₦airaland Forum

Duggedised12:
your ancestors both on your mother and your father's side

Sit down ontop your ancestors head

Duggedised12:
your real mama

Flog all your family members put dem inside gutter

Duggedised12:
lol mr advicer ,. I have come across your type in the real world,i have heard, . ,it is my rant, i don't have to ass lick anyone so i can be seen as wife material,my response is very much on point ,Lol ,now move along.

Stupid hoe

Duggedised12:
i cant remember asking you for help?

It's no surprise that you are where you are. You were talking about late marriages running in some families as though your family or village people were responsible but you are actually your own problem, no matter how many rants you put out, it wouldn't change nothing. Work on yourself first and then people would take interest in you, your response says it all

Duggedised12:
To each his own. You are not to tell people what to desire. Yes it might be less probable,but its not your call to make. By the way, thats not the issue here,so i don't see how that relates to me.

If you don't see how it relates,then I'm sorry you can't be helped

No teaching jobs in Warri or Delta state?

Duggedised12:
50-55 no children might be impossible but then again that is why they probably when to the hook up because they have a larger audience.

I know of a 45 year old lawyer who got married for the first time. Another man lost his wife and two kids and got married ten years later at 49. Everything is not black and white .

Did you see the part where she said he must be a pastor? How many pastors are there who are urhobos in the first place? Then fall within that age bracket? No wife? No kids? Listening to that program at that time? Within a radio coverage of less than 100k? What's the possibility? That's like looking for a grain of sand in a bag of rice.

Yes, nothing is cast on iron but don't go around looking for a lion in an Ocean, you wouldn't just find it

Duggedised12:
First , thank you nairaland for providing an avenue for me to bare my mind.

I wish I could write a sign board in from of my house that says "husband wanted apply within" without getting judged since the pressure of marriage has become too much to bear.

I wish those who see me and make remarks like "when is she settling down sef?" Will not lump me among the "choosy spinster" not knowing I wasted a good number of my years in a long term relationship with promise of marriage only to be disappointed at the end.

I wish I could put "single and searching " on social media and not have married men looking for free cookie wanting to cash in assuming I am desperate and play boys playing the part of serious bachelor just to get free cookie.

Maybe its a curse cos I heard late marriage runs in some families, maybe I am just unlucky ,maybe its something I am not doing right ,maybe just maybe .

I wish I could ask a guy out and he will take me serious and not think I brought him my cookie for free.

Dem say boyfriend full everywhere na husband scarce ,but thats because one guy can be dating 5 ladies with all the ladies thinking they have a boyfriend until he decides to settle down.

Cc lalasticlala

As you said, perhaps it's something you are not doing or perhaps doing. Are you willing to work with a guy and build together or you are waiting for a particular unreasonable standard to be fulfilled. I sometimes listen to those radio programs on hookups and what I hear from most women as what they need from a man is just stupid. Imagine a woman saying she needs a man, who's a pastor, between 50-55, urhobo, does not have children etc What's the possibility of finding such a man? So you have to look within and start making changes to either your set mindset or your outward disposition

soberdrunk:
Please please!!! I beg you brother!!! Dont ever text her, just be calling her...........

Why na

More....,....

More photos......

An 11 year old Fulani boy was declared missing in my area(Nigercat) since a week ago but unknown to friends and neighbors, he had been gruesomely murdered by the fathers second wife together with some accomplices. He was found laying lifeless in the bush by a woman who went hunting for snails, the young boy is said to have been taken away in the presence of his step brothers and sisters who confessed that it was their mother who orchestrated his demise due to her hatred for him since the father loved him more than her children.

Local coaches is the way forward, and I believe he very well knows that

Everyone has their own reasons for doing whatever they choose to do

Valverde remaining the head coach of FC Barcelona is really baffling, I'm not a Barcelona supporter

What's it you want us to do now?

IamIn:
I'm a Lagos based graduate. I am a NURSERY SCHOOL TEACHER, a poor one for that matter, but I'm very ambitious and I am a visionair. By virtue of my job, I'm not rich, don't really have much but I'm comfortable. I'm tall, dark and funfil. I'm a stunt believer of God and also a goal getter. I destest lies; integrity, hosnety and being faithful are my watch words. I need an ambitious and faithful lady for a serious relationship. Please, my intention is for us to have a successful life. Settle down and mould the type of life we want to live together.

I know it's kind of weird posting this here but then I believe nlds are just like every other person we meet on the road. If you're interested and believe in my vision, kindly reach out to me.

