₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,329,524 members, 8,441,064 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 July 2026 at 11:44 PM

Toggle theme

Janosky's Posts

Nairaland ForumJanosky's ProfileJanosky's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 (of 441 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: Stop blasphemy God by Janosky: 9:55pm On Sep 06, 2020
Source:neverthirsty.org
Why is verse 11 missing in Matthew 18?
Bible Question:
Why is there no verse 11 in Matthew 18? It goes from verse 10 to verse 12.

Bible Answer:
Matthew 18:11 does not appear in several current Bibles such as the New International Version (NIV), the New Century Version (NCV), the Contemporary English Version (CEV), and the New Living Translation (NLT). The verse you are referring to is as follows:

For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. (NASB) Matthew 18:11

However, the verse does appear in the New American Standard Version, the New King James Version, and the King James Version, for example.

Why Is Verse 11 Missing In Matthew 18
Why Is Matthew 18:11 Missing?
The verse is missing from some of the Bibles because the passage does not actually appear in the best early Greek manuscripts which contain Matthew. It is important to remember that the New Testament was written in Greek. These original documents called “autographs” were copied and passed from one person to another. In the process of making copies, errors would occur sometimes. Sometimes words were misspelled, words were left out, and on rare occasions, some copyists would insert some words. Today there are more than 5,800 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament in our possession. In addition there are other manuscripts of the New Testament making the total 24,633 manuscripts. By using a process called textual criticism scholars have been able to determine very accurately how the original “autographs” should read. A better explanation of textual criticism and the accuracy of our Bible is available from an article at the following link, “How Accurate Is The Bible?” The conclusion of that article says that the Bible is 99.8% accurate and no doctrines are affected. There is no other ancient book in existence with so many copies and with so little error. The Bible is really unique. The Bible is very accurate!

Textual criticism has determined that verse 11 should not exist in Matthew 18 since it does not appear in the oldest and best manuscripts:

B – Vatcanus
א – Sinaitius
L – Regius
Θ – Koridethi
1 – Basle
1582 – Mt. Athos
1346 – Jerusalem
33 – Paris[1]

The inclusion or exclusion of Matthew 18:11 does not affect Christ’s message or any doctrine. Alfred Plummer (A.D. 1841-1926) writes,

The whole of ver. 11, “For the Son of Man came to save that which was lost” is rightly omitted as an interpolation from Lk. xix. 10. It is wanting in א B L and other important authorities, and is rejected by all editors. It was probably inserted to make an introduction to the parable of the Lost Sheep, which follows somewhat abruptly. But the insertion spoils rather than helps the connexion between ver. 10 and ver. 12.[2]

The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, edited by Frank Gaebelein, says that verse 11 was,

Omitted in the earliest witnesses of the Alexandria, pre-Caesarean, Egyptian, and Antiochene text types.[3]

In William Henrickson’s commentary on Matthew he comments,

The words, “For the Son of Man is coming to save that which was lost,” c.f. verse 11 in A.V., are lacking in the best manuscripts and were probably inserted from Luke 19:10.[4]

R. C. H. Lenski, the Lutheran scholar, adds this about verse 11,

The textual evidence against this verse is so strong that we must cancel it from Matthew’s account. It was probably inserted from Luke 19:10.[5]

In the MacArthur New Testament Commentary, John MacArthur writes,

As indicated by brackets in the NASB text, verse 11 (For the Son of Man has come to save that which is lost) is not found in the best early manuscripts of this gospel.[6]

Grant Osborne, in his commentary on Matthew states,

Verse 11 (“For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost”) is added in several manuscripts (D L c TR lat et al.) but missing in others . . . and most likely was added in assimilation to Luke 19:10 and because it aptly fits the imagery of v. 12.[7]

The recognized authority in the field of biblical textual criticism is Bruce M Metzger. He states that Matthew 18:11 is “spurious” and was inserted by a copyists.

