Emusan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emusan's Profile › Emusan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 (of 397 pages)
freshboi88:You can even see him saying There are TWO Lords When the scripture says there's ONE LORD |
MiddleDimension:Titus 1:6 |
ThreeEyedRaven:Bible didn't ONLY instruct minister's or church workers but ALL BELIEVERS. The verse is: If ANY be blameless, the husband of ONE WIFE... The question is, are believers commanded to be blameless? |
EMILO2STAY:This was a picture of a full moon taken from a mountain in Saudi, ask them to explain to you why the blue sky can be seen through their solid moon above our atmosphere.
|
LordReed:These your lies are getting too much Why are you diving into what you have limited knowledge of? Space dust enters earth and tons of matter escape our planet to space everyday not just a year or once in blue moon. |
LordReed:@underlined even shows your level of understanding in the subject matter, yet you're the one who want to teach us. Teach don teach me nonsense! Earth is never an initial reference frame. Strictly speaking, Newton’s laws of motion are valid only in a coordinate system at rest with respect to the “fixed” stars. Such a system is known as a Newtonian, or inertial reference, frame. The laws are also valid in any set of rigid axes moving with constant velocity and without rotation relative to the inertial frame; this concept is known as the principle of Newtonian or Galilean relativity. A coordinate system attached to the Earth is not an inertial reference frame because the Earth rotates and is accelerated with respect to the Sun. Although the solutions to most engineering problems can be obtained to a satisfactory degree of accuracy by assuming that an Earth-based reference frame is an inertial one, there are some applications in which the rotation of the Earth cannot be neglected; among these is the operation of a gyroscopic compass. (See centrifugal force; Coriolis force.) Imagine, ASSUMPTION was even made that earth is an initial reference frame. Link Here At no point did I say I was demonstrating a ball earth so don't be pathetic in putting words in my mouth.So what are you trying to prove if not a ball earth saga? The question still remains, how can plane fly in opposite direction of a rotational motion and still get to its destination? Considering that earth rotates at high speed. What has the earth being a closed system got to do with inertial reference frames?It has been established that earth isn't an initial reference frame, what excuse do you have now for a plane reaching its destination when flying in opposite direction of earth rotation? If earth is a closed system then it can be said to have initial reference frame just as a spaceship orbiting the earth can be said to have initial reference frame. The picture below sum it up
|
LordReed:So of what important is your demonstration to the POV of a ball earth? If the video I linked is not enough for you to understand then even if I did the one I outlined you still won't.Just imagine, you claimed the experiment isn't about a ball earth yet you're using the same experiment to validate your point. Very pathetic! For your initial point to be true, earth must be a close system. |
LordReed:I should get ![]() Aren't you supposed to practicalize it then show us here? Besides, do you know the energy required to move a body of water that a projectory object can travel in? Measure the average speed of the projectile moving through the water while the basin is stationery. Now move the basin around and do the measurement again while it's in motion. The average speed of the projectile will not change.I'm waiting for your experiment with detail video on this. This video illustrates it:It didn't Earth is A SUPPOSED BALL with a ROTATIONAL MOTION not a linear motion Rotational motion and linear motion behave differently on object. |
aadoiza:@underlined is the reason of my question. Yet no straight answer! |
LordReed:can you demonstrate this in the lab? |
Janosky:See the Janosense the lying liar JWs like his father the Devil. I know you lack basic English. Christ is the IMAGE OF GOD. My question was, where in the scripture this statement appeared, that Jesus bears the Image of anyone? Jesus is THAT VERY IMAGE man was created after. Oponu radarada |
CAPTIVATOR:Olodo radarada! But Jesus IS THAT VERY IMAGE, which means without Jesus the Father has no image. You are too daft. Every intelligent creation exist in The father's image because he created them all, Jesus included.Oponu ju... And that Father's image is Jesus Himself. Do you get it now, oponu? |
livingchrist:You'll wait for the answer till thy kingdom come. If not because you're wiser than him, he can boldly say, kingdom hall of JWs. |
CAPTIVATOR:So funny.... Let's replace your definition in the verse. Jesus is the IMAGE belonging to the invisible God (the Father) Can you see what the scripture is saying here is that, the IMAGE OF GOD is Jesus Himself? Which means without Jesus the Father has NO IMAGE. And man was created in the Image of God |
