₦airaland Forum

CanadaOrBust:
See how u twisted and contorted everything to fit your pre-ordained mindset.
Presidents get sick and die in office. How many Russian presidents have died in office? There’d be a count of how many months they haven’t appeared in public. Weren’t Yaradua and Buhari very sick in office and disappeared for months. Well u can’t do any of that as US president. It is simply a different type of society.

You idolise the US too much. Trump's impeachment and subsequent acquittal has exposed the weaknesses of the US system. If Trump gets sick and disappears from the public for months, nothing would happen. Reporters (fake news) and Democrats (traitors that want to overthrow the president ) would only make noise. The Republican dominated senate would never vote to remove Trump.

ChristianNorth:
Only Yoruba Moslems and demon rats hate daddy Trump.

The whole world loves Trump

The whole world laughs at Trump. Even Trump himself knows that.

dangermouse:
i am not a trump appologist but i commend him for putting those he was elected to serve first before the rest of the world. i will sleep with both eyes shut, knowing i have a president who has got my back!

You are a Trump apologist. Just admit it, there is no shame in it.

Trump that has put the US at risk in all aspects. Trump that put business and the stock market market above US lives.
Trump that disband the global health security office two years ago to save money, only to vote $50 billion to fight a global pandemic. It's the global health security office that makes sure a global pandemic is attacked at source.
Trump that allowed 2 whole months to pass before admitting we have a pandemic at our hands, after which it is too late.

Trump when asked to take responsibility for disbanding the White House global health security office, he said "I don't know anything about it". He later admired that it was disbanded, but blamed the administration;

it's the administration. Perhaps they do that. You know, people let people go. You used to be with a different newspaper than you are now. You know, things like that happen."

Abeg which administration? Maybe the Obama or Bush administration.

frank317:
Baby daddy who told her to move on and is married to another lady? And u think because she is a woman she will not have sex in her home at a given opportunity even after her man had left her?
If the man wants to have a say for the house he paid for he should be there for the occupant. He is the stupid one here... If I were the woman I will leave live in the house with my boyfriend, especially if he has house issues, I will not hesitate to bring him in.

You are just repeating the false statement of "her home" like a religious manta that your salvation depends on. The headline says it's "husband's" home, the woman in question never claimed it's her home, but you want to dash her the home by force. If it's the man that owns the house or pays the rent, the baby mama has no claim whatsoever to the house, no matter how many children she has for the man. Being a baby mama does not give you rights to the man's properties, only marriage does. If they were married, then she can start claiming properties. As it is, the man can eject her out of his property, and she has no choice but to move. The best she can do is go to court to claim child/children support. The custody of the children would even be contested and she would be disadvantaged if she is homeless.

You want to live with your lover in a house owned or being paid for by another man? How sensible is that. Anyway, the owner of the house will disgrace you and your lover as seen in this story.

I honestly don't understand where you get the idea that a woman would inherit a man's properties once she becomes a baby mama.

Leave that thing... U do not know the circumstance surrounding him being there. What if she insists he comes around because she does not want to leave the kids. U are taking these things too serious, people are out to have fun and would cease any opportunity they see to do it. This has nothing to do with the guys being a man or not... Once again u are taking it too serious.

What do you mean she insists he comes around? Should the lover not inquire, who owns the house? Except the woman lies to the lover that the house belongs to her.

I know u are a smart guy, always loved it when u used to comment in religious section, but how did u know they were doing this in front of the kids... What if the woman ensured the kids went to bed before being all romantic with the guy?

I am not talking about making out in front of the kids, I am saying bringing another man into the house and be doing boyfriend and girlfriend, including locking themselves in the bedroom is immoral, when the kids knows the house belongs to their father. How will the children relate to the love in their father's house? Will they respect the lover? If the woman is completely seperated from their father and marries another man, then they would understand the lover as a step dad.

LOL... I really like ur naija delta babes because they are more fun and adventurous... Have u seen a bad Niger delta chick... Try one.

Not just fun and adventurous, they are very independent. Most guys and babes from the Niger delta were raised and educated by their mothers, most times with very little input from their father's. Once a man says he is no longer interested in the relationship or marriage, they take their children and move on.

April 14, 2017 was the third anniversary of the kidnap of the Chibok Girls. The #BringBackOurGirls BBOG Movement had organized its 1st Annual Chibok Girls Lecture where the former Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi was invited as a keynote speaker.