There can be little doubt that the words ἦλθεν γὰρ ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου (ζητῆσαι καὶ) σῶσαι τὸ ἀπολωλός are spurious here, being absent from the earliest witnesses representing several textual types (Alexandrian, Egyptian, Antiochian), and manifestly borrowed by copyists from Lk 19.10. The reason for the interpolation was apparently to provide a connection between ver. 10 and verses 12-14.[8]

Some biblical scholars have simply excluded Matthew 18:11 from their books. Their commentaries skip from verse 10 to verse 12. Here is a brief list of a few noted authors:

Davies and Allison. Matthew. The International Critical Commentary [9]

R. T. France. The Gospel of Matthew. The New International Commentary on the New Testament.[10]

John Nolland. The Gospel of Matthew. The New International Greek Testament Commentary.[11]

Did Copyists Insert Matthew 18:11?
It is widely agreed that someone copied Luke 19:10 and inserted it into Matthew 18:11. The copyists probably recognized that Luke 19:10 had recorded the same event and thought it would be helpful to “improve” Matthew 18:11 with the addition. Here is both Mathew 18:11 and Luke 19:10,

For the Son of Man has come to save that which was lost. Matthew 18:11 (NASB)

For the Son of Man has come to seek and to save that which was lost.” Luke 19:10 (NASB)

The only difference between these two verses is the phrase “to seek.” It is important to note that while Matthew 18:11 should not exist in our Bibles, the verse does accurately describe what occurred. It captures the sense of Luke 19:10. This discrepancy does not impact what is true or what we believe. It does not affect any doctrine.

Conclusion:
We can thank our God that He has protected the accuracy of His Word. Thank the Lord for His Word!

References:
1. Reuben Swanson. Matthew. New Testament Greek Manuscripts. William Carey International University Press. 1995. p. 173.
2. Alfred Plummer. Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According To St. Matthew. Roxburghe House Paternoster Row. 1920. p. 252.
3. Frank Gaebelein. Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Regency Reference Library. 1984. vol. 8, footnote 11. p. 401.
4. William Henrickson. Matthew. New Testament Commentary. Baker Book House. 1973. p. 695.
5. R. C. H. Lenski. Matthew. Commentary on the New Testament. Hendrickson Publishers. 1964. p. 693.
6. John MacArthur. Matthew 16-23. The MacArthur New Testament Commentary. Moody press. 1988. p. 119.
7. Grant Osborne. Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Zondervan Publishing. 2010. footnote 4. p. 681.
8. Bruce M Metzger. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. United Bible Societies. 1994. p. 36.
9. Davies and Allison. Matthew. The International Critical Commentary. T&T Clark. 1991. vol. 2., pp. 769-772. Note that their commentary skips verse 11.
10. R. T. France. The Gospel of Matthew. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Eerdmans Publishing. 2007. pp. 686-687.
11. John Nollad. The Gospel of Matthew. The New International Greek Testament Commentary. Eerdmans Publishing. 2005. pp. 741-742.
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 9:39pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
Yes. He is the Servant of Jehovah. Anyone who doesn’t know that is deceiving himself/herself.
No be by mouth, e no dey reach your heart grin.
"Trinity of Dog heads" grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: Stop blasphemy God by Janosky: 8:33pm On Sep 06, 2020
MuttleyLaff:
I am showing you up for what a shameless hypocrite, double standard, and walking contradiction, the Jehovah's Witnesses organisation is

If Matthew 18:11, is an interpolation, and so not to be found in the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible), then why is 1 John 5:17, which too, isn't in the original early Greek text able to make it into the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible), why does Matthew 18:11 get the reject and pariah treatment, as if it is a leper, hmm?

Its no secret that the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) was dishonestly and entirely created for the sole purpose of supporting the very flawed and heretical doctrines of the Jehovah's Witnesses. This is why their translators are faceless and unknown
Matthew 18:11 is also missing in other Bible translations.
Deal with it.

