₦airaland Forum

Jirehrealestate:
Fury is a beast.
Wilder is wild but the hunger to 'kill instantly' made him lose focus.

Fury went down twice. Kept leaning on Wilder and equally dodging those hard hooks.

His trick worked. Wilder gassed out and Fury went for the kill.

Fury used both hands. Wilder kept looking for the Left.

My verdict, nobody knows Fury's 'code' yet. He's a con-man.

Your analysis of thus fight is correct however, we know furry's code. He fights with open mind.........and his opponent need stamina has much as punches.

Good strategy by AJ though


Eni o gbon, l'awe ngbo

That is the path human race is heading......no right or wrong as far as you're not ashamed.





By the time that gender's advancement exceeded their designed capabilities......human will become beast.

constance500:
Connected but no internet

When a lady tells you she likes you but can't return your love

So you can't browse

The op is on Glo network

Kobojunkie:
I don't understand how a person can boldfacedly cite Tonto dike as evidence for the perceived idea that there aren't traditional laws in Nigeria which give custody to the husband at the time of the child's birth.

Someone already pointed out the existence of same laws in an earlier comment. https://www.nairaland.com/post/106322607

Anyways, it is OK by me that you refuse to believe there are such laws.

You re very funny. I read the link and no sections of the supposed law was quoted by the person to back his claim of the existence of the law....and to point that I know better he mentioned customary law and buttress it with Igbo culture......please check the dictionary meaning of customary law, then come back to what I typed earlier.......no section of the Nigeria constitution mandated any man to assume responsibility of a child that he have a proof that such is not his biological child (bastard).......except only and only if the man consented or agreed to take responsibility of such a child (bastard)...which won't generate any controversies in the first place

Meanwhile, the guy in the thread already make exception for that, that a husband (man) and his wife (woman) can have an arrangement for surrogate(s).

That is prevalent in Igbo culture due to their preference for a male Child.


Knowledge and understanding are two different things madam.

Kobojunkie:
I already told that such Tradional laws exist for both Igbos and Yorubas.

It exist only in your head....if you can't cite reference(s) like I did with Tonto dike.....her bride price which she claimed was paid by herself had been refunded hence her son can adopt her maiden's name. Therefore by there tradition, he is a heir the Tonto dike family inheritance.

The same culture entrust an entire family fortune solely to the first male child.

Kobojunkie:
I don't know about Tonto Dikeh, nor am I interested in judging her situation.
Anyways, you can always contact your traditional leaders to ask them of traditional laws that are applicable to you.

I already told you we don't have such traditional laws.........we don't groom unreliable woman in my society.......being a bastard is shameful, our women are not allowed to play such trick on their husband and there is no special law that protect an investment on a bastard.

Adultery/infidelity/divorce/unwanted pregnancy/promiscuity It is a shameful act that no one is proud of.....especially the family of the bride.....

I'm from a progressive society, we don't condone irresponsible behavior from both men and women.

Kobojunkie:
At least the major tribes have such laws.

I know people from the east......I understand Tonto Dike situation very well...and we're all witnessing her irresponsibility.

Kobojunkie:
U asked what tribe so I can specifically search and show you the related traditional law.

Just tell the tribe with such ridiculous traditional laws, I can tell my generation unborn to stay clear

Kobojunkie:
What tribe is that?

I don't understand what you're thinking but....


In implication is that; the traditional laws you're making reference to confirm the narrative we are trying to correct about women......such law if it does exist implies that
1) women cannot be trusted
2) women cannot be hold accountable
3) women are not responsible
4) women might or does not honor marriage vows
Therefore men should be protected against men and the women should not be taken serious, hence women won't fight against such biased traditional law as it seem to make women appears stupid.

Shokoloko:
What is wrong with a man bathing his daughter that is less than 6 years old.

The problem is that ladies for want of marriage go and marry pedophiles (yes, they see the signs) and start shouting men are bad, men are scum ( which is a downright lie)

Then these men molest their own children and the women now say "protect children from their fathers"
My dad was the one who cleaned my bum as a toddler. I was told I would wait for him to start eating his dinner then I would bring my potty close to him and start baby-gisting with him and doing my poop business.

I have never come across scenario as yours when your gender were dragging every men on the subject matter.

Kobojunkie:
Save money and worry.

Also, Some Nigerian traditional laws also have provisions to protect against an outsider comibg in to drag a child with you, the one who raised your child.

In other words....some traditional laws encourages adultery wife then protect men's investment on the bastard hence you can train bastards and still have the locus standing to fight the biological father........

That is an abomination in my tribe.

Romanoff:
You need to see a therapist, you're obviously still dealing with trauma from your abuse.

There's nothing wrong with a mother kissing her baby in the mouth, you're just projecting your trauma on your wife and child.

Please, deal with it before it ruins you.

If women are agitating against men bathing their daughters....I think the op's wife should stop kissing her son in the mouth.

DNA after or before someone start dragging a child with you. What is the difference ?


Stupid actors acting stupid stories.

