₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
Bla bla bla sheep you don't have any wool? Yes sir, yes sir, no bags full! None for the master, none for the dame, none for the little boy who sits in Nairaland!

Bla bla blah Sheep!

If you calm down and allow the “power of reason” God bestowed on you to play its role(Romans 12:1)—you'll see the truth in all Maximus69 is saying.
How dare you quote Revelation 21:8 that talks about the “lake of fire” and ignore the rest that says it culminates in a “second death” without a resurrection?
Are you that desperate?

Since you claim to know the Bible, can you please tell us where the first man Adam is presently? As in explain using scriptures this time.

Your aim now is to see how to convince atheists to see the light in God's word rather than being a laughing stock and threatening them with your nonexistent and deprecated hellfire.
So much for you being a “truth speaker” .

Eagban:
This is how Biblehub.com rendered it... And I am very much satisfied with it.

No wahala.

Acehart:
My brother you see am? E dey pain abi?

Pardon?

Janosky:
Church of Pastorpreneurs, Daddy/Mummy G.Os
and cult of personality gods of men operating business franchise for fleecing gullible sheeples & passing the loot

This one he's there making uneven comparisons.
You should ask him whether the churchgoers and clergymen in RCCG, Winners Chapel, Scoan, Deeper Life, Assemblies, Lords Chosen, Catholic—are bound by the covenant that Elijah and the prophets of Israel were bound by.

Eagban:
The Jesus I know is God (1 Timothy 3:16).

Will Eagban ever put sentiment away and agree that the translators of KJV dubiously inserted “God” into 1Timothy 3:16? Please see the original Greek text in the picture below and tell us where you saw “God manifested in the flesh”.

The one Jehovah's witnesses preach is just a prophet like Moses..

You'll just stay and be exposing yourself for nothing.
What was Moses inspired to write at Deuteronomy 18:15?
KJV Bible
“The LORD thy God will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken”

Please who is this Prophet to come that is like Moses?
The Bible itself answers this to be Jesus Christ. Please see Luke 7:16, John 1:45, 6:14, 7:40 and confirm for yourself.

Doesn't this now show that JW's are right about who Jesus truly is?

What makes you think I leave the Original for your own?

It is only Jehovah God that draws people to the truth—John 6:44, 1Corinthians 3:6
We just do our own part by teaching people the truth about Jehovah God and his Son whom he sent, Jesus Christ — Matthew 28:19,20; John 17:3

Eagban:
These are translations of John 1:1 from different Bible societies...

¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 JUB
https://bible.com/bible/1077/jhn.1.1.JUB

In the beginning the Word already existed; the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 GNB
https://bible.com/bible/296/jhn.1.1.GNB

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;
John 1:1 YLT98
https://bible.com/bible/821/jhn.1.1.YLT98

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 ASV
https://bible.com/bible/12/jhn.1.1.ASV

In the beginning was the one who is called the Word. The Word was with God and was truly God.
John 1:1 CEV
https://bible.com/bible/392/jhn.1.1.CEV

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Yochanan (Jhn) 1:1 CJB
https://bible.com/bible/1275/jhn.1.1.CJB

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 NASB
https://bible.com/bible/100/jhn.1.1.NASB

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Yochanan 1:1 WMB
https://bible.com/bible/1209/jhn.1.1.WMB

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 RSV
https://bible.com/bible/2020/jhn.1.1.RSV

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1 KJV
https://bible.com/bible/1/jhn.1.1.KJV. ..

And this is your own version of it :-
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god(NWT).

How come all these Bible societies see God in capital letters and your translation committee didn't see it..?

And for your information I do not dislike the Jehovah's witnesses, I only dislike the disregard for the Mighty God(Jesus) Isaiah 9:6..

Uncle/Aunty Eagban, if we're to talk about John 1:1—you're going to have to free your mind and leave all forms of sentiment out of this and it should be noted that it's one thing to consider a Bible translation and it's a TOTALLY different thing to consider the ORIGINAL SCRIPTURAL TEXT.