Bros, STOP this is ignorance about 1John5:7. The fake Textus receptus version ("in heaven the Father, the Word and the holy ghost. These three are one" FRAUD in KJV, Geneva, Weymouth Bibles) is not in the holy scriptures.
Bros, go and confirm. No disgrace yourself here.
grin grin grin grin grin

Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 8:30pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
Them together with the JW will be cast out
Acts 3:13 and Exodus 3:14-15, John 17:6,26, go and confirm it in your Biblegrin grin
Jesus Christ is the servant of Jehovah, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

No dey DECEIVE yourself
grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: I'm Beginning To Reason With Jehovah Witness On Their Stand Concerning Trinity by Janosky: 8:27pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
You just wasting your time arguing. Jesus Christ remains who He is - The MIGHTY GOD (Isaiah 9:6).
No be argument. Your screenshots says "in the beginning the (Greek3588) was with the (Greek 3588) God, and the (Greek 3588) was with Greek 3588 -(dash in English, no dash in Greek).
Why this omission?

Bros, Why you dey run from scrutiny grin grin

Hebrew EL gibbowr (means Mighty one/mighty God) is a title for Jesus, man, angels and Yahweh.

Did Isaiah 9:6 say the son is God in heaven before his birth on earth?
Why you dey fear scrutiny and jakpa like Usain Bolt?
EL gibbowr doesn't proof anything grin
Christianity EtcRe: I'm Beginning To Reason With Jehovah Witness On Their Stand Concerning Trinity by Janosky:
Eagban:
This is how Biblehub.com rendered it... And I am very much satisfied with it.
Bros, in your screenshots, tell us what was omitted twice in Greek3588 ? Why was it omitted twice? Was it omitted in the Greek manuscript?

Bros , compare the Greek lexicon of John 14:1 and John 17:3, is the same Greek spelling for
'the God' @John1:1 applied to the Word (Jesus) @ John 17:3 and John 14:1?

grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 7:44pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
Yes and those ones too
These are the ones who teaching you (Church of Pastorpreneurs, Daddy/Mummy G.Os
and cult of personality gods of men operating business franchise for fleecing gullible sheeples & passing the loot ) what 2 Corinthians 11:31 and John 20:17 NEVER taught you
grin cheesy
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 7:36pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
You must really have mind reading abilities. grin
It must be a Jehovah-given gift, right?

You mentioned a competent JW brother schooling me... it is a nice suggestion. How many of the Elders from the Kingdom Hall have recoiled at sound doctrine from the person who bears the moniker, Acehart? Maybe you will end up lambasting them for being false JW elders.

Please sir from the Kingdom Hall, don’t flatter yourself. I know JWs are the present day “Elijah” -"What are you doing here, Elijah?" He replied, "I have been very zealous for the LORD God Almighty. The Israelites have rejected your covenant, I am the only one left

As Elijah’s time faded away, so your time will fade away because the Lord will return to meet a Church without spots and wrinkles - yours can’t boast of that.
Church of Pastorpreneurs, Daddy/Mummy G.Os
and cult of personality gods of men operating business franchise for fleecing gullible sheeples & passing the loot grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 7:33pm On Sep 06, 2020
bloodofthelamb:
Your own case is something else
Jesus christ belongs to God, Bros na JWs write am put for your own Bible?

1 Corinthians 3:23, Acts3:13,2 Corinthians 11:31.
"The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ knows I am not lying"
grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky:
Eagban:
The Works you and your fellow witnesses have is to try to disprove the deity of Jesus. I can assure you it is practically impossible, ask the Jewish leaders.
John 20:17 in your own Bible, either Jesus Christ is right or you have DECEIVED yourself grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 7:29pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
I have told you and Maximus69 that since the Bible can't help you, I can't help you either..
We've gone through this several times.
Bros ,in your own Bible Acts15:14 ,2 Chro7:14, Acts3:13, Isaiah 43:10-12, 1 Corinthians 3:23...
Bros, the Jesus of the Bible belongs to our God, Jehovah.John 20:17.
Since Acts15:14 ,2 Chro7:14, Acts3:13, Isaiah 43:10-12, 1 Corinthians 3:23 and John 20:17 can't help you RECEIVE SENSE, nothing else will.
The Reverse of your claim is true grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 6:19pm On Sep 06, 2020
bloodofthelamb:
You are not claiming follower of Christ but of Jehovah. Stop deceiving yourself!
1 Corinthians 3:23
Bros, RECEIVE SENSE grin
Christianity EtcRe: Stop blasphemy God by Janosky: 6:15pm On Sep 06, 2020
MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s5/images/sourcecfa79666e8110220.gif[/img]
Look at this jagidijagidi bonafide kofam ogboju ole WAYO man pass WAYO, talk out of both sides of the mouth

