earth's atmosphere can't form in the presence of the Sun, do you still believe earth was formed through remains sun metoers?

Cheif atheists will never braek everything down like this for you people to see the true light.

About organism survive in extreme cold or hot conditions is highly refuted by our neighbouring planets.

If you like tell yourself the truth or keep decieving yourself. No scientific method can disprove existence of God anybody that said there's no God believe on his own will not because somebody prove it.