Janosky:You people don't see how foolish your doctrines are, that's why you can open your dirty mouth to defend a doctrine without seeing the negative impact on the other doctrines. The same people who claimed, Jehovah first created Jesus and used Jesus to create other things, now claiming that Jehovah was ISSUING COMMAND OF CREATION TO HEAVENLY HOSTS. Which means, Jesus wasn't the only person used to create all other things but ALL THE ANGELS. This is Ellicott's and Barnes'commentary on Gen 1:26 I know you won't agree with them but will only agree with the part that suits your lying mouth. Ellicott: "As regards the use of the plural here, Maimonides thinks that God took counsel with the earth, the latter supplying the body and Elohim the soul. But it is denied in Isaiah 40:13 that God ever took counsel with any one but Himself. The Jewish interpreters generally think that the angels are meant. More truly and more reverently we may say that this first chapter of Genesis is the chapter of mysteries, and just as “the wind of God” in Genesis 1:2 was the pregnant germ which grew into the revelation of the Holy Ghost, so in Elohim, the many powers concentrated in one being, lies the germ of the doctrine of a plurality of persons in the Divine Unity. BARNES Note: "At the same time he sets it before himself as a thing undertaken with deliberate purpose. Moreover, in the former mandates of creation his words had regard to the thing itself that was summoned into being; as, "Let there be light;" or to some preexistent object that was physically connected with the new creature; as, "Let the land bring forth grass." But now the language of the fiat of creation ascends to the Creator himself: Let us make man. This intimates that the new being in its higher nature is associated not so much with any part of creation as with the Eternal Uncreated himself. The truth is you decided to give another meaning to their stance on Job 38:7, which isn't surprising as you're a liar like your father the Devil. |
CAPTIVATOR:Where in the scripture this statement appeared, that Jesus bears the Image of anyone? |
CAPTIVATOR:Only JWs see emotional burst but never see themselves being emotional. None are prophecies. " MAY" is not prophetic.See another lie from the son of the father of lies. I challenge you to provide where watchtower used MAY in their prophesies. Besides, how can anyone under the guidance of the Holy Spirit be using MAY? How many MAY did John use in revelation? " It is right to hate the wrong committed by the disfellowshiped one, but it is not right to hate the person nor is it right to treat such ones in an inhumane way. " W74, 8/1 p.467See hypocrite! Why then most disfellowsip people got disowned by their people? Bow the blame is on the people not the organization that sets the rule. Humility to change when a person err, is a sign of God's guidance broIt's good as you agree that they ERRED, now it means those doctrines aren't directly taught by Christ or Holy Spirit. So what is the fate of those who died in those wrong teaching? True worshippers will worship the Father. (John 4:23) Not Trinity."And you should honour the Son JUST AS you honour the Father" Do you honour the Father through worship? Satan own the government seat.I didn't see government seat in that verse, that means it's just your delusional idea. If Satan owns the government seat and scripture admonishes us to submit to the governing authority, are you saying scripture is telling us to submit to Satan? Romans 13:1-7 Every person is to be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves. Scripture is clear, it is God who ESTABLISHED ALL AUTHORITIES, how are you to claim Satan owns government ![]() |
haddeylium:This is the verse ERV: Love will never end. But all those gifts will come to an end—even the gift of prophecy, the gift of speaking in different kinds of languages, and the gift of knowledge. Do you still have the gift of knowledge today? |
haddeylium:The fact that, you can openly say the @red part shows you're of your father the Devil because he's a liar from beginning and the father of it. If Jehovah witness never claimed to be an inspired prophet, what is the meaning of these statements in your publications? “Under the guidance of his holy spirit and on the basis of his Word of truth, Jehovah provides what is needed so that all of God's people may be "fitly united in the same mind and in the same line of thought" Kingdom Ministry Sep 2007 p.3 US Edition "We will also increase our joy if we prayerfully and diligently study God's spirit - inspired Word and Christian publications prepared under the spirit's guidance." Watchtower 1992 Mar 15 pp.21-22 "When the time comes to clarify a spiritual matter in our day, holy spirit helps responsible representatives of the faithful and discreet slave at world headquarters to discern deep truths that were not previously understood. (Matt. 24:45; 1 Cor. 2:13) The Governing Body as a whole considers adjusted explanations. (Acts 15:6) What they learn, they publish for the benefit of all." Watchtower 2010 Jul 15 pp.22-23 Let me stop here. So who is a prophet? a person who speaks for God or a deity, or by divine inspiration. Says the https://www.dictionary.com/browse/prophet So, is watchtower claimed to be INSPIRED PROPHET or not? Official Journal of Jehovah's witnessesCheck all these citations from your publication. "Third, holy spirit is at work in bringing Bible truths to light." Watchtower 2010 Apr 15 p.10 Holy Spirits Role in the Outworking of Jehovahs Purpose "Consider, too, the fact that Jehovah's organization alone, in all the earth, is directed by God's holy spirit or active force. (Zech. 4:6) Only this organization functions for Jehovah's purpose and to his praise. To it alone God's Sacred Word, the Bible, is not a sealed book. Many persons of the world are very intelligent, capable of understanding complex matters. They can read the Holy Scriptures, but they cannot understand their deep meaning. Yet God's people can comprehend such spiritual things. Why? Not because of special intelligence on their part, but as the apostle Paul declared: "For it is to us God has revealed them through his spirit, for the spirit searches into all things, even the deep things of God."" Watchtower 1973 Jul 1 p.402 If you've encountered Jws ,Our believe is that miraculous gifts, including the gift of prophecy, dissappeared after the days of the apostlesAnd where does this written in the scripture? Then, How does watchtower chose a replacement for the dead governor's body members? If miraculous gifts have disappeared. What we do is to understand the Bible prophesies about our times in preparing for the Lord's coming . That's not prophesy itself because we don't bring about a new one.Prophecy isn't ONLY about bringing A NEW MESSAGE Truly, some people with scores to grind with Jws will tell you differently.Sure, there is no one prophesying among you because there is no spirit of God in your hall. We Just try to understand and research the Bible chronology ofThat means watchtower is using human knowledge and understanding, but what about the numerous claim that it was the Holy Spirit who is guiding the Governor's body? If you want I can show you some of our understanding of the Bible prophesies which seems to be extremely accurate or you call aswell visit Jw.orgWill you also care to show us the numerous inspiration claim of many failed prophecies ![]() |