Take a look at the picture below. We see two forms of Greek expressions of “God”.

The first one “Theon” [God] is preceded by a Greek definite article “ton” which in English corresponds to “the” definite article.
This first form is usually and always designated to the Supreme One, the Almighty God alone—Jehovah(Psalm 83:18)
The second one however is “Theos” [god] occurs without a definite article indicating that this can be designated to others—unlike “Theon” that's assigned to One Person only—the true God Jehovah.
Jesus(The Word/Spokesman of God/firstborn and only begotten Son of God) is the one bearing this “god” title in John 1:1 indicating that he also occupies a high position and is of divine nature but not the same as his Father, Jehovah (John 20:17, 1Corinthians 8:6)
It's just like how the men of Israel during the time of the judges wielded power so as to be referred to as “gods”—Please compare Psalm 82:6 with John 10:34-35

THE THREAT : External threats such as decay and opposition have not destroyed the Bible. Yet, some copyists and translators have attempted to alter the Bible’s message. At times, they have tried to make the Bible conform to their doctrines rather than conform their doctrines to the Bible. Consider some examples:

Place of worship : Between the fourth and second centuries B.C.E., the writers of the Samaritan Pentateuch inserted after Exodus 20:17 the words “in Aargaareezem. And there you shall build an altar.” The Samaritans thus hoped to make the Scriptures support their construction of a temple on “Aargaareezem,” or Mount Gerizim.

Trinity doctrine : Less than 300 years after the Bible was completed, a Trinitarian writer added to 1 John 5:7 the words “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” That statement did not appear in the original text. “From the sixth century onwards,” notes Bible scholar Bruce Metzger, those words were “found more and more frequently in manuscripts of the Old Latin and of the [Latin] Vulgate.”

Divine name : Citing a Jewish superstition as their authority, many Bible translators decided to remove the divine name from the Scriptures. They replaced that name with titles such as “God” or “Lord,” expressions applied in the Bible not only to the Creator but also to men, objects of false worship, and even the Devil.​—John 10:34, 35; 1 Corinthians 8:5, 6; 2 Corinthians 4:4. *

HOW THE BIBLE SURVIVED : First, although some Bible copyists were careless or even deceitful, many others were highly skilled and meticulous. Between the sixth and tenth centuries C.E., the Masoretes copied the Hebrew Scriptures and produced what is known as the Masoretic text. They reportedly counted the words and the letters to verify that no mistakes crept in. Where they suspected errors in the master text they were using, they noted these in the margin. The Masoretes refused to tamper with the Bible text. “Interfering with it purposely,” wrote Professor Moshe Goshen-Gottstein, “would have been for them the worst crime possible.”

Second, the sheer volume of manuscripts today actually helps Bible scholars to spot errors. For example, religious leaders taught for centuries that their Latin versions contained the authentic Bible text. Yet, at 1 John 5:7, they had inserted the spurious words referred to earlier in this article. The error even crept into the influential English King James Version! But when other manuscripts were discovered, what did they reveal? Bruce Metzger wrote: “The passage [at 1 John 5:7] is absent from the manuscripts of all ancient versions (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, Arabic, Slavonic), except the Latin.” As a result, revised editions of the King James Version and other Bibles have removed the erroneous phrase.

Do older manuscripts prove that the Bible’s message has been preserved? When the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947, scholars could at last compare the Hebrew Masoretic text to what appeared in Bible scrolls that had been written more than a thousand years earlier. A member of the editorial team of the Dead Sea Scrolls concluded that one scroll “provides irrefutable proof that the transmission of the biblical text through a period of more than one thousand years by the hands of Jewish copyists has been extremely faithful and careful.”

The Chester Beatty Library in Dublin, Ireland, features a collection of papyri that represents nearly every book of the Christian Greek Scriptures, including manuscripts dating from the second century C.E.​—only about 100 years after the Bible was completed. “Although the Papyri supply a wealth of new information on textual detail,” The Anchor Bible Dictionary observes, “they also demonstrate remarkable stability in the transmission history of the biblical text.”


