₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
Tomorrow this idiot will be on nairaland making xtupid posts about virginity and body count. At the same time, the lot of you don’t even take no for an answer yet somehow you want women are have never had sex. Because how?
I wish your girlfriend had the impetus to arrest you for attempted rape and sexual assault.
Disgusting low grade animal

Attempted rape?

He clearly says he had to force her, meaning that he actually violently raped her. It's in the process of raping her she scratched him and he slapped her to subdue her. This is an entitled violent rapist that needs to be arrested.

NL boys will more likely say she deserved it or that she has been collecting money from him, so she is lying if she's dating them and says her ex raped her. After all, according to them females who say they are raped are always lying.

What a disgusting thread.

Cashsteady:
It pains me alot reading alot of stories and how married women cheat on their husbands...
The worst thing that can ever happen to a man is being cheated on by a woman he loves.. The pain is unbearable and hard to forget..

Women if you know your husband is not satisfying you enough before marriage why agree to marry him or if you know you not ready for marriage why accept his proposal and end up cheat on him.. marriage is not by force..

It'd be better if you are single and sleep around with men rather being married and sleep with other men

So interesting to know that it's only married women who cheat and it's only men who love and agree to marry women.

Men aren't polygamous by nature any more.

Change the gender from man to woman and watch this thread grow to 10 pages on the wickedness of women.

But what can men say of this. Watch them joke around and divert from the issue.

Biglittlelois:
See ehn, the hypocrisy of people especially men on this form ehn

Once a narrative doesn't conform with their responses on a thread, they forget all they supported or their previous idealogy, see all of them coming to my mentions forming saints and do-gooders, same people that preach against dating broke girls, class mixing, or marrying someone of lesser level of education as you said, it's the double mouth hypocrisy for me, I got over 70 mentions because of my comment, you can imagine.

Fear NL people. Their comments still astonish one.

You asked them a question and they are instead giving you poetry in response. LMAO. If a driver impregnated their mother, would they be in full support and begin bowing to him as their new lord?

Even tribalists are suddenly accepting. People can be so insincere. Or maybe it hits home hard.

Biglittlelois:
[s][/s]


How will you feel if your mother gets pregnant for your driver and end up marrying him

The same men who lament women sleeping with drivers are suddenly in support of it.

People are so insincere. Suddenly everyone is going to accept such an incident and cheer it on.

Why haven't more wealthy people married the street sweepers, the vulcanizers? Aren't they humans, too?

Same forum that a man said he couldn't marry a girl because she didn't go to the university, and other men (and even women) came to support his decision to marry someone more educated/in his class? The same people who are against class mixing?? Same story repeats itself daily and this is suddenly their reaction.

Lol.

Kajaard:
Shameless things. A 42 years old woman still does not have sense

So being pregnant or having a child out of wedlock is now something people proudly show to the world. She is proud of having a baby daddy. Na wah

Were you going to marry her? Or did she tell you she's scared of commitment and responsibility? Is it wrong for her to have a child and be loved at 42? She's enjoying her peace.

If that's the only way she can have a child, she's going to and you're only going to complain about it. The man isn't complaining.

federal9:
Don't be blinded by love.

She is not meant for you. A woman who loves a man will stand by her no matter what.


Listen if you have ears!!!

Above is typical male-type emotional blackmail. The usual reflex propaganda.

He is not meant for her. A man who loves a womsn will stand by her no matter what.

You people simply want women to lose their dreams and ambitions to prove they love you, while you can never do the same. Men are so quick to cheat, drop and batter these women to get what men want.

Was love not created for men to love their wives and stand by them?

Ethanuella:
Nobody holy pass .

Comments against this girl's act can drive her into depression. I do not support her action but words go a very long way.

I hope she learns her lesson though

Almost expecting Savage to come own her as a celebrity standing up for the rest of the populace.

Abfinest007:
I prefer taller girls cuz short girl with their over Sabi attitude

LMAO

Amusing.

Nice topic. But even nicer is how this man handles his vitiligo.

Kehmi:
Did you not see the video where he was touching the child and confessing with his own mouth? I don't need to say more to you. From your reasoning it is obvious that thunder has already finished its work in your generation. I feel sorry for your generation. May the good lord have mercy on them.

