Crackhaus's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Crackhaus's Profile › Crackhaus's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 358 pages)
DeeMain:One mad person is already enough recipe for chaos and dysfunction. Looking at the bigger picture; whatever damage you think the second mad person will do, the first has already done it. |
Plead:The OP itself is simplistic at best, not well thought out. The author sought to appease both sides of the line, but left out a critical aspect, which I attempted getting out of that dvmb character who has been talking to herself all over the thread. Maybe you can do justice to it, so you can understand why being against provocation is always the most appropriate measure. Here's the conundrum: If physical abuse (violence) is a satisfying response for only physical abuse (violence) and we have grouped slapping under physical abuse, is it therefore okay that after a woman slaps her husband, then he is definitely within his boundaries to respond not just with a slap but also with blows/punches, the use of a belt/stick, or in extreme cases, even a knife that will lead to very serious injury? DeeMain, you are also invited to apply your 'change the outcome' maturity tactic to the above question...if you don't mind. |
DeeMain:An educated emotion is trained to de-escalate by not provoking, NOT fanning the embers of tension on the probability that the other person is more educated emotionally to ignore. This is why provocation is recognized by law as a suitable defense, even in cases as serious murder. |
DeeMain:Which is a better way in your opinion to remove the madness completely? To eliminate the verbal abuse (cause), or to eliminate the physical abuse (outcome)? |
DeeMain:This guy sef ![]() So you already know that the provocateur (using verbal abuse) and the agitated (responding with physical abuse) are both mad people in equal degree, but for some reason, only the latter must take responsibility for their madness. |
DeeMain:Is there human thinking involved in a woman being verbally abusive to her own husband? Humans can think of purpose, of consequences, can begin with the end in mind and allow it guide their responses. We can pause and educate our animal side before we respond.Lol, I like your comments because you're strutting on both sides and making a good case for each. So going by the bold text, for a 'human' who is verbally abusive, has that person thought of the purpose, of consequences? Let me rephrase: When a person is being verbally abusive, what exactly is the end goal and how has that end goal guided their behavior? If I beat up my wife for verbally abusing me, I've given up leadership on how to behave right in my home. I haven't thought about the effect on the home, the fear and tension it can unleash in the home or the examples I want to set for my kids. There is no vision. This home is visionless.Let me guess, it's ONLY your job to behave right in your home and set a good example for your kids, not your wife's job. So what example is your wife setting when she's raising her voice at you, shouting and verbally abusing you in front of these same kids? Do you honestly believe that if you slapped her right there, your kids did not see & understand what led to it? If your wife knew better she would behave better. So you can teach her through example. Example is better than precept.This is exact message I am passing to you. A woman who knows better will not be verbally abusive in the first place because her emotional reaction to displeasure should be intelligent and well educated enough to understand there is really no positive outcome that can come from it - it's either her husband will completely ignore her and she ends up making a shouting idiót of herself, OR she will be bítch slapped in return so her shouting can turn to crying. Like I said, no positive outcome can come from being verbally abusive, so why would it be okay. If the idea is to maintain peace, to behave right in the home, and set a good example for your kids, then there wouldn't be verbal/emotional abuse as well as physical abuse. No self-aware person tries to mitigate problems by dealing with outcomes, problems are mitigated by dealing with causes. |
Prettiedame:If you assumed the question was more about getting you into an argument and less about giving you the chance to make a complete joke of yourself with the response I know you will provide, then you're really more stupid than I thought. ![]() Anyone with working deductive faculties knows that you or your main moniker have no way of answering without shooting yourself in the foot. |
Jadeobee:https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/mjl.gif |
UyaiIncomparabl:Na me you dey call your boy? If I enter you ehn, you will not recognize yourself in front of mirror when I'm done with you. |
bukatyne:Buka, what an ignorant person does not want to know, they will never know it. The idea behind preventive measures is never to completely eliminate, but to reduce the chances of something occurring. Apparently, because some people who wear seatbelts still end up dying in serious collisions, then there's no need to wear seatbelts. God help us indeed. |
CsRockefeller:The guy is on la la land mehn ![]() |