THE RESULT : Rather than corrupting the Bible text, the age and multitude of Bible manuscripts have actually improved it. “No other ancient book has anything like such early and plentiful testimony to its text,” wrote Sir Frederic Kenyon about the Christian Greek Scriptures, “and no unbiased scholar would deny that the text that has come down to us is substantially sound.” And regarding the Hebrew Scriptures, scholar William Henry Green stated: “It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted.”


Source : www.jw.org
Link : https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/watchtower-no4-2016-july/bible-changed-or-tampered/

Blabbermouth:
You still don't get it do you? In my Church, there are only 4 beings - Me, God, Jesus And The Holy spirit (yea, you can refer to the Holy spirit as an active force if you like)...
I don't go to churches made with bricks and woods!
So, those points you raised ain't my problem.

No wahala I Don hear you.
You know better than the Christians of the first century who worshiped together as one united “CHURCH” abi?—Acts 2:46-47, Hebrews 10:34-35
Emela ka m chịa ochi biko

Blabbermouth:
I hear. Howbeit, there be those amongst them that spread legs door-to-door rather than spread the gospel door-to-door.... A very charitable love.
I won't make heaven (I mean "eternal life" by claiming JW for Jesus. Last I checked, he was going to judge and reward not by the denomination you belong to... But by His Grace and you are rewarded by your works.
Sir, it profiteth me nothing therefore to associate with any denomination.

@bolded, I suggest you leave unsubstantiated claims/jokes/weak humour alone let's focus on what we're discussing here.
So why is it that it's only amongst JW's that you consider the bolded to be a sin? Simple, it's because you believe only JW's stand for the truth in the Bible.
Mr Blabbermouth, in all your churches, who holds anyone accountable for their actions if they commit fornication or any other sin?
Do you know that Jehovah's Witnesses hold fast to Bible standards to “STOP KEEPING COMPANY” with sexual immoral/sinful/unrepentant people?—1Corinthians 5:11, 6:9,10
How many of your churches strictly follow this stern but simple rule from the Bible?

Blabbermouth:
It's not as if anything will change if I raise the heat.... No problem, enjoy your sect.

Go and confirm all I said above. Nothing is out of place. That's just how things are.
The LOVE amongst JW's runs very deep.(1Peter 1:22)

haddeylium:
The last time I checked
Assertion: A statement or declaration which lacks support or evidence.
But there you're embarrassing yourself again


Instead of you trying to create a justification for leaving Jehovah's organization...
Why don't you just go out there and teach people your new found truth and make disciples.
Likeeeee, move on with your life Mr Kolade

That one go hear?
Like I already said, he's a SOLD-OUT DISSENTER.
He has nothing better to do than to incite JW's all day all night on NL so as to make them feel out of place but when they(JW's) maintain their faith and silence him(Ephesians 6:14, 1Peter 3:15), he'll resort to other attacks—and start telling you about all the things that happened 100years ago in the organization as if he was there to witness any of it.

Ask him whether since he came to nairaland if he has been able to impart anybody with his words, that would be a resounding NO because anybody maligning Jehovah and his organization cannot have his life organized or figured out—since such one will always be restless.

Blabbermouth:
Who said you ain't doing well in "Love". I'm saying you are not the only one.

The definition of this “LOVE” is not of a contigent sort. Infact Jesus said his followers will be identified with this mark of LOVE existing today only amongst Jehovah's Witnesses (John 13:34,35)
That's why you'll often hear people say
“Tufia Jehovah's Witnesses love only themselves haba sef”
And you yourself confirmed it in your preceding comments on another thread.


And that's why I'll feel safer and at peace in the home of a JW I've never met before in my life residing in a foreign country(John 14:27) than in the home of a blood relative I've known all my life in Nigeria.

haddeylium:
For someone that have a background been a Jw. This your assertion is so embarrassing and it saddens me for you.
If you run out of what to use against them; Don't stoop so low to lying.
You can do some googling, they're many of this accusations you can lift online



Haddeyllium: This love can only be found among Jw


Ohh!
Ouch!
Someone denied you their daughter?...Eyya
Now, I see where this springs from


I don't have a problem with you btw.
Enjoy!