Emir Sanusi defied the status quo, where women were not to be seen in public without a male relative companion. Hesent one of his daughters (in her early twenties), Shahida to deliver his paper. The presentation itself was defiance in tone, he dare the powers that be to do their worst.

Here are excerpts from his presentation;

All my life, I have been engaged deeply with the question of women and the oppressed and marginalized groups in our society. I have come to accept, like you, that remaining committed to this discourse is a risky and potentially costly venture in this environment. The elite consensus is about a culture of silence and complicity, where everyone remains in his or her comfort zone, and where the voiceless majority are allowed to remain where they are.

I recently gave a speech in which I said the North-East and North-West of Nigeria are the poorest parts of the country. This simple statement of fact has generated so much heat the noise is yet to die down. But what really are the facts?

The response to this speech has been a barrage of personal attacks and insults aimed at silencing any voices that dare shine the light on the society to which we are saying Bring Back our Girls. There are those who believe these attacks are aimed at discrediting me personally but even if that is the objective it will not work. I can only be discredited by what I have done and not by insults and lies on the Social-media. And in any event, personal criticism has no impact on the issues.

Let me conclude with a few remarks. Anyone who challenges a system or fights for the voiceless must be ready for a serious backlash. Character assassination, slander, blackmail and intimidation are the normal tools employed by those who defend and profit from the status quo.

Do not be intimated. Do not be silenced. Do not betray your conscience or sell your soul. Do not fear any human being. Stand up and take all the bullets that are fired at you but never kneel down. If you have to die, please die standing and not on your knees. Most important, ignore the noise.

Do not defend yourself too much against personal attacks because they want your person, not the issues you raise, to be discussed. I know it is tough, I go through this every day, but I have learnt that after all the insults and blackmail the issues remain and will not disappear until they are addressed. That is your task, put these issues on the table and do not walk away until they are resolved.
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2020/03/if-you-have-to-die-do-it-standing-not-on-your-knees-former-emir-sanusi/amp/

frank317:
Pls what exactly is wrong with a male lover going to a female lovers home... Can u list just 3 things wrong with that?

1. Because the home is not hers (or hers alone). The house also belongs first to her baby daddy, her children and any other relative the man paying the rent agrees to live there. Now, if they were married, then the house would belong to both of them equally, until a court makes a pronouncement. But to insist that a man has no say or rights for a house he is paying for and maintaining is ludicrous.

2. The idea of a male lover going into another woman's family home of, being paid for by another man to fvck and parasite there, is shameful. He does not deserve to be called a man, maybe a boy.

3. Doing lover boy and lover girl right in front of her children is morally perverse. What is she teaching her children, especially the female ones. That is it OK to bring men home to fvck? If she is completely seperated from the children's dad, and planing on marrying another man, the whole world would support her, but playing boyfriend and girlfriend at her age and under these circumstances is shameful.

A shout out to my Niger delta sisters. They don't go around disgracing themselves like this. If man says "he no dey do again, they pack their loads and get on with their lives. They work, go to market, fish, do all the can to raise and train their children. They don't parasite on their baby daddies for life, or Felmingham entitled to be housed and fed (and even provide rooms for them to fvck small boys. That's the way Urhobo, Itsekiris, Ijaw and even Anioma women roll.

CanadaOrBust:
The West does not work like China or North Korea - Canada didn’t have to tell anybody their First Lady has corona

What do you mean the West does not work like China or North Korea? Canada is different from the US, Canada does not have Trump who tells lies about everything as president.

Trump lies about his health, his taxes and everything. If Trump tells you goodmorning, it's probably evening.

Trump even lies about his own height.

Photos of Trump standing next to others prove he is lying about his height

President Donald Trump's latest medical report from the White House listed him in at 6'3" and 239 pounds. That gave him an on-paper BMI reading of 29.99, just under the "obese" category.

If it had listed him just one inch shorter, his BMI would have come in at 30.7, meaning all the newspapers the next day would report him as obese.

Our guess? Trump lied about his height in order to avoid this embarrassment.

Trump's own drivers license issued in 2012 showed his height as 6'2", but even that may not be correct.
https://www.sourcepolitics.com/when-you-compare-trump-next-to-world-leaders-you-can-tell-he-is-definitely-lying-about-his-height/

Vicyace:
I wanted to ignore you and not dispute your points but then, it's clear to me that you are one of the few people that find it difficult to air their viewpoints without being insulting and abusive.