UyaiIncomparabl:No need bashing her. There was an agreement between them on when she should start working and he has reneged on that. So if she had any sense, now will be the time to start making financial demands that will drive him crazy since he wants to be a superhero. Nobody will tell him to let her work by the time her shoes, clothes, and handbags start to occupy every available space in their wardrobe. |
I wonder what you are still waiting for. The time it took you to type this cry cry essay would have been enough to reach her father and tell him you now understand why he was so happy & eager to dash his daughter to you and stop all financial obligations to her. Tell him you have learned your lesson, and that you are not ready to die for her. He should take her back and as her father, he should be the one dying for her. |
The other day when I stressed the fact that parents should not allow children access to mobile phones with internet access, it seemed odd because according to some people, a child can become the next IT tech guru because he/she makes use of a cellphone. The utter foólishness of this thinking is way more funny than all Nigerian comedians combined. While this investigation by the woman and her team is very revealing and highly commendable, they seem to have completely gone in the opposite direction regarding the best way to curb predatory sexual behavior on the internet. I mean, how many of these sexual predators are they going to keep arresting, when the real question they ought to have been dealing with is what the fvck is an 11yr old even doing with an instagram account in the first place? |
DeeMain:Provocation or Loss of control (English Law) is an acceptable defense in law courts, it will get the perpetrator a lesser sentence - look it up if you didn't know that. Even crimes of passion are judged very differently on the basis of pre-conceived versus crimes on a whim (due to provocation). As for your animal reference, perhaps you should explain how a sane person with no animalistic tendencies ought to be verbally (emotionally) abusing another human being in the first place. Animals in fact come in many different shades and forms - if you provoke a snake long enough, it will surely make you its personal problem, whereas you don't need to provoke a Lion before it does damage...and if the animal kingdom had a law court, who do you think will be guilty of a bigger crime, all things being equal? Just keeping it within your animal metaphors anyway. |
It seems to be a recurring theme among SJWs to erroneously assume they can actually regulate and legislate other peoples' internal feelings. If it's not in trying to stop people from expressing how they feel about things which they don't like, it's trying to determine how an angry person should respond to provocation. Is this not a psychological malformation like this, or what else are we supposed to call it? Prettiedame:I know you're a smart girl, so let me borrow some of your insight from the answer you provide to this question? Since physical abuse (violence) is physical abuse (violence) and we have grouped slapping under physical abuse, is it okay therefore that after a woman slaps her husband, then he is definitely within his boundaries to respond not just with a slap but also with blows/punches, the use of a belt/stick, or in extreme cases, even a knife that will lead to very serious injury? |
Let me ask you and I hope you answer yourself, what exactly do you want to do? Continue trying to get him to change, or removing yourself and your children from the situation? |
midnighter:Like I mentioned to the chic I had some back & forth with here, screaming in someone's face or even raising one's voice to express displeasure, is asking for it. No one likes it, no one...not even the goddamn superheroes here who pretend to see absolutely nothing wrong with it. Everyone's stress level is different, you can't continuously provoke another person and still determine how they must respond. |
midnighter:You're a darling midnighter, a fùcking shinning wrapped red-ribboned box of darling-ness. You schooled that "genius" more than I ever would have had the patience for. |
sassysure:If only you know the number of people that look at 'it' from behind without your knowledge, you will not be talking this one. ![]() |
armyofone:I salute you ![]() |
sassysure:I juss dey look you too....from behind |
joyandfaith:Very true. |
armyofone:Wetin con concern housework concern the thread? Or you deliberately want to look for her trouble. ![]() |
sassysure: sassysure:Sassy bebe, you will not meet a more genuinely 'good' person than I if you live to be 1000. ![]() ![]() https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/barry.gif |
merahki:I like me a good coming-of-age whoré story ![]() |
bukatyne: ![]() ![]() https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Tina_HGH.gif |
fatymore:Well it was just a suspicion on my part, but now that it seems you won't let it go, I take back my suspicion. Fair enough? |
bukatyne:Sure about that? I have no such knowledge. |
bukatyne:It is already possible na. It's the same DNA testing that can be used to determine maternity . |
fatymore:Perhaps it's because I find you interesting in a comical way. |
sassysure:Yes oo, like you and I. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 (of 358 pages)




