₦airaland Forum

openmine:
I agree that Liverpool is thief and problematic VAR awarded them marginal offside against Wolverhampton therefore Liverpool do not deserve to win the game

openmine:
[s][/s]

[s]
...and you have proven so far that you are hardly current or still using cathode ray tube as a TV set!
Stupidity and ignorance is not an excuse when you can simply access the internet to find out what the rule says!
When your teacher was doing comprehension as a subject in school,you were busy thinking of how to play with sand

Read what FIFA say and get enlightened instead of una beer palour gist!

A player is in an offside position if: ANY PART of the head, BODY or feet is in the opponents' half (excluding the halfway line) and. any part of the head, body or feet is nearer to the opponents' goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent.

Shey your hand is not part of your body abi

Let me make it simpler for your cerebral system to understand better....
The rules states clearly that if ANY PART OF YOUR BODY including YOUR ARMPIT or ARMS or FINGER or HANDS are ahead of the LAST OPPOSING player before the ball is given to you,VAR will rule against it as OFFSIDE!
whether minimal or maximum is not the case here!
Then the linear patterns are outlined,it indicates clearly whether a player was adjudged to be off or on-side...which has been happening for a long time!
Dermot Gallagher who happens to be the head of the referee association stated clearly that the decision was CORRECT which also received a unanimous backing by the pundits who happened to be former players of rival club-sides to liverpool!

The question is was the hands of the wolves player ahead of the liverpool defender before he received the ball?
The answer is YES...hence the goal does not stand! SIMPLE!

Wolves are not the only 'victims'(thats if they were actually one)....other top flight clubs have also been victims of what transpired including liverpool and mancity!

When VAR was favouring Nuno's wolves against other less teams,you and espirito went blank and said NOTHING!

So why are you now heaping it on liverpool as if liverpool are the only club playing in the premier league?

Did VAR not favor Mancity against wolves when they were given a dubious penalty and against sheffield united when the referee impeded on the progress of the game where mancity utilized the advantage to score the first goal?

Did VAR not favor Tottenham against Norwich when VAR ruled out a 'minimal' offside against Pukki?

Is it because liverpool are top of the table hence any judgement in favour of them is deemed a 'scam' according to you but when its against them,you make a mockery of them by tagging them 'losserpool'?

I am very sure you went blind when you watched the referee refusing to give a jorginho a second yellow card after he clearly dragged a ghendzozi to the ground!

But if it was liverpool,you would be calling it a scam or a gang up to favour LFC!
If Liverpool were victims of all that you said,i highly doubt that you will sympathize with them!

Guy go relax....whats simply hurting or making you extremely bitter is that your team is not performing well and you are looking for who to heap the blame on!
Like i asked someone,have you taken your drugs this morning because its apparent from your write-up that you are very high on something strong! [/s]

openmine:
Thats a Nonsense and hasty conclusion!
The goal scored by Liverpool was initially thought as a hand ball from lalanna to mane but further playbacks and reviews from VAR showed that lallana controlled the ball with the shoulder to the eventual goal scorer!
There is zero debate about that!

The one from wolves was clearly offside!
The wolves player's hands clearly made him offside....Liverpool had similar outcomes in the Watford and Aston villa games where mane and firimio were respectively adjudged to be offside simply because of their armpit!

Lastly, every club has had VAR in favour or against them!
Man city's first goal should have been ruled out because the referee was a hindrance to the flow of play for Sheffield united!
Pukki had a goal ruled out against Tottenham because his shoulder slightly put him offside!
Kane had a goal ruled out for offside because he was slightly offside!

VAR did not save Liverpool!
Its as simple as that!

post=85339319]@ the bolded, like seriously?!


Na wa for u o[/quote]this is what the op has said
[quote author=tenderlaw:
Pastor Bakare said the banks had always come to his home for transactions.

post=85337940:
Go ahead and tell us Mr Paxo,
We are listening?

yousooph:
Retype that without crying

Devilfriend:
See mumunatu write-up here...

Amiteye:
who is this clown? you have nothing to do with football

Devilfriend:
Haaaaaa!

Wailer go wail tire....

JentuPrinz:
Will u keep kwayet

dochenaj:
Someone thought you were being sarcastic.

Please tell him you are serious.

oluwaseyi000:
What do you have to say when Aston villa beat Liverpool 5-0?

Timileyin1234:
We can’t jeopardize this year cup. Even if means breaking toes

Timileyin1234:
We no chop 5:0 from Aston villa with the academy players . Don’t let me tear u hot slap this evening

Hypocrit:
wetin you dey smoke strong pass US, and e big pass Nigeria.

EbukaHades10:
See me see trouble o.

When Pep and co were winning, nobody typed all this bag of poo but it comes to Liverpool and then we're cheats?

Ask Aston Villa why they paraded elders against the Liverpool U23s in the Caraboa cup.

EbukaHades10:
And Where were/are the other coaches when he's "cheating".

From one excuse to another. If no be VAR, na bad officiating. Just

ThreeBlackBird:
Mumu talk

Jokerman:
Only Barca fans wail like this

Dannyozs:
Ref slightly favouring wolves to cover up the VAR manipulations

MiddleDimension:
You want to abolish a thing when you have nothing to replace it?

cerpvad:
From your last lines, I can deduct that either you or your approaches are agnostic. If this is so, you neither have business with Christianity nor Christmas. However, what are your last words?We can't drag this argument till eternity

cerpvad:
If Christmas brings you happiness and yet it is INCONSEQUENTIAL to God

that means you have placed your happiness above God.

What you are saying is that ' Mr. God, Bleep off, I dont care if celebrating Christmas pleases you,

so far I am happy doing it, I am good to go." So if you dont please God, who do you please? Yourself or the Devil?

cerpvad:
Look at the bolded. Don't you think you have just confirmed that Christmas is INCONSEQUENTIAL?

cerpvad:
Everything starts in the spirit before physically manifesting. Worship is part of those things that starts in the spirit and manifest in physical bowing of heads, singing, dancing, pouring libations, giving offerings and so on. Every celebration starts in the spirit because spirit does rejoice. If your spirit rejoices during Christmas, then Christmas is a worship which starts in your spirit before manifesting in your lighting and beautifying everywhere and singing tunes in the mood of Christmas

cerpvad:
It seems like you don't know that worship implies everything you do in reverence of God or gods, and this includes celebrations, libations and so on