He's always seeking ways to stay relevant
I often see him begging for my attention on several threads—and of course, he never gets it because he's a SOLD-OUT DISSENTER.

Ken4Christ:
The story of the Rich man and Lazarus is not a parable. This story was narrated by our Lord Jesus as recorded in Luke 16:19-31

19 There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:

20 And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores,

21 And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.

22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;

23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.

26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:

28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.

30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.

31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.

If you examine this passage, specific characters where mentioned; Lazarus, Abraham and Moses. I believe Jesus knows the name of the rich man but deliberately didn't mention it.

In parables, specific characters are not mentioned. I challenge anyone who thinks otherwise to mention any other parable where names where mentioned.

Our Lord Jesus said this by revelation just the way he told the woman of Samaria he met in the well her past.

Even if you insist it's a parable, it doesn't change the message. It still proves that lost souls will go to hell. You don't tell parables with things that are not real. All the parables of Jesus are illustrated with realities.

Besides, there are many other Scriptures that supports the existence of a burning hell. Scriptures must not be interpreted in isolation.

Please, give your life to Jesus if you haven't done so. Hell is real. You have been warned. The torment there is unbearable. God doesn't send people to hell. Your decision does.

So when someone simply says “I accept Jesus as my personal Lord and savior”, the person is no longer bound to go to this mythical “hellfire” of yours?

Please can you show Biblical evidence of this Lazarus being a worshiper of God or a follower of Jesus that he merited going to heaven?
Since you churchgoers will say that the Abraham's bosom represents heaven and that the rich man is in hellfire
If this was a true event that happened and Lazarus truly went to heaven, then Jesus was lying that before him NOBODY ELSE had ascended up to heaven—John 3:13.


Churchgoers who have differing beliefs about this “hellfire” will often miscontrue the PARABLE OF THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS to fit their own useless doctrines. Take a look at your concluding statements, you so so so want people to burn forever in your mythical nonsense!
Something that had never come into God's heart at anytime—Jeremiah 7:31

I'll leave you with one question which should be easy to answer—using the Scriptures, that is.


Can you tell me where Adam presently is right now?


Is he in this mythical “hellfire” ? Or somewhere else?
Please do answer in earnest with Scriptures, thanks.

Acts 10:10-16; 11:5-10



In the vision he saw, why did Peter call the animals that descended from heaven “UNCLEAN”?



Peter, before he became a apostle of Jesus Christ, he was a fisherman and a Jew—who practiced the Mosaic Law. The Law put restrictions on the food the Jews could consume—with some being unclean. (Leviticus 11:4, 13-20, Deuteronomy 14:19)

Now even after some years had past since Christ's death, evidently in the year 36CE, approximately 3years after the death and resurrection of Christ, DIDN'T PETER KNOW THAT THE DEATH OF CHRIST MARKED THE END OF THE LAW? (Matthew 5:17, Romans 10:4, Ephesians 2:15, Colossians 2:13,14)

The answer is simple. The Jewish Christians had long practiced the Law from childbirth so they needed time to adjust and change their mentality/lifestyle and they were willing to do so. Just like Peter was ever ready to receive correction and readjustment, like how the voice from heaven corrected him. So you cannot hold Peter accountable for what he believed prior to when he knew Christ! Since all that's important is humility to make changes.

Now that's what is known as PROGRESSIVE LEARNING .

Maximus69:
Through with you!

You get time dey answer am sha

FatherOfJesus:
You are really bent on peddling your own personal beliefs and disregard whatever millions of others believe

When you created this moniker ‘FatherofJesus’, wasn't the above the same thing you had in mind?
Mocking and disregarding the beliefs of others?

haddeylium:
What are the criteria to indentify true Christains?