reubenobi:The same people will tell you that, Jesus is the ONLY ONE DIRECTLY CREATED by Jehovah. Yet to them Jesus is ONE OF THE CHIEF PRINCE. You'll begin to wonder, how they pass their English exam in school. |
shadeyinka:You'll wait tire to get answer to that question. |
Janosky:What about you? You're destroying your soul... Isaiah 6:8 Then I heard the voice of Jehovah saying: “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” And I said: “Here I am! Send me!”If you don't lack basic English, you'd have seen this without exposing your ignorance. Lemme break it down for you because I know, you're a toddler. The writer: speaks in first person pronoun "I" i.e "Then I heard the voice of Jehovah saying..." The writer switches to first person pronoun which means Jehovah is the ONE SPEAKING NOW. Jehovah: Who shall I (Jehovah) send and who will go for US (Jehovah)? This is a question, that needs answer! And guess who answered it! The same Jehovah Himself because Jehovah continues to speak in the same first person pronoun. "And I said, here I am! Send me" If the entity speaking is totally different from the speaker then it will be a grammatical gaganrium for the speaker to continue speaking in first person pronoun. [s]1 Thess 4:16 , John 5:26-28, whose voice will resurrect the dead ? Wesley Commentary & Geneva Bible Commentary na your 3 idol spirits devotees brethren write amHypocrite! Do you agree with the same Wesley commentary & Geneva Bible Commentary on John 1:1, Heb 1, John 1:3, Rev 3:14? |
Barristter07:Can you realize how foolish you are now? "EVERYTHING THAT GOES INTO THE MOUTH" So when those spirit beings ATE, it didn't go through their MOUTH but through their ANUS. Keep on exposing your ignorance. Again, Luke 24:39 is still nailing your lying doctrine to hell. |
Barristter07:because it appears then it means Jesus is Angel But The Trump of God appears, to your hypocrisy, it doesn't mean Christ is God. The Lord comes with that VOICE !!!"WITH" not "FROM HIM" which means the voice doesn't belong to Him yet "The way the Lord COMES WITH trump of God" and doesn't make him God to you" Oponu oniro radarada. |
Barristter07:And when the Father is said to be The Beginning, beginning of what? Originator/Source cannot be given Children . !!!Does it mean Originator /Source? Yes! You'll receive sense the day you know when scripture is talking about preincarnation and postincarnation of Jesus. |
Barristter07:Luke 24:39 Only materialized Spirits are spoken of as eating in scriptures without defecatingCan you show me where someone was said to defecate in the scripture? Lying liar JWs like your father the Devil. |
Barristter07:You want to boycott this and I won't allow that. It calls for serious concern because a SEC claiming something and was disproved by the true Christian. So, the question still remains: Who is right? 1. Oriental SEC who claim Jesus is one of the Aeones and created, Or 2. The inspire Apostle John who countered that claim that Jesus is God Says the deluded JWs. Does the Greek word "Ache" mean Originator, Source? |
Barristter07:As something is wrong with your dull skull. Here is your claim Oponu, can you see how you're implicating yourself, "Arch ANGELS (plural) voice, so all Angels are Christ." Lying liar JWs like your father the Devil. I'm still waiting for the place where it is said that it was the VOICE of Angel that Christ issue COMMAND. |
Barristter07:Luke 24:39 |
Barristter07:It calls for serious concern because a SEC claiming something and was disproved by the true Christian. So, the question still remains: Who is right? 1. Oriental SEC who claim Jesus is one of the Aeones and created, Or 2. The inspire Apostle John who countered that claim that Jesus is God My post is still up there . It's left to you , or are you scared you can't refute that explanation of Revelation 3:14 ?Your post is nonsensical and meaningless because even a baby Bible student knows that the Greek word "Ache" rendered as beginning meanings "Originator, Source e.t.c" About your claim that Jesus was given children has been dealt with seriously here so no need of repeating nonsense. |
Barristter07:Oponu, can you see how you're implicating yourself, Arch ANGELS (plural) voice, so all Angels are Christ. Besides, stop twisting that verse, it's not the voice of Angel that'll raise the Dead, Christ Himself said, He will come WITH ALL HOLY ANGELS including Michael. |
Barristter07:You don't have business but both the Oriental SEC (who are not part of early Christians) and your claim doctrine are the same, so this calls for a serious concern. "Your comment" Who dash you? Until you support your comment with a reputable scholars commentaries. You can't escape this. So it's either John is right that "The Word was God" or the heretics known as Oriental Sec who held the doctrine like your demonic organization today, The Oriental SEC "held that the λόγος Logos or "Word" was one of the "Aeones" that had been created, and that this one had been united to the man Jesus." is right. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 (of 397 pages)