If for the sake of pretending that you have a valid point of not being able to verbatim quote here, for all the world to see, what Matthew 18:11 says, pasting it here, obtained from the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) but giving a bullpiss excuse of a reason that the verse allegedly, is not found in early, when Pulpit Commentary, states the following: "For expository use, at any rate, we may consider the verse as genuine, and take it as" Now, if 1 John 5:17, too that isn't in the original early Greek text can make it into the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible), why does Matthew 18:11 get treated like as if a leper, hmm?

The whole Jehovah's Witnesses doctrine et cetera, is built upon a shaky, shallow foundation of fraud, WAYO, invention and make-believe.

You of course, know that Matthew 18:11, is just one of many verses JW have flippantly flung away and/or literally teared out of the Bible
grin grin grin grin.
Muttleylaff Framing up FALSE claims everywhere

The fact have been convincingly confirmed.
Matthew 18:11 is an interpolation of Luke 19:10.

Muttley Wailer grin grin cheesy cheesy

Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 5:58pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
I do not believe in any group, I only believe in Jesus...
Acts15:14 ,2 Chro7:14, Acts3:13, Isaiah 43:10-12, 1 Corinthians 3:23...
Bros, the real Jesus belongs to our God, Jehovah.
John 20:17, His Father and our God.
Bros, come and worship the one true God Jehovah whom Jesus Christ is worshipping
grin grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 5:45pm On Sep 06, 2020
MuttleyLaff:



Acehart, I just like you travel often to NWT, the Quran, Ethnic/aboriginal spirituality literatures, Book of Enoch (i.e. BoE) other apocryphal and pseudepigrapha books et cetera, but at the end of the journey, the bible is my home. I always touch base with my Bible home sweet home.

Why dont you use your charmful nature to get one or all of the Jehovah Witnesses family (i.e. Maximus69, Janosky, DappaD, haddeylium, TATIME et cetera, to pull out their fingers from under sitting on their hands, to verbatim quote here, for all the world to see, what Matthew 18:11 says in and from the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) and give whats the reason for it, if they are unable to successfully carry out this dead easy, simple, direct, innocent, harmless, straightforward request
WAYO man, Matthew 18:11 is an interpolation of Luke 19:10.
Muttleylaff Framing up FALSE claims upandan.

Hypocrite, you close your eyes to extended version of Matthew 6:13 , come NL to DECEIVE yourself

grin grin grin

Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 5:41pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
The preface of the NWT is as misleading as the NWT translation...
Because it DISPROVE the Textus receptus FRAUD of 1John5:7 , Phillipians2:6 and 1Timothy3:16 you cherish so much


Do you have John20:17, John 17:3, John 11:27 and Rev3:5,12,21 in that Bible you hide under your bed?
grin grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: What Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity? by Janosky: 5:29pm On Sep 06, 2020
solite3:
Being is the essence of person
Person is the consciousness of self.

If two persons has one essence, they are one being but two consciousness (persons).

If two being has one person, that is one person in two essence
.
Solite3 LIENUS needs urgent emergency brain rehab
This is the very reason you dodged the question.
John 4:24 "God is a spirit".
How many person is that spirit in John4:24?

John 20:17, Jesus Christ says your SENSE was sold to Trinity Delusion

grin grin grin

grin grin grin grin

Christianity EtcRe: If Satan Reconciles With God, What Happens To Sinners Who Are Dead? by Janosky: 5:22pm On Sep 06, 2020
MJBOLT:
i dont have time to read rubbish,tell us how people on earth will know if satan apologise to god.
You have no business being on this thread grin
Christianity EtcRe: Stop blasphemy God by Janosky: 5:19pm On Sep 06, 2020
MuttleyLaff:
Mister man, will you please stay in your hypocritical, sanctimonious, self lane. Afterall you did say, you are done with me, Mister Forgetful-Promise-Breaker angry angry angry

GRIMMJOE, ask him, Maximus69, to paste out here what Matthew 18:11 says in or from the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) and whats the reason for it, if he is unable to do so grin grin grin

"Wọn pi irẹsi, oun na yọ sibi" loosely translates as "rice is served, he too is pulling out his cutlery"
WAYO man, when you don't research very well like a good student of the Bible, you come to NL to showcase your NONSENSICAL ignorance grin grin.