Sorry if you felt insulted

Where was it stated that the man sneacked into the house?

The man obviously sneaks into the house, because he was caught "cheaters style" in the bedroom of the couple. (I assume that's the bed the baby daddy sleeps in when he is in town). The US baby daddy and his family would have been investigating and tailing the woman and her lover for some time. She obviously did not tell anyone of her new lover.

Tell me the crime in sleeping over at your BF or GF house

It is a moral crime to be sleeping over at your GF's house, if the house belongs to another man. The bed belong to another man. In front of the children, neighbours, and other family members.

Was it stated anywhere that the woman has been irresponsible in discharging her duties.?

No one is talking about weather the woman has been irresponsible in discharging any duties, what is under discussion is the impropriety of bringing a lover into a house you shared with your ex lover and his children and still being maintained by him

If she had moved out of the house to another man's house with the child, you would still complain.

Why will I complain? That will show she has truly moved on. Do I expect her to live under the man's roof forever. The children's welfare will be discussed when they finally separate.

If she was seen at a hotel with another man, you would still call her a prostitute for going to a hotel

Why will I call her a prostitute? Is it only prostitutes that spend the night with their spouse? If they were in a hotel, would the man and his family have the rights to bust them like they did, giving the excuse that they are broken up.

I will continue to defend her simply because the Nigerian society somehow trample on the rights of women.

You don't defends women's rights more that I do on this forum, but that right doesn't include the rights to use the sweat of one man to entertain your another guy. The lover should be a real man and not a freeloader

Some men don't care how women feel so long they put few coins on the table.

Relationships should not be about coins. If it works out ; good, buy if it doesn't, everyone should move on. A woman should not be dependent on a man for the rest of her life.

The man cheated and its okay..... But the woman is not allowed to live freely?

Even though I don't support men cheating, the man is cheating because he can't afford it. A woman should not be cheating at the expense of her former lover. If the woman and her new lover can afford it, then they are free to cheat.

Listen and watch those videos and tell me something is not wrong with those people.

Believe me, they are all not insane. Obviously, they had not gotten the message that the relationship was over, and the woman had moved on.

In a sane society, the man will pay child's support for as long as possible, he will lose the house to the woman as well.

Lose the house to someone you never married? In the West, especially the US, the guy will pay child support, but he does not have to pay rent, bills and living expenses for the woman. The woman is expected to work and pay her own living expenses and even contribute also to child support.

Vicyace:
I get the feeling you are the type that would treat a woman this way and feel its cool just because you are a man.

This is not cheating. We are not talking about the man that clearly cheated and got married while still with the woman just to get a PR in the states.

She said the man clearly told her to move on with her life.

Did you think its easy for a woman of her age to start a relationship?

So because he pays the house rent and uses the house as his Nigerian correspondence means he has right over her?

It's clear he's still handling some responsibilities because of the child which is the link between them.

The man and his relatives are pure evil and selfish people.

Now, they might have successfully scared that woman's lover away. At the end, she's left in a lonely state, without a partner.

Can't you see that she's the clear victim in this case?

You guys are stubbornly refusing to see the shame of a man sneaking into another man's house to have sex with his ex wife or girlfriend. I think you have such shameless men in your family, because I cannot help think of any other reason you vehemently defend the shameless lover.
A lover who cannot afford his own home or at worst a N10,000 hotel? Is that one a man? So it is the lonely woman catering for her lover with the money of her so called baby daddy.

If you don't see anything wrong in bringing a lover into the home and bed she shared with her ex "husband" in front of their children, then I am sorry for your values.
Are you now saying, she must live forever under the roof and expenses of her US based baby daddy, with whomsoever she decides to marry or have affairs with? Why can't she move on, and move in with her new lover?

Why should he be paying her rent if they are no longer tlog together? Taking care of the children should be the responsibility of both of them and not for only the man. She too must contribute to the upkeep of the children.

hopexter:
How can you be this myopic? Can't you see the Emirship was only a disguise from being probed by Weak Jonathan. Being an Emir was never his intention. Who becomes a Governor and later choose a position under local government chairman? Let's just watch and see where he thinks he's heading with his craftiness. Nigerians are not fools but observant and carefully watching.