Please quote that guy on the latest info concerning his sentimental rant.

Ugly skit.

Maybe he used to beat her up and she's having her pound of flesh.

Where is the chief underage sex rape apologist? Isn't Mr Ijesha the innocent seduced rapist again? Where are all his supporters?

Where is Yomi Fabiyi? And the hordes of Fabiyi-inspired "where is the evidence of rape, I don't believe it, never believe women, this is a true friend !" misogynist posters? Your Lord and Master at child rape has admitted to his crime. Very soon some of our resident apologists will follow.

Don't you lot still have much to contribute to his legal team? You know, from your legal standpoints? Jilted Princess and her feminists made him admit his crime, since he's been so innocent? Is the setup now unset?

Pataricatering:
ur an idiot ! May your hatred for women not kill you ..

Woman is killed: immediately, all males are judge and jury— she deserved it, she brought it upon herself with her tongue, why didn't she quit her job to tend the home, this woman doesn't understand a man's ego, she was emasculating him! etc

Man is killed: immediately, all males are judge and jury, too—hang her on the highest pole, fear women, wicked beings, this is why we should go back to the dark ages, poor man! Etc

Either way, a female is to blame. No matter how stupid it sounds.

It's a condition they put themselves into.

Pataricatering:
dont mind the hypocrites - when a women is the breadwinner- they will say she must not allow anybody know she is the breadwinner - she must drag herself around on the floor so that she is not seen as being rude and trampling on his extremely sensitive, fragile, jobless ego - but when he's the breadwinner - they won't let us hear word with " under my roof " and fvcking up and down .
Im surprised the human vultures havnt come out to celebrate and gloat over her dead body as they usually do when women are killed .

Truth is most of them have only their mothers taking care of them, and they know it, but they are too full of crap and would rather die than admit it. They will be emasculated and dominated if they say the truth.

From their comments one can tell they're enjoying it, but they've learned to divert rather than voicing it out.

The what-did-she-do? crew are about to show if they haven't already.

Now it's an argument of if he pushed her or stabbed her, not if he killed her, because it's so easy to divert when it's very difficult to exonerate him. Only men have tempers they cannot control, according to the male murder apologists on toxicland. They didn't have these excuses for Chidinma Ojukwu. No, they wanted her to get the chair and sate their hunger to punish a woman for doing what they usually do to women, because they are untouchable in NL rhetoric.

Ephemmm:
"We breathed into her (Mary) from My Spirit." (Quran 21:91)

It is He who gives life and causes death; and when He decrees a matter, He but says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is." (Quran 40:68)

Qura 5:110

Then will Allah (God) say: “O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favor to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the Holy Spirit (roohi alqudusi), so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Torah and the Gospel. And behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! thou bringest forth the dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the Children of Israel from (violence to) thee when thou didst show them the Clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said: ‘This is nothing but evident magic.’


Quaran 3:55 "Behold! Allah said: O Jesus! I will take thee And raise thee to Myself And clear thee (of the falsehoods) Of those who blaspheme; I will make those Who follow thee superior To those who reject faith, To the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, And I will judge Between you of the matters wherein ye dispute."

This is interesting.

What are the Clear Signs?

Does this mean the Clear Signs of Jesus should be accepted by Muslims, because it is Allah who permitted it? But if so, why don't Muslims accept Jesus the way Christians do, when clearly they should? There's an open collaboration, meaning Muslims should believe in Jesus. Why resisting the words of the Holy Quran?

If 3:55 above said that Allah lifted Jesus, and those who follow Him will be Superior on the day of Resurrection compared to any others.

Doesn't that clearly mean that Jesus is the way?

barbstee:
I beg to disagree though
This actually shows the level of intolerance/hatred that people can exhibit to Muslims.

It's of note that the only people who could defend themselves against that claim are dead.

Which begets the question: what exactly is the narrators point?

Yet little boys on the forum believe women are leeches and after their non-existent money.

Expect the thread to take a different turn. They will try to divert the case of a man killing a woman and post pages of rubbish to that effect.

The killer is a typical NL male. Always saying women don't do anything, yet ready to kill them when they are actually beneficiaries of hard working women. What do you bring to the table? I can't marry a liability! Yet who is the liability in reality?