Bros, go and learn grin grin grin

Luke 19:10 was interpolated in Matthew 18:11 in the KJV, that verse is not meant to be in Matt 18.
That's the case in many other instances , except it's proven that a forgery was done,as in all 1st John 5:7 Textus receptus Bibles
The screenshot evidence.....

Christianity EtcRe: If Satan Reconciles With God, What Happens To Sinners Who Are Dead? by Janosky: 5:01pm On Sep 06, 2020
MJBOLT:
if satan apologise to god,how will people on earth even know? undecided
Genesis3:15, if you can comprehend it's entire ramifications
Christianity EtcRe: I'm Beginning To Reason With Jehovah Witness On Their Stand Concerning Trinity by Janosky: 4:47pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
I can give you 30 different Bible translations of John 1:1 but you can't give me 15 different translations that supports your New world translation. The one you'll most likely quote will be the one of Johannes Greber( a known Spirit medium).
LIAR grin

Bros, if majority is Jehovah's yardstick, Noah and his offsprings won't survive the Great Deluge grin

If majority is Jehovah's yardstick, Lot and his daughters won't survive the destruction of Sodom & Gomorrah grin.
Is Matthew 7:13-14, in your Bible?


The bone of contention here is how the last words (Greek1510 and Greek 2316) in John1:1 should be translated.

In the entire Bible there is only one legitimate way of translating Greek 1510, Greek 2316).

There are 3 genuine evidences for sticking to the legitimate way for translating Greek John 1:1c.
*1) Greek 1510, 2316 is the same Greek grammatical construct in both places it is found in the holy Bible- Acts 28:6 and John 1:1c.
Greek 1510 Greek 2316= was a god.
" A god" meaning "godlike, like God, "divine/divine nature/quality
A god is divine, of God, like God but not Yahweh EL Shaddai. (Check "Divine" , your Dictionary go help you small grin.
Exodus 7:1 Yahweh made Moses divine.
See the Dictionary screenshot)

Note:
Angel Michael meaning " the Messenger,son of God Who is like God?" grin

*2 Greek John 1:1b= The word (Jesus) was facing towards the God (Yahweh).

Trinity mongers, Is Almighty Yahweh facing towards himself?
If you are honest, only different spirit beings will face towards each other.
grin grin grin grin


*3) The harmonious validation of the New Testament by the Old Testament provided very strong evidences for disclaimer of the dubious but popular version of John 1:1c.
Deut 6:4, Yahweh is one God.
John 17:3. One True God is the Father of Jesus, according to Jesus.
John20:17, Rev3:5,12,21 One True God is our Father/God and the God/Father of Jesus Christ in heaven since time immemorial.
According to Jesus.


Ephesians 4:6, One God the Father who is over all.

1 Corinthians 3:23 Jesus Christ belongs to God his Father.
Every child belongs to his Father grin grin.

Genesis1:26 = Job38:4-7/Hebrew 1:2.
Genesis1:26, Yahweh was talking to his sons in the spirit realm, angels. Jesus is one of them.
grin grin grin grin


Trinity is a man made Scam
grin

Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 3:36pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
Welcome from the field. You haven’t answered my question. If you wouldn’t answer, no wahala. Rest.
I have addressed your question. You have posts in other threads, don't you?
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 3:32pm On Sep 06, 2020
sonmvayina:
Fact..
Bros, your claim is FALSE.
However, freedom of speech is your fundamental rights, exercise it. grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 3:30pm On Sep 06, 2020
Acehart:
My friend, I read the NWT sometimes; so don’t think I think it is fake. Have we met?

You mentioned tithes - have you collected one from me? If I say you are a bitter person, you will be doing one kind. Your fight shouldn’t be with me, my friend.