You people and this never ending wailing over Jonathan's loss and stupid conspiracy theories? Was there any time Sanusi was under probe? The Financial Reporting Council Of Nigeria is not an investigating body and it's not a prosecuting body and it is a reporting body. He was never never under EFCC or Police probe, not even under code of conduct bureau probe.
The Federal High Court in Lagos Monday held that the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria lacks legal backing to probe suspended Central Bank governor of Nigeria Sanusi Lamido. - http://www.aitonline.tv/post-sanusi_lamido_wins_suit_against_frcn_in_federal_high_court__lagos

So in effect, the suspension of Sanusi by your hero, president jonathan was illegal.

Trump needs to come to our "shit hole country" to learn how to contain a pandemic. You don't control a pandemic by denying it's existence for two months and then declaring a national emergency and throwing around $50 billion after it is too late.
Nigeria was able to identify the index person just 2 days after entering the country, quarantined him and traced all people he came in contact with, tested them, and quarantined those that tested positive. That was how Nigeria contained ebola and how it's containing coronavirus.

babdap:
Like or Hate him,the welfare of US citizens has always been his priority since inauguration

welfare of US citizens his priority, when he downplayed the virus for 2 months and allow the virus to ravage the US before taking it serious? Nigeria handled the coronavirus pandemic far better than the US.

The US has resorted to understating the total number of people infected with the virus (just like China ), all because of Trump's mishandling of the virus response.

'Don't believe the numbers you see': Johns Hopkins professor says up to 500,000 Americans have coronavirus

“Don’t believe the numbers when you see, even on our Johns Hopkins website, that 1,600 Americans have the virus,” he said. “No, that means 1,600 got the test, tested positive. There are probably 25 to 50 people who have the virus for every one person who is confirmed.”

He added: “I think we have between 50,000 and half a million cases right now walking around in the United States.”
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/marty-makary-on-coronavirus-in-the-us-183558545.html

Below is Trump's views on coronavirus for the past 2 months

[quote author=sisisioge post=87422348]

Again, they were not married,

What does it matter? They are/were in a relationship and they have kids together.

they were over,

But according to the man and his family, they were not. So who do we believe?

guy was married,

Speculation with no proof. Even at that people do marry 2 wives. Traditionally and according to some religions, a man can marry multiple wives.

madam had moved on,

Moved on to who or where? The woman denied any romantic or sexual relationship with the guy she was caught with.

rent was part of his support of his kids...what's so confusing about this?

And you know this because. .... ?
You are part of the divorce/seperation agreement?

Let me leave you to it biko. Cheers.

OK.

sisisioge:
Hmmmm...if only the husband can refute these allegations:

1. That they are not legally married.
2. That he is in fact married to another woman.

If those were lies then we can castigate her.

Regarding her living in the house he pays rent in, should we ask that he stops providing housing for his children? Or should we ask that he provides the house for the kids to live on their own without their mother? Or should we ask that if their mother should have another child by another man, the " husband" should withdraw the housing support for his children for fear of the new child living in it?

Biko imagine your sister having children with a man that refused to marry her although he provides housing/support for his children. If your sister should dare move on and have another child, she should just take the new kid and move out leaving the other children to fend for themselves in their father's house lest her new kid enjoys it

Although I do not consider myself a Christian, I am not impressed with your moral judgement. A woman bringing another man she is not married to, to have sex with in her children's home. If she is truly done with the other man, what stops her from calling for a family meeting, where issues of child care can be sorted out, and she can move on with her life. The man or his family can decide to take custody of the children or the woman can take custody and the man pays child support. All these issues must be iron out.

If she now have boyfriend after complete separation from the US based baby daddy and marries another man, the children would understand they now have a step dad. But bringing a fvck mate home to your children's home is wrong, even by Western standards, not to talk of African standards.

todaynewsreview:
It's Bini Kingdom. Do a little research bro. Thanks.

It was originally called Ubini before the Europeans changed it to Benin. We itsekiris who are very related to the Benin use to call Benin Ubini. My grandma who was born in the 1900s called it Ubini until she died in the late 90s.

Imagine, they are now removing videos of the former Emir criticising the political elites. They remove the last video I pasted from YouTube.

Here is another one where he finished northern leaders at a Mo Ibrahim Foundation fora.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgczxDwEy4c

dasauce:
As a man, I totally felt for her... only if you know what it's to be sexually active and all of a sudden, compound to celibate due to some circumstances, then you'll understand her. Life is meant to be enjoyed... If I am the husband, I'll free her to enjoy herself.