This evil man deserves the full wrath of the law. The hearts of men are desperately wicked.

Cholls:
My brother that Oga na drama King

Nigeria's Nero.

That's if he didn't actually push her over for a policy.

This lady is unrepentant. Apparently she was laughing at the police when she was first caught.

Everything about her —and her killer boyfriend— is just sadistic and evil. She got off too light for someone whose mother had to call the cops on her numerous times.

Poor woman, murdered by a child who was to care for her.

First they tried culture and it didn't work.
Then they tried religion and it still doesn't work.
Now it's about likening humans to animals to make a point in not wanting to help their wives.

Future women are in trouble. These aren't men. These are escapists. They are not husband material.

Their new mantra is no responsibilities. They look for every rule to twist so that they can do as they please without responsibility.

This is why they wanted women to work, so that they would sit back and have someone giving them money while they can't even care to wash the behinds of their own children. They hid it behind "what do you bring to the table? Are you a productive woman?" and now it's clearly, "how can I suck you dry?"

Kudos to the responders trying to talk to stones. It's been amusing, but at the same time one can see that the logical gender is far from logic.

This jorn guy sounds as robotic/brainwashed as jersahl aka bloodiedsprrrm.

He sounds like the markles and all other greens. Hopefully Thunberg is better.

Lollittaa:
Very selfish man indeed. He just left his wife to be a ticking time bomb. Poor woman indeed. Can't even give her oral, I'm pretty sure he's very lame at other aspects of forreplay. God abeg.

Lol

Man may be doing those things for his side dish.

Hathor5:
I pray God opens your eyes to punctuation.

It's always the men at the bottom of the food chain who need something to dominate via religion and culture and have decided it will be women. The low self-esteem demands they control someone. Who else but women?

Show me a domineering young man/misogynist, and I will tell you his economic background and why he can't punctuate.

Lollittaa:
The hypocrisy stinks to the heavens.

Cumming in less than 10 seconds. Must be extremely frustrating just imagining. As much as God doesn't like divorce, this is enough grounds for a divorce. If he's been like that since day 1,she's a walking sex time bomb.

The real ten seconds man.

And because he's a man, he doesn't see it as a big issue, neither do other men. He probably claims it's dehumanizing because if he does oral on her, she would want to do the same on him, and he can't keep it up for more than ten seconds before blowing his load. A very crafty man.

He could probably have tricked her into a lavender manage and can't wait to be done with the compulsory sex, so that his true desires stay hidden. Hence his ten hurried seconds.

Don't believe men who use words like "dehumanizing".

Lollittaa:
I love how the men will tell her to be patient and endure, but will tell a man in her shoes to find a side piece.
Bratislava, don't you just love it?

That's funny. Did they talk about her husband being a visually stimulated sexual being who must have sex as bread for the marriage to work? And how she must be ready to submit to him in all poses? And how even if he wants it 7 times for each hour of the night she must oblige? And how her body is his to derive pleasure from, and selfishness isn't acceptable for any reason whatsoever? And how she must give him any kind of sex he wants unless she wants to lose the marriage and return to her fathers house? Eh, let's switch the genders.

Is she sure her husband isn't. . . one of several things?

Femeto:
Same someone has been sending her money and gifts. Along with love messages on her phone. Plus she never rejected it. Most of these cases her deeper than you can understand.

Most rape is perpetrated by people trusted and/or known to the victim.

Because he gave her money and gifts, it means that the day she's drunk he is entitled to have sex with her?

Once again, define rape, please. From there we will know what went on.

Femeto:
Na so my girlfriend that time talk self. She was drunk and the guy carried her to his house and raped her. Fear women. The word rape is most often used wrongly.

Define rape, please.

Someone sees an inebriated woman, takes her to his house and has sex with her, and to you that isn't rape? Like, she's drunk and unable to think clearly, and he takes her home and has sex with her, but to you it isn't rape?

Brushstrokes20:
Hmmmmn..... I had a similar experience with an ex girlfriend who claimed that she was raped, only for me to later discover that when we had a brief misunderstanding, she went back to her ex boyfriend who forced himself on her .... bitches ain't loyal!!

Trust them at your peril

What exactly is rape? How is it a "claim" with your admission?

Some of you don't know what to say.