We aren’t discussing about Bible versions, so let our conviction speak; what is the meaning of “God”? Please tell me in your own words, your own conviction.
grin grin

Bros, no be fight, I have no bitterness in my bones grin grin grin

Your claim is FALSE. grin
Those scriptures I cited on this thread shaped my convictions about God.

Bros, you don't need any paper qualifications to understand John 20:17, John 17:3, John 14:28, John 11:27,Ephesians 4:6 or Revelations 3:5,12.
These verses are in all Bibles, including yours grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 3:20pm On Sep 06, 2020
Eagban:
The NWT is a perversion of the Bible translated by a committee that have little or no knowledge of Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek.
FALSE claim.
Bros, go and study the Preface of the New Word Translation and stop deceiving yourself.

So you have to sink this low to resort to Desperado tactics ?
grin grin


God dey use accumulation of Paper qualifications to choose who enters the kingdom of God?
grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: What Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity? by Janosky: 3:07pm On Sep 06, 2020
solite3:
Yes the trinity can be difficult for the human mind to grasped but yet nonetheless true.
@,bolded, yes many face these questions but only an honest study of the bible would give an accurate answer.
Atleast from the bible, God is described as one being and also in more than persons.

The confusion most do face, is not realizing the difference between 'being's and 'person',
While being refers to the essence, person refers to an individualized consciousness or awareness.

That God is a trinue person is totally compactable with Deuteronomy 6v4.

Do you know that the oneness of Deuteronomy 6v4 is that of plurality rather than that of singularity?

There two words use for unity in hebrew, one is yachad which means a unity of singular person and Echad which means a unity of more than one person. Surprisingly, the word that was used for God's oneness in Deuteronomy 6v4 was Echad, giving credence like many other verses to the plurality of persons within the Godhead.
WAYO man, after your dictionary rejected your twisting of "being" & person" , you pick race go twist Hebrew language to console yourself grin grin

I challenge you to name any Servant of Jehovah God who taught the Trinity FRAUD to the Jews grin

American Standard Version, Darby Translation
Deuteronomy 6:4
Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah

Ephesians 4:6
" One God and Father of All who is over all"

@ John 14:28, did Jesus Christ confirm that Ephesians 4:6 , Rev3:5 & John 20:17 is the truth?
Capital YES!!!!!!
grin grin grin grin


2 Corinthians 11:31, Jehovah " the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ knows that Deuteronomy 6:4 is NOT LYING.

Trinity scam belongs to the Sewage Tank
grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: What Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity? by Janosky:
Acehart:
The Trinity of God - Hmmm. Only through the scriptures can one know by divine revelation alone that God is a Unity of Three personalities. THE doctrine of the Trinity is perhaps the most mysterious and difficult doctrine that is presented to us in the entire range of Scripture. Conse- quently, we do not presume to give a full explanation of it. In the nature of the case, we can know only as much concerning the inner nature of the Godhead as has been revealed to us in the Scriptures. Natural reason can not grasped it and any explanation using natural reasoning would be subjective and filled with flaws.

When Ezekiel saw a vision of the Cherubs and the wheel that turns them, there was something unique about their movement: there was great synchronization, so much that each one knew the mind of the other and the movement of one was the movement of all. This is how super-organisms move. For instance, an ant colony: the knowledge of one ant is the knowledge of all: one ant’s movement determines the movement of the colony. When ant colonies are studied, it has been universally accepted that millions of ants move as if they were ONE ant especially during the transmission of information and reaction to danger. The faces of the Cherubs in Ezekiel’s vision were a reflection of the One who sat on the Throne of Heaven.

In the NT, we see clearly that in the act of redemption from sin, three personalities were involved. The synchronization of their contribution fits perfectly like the “wheel in the middle of the wheel” in Ezekiel’s vision.

Where many people stumble in this very difficult subject is in the meaning of the word “God”. Is God a person? Is God a title? Is “God” an attribution? Another place people stumble is in the meaning of the description “Son of God”. This subject is the greatest mystery of all and since the scriptures reveals that no one can know about God except by revelation; however, what ever one’s revelation is, it must not come in conflict with Deuteronomy 6:4.
John 4:24, 1 Corinthians15:40,44.
God Almighty is a spirit being, a spirit person.