That's not the issue here. Why can't she go and cure her konji at the lover's house or they get a hotel? Why do the rubbish in the man's house in front of his children?

sisisioge:
But his kids leave there as well...shouldn't he pay for his children's accommodation? She said he asked her to desist from attaching his name to hers and she obliged. Biko, imagine your sister has been tossed after having kids for a "in the abroad" man that turned out to eventually marry someone else, refused to marry her and blatantly asked her to move on...won't you support her moving on?

Again, that scumbag is expected to pay for the apartment his children live in! Abi is she expected to singlehandedly cater for the kids needs?

And you believe her disjointed story? That the man is paying for his children's accommodation and upkeep makes him a very responsible man. I know many men who abandon their kids when they start a new family, even in the same state.

OK, what happens if she gets pregnant after "moving on" in his house? You expect the "abroad based baby daddy, to continue to pay for the rent, upkeep and bills of the woman, her lover and his own children?

TheGoodJoe:
She has moved on. She is in the house for the upkeep of her children. Her babies' father does not exist in her life. There is no rule to stop her from seeing someone.

She is the victim here. The one abandoned. The one with a broken heart. The one watching over children of a man who is boning another woman and having a kid with the other woman.

Heck. Allow the woman to get laid and forget the series of mistakes she has made in her life.

If she has truly moved on, why not truly move out and rent her own apartment. If she rent her own apartment, the guy would not even know the address, and if he found out and trespass, he would be arrested.

She is a victim, and she is bringing in another man into a house being maintained by another man? She is watching over the children of a man, but bring in another man (she is not married to), into the house in the presence of the children. What value do you think she is imbibing on the children? It there is no rule stopping her from seeing other men, why not admit she is sleeping with the man, instead of waiting for you to make the excuse for her.

You think if she has told the man and his family she has moved on, the sisters and family would bother to come and make a scene in the middle of the night?

Your "victim" wants to have her cake and eat it. She wants to still be the responsibility of the "husband" in the US, but wants to keep enjoying other dicks at the "husband's expense.

TheGoodJoe:
Exactly. She should not feel ashamed that she is seeing someone who cares for her. Her babies' father has moved on with his life with a different woman. She should feel free to see someone too.

If she has seen someone who cares for her, why can't he care for her in his own house,

Vicyace:
You have tried so hard to make sense but........

Watch the video again and ask yourself if the man treated the woman in a good way.

The man in question is living a good life, legally married to someone else, got a kid with someone else, having stable sex with someone else but the woman can't these things too right?

The woman can do these things too, but in her own house. It an assault on a man's ego to bring another male into a house another male is paying for, eat the food he is paying for and fvck his woman or side chick on a bed he paid for.

And she is in first and jeans, not covered from head to toe in a burka or a simple hijab. Meanwhile, the religious and political elites will be posing hijab and burka on the poor masses.

Indeed religion is a tool for controlling the poor masses to accept exploitation by the elites.

NGpatriot:
Must they keep what doesn't belong to them?

What if Sanusi asked for his books to be removed and sent to him?

Where how do you suggest for the new Emir to keep his own books?

Are you also allergic to the new emir having and reading books or removing what doesn't belong to them just means in your shallow world they are promoting illiteracy because I still don't see how you arrived at illiteracy?

The silliness and condescending utterances by you and your kind that other people's actions mean they are not educated or they support illiteracy is just a reflection of your own ignorance and self-induced bigoted mentality.

Where else can you house such quantity of books except a huge complex like a palace or a public library? There is no way the books can go with Sanusi to Nasarawa or a private residence in Lagos.
As I speculated, I am sure Sanusi would gladly donate the books to a palace library, as the palace is a family home. Most of the residence of the palace are his brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and even children.

Sanusi had often criticised the building of mosques rather than schools and learning institutions. I feel that the books should have been preserved in a library, as a legacy of Sanusi's reign.

Maybe the new Emir too is anti education.

NGpatriot:
Typical sensationalized headlines.

Obviously, they can not keep his books and the new emir, of course, must have his own space to store his own books.

Load his the sacked emir's books inside pick up truck and send it to him in his Nasarawa village or where ever he was banished to.


Good riddance.

Why can they not keep his books? Are they allergic to books? Why can't the palace house a library? I am sure Sanusi would gladly donate the books to a palace library.

One minute you guys would support and promote literacy and education, insulting Buhari for not being literate or educated, another minute you would mock and insult someone promoting literacy and education. It seems you guys have no values, stance or opinion, but change according to your emotions.