JESHAL:
Go Thread

Why Are Men Not Helping Each Other To Become Better Men?https://www.nairaland.com/6776260/why-men-not-helping-each#106254645

I went through the thread and I think the title should be why do men give female financial help...or why did her own father gave more attention to her than her brothers. If she has any.

Because men helps men far more than they give woman money.

Women are very myopic on many subject matters.

SkyFlint:
This is very valid.

I don't subscribe much to conspiracy theories, but it is very evident that someone, or a group is someones, is using movies/shows to brainwash the public.

It became obvious with the homosexuality trope. It was weird the first time we saw it on TV. But now, it is expected.

The desensitisation of homesexuality through the use of movies and TV shows has been quite successful. Few people, if any at all, think it's weird anymore.

That said, writers of movies and shows seem to have a list of mandatory characters. The list includes:

1. A gay person (preferably male).
2. A black man.
3. A patriarchy-oppressed white woman (usually the lead).
4. A caricature of a masculine man.
5. A lovable doofus of a man.
6. A very powerful man whose balls are in the palm of a woman (wife/GF).
7. A strong, independent woman .
8. A transgender (EXCLUSIVELY a man turning into a woman. Women are already perfect just the way they are).

For these writers, finding a way to slot in a "black gay man" character is like hitting the jackpot. It makes them giddy with joy. A black transgender man? That's bliss!

That aside, there's a fairly new narrative that movies/shows are pushing now. Writers, or perhaps their sponsors, are catching on quickly. And it's gaining ground rapidly.

The narrative is this:

Men willfully relinquishing their rightful positions of leadership or authority to pursue love or a life of mediocrity and frivolities.

Of course, the narrative is fostered by conveniently making the men in the movie/show grossly incompetent and the women overwhelmingly competent.

Somehow, the women are natural-born leaders with huge ambitions and transformational ideas. Whereas for the men, leaders are just "not who they are."

First time I noticed the new narrative was in Coming 2 America. A poor bastard forfeited his throne to a natural female leader to pursue love with an ambitious lady. And that's okay?

The next time I noticed it was in Cinderella (2021) where the Crown Prince, who's conveniently made out to be incompetent and irresponsible, also forfeits his throne to his ambitious sister to pursue love with an equally ambitious girl whose ambitions require her to travel.

Avengers: Endgame was the next movie I saw with the narrative. Thor forfeiting the Asgardian Throne to a Valkyrie. In Norse mythology, the Valkyries are just servants of Odin. But it's okay to give up the throne to one of them and then go jostle for the leadership of a small space shuttle.

The objective of the narrative is simple:

It's okay to be unambitious as a man. Leave the leadership roles to women, they are more capable than you anyway.

If the propagation of the narrative continues, it'll become imprinted in the minds of men. Men will become more laid-back and unambitious than ever. Women will have the reins of society more firmly in their grasps.

Then HELL will reign on earth.

I have noticed this not only in movies but talk shows, radio programs, seminars, official meetings and official roles at work.....but my major concern are the men employed/engaged to do such.

Most times, women are given roles not because of their obvious competency but just to bring them on board but at the end, the men ended up doing the job for th(ese) women.......and the same men still encourages and justifies the reasons men should help women out perform men right in front of the men.........

I have tried and try so many time in various approaches, the purpose men want to achieve by short Changing fellow men with such mental damage narratives.

Eriokanmi:
I'm a lover of boxing from the days of Calcius Clay ( Mohammed Alli) . Match fixing in boxing is as old as man and dates back to1920s. The rematch will confirm my claim.

I'm boxing fan.....I will watch amateur fight over champions league final match.

We shall see

Eriokanmi:
To be candid, it looked more of a fixed match to me, just to make money by promoters. The Uktanian Usyk's arrangement with AJ came up all of a sudden. We were all expecting an AJ/Fury match. Anyway, let's see what happens in the rematch

I don't believe anyone can fix a mandatory fight.......in fact, AJ can't pre-arranged a match and be beating to such extent.....he gassed out and couldn't stand on his feet.....while his opponent appeared to be ready for another 5 rounds.

Usyk is undefeated in his previous category, he has what it takes to be champ

I've analyzed usyk precious bouts and understand his tactic and approaches, I believed AJ coaching team did the same before preparing AJ for the fight.

And sadly, we couldn't see any tactic on the part of AJ but Usyk defeated him with his same old tactics.

Eriokanmi:
Same biased comments as ever. What a joke. Since the 80s...peoples opinions on boxing each time a winner lost had always been the same. Only one per cent of comments read here were accurate and apt in terms of who understand the game of boxing and those who do not. I remember the first time mike type was defeated even before his match with Evander Hollyfield, a large number of commentators inside news papers and cable TVs were lashing out at Tyson, forgetting his glorious past and that shows how hostile some who did not like his style or never his fan were.