*1 Corinthians15:40,44. Spirit beings exists in heaven. Human beings exists on earth.

Psalms 82:1,6. Psalms 8:5. The word 'EL' ("God"wink is a title for man, Yahweh, angels and Jesus. (Compare 1 Corinthians 8:5-6).

G5207 (Son of God) is not in any way confusing. There is nothing mysterious about it if you stick strictly to the Bible's proof.
G5207 refers to a person born/created by the Father/parents as the case maybe.

Ephesians 4:6.Ephesians 3:14-15 &Rom11:35-36, Proverbs8:22-30, Matt3:17, Luke 9:35, John 20:17, PROVE that Adam is the son of God for the same reason that Jesus Christ is the son of God.

When you reject Bible's Truth @ Ephesians 4:6. Ephesians 3:14-15 ,Rom11:35-36, Matthew 3:17, Proverbs8:22-30 & Luke 9:35, John 20:17, you begin to forge man made mystery contrary to the holy Bible's proof.


American Standard Version, Darby Translation
Deuteronomy 6:4
Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah

Ephesians 4:6
" One God and Father of All who is over all"

@ John 14:28, did Jesus Christ confirm that Ephesians 4:6 , Rev3:5 & John 20:17 is the truth?
Capital YES!!!!!!
grin grin grin grin


2 Corinthians 11:31, Jehovah " the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ knows that Deuteronomy 6:4 is NOT LYING.



Trinity scam belongs to the Sewage Tank
grin grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 2:31pm On Sep 05, 2020
Acehart:
Please, tell me in your own words, the way you would tell if you knocked on my door to preach about Paradise.
You already believe the FALSE claim that my Bible is fake.
We would use your copy of the holy Bible and study
John20:17, John 17:3, John 11:27 and Rev3:5,12,21 free of charge no tithe no sowing of seed with your hard earned income
grin grin.
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 2:22pm On Sep 05, 2020
Acehart:
Please tell me according to your own words, from your understanding.
John20:17, John 17:3, John 11:27 and Rev3:5,12,21.
The holy scriptures gives me what you desire to know
Christianity EtcRe: The Most Mysterious Doctrine - The Trinity of The Godhead by Janosky: 2:19pm On Sep 05, 2020
Acehart:
What is the meaning of “God”?
It is there in John20:17, John 17:3, John 11:27 and Rev3:5,12,21.

grin grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: The Story Of The Rich Man And Lazarus Is Not A Parable by Janosky: 2:10pm On Sep 05, 2020
CodeTemplar:
So why was there a distance between Lazarus and the rich man after death if was the common grave dead men go to?
Bros, use your brain.....
Why would someone in hellfire (rich man) see somebody in heaven (Lazarus) ?
Una Christendom no talk say heaven dey above and hellfire pit dey below?

Do you know that in Luke 16:19-31, the Greek word there is Hades?

Hades is NOT a place of torture, Bros go and learn grin

Luke 16:19-31 is a parable, fulstop !
Christianity EtcRe: Why Don't Apostate Just Move On With Their Lives by Janosky: 2:00pm On Sep 05, 2020
Emusan:
That's why I always say you lack simple comprehension!

Holy Spirit came as the greatest teacher and the disciples' knowledge were brighten and they never reached any wrong thing because the Holy Spirit is a working in them.


.
Mr LIENUS, "Jesus disciples never reached any wrong thing", why were they disputing about the issue of Circumcision?
Absence or presence of holy spirit can not remove imperfections of Jesus followers.

Now we definitely know you're here forming James Bond while you receive "Expo" from JWs
grin grin grin


.
Emusan:
The question you'll never answer still remain, did they die without knowing circumcision is wrong or right?

Mr accolade lying liar
Does Mr LIENUS have proof that none of the disciples died while the dispute about Circumcision was going on ?

Mr LIENUS done give everyone of them immortal life on earth wey Jesus never give them at that time
grin grin grin grin grin

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 (of 441 pages)