There are no poor men because no one man can ever have it all. There's someone for everyone, it might take time but you would surely get there, and it's important to be sincere at all times just as you have done. Don't listen to any moronn trying to shame you for being forthcoming, many men have gone to their graves early for choosing to live a lie

GrabHisBalls:
Thanks. I'll check it out, but I think it's going to be boring 'cause they're done with the best of Harvey in the series.

Nah....The drama just got more interesting

Deathisfree:
I’m single and jobless,My landlady has a shop but mostly she’s always home.
It all started when my landlord travelled,I Have been noticing her for about 2 weeks now. She’s always giving me too much attention she comes up to my apartment with some sexy wears and foods

Last night it was raining, she knocked my door and asked if I was busy. We enter my sitting room,watching the tv and suddenly everything started getting out of hands. To cut the story short. We sha had sex and ever since then. She’s been treating me with love and respect even more than she gives her husband

After the sex. She told me she married her husband base on his money. Shes been giving me too much attention and she doesn’t even care if we are caught or not. Please how do I play my game safe

Move out of the compound whether you want to continue or not, you don't go to another man's stead and insult him, he knows where the cutlass is, be smart.

GrabHisBalls:
Yeah, seems he's doing more of advisory job for them than representing.

Now, I miss the movie 'Suits'.

Season 9 is out

EditorsPalace:
Please let's discuss these issues my people and learn from each other.

Why would a woman take her suitor's or boyfriend's name to 5 or more different pastors to find out things about him?

To find out about his past life.

To find out about his future.

To find out even things she's not supposed to find out about him? Pokenosing!

Why would she visit so many places just to find out about him if she truly loves him and wants to get married to him?

What if some of these pastors mislead or lie to her?

What if some are even fake?

Please women tell us why you do this kind of thing. What do you hope to achieve?

It's so annoying how many marriages have been scattered by some of these pastors who don't see anything spiritually but would say they saw this and that about the person which isn't true.

I need answers to these issues please.

Men, what do you think if your girlfriend/lady comes to tell you her pastor said both of you should not get married?

Please I want to know. Please let's have your comments.

It's very important to seek the face of God when choosing a life partner but wisdom should dictate to any reasonable person that such nonsense does not determine the fate of a marriage.

Flytime:
Can I get a pic of the phone

You could check it out online

Iamemmacoz:
I replied your mail now

I didn't receive anything o, my mail is kingsleyzaria@gmail.com

What are we to advise you about? She don get belle for another man, abi you want take responsibility

PUSSYHOE:
Every good girl i know are just there, nothing wow about them, someone should explain.

What sort of stupid stereotype is that? @ the topic. Are you saying character is based on physical looks?

Patrick33:
I'll email you..check your inbox

Thanks bro, I already replied your mail

Ubenedictus:
lol
He is trying to leverage the fact that holy orders leave a mark on the soul. And so the anointing doesn't really die.

The end point is that his church fell and the English kings took over and martyred all the faithful Christians who didn't agree with him.

Fell from a tree? Really hilarious! I'm not even an Anglican.

Please who has the game, I need it, no one wants to answer me, please help a brother

Look at this one, she's not ready for a relationship obviously, if she wants to fvck your friend, let him have her, Moreover she has not accepted to date you, you guys are just fvcking

Ubenedictus:
then you still don't get it.

First of all, sacraments have 3 important component from Apostolic time. They now have technical terms, form, matter and intention.

Laying hands on somebody doesn't necessarily confer upon him Apostolic succession. In fact I received a laying of hands during my confirmation, it increased in my soul the outpouring of the spirit but it didn't confer upon me any Apostolic succession because, the intention and the words used are all about confirmation.
The apostles did confer on Matthias Apostolic succession, they both intended to make him all that Jesus has made them and allow him a share in all the ministries that has been given to them.
What are the ministries giving to them?
Chief among them are Eucharist and the power to absolve sins.
The Eucharist is a sacrifice because Jesus Christ himself said "my body given for you, my blood shed for you" that is a sacrifice. And all the church fathers are unanimous in that teaching.

When you guys Anglicans, adopted the heresies of Calvin and Co, you started to doubt the power to forgive sin and the Eucharist as sacrifice.
If your Eucharist is not a sacrifice and your priest can't absolve sins, then what they are celebrating is not the true Eucharist that the entire church celebrate, if your priest are not ordained to offer sacrifice and absolve sins then they are not priests.

If your bishops decided to "ordain" people who can't offer a sacrificial liturgy and absolve sins, then they certainly did not really ordain priest.

When priest were ordained in the Catholic Church in England they were ordained as priests and just like the orthodox, with power to offer a sacrificing priesthood and absolve sin, that is exactly what a Catholic priest does. When Anglicans broke away they started to ordain people who can't offer sacrifice, those are not priests... They certainly didn't receive the power of the priesthood because the bishops never INTENDED to confer on them all that the Catholic Church confers in her ordination.