Watch out for his answer

Expo: “Holy Ghost will teach you”

Sometimes I just don't know what these churchgoers use their brains for.

kingxsamz:
You didn't have to write an epistle for me.
No where I mentioned I'm an atheist, but go off lol.
And also, if you're bright, you'd clearly understand why I wrote that. So go through what I wrote, this time slowly, and read with your brain not your emotions.
And like I said, I'm not obliged to answer your question, so Scram.

I see you want to deny your own identity now. No wahala it's normal.
Why are you asking me to reread what you wrote—are you scared I caught you by your tongue?
Provide an answer to my question or vamoose!

kingxsamz:

Watch how people display their stupidity on this thread.
These same folks who have refused anything that has to do with millions of years would jump on this to claim that it validates some books about talking snakes and talking donkeys.
What some mofos don't know is that certain stories in the bible are based on real places that were present at the time it was written.. Same way the spiderman movie is based on a location, New York.

The above is TOTALLY your opinion. If you choose to believe the events in the Bible are fictional, that's up to you chief.

But sadly, people don't think.

This is actually what caught my attention—because it seems you now have a say in what others choose to believe.

Hence the question:

“Would you like to do the thinking for the people who choose to believe in the Bible?”

If you cannot provide a reasonable answer to that, then you have no argument.

I notice that when you put atheists in their place and silence them, they look for the next avenue to run—which is what you just did here.

kingxsamz:
You're not making any sense.
If my opinion is of no business of yours, then you shouldn't have bothered quoting me nw, since you're intolerant about others having a different opinion from yours.
Writing in bold sized letters doesn't prove a point.
And no, I'm not obliged to answer any question of yours. Sorry.

I don't care much about your opinion Mr kingxsamz.
Really I don't. You have yours, like I have mine.


Since you can't answer the simple question I asked you, I suggest you scram.

kingxsamz:
I didn't know you can now stutter through texts.
If your body wasn't 'pinching' you in the first place, you wouldn't have quoted me, no?

I don't care what you choose to believe in, Mr kingxsamz. It is totally none of my business.
But I'm not sure you can say the same for me—seeing that you're intolerant of other people's beliefs.

I earlier asked you a question,

“Would you like to do the thinking for them?”

If yes, show us evidence of such an authority you have.

kingxsamz:
"What is it to you" if I decide to point out people's ignorance?
Why do you feel you have an opinion on what I say on a public forum?

You don't need to stutter if you have nothing to say. Using double quotes wrongly shows you were just rushing to reply.

Your body just dey pinch you as you see people come here dey comment
Later una go say na religious people dey intolerant

Macsjebs:
Source: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/archaeologists-stumped-after-discovering-2500-22629167

cc: lalasticlala, mynd44, dominique

Well, the year in which Jerusalem was destroyed is one that is still debated 'til today.
Some will say 607BCE, others might say 587/586BCE.
It is worthy to note that the date MUST correspond with Bible chronology.

kingxsamz:

Watch how people display their stupidity on this thread.
These same folks who have refused anything that has to do with millions of years would jump on this to claim that it validates some books about talking snakes and talking donkeys.
What some mofos don't know is that certain stories in the bible are based on real places that were present at the time it was written.. Same way the spiderman movie is based on a location, New York. But sadly, people don't think.

Oh would you like to do the thinking for them?
What is it to you if people choose to believe in “fables” and “stories” as you might call it?

Why do you feel you have an opinion over what other human beings choose to believe?

Emusan:
After commending him with "WELL SAID" why do you still go ahead to recommend a book for him for MORE LIGHT?

Because you knew he goofed big time and that thought was totally out of the reach of watchtower society instead of you to correct him openly. you're commending wrong thing.

I've seen you've tried to call him to order many times but the truth is, he doesn't have life outside NL

Please, can you stay off my mentions?

Maximus69:
Well Jerusalem according to Jesus (God's only begotten Son) has been been condemned so Warwick is the place!

But you're not even meant to be replying him nau

TheBedWench:
I have no problem using people's words against them its done in courts all over the world. I quoted works you are familiar with and most are familiar with the Bible.