If boxing was easy, why are the majority of you not going into it? Mike tyson, instead of being praised for his heroic past, he was rather booed. What a joke! AJ cannot be a winner forever and that's the fact the majority of AMATEURS in this thread should understand and take away. Tyson had been defeated in the past and bounced back. I could recall people comparing him with calcious clay ( AKA Muhamed Ali) back then when he received his first defeat, saying Ali would have beaten the guy. The Tyson fury the majority of you are backing with bias, we shall see what happens with his Wilder rematch. I hope you guys wouldn't change your tunes, should AJ also defeat him. Boxing isn't a beer parlour permutations. It's purely a professional and unpredictable game. I expect a rematch soon with this Uktanian guy. Someone here also said after the match that all belts are gone, to describe how much he hates AJ...all belts aren't gone yet. The Ukrainian would only
take a way one. He did well no doubt and that's how boxing is all about . Someone even said out of hate that he knew AJ was a fraud....so all those he beat in the past willingly allowed them to be beaten because they too didn't want to reach to top? I don't get it.

Not just criticizing him or the bout for nothing or out of hatred......no champ forever but the fight should worth the defeat...

Take the case of lenox lewis and rahman.......it was first round win for the rahman but I personally believed lewis was better due to the circumstances under which the match ended.....and the expression on Lewis' face that day kept fan looking forward for a rematch

And the rematch was a bomb as expected

The rematch of AJ and Ruiz is nothing spectacular and the rematch of this won't be any different.....it wont be interesting.

Even if you take the fury and Deontey first fight, there are many thing to analyze from both ends......not to talk about their rematch which of course reveal the technical sagacity of Tyson fury and his team and Deontey stamina was commendable.

I'm disappointed not Because usyk won but he was not resisted as expected from a world champ.

Gentew:
Aj is fighting for the money. Its a fixed match. He's gonna win the rematch...

At least he should make it an interesting fixture.

He should learn from mayweather

PediakAuthor:
Men... life is full of ups and downs...

There is no ups or downs in this fight.....AJ is very sluggish, refuse to Capitalize on his advantages over the usyk guy.


Too many chances for AJ to seal knockout but instead choose defensive approach

AJ came to play.....never seen a soft defending champ like him.

He threw away all clear cuts and jabs

Champ on defensive in a bout instead of an aggressive attack approach

Very disappointing match

Samuel peter would do better.

Not impressive performance from a defending champ

Women and overbearing opinions, manipulative and oppressive request.

The illogic in the logic of the complaint about women related topics........wondering what topics are expected in a ROMANCE>SEXUALITY section of a forum.


Romance is centered on love affairs, sexual relationship, intimacy etc, hence men write about women and vice versa.

Therefore, complaining about the type of thread here shows low IQ in the part of the complainant

COREN registering engineers with no practical knowledge.....worse case....an electrical engineer supervising a civil engineer project for COREN registration......den full my organization.




Sorry, COREN certificate is not equal to competency....and does not guarantee value to any team.

BLOODYSPERM:
Exactly,
Sadly most ignorant betas can fight you for thinking these way, they will go so far as labelling you a potential wife beater for Dearing to think these way

Our culture even though it's Patriachal compared to western societies, but with the influence of colonialism and acceptance of western values and Christian monogamy, most are conditioned to put women on a pedestal thinking that's the secret of a happy home, our ancestors were not that gullible

My projection is feminist will destroy female chances at anything in the long run; seeking for easy pass and access to what they don't understand how is come about is dangerous.

From observation, woman can't lead anything without destroying it at the end, they are easily distracted by progress and possesses tyrant and dictatorship tendencies when in charge of anything.

BLOODYSPERM:
Redpill Nugget 13

Your happiness as a man stems from how priceless and valuable you are to the society, and not because you have wife/wives and kids. To become a high tier man and valuable, you must pursue your purpose and desires relentless to the very end. Win you must!

Happiness flows from the man to his wife and children. And When a man is happy, everyone around him will be happy.

Don't be a simp.

A woman cannot make you happy. And if you seek joy and happiness In a woman, you will end up pained, worried and disappointed.

Authority: Be happy with yourself first. Appreciate yourself for every little achievement. Be focus.

This should be cast in stone......Happy man is happy and peaceful home......not the other way around......

Victerica:
Anything a human being can offer.

Go to the western world and see what women are offering.

They are still humans, bro.

They are offering divorces, me too movement and superiority complex to take possession of proceed from men's hard work and labour....nothing more.

buJu234:
I don't believe women are easily deceived nor do they have fish brain..

What we have re women that are:

(1) financially deprived.. u can trick them with fake monetary promises

(2) Loneliness.. u can trick these sets with Love scam..

But wen a woman has these 2 above @100%..
then u will knw that women are smarter than men..

Lol....women without illogical excuses for stupidity does not exist

Isupaefugbemi00:
Go and deceive Okonjo Iweala then I will believe you.

What make her different ? Because you dey read fan fair news ?

And if he sell fake iPhone 11 pro max for her now with this deal

She will say men are scum

Burruchaga71:
Katsina get airport?

Before nko


Spending Nigeria fund on airports the same minister proposed for concession.