These issues are held by the entire Catholic Church as regards the priesthood, including the orthodox... You guys have fallen into heresy that has affected the intent of the sacrament.

I am referring to the entire corpus called the church fathers, from iraneus of Lyon, Ignatius of Antioch who were disciples of the apostles, down to St maximus in the 9th century. All acknowledge the headship of Rome.

Actually the council of Constantinople that elevated the Bishop of Constantinople into a patriarch pretty much shows that Rome has primacy without any arguments.

The schism were caused first and foremost by heresy, in the 4th century when most of the Eastern Bishop were Arians, that immediately caused a schism until they rejected their heresy and we're accepted back by Rome, the patriarch of Alexandria and the Church of Armenia were excommunicated in the council of chalcedon. This one between the Eastern church and the west isn't the first time schism has happened. Whenever the Eastern church falls into heresy it always results in schism until they repent and the Church of Rome accepts them back.
The last and current schism is based upon the doctrine of the Filioque, which the eastern church rejected using the teaching of Photius, ....that issue along with political issues caused the delegates sent to Constantinople to issue excommunication which became mutual.

That didn't finalise the schism though, in the council of Florence the Eastern church agreed that the fathers taught the filioque but they went back and changed their minds again so that the anathema of the council took over. That was cemented by the disastrous war of the Crusades against Constantinople.
The issue about primacy was hardly an issue, in fact it came up in the council of Florence and there was hardly argument.

Rites are based upon Apostolic tradition, that is why all rites express the INTENT of the sacraments, something the Edward rite failed in.

Apostolic succession is part and parcel of the sacrament of Holy orders AKA ordination. And all sacraments are bestowed upon the church to be celebrated for the community, he who does not receive orders validly, didn't receive succession.


I hope by now you realize that these issues are stuff I am familiar with, both in church history and ecclesiology.

I don't know where you got that idea of Anglicans not believing in the Eucharist from or unable to offer the sacrifice of the mass when they believe in the real presence and offer up the body and blood. This is just to correct impressions not for the sake of arguments

Ubenedictus:
actually Arius was a priest and his teaching was rejected by the council of Nicaea. after that council the Eastern church fell back to the same heresy.

Athanasuis was deposed from Alexandria and sent on exile are you not aware? It was the church of Rome that upheld him. Arius the heretic was accepted by the eastern synod that met in tyre and in Jerusalem. Between 330 and 360 atleast 14 different eastern synod accepted some form of Arianism. An antiochene councils in 341 condemned athanasuis again. This same matter caused divisions in the council of sardica where the eastern bishops were majority in heresy.
It was Rome that upheld Alexandria and Athanasuis until the matter was put to bed in the first council of Constantinople.

only a Anglican will claim to Have Apostolic succession and still ask who is a church father? Come-on you guys should decide already are you part of the ancient churches or are you a protestant because no orthodox or oriental Christian will be so ignorant as to ask who is a church father, like seriously? And the names I called is just a sample, giving you the timeline from the disciples of the apostles till the 8 century. If you want names I'll happily provide them.

I have already rebutted this. The council of Florence had both east and west represented with the patriach of Constantinople present and all others sent delegation. so it wasn't regional.

in rites there are developments but the basic rituals are according to how that particular people were led in worship by the apostles. If you read the liturgy of Rome as witnessed by St Justin martyr in the 2nd century and match it with that of today you will arrive at the same thing. Even though specific things are changing, if you look up to liturgy of St Basil in the 5th century and that used in the east you will come out looking at the same thing. Specific things are added, some modified, others adapted but the liturgies are significantly same.

when the entire churches with lines to the apostles ordain priest they ordain them to offer sacrifice and forgive sins in Jesus' name, your church has no sacrifice to offer nor are your priest into sin forgiveness, so whatever was conferred on them is not the same because your church never intended it to be the same and you changed the words during the time of Edward to emphasize that they are not receiving such ministries. They dont have the ministry of priest they certainly don't have the Apostolic succession that goes with it.

Well nowhere does the Bible allow a king to be head in the new testament church, that alone is a minus against Anglicanism.

Just for your information, the Pope of Rome is also known in matters of immediate patriarchal jurisdiction as patriach of the west which means the church of England from ancient times is part and parcel of the church of Rome and subject to the Roman synod and Pope.

Do you get it now, how your church entered schism and then heresy by placing itself under a king.

We would go back and forth on this argument without getting to a conclusion, please let it rest.