The true holy books are written in Hebrew, Arabic and Sanskrit. Besides like Ifa these religions were actually oral traditions which is the superior method for passing down tradition.

Did I ask you what holy books are or how many they are?
As you no sabi anything just go sitdown one side abeg

Maximus69:
He's a terrorist in the making!

When he's fed up with his stories and found out that nobody gives a damn about all his agitations the next thing is to get weapons and start killing people for ignoring him. Note that he said People should hate people for the stories he is fabricating!
So he's not different from Shekau who was brainwashed by Politicians to start killing his neighbours for God!

There is no need wasting time with such ones.
He thinks it's by telling us long long story.

Maximus69:
OK!

So let's reason together from the scriptures! Isaiah 1:18

According to the Bible God created the heavens and the earth {Genesis 1:1} he didn't provide any information about the heavens because we don't need to know about what we can't see so God continued with the information regarding what is visible to our eyes (our planet home earth) {Genesis 1:2-31} notice that as from verse two of Genesis 1, all the info is about the earth.
So how do we now know that God is male?
Well let's proceed to Genesis chapter 2!

God now explained in details how humans began having problems. First he made it clear that when he said "let us make Man in our own image" he didn't create instantly the female alongside the male! {Genesis 2:18-25} So it has taken some time before God created the female, after God has given Adam the life saving info regarding the forbidden fruit {Genesis 2:7} and after Adam has named all other living creatures {Genesis 2:19} therefore everything has been established before God later brought the woman out of the man, this is the first evidence that God and all other heavenly beings are Masculine in nature not feminine!

Secondly another event helped us to ascertain the Masculine nature of God. Remember that God didn't give us any info regarding the heavens and those living there from the beginning, so when angels came down from heaven, put on human bodies and started having sex with female humans {Genesis 6:1-4} it is evident that their masculine nature made them feel the need to enjoy what Adam and his sons are enjoying with their females (SEX) so they abandoned their assignment and came down for that purpose!

Again when Job was complaining bitterly about his condition, God asked him "do you know how many SONS i have in heaven?" {Job 38:7} of course God wanted Job to know that some of his mighty spirit sons have become rebels so all the calamities that befell Job came through those rebellious angels! 2Peter 2:4; Jude 6

Lastly when Apostle Paul was addressing the Christians in Corinth he made it clear to them that God's spirit sons don't relate with female humans the same way they do with males {1Corinthians 11:10} of course those angels look at female humans as lesser creatures so during worship they don't welcome females leading in sacred services, that's why anytime their is no baptized male around any female who wants to take up the responsibility to lead in worship must have her head covered {1Corinthians 11:5} women must cover their heads as a sign of respect to show they're not supposed to take the lead in worship because Eve came from Adam! 1Corinthians 11:8-9 compare with 1Timothy 2:12

All God's creations both heaven and on earth will never forget that the disorder in the world today began after the birth of female human (Eve)! 1Corinthians 33-35

God bless you!

Well said, brother Maximus69.
But allow me to kindly suggest you read up the Awake! issue of October 2008 for more light on this.

TheBedWench:
No one said anyone owns morality. Righteousness is belief in the true and living God. I said other cultures have had moral heroes. You have moral people among Ifa practitioners who wear all white and worship Olodumare as the highest purity in their lives. You are talking to someone who respects and slightly knows Yoruba culture, and I don't know it all. It's simply too vast and ancient to know all of it. Yet I have the gist of it.

TheBedWench, I do not care about what you believe in and what you do not.

My question is:

Why did you quote 1Corinthians 6:9-10 as response to Maximus69's questions and still claim Paul never existed?

TheBedWench:
Yes I feel comfortable quoting even your lies.

No no no.

Maximus69 asked you: So what happens to people from all other nations who accepted pure worship and do God's will?

Will they be welcomed into his kingdom?


And you replied by quoting 1Corinthians 6:9-10 as response to his question? So ‘people from all other nations’ are the unrighteous?