Amotolongbo:
The books are better donated to libraries in universities or a state owned and maintained libraries to keep the legacy of the man, Sanusi.

Unfortunately, Ganduje isn’t interested in the illiteracy liberation of his state, which is one of the reasons he has been against SLS and dethroning him.

The northern elites are the real Boko Haram (book is forbidden ). They thrive by keeping the population illiterate. They would rather destroy the books than make it available to the public,

[quote author=enemyofprogress post=87381328][/quote]You can strike through all you want, it does not change the fact that thraditional rulers are appointed by the governor
https://dailytimes.ng/2020/03/12/kano-govt-presents-letters-of-appointment-to-new-emirs-of-kano-bichi/

bamdexfarms:
Actually it is you that is the Ignoramus. The Bible and Koran were ancient books that doesn't realise the genetic implications of inbreeding. The royal families of Europe suffered from this acts. Diseases like Hemophilia, Sickle cell anemia and the popular Harpsberg Jaw was as a result of inbreeding. A simple Google search will clarify all these your ancient way of life.

Royal families of Europe suffered from t Sickle cell anemia? That's some strong shit you are smoking.

seunmsg:
If the governor of Osun State for example appoints Oluwo as chairman of Osun State council of Obas, do you think the Ooni of Ife will attend the council of Obas meeting where Oluwo is presiding? That’s the scenario that is playing out in Ekiti.

You are taking about a hypothetical scenario. We are talking about the constitution and the laws governing the appointment, role and duties of traditional rulers in Nigeria. Nigerian laws give governors absolute authority over traditional rulers. Yes, most governors have refused to use these powers in the past, but Ganduje has shown that he can exercise that power and damn the consequences. What can the Ooni do if Oyetola appoints Oluwo as chairman of Osun State council of Obas? Can the Ooni decline an order of the governor? What remedy can the Ooni take if the governor depose the Ooni, banish him and appoint someone else, according to the Nigerian constitution? Then this leads to a more fundamental question; what are the role of traditional rulers in the Nigerian constitution?

seunmsg:
It is not fake news and that is why I attached the letter he issued to the Obas. The disagreement between Fayemi and the 16 Obas started last year when he was sworn in. He appointed someone who is not qualified as chairman of the state council of traditional and the 16 kings filed a law suit against him. In addition, they stopped attending state functions and traditional council meeting because they claim they cannot attend a meeting that is chaired by the unqualified chairman.

What effrontery? Don't the Obas know that they serve as an appointee of the governor?

seunmsg:
Those close to Fayemi better advise him to desist from this dangerous path. You can remove one ruler and get away with it. But attempting to remove all the top 16 rulers at once is an invitation to chaos. He won’t be able to manage the fallout.

Which dangerous path? Whether the governor remove 1 traditional ruler or 100, what's the difference? The Sanusi removal and subsequent appointment of another has shown is that traditional rulers are appointees of the governor and remain in office to promote the wishes of the governor. Imagine the 16 ekiti traditional rulers refusing the summons of the governor to a meeting, that's insubordination. Fayemi better dethrone all 16 rulers, banish them to a village in Ondo and appoint other rulers who will carry out his exact wishes.

Romanoff:
The imperfections before Jesus tike is the reason Jesus came.

My explanations of the story of Abraham or Jesus might now help you see the light but I'll keep praying that the seed of God's spirit be planted in the hearts of your kind.

Peace unto you.

Only you or someone with the holy spirit can make sense of what you wrote up there.

GidiWoodsMan:
Those were cousins, not siblings. I think we've already established the fact that middle-eastern tribes marry their own cousins. And it's not at all a religious thing, it's cultural. Why the Hausa-Fulani chose to assimilate such a regressive habit with their religion, is entirely their own headache.

My problem with you guys is that you feel your culture or way of life is superior to others, and so denigrate other people's way of life. Meanwhile, your own culture also has what can be considered by others barbaric practices.

What do you expect a nomadic tribe moving around through hostile territories to do? Obviously, it makes better sense to marry close family members and fellow tribesmen. It's different from tribes settled in villages and towns, where there is relative peace and stability.

The Fulani adopt similar marriage cultures like the early Jews, Arabs, berbers and other nomadic tribes because of constant instability, enemies with neighbouring tribes, and the need to maintain cultural and tribal purity.