₦airaland Forum

MyOpinionNotUrs:
Freeze really fvucked up by apologizing to this dude.

Donbabaj:
Kidd is the realest guy in the house! no pretense! but i won't want him to win sha becos he's already a wealthy guy.

PaulH07:
Erica won't be forgotten.

She'll also get her share.

As a video vixen.

Imagine Laycon feat. Kidd & Erica...

daddytime:
E se gan aunty mi

fattprince:
You welcome though I would have preferred a kiss to a smile sha

angelfallz:
i don't have an opinion on that.

fattprince:
Being. I don't know this mistake is getting out of hand.

OlawaleBammie:
Aye Lon bayen ja.

Truly love was intoxicating him, if not he should have seen the writing on the wall from the onset. well, his own palava.


Anyways, I respect Ur submissions on the issue, seems like there are only 13 of u in Africa

Zzor:
You once asked me to go read ubunja topics and I was supprised,so I'm somehow right when i said you defend men alot

Zzor:
For obvious reasons,you defend men alot,my regards to your good husband,you and my mom are just among the few lucky women.

Carlyboi:
That’s the article said that he proposed and she accepted lol

OlawaleBammie:
yeeni Ife aye ojoun.

eise Ife aye odeoni

And if I may ask, tani Ife nda laamu ninu awon mejeeji??

Zzor:
women are mostly victims of all these,just some few exceptional cases.Why are you acting like you don't know

Zzor:
infidelity,domestic and emotional abuse,irresponsibility,negligence and so on

networkrecharg:
Section 136 of the Criminal Law of Lagos state, 2015 provides that any person who commits any act of gross indecency with another person in public commits an offence and liable on conviction to 3 years imprisonment.

dannex4adx:
Does he has a spiritual father? don't get me wrong! I am not saying that he is a fake pastor ooo!

Blackpearlous:
Amen amen fire!!!!

OlawaleBammie:
Abi?? koju bayen lo.

MrBrownJay1:
He didn't spend on her, he changed her life entirely, thus because they were common law husband and wife, she can now claim to be accustomed to such lifestyle, and desire to continue living like that. If the man was broke and she was the only one working and taking care of the dude, then the man could sue and ask for the exact same spousal support.



The marriage refusal is irrelevant since the man kept being with her this whole time, and whether they are married or not, the law is the same.



Not at all....even if the woman did absolutely NOTHING, she is still entitled to spousal support in order to continue living the lifestyle she has been made accustomed to by this man. You are confusing spousal support with a settlement to get half of what a husband made during marriage. Different ball game. She doesn't want half of what he made during their union, she just wants to be able to continue living the lifestyle she is accustomed to (thanks to this man)



I think it is fair as everyone knows the law... And any fool who thinks it is ok to have a lazy spouse at home while using money to put them in a certain lifestyle, while that spouse does absolutely nothing, shouldn't/cannot drop them at the snap of their fingers. Stay in your lane instead of trying to change desperate people's lives



Simple common sense would fix such issue....have your woman WORK, Have her contribute to whatever lifestyle you guys are into, have her PAY for such lifestyle, if you are rich and bring some poor woman to your life then within 6 months you have to make a life decision: keep her around and possibly have to pay her spousal support OR get rid of her (or have no paper trail that would link your life to hers)

crackhaus:
Lol, it may never get to that.

The idea of common-law partnerships/marriages would usually make sense when you consider these criteria that should be met:
– Having child(ren) together
– Living together/shared accommodation continuously, not intermittently.
– Shared ownership of property
– Shared bills/addresses on IDs

If the two persons in the OP had all of this, the court judgment would honestly make more sense to anyone considering that they had built a life together but simply did not take marital vows – spousal support here would be very understandable.

But what happened between those two was nothing more than boyfriend and girlfriend matter, none of the usual criteria for CLM were met.
So is that judge not mad like this...

mutter:
You are absolutely correct with that assumption.
Assuming no issues like I'll health, loss of loved ones and the like occur.
But as you get older you start getting dependent on people.
Part two will soon be uploaded.. Advice to daughters in law.
I think they need to understand that their husband's don't divorce their mothers to marry them.

LadySarah:
Women who are busy have less time for drama.

My mum is very busy with herself that she hardly visits any of us except Omugwo. As she is coming she is telling you her departure date which will never exceed 3 weeks.

I like her style and will adopt it cos she says she doesn't have strength for anybodys drama or Dil/sil gossips.If you miss her so much come and visit her.

Th rest is that there is peace for everyone.
Most of all these brouhaha stems from one party
claiming over interference.

Jannuxajj:
I even noticed some poorer countries are more contented than us

OlawaleBammie:
See forget the men fighting the useless law, am happy for them after all they are the one who created the law.
Or are u telling me it's only women who enacted the law??

See let be radical with this thought, if women are enjoying the law now they should not forget that they have male siblings and of course A MALE CHILD who will also share from the cake

So live them to it and let dem face the muzik demselves

In this life if all u know is self-centredness, creating a demon den don't forget the demon Wil one day directly or indirectly torture u.
More reason am lafin at buhary and his cohorts for the unnecessary law they are making thinking the Wil be in power for life..lol


Buena boy... The demon u made...

charlsecy:
Did you miss the part that says, "Latner proposed several times and Climans accepted."

Blackmiserable:
I'll keep my ring in my pocket until I meet someone who thinks like you. Gigigba. Thanks.

emkz:
I was unfortunate to be in a relationship with someone back home but we never quite got to the marital union. She calculated my earnings, deducted the costs of my rent, fuel and feeding, and requested I sent her the rest. She wanted to spend it on a lavish lifestyle to impress people and on her new relationship since I wasn't around. She was housing a man in a space I paid for and was trying to extort me (person wey I never marry oh). Imagine marrying such and taking her abroad. Na tears.

Well sha, I cut the relationship off because she was working at cross-purposes with me and teamed up with her boyfriend to deceive and extort me. She then promised to make my life miserable.

I am no longer abroad, but if I were, I'd marry a lady there, prepare a water-tight prenup and discuss the terms of disengagement should it ever come to that. That we are in a relationship does not mean I should be paying you for the rest of my life once the relationship ends. And except it is a woman whom you have been with for long and grew together in the relationship or someone you already married at home and she is still loyal to your vows as you can verify, I wouldn't advise any man to go and use his hand to carry a Nigerian-educated unexposed and ill-exposed girl and take her abroad for any reason. If you were Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Latino, Indian or Pakistani, I'd have advised you differently. But there is something fundamentally wrong with the African mind and I still can't dissect it.