₦airaland Forum

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s8/images/dude213ad65498e734f91.gif[/img]
"When a mad man walks naked,
it is his kinsmen who feel shame, not himself"
- Chinua Achebe RIP (1988). “A Man of the People”, page 118

When man become mad, they quite lose their dignity

wale377:
Daddy Freeze reaction h ttps://youtu.be/XXjjR2Qw8UY

diasporaman:
Daddy Freeze is a Bastard for insulting my father. Pst David Ibiyeomie blows hot.

The founder of Salvation Ministries, Pastor David Ibiyeomie calls Daddy Freeze a bastard who doesn't know his father and he threatened to arrest him next time he hurls insult on Bishop David Oyedepo. Daddy Freeze was born in a ship by a Somali and he has no money he says

h ttps://www.facebook.com/105295774556365/posts/183895303363078/

h ttps://youtu.be/i0dU_X8U8NY

Read Daddy Freeze's post below:

h ttps://www.instagram.com/p/CEru_bfBhdd/?igshid=1bs6jg8v3wv52

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s8/images/dude213ad65498e734f91.gif[/img]
"When a mad man walks naked,
it is his kinsmen who feel shame, not himself"
- Chinua Achebe RIP (1988). “A Man of the People”, page 118

When man become mad, they quite lose their dignity

achorladey:
Must he use FRAUD or WAYO or LIARS to advance or say whatever he want to put out there . It is not that those words change the point made anyway.

Blabbermouth:
No problem ...

Blabbermouth:
... However, I also need to demonstrate how flawed and unreasonable everything will be if a "Fantasy-future" exist. Will you be my guest?

Blabbermouth:
Good morning sir.

Blabbermouth:
Your Question:
How did God know that the Rich fool in Luke 12:20 above will die later on, in the future, that night?
God (Himself Speaking): You fool I will demand your life from you tonight
Scripture-Backed Answer: God Himself took the rich fool's life.. That was God's orchestration/declaration! So what shall we say, God does not know what He himself has declared?
This is the truth- there is nothing like future (as it doesn't exist) aside what God HAD DECLARED or PERMITTED to happen(I.e. God permitting another being's declaration of "what will happen)...

Blabbermouth:
We've assessed the scriptures you and Shade dropped

Blabbermouth:
We will like to open down ours and ask questions from them. Should I carry on?

donnie:
My friend look up the definition of swarthy and don't be silly.

Mentcee:
Very uncivilized bloke you're!

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s5/images/ezgif-2-bb81ab7ea10d.gif[/img]
Researcher and messenger
More like researcher of filth and messenger of trash
Hin come put titles for head as if like shrimp

alexander7:
DADDY FREEZE IS A BASTARD-HIS FATHER IS NOT KNOWN AND THAT IS WHY HE INSULTS MY FATHER
-Pastor David Ibiyeomie curses Daddy Freeze on his constant insults of Bishop David Oyedepo

Pastor David Ibiyeomie is a Nigerian televangelist, and founder and senior pastor of Salvation Ministries, in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. he is widely known worldwide for his anointed messages and his yearly program the 5 nights of glory. He is a spiritual son of Bishop David Oyedepo

David O. Oyedepo is also a Nigerian preacher, Christian author, businessman, architect and the founder and presiding Bishop of the megachurch Faith Tabernacle in Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria, and Living Faith Church Worldwide, also known as Winners' Chapel International. 

Things got hot this Sunday after Pastor David Ibiyeomie curses Daddy Freeze on his constant insults of Bishop David Oyedepo his spiritual father and also revealing that the popular AOP is not even a Nigeria. He further said that he cursed the day the OAP was born. Raining many other curses on him he mentioned he can't be alive and watch anyone insult the father

Watch Video Below:

h ttps://web.facebook.com/watch/?v=2919410688162972&extid=u1ngwLpECjsMsj85
Source: h ttps://decblog.com/daddy-freeze-is-a-bastard-pastor-david-ibiyeomie-curses-daddy-freeze-on-his-constant-insults-of-bishop-david-oyedepo/

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s8/images/dude213ad65498e734f91.gif[/img]
"When a mad man walks naked,
it is his kinsmen who feel shame, not himself"
- Chinua Achebe RIP (1988). “A Man of the People”, page 118

When man become mad,
they quite lose their dignity

Janosky:
Mr Projection FRAUD Exponent, JWs won't fall for your cheap blackmail.

."*John 17:6,26
"I have revealed your Name to the children of men, those whom you have given me from the world; yours they were, and you have given them to me, and they have kept your word."

." 26"And I have revealed to them your Name, and I am revealing it, so that the love with which you have loved me shall be in them, and I shall be in them."

*Whether MuttleyLaff like am or not, Yeshua spoke his Father's holy name, YHWH Jehovah.
Jesus Christ & his followers spoke Aramaic and Greek respectively during his earthly ministry.
Bros, STOP deceiving yourself.

Muttley WAILER

MuttleyLaff:
"Jesus said to them,
“If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and came from God;
nor have I come of Myself, but He sent Me."
- John 8:42

In John 8:42 above, "exerchomai" is the Greek original word, translated as "proceeded forth". By definition, it means, to go or come out of, with mention of the place out of which one goes, or of the point from which one departs. So, John 8:42 above, makes no mistake, where from, Yahshua Ha Mashiach aka Jesus Christ proceeded forth and came out from.

Blabbermouth:
None of this scriptures back your view.... Different plot, different context, all swallowed up with a lazy "God saw the future" belief.

kkins25:
I don't see any difference between the 'g' and 'G', whatever difference exist- only exist in your mind.

The totality of possibilities exist in 'God', yet the outcome of any event cannot be known by 'God' until the the cause that would affect the outcome is effected.

Without the cause and effect principle, then the concept of 'freewill' is a sham and all creatures would be subject to the pre-installed genetic and psychological paradigm of the creature's environment. infact, because of the pre-installed genetic and psychological parameters of every creature the concept of righteous and unrighteousness is a downright ridiculous.

Blabbermouth:
Spot on!

MuttleyLaff:
When a policeman/woman arrests you under the suspicion of driving under influence, he/she is telling you he/she has reasons to believe that you are driving under the influence of a "g" and of course not under the influence of "G". The chance of you being stopped by the representative of the law while under the influence of "G" is slim.

Either one of "g" and "G" are a reality(ies)

You are thinking this way with the reasoning of a mortal human being's level of thinking

Are you free and ready to be a volunteer and play the guinea pig role, I have in an experiment, to determine whether or not you have freewill and if the universal law of cause and effect. Also to see how much of this alleged pre-installed genetic and psychological thinking of the creature's environment will come or not come into play.

The cloth of righteousness was lost, right there, back in the Eden. The only way of having it back, the only way of restoring it, the only way of putting it back on is through Yahshua Ha Mashiach aka Jesus Christ, who dresses every believer, with a clothing of salvation and draped in a robe of righteousness (i.e. Job 29:14 and Isaiah 61:10)

Janosky:
[s]Bros, You see but you don't read English, my comments is not in French
Go back to my posts and read as long as it takes you to understand it line by line , including the screenshots of 1 John 5:7.

Assignment for MuttleyLaff:
Bros, go and ask other Bible translators why they are hiding the holy name of Jehovah God which Jesus Christ said himself proclaimed everywhere
John 17:6,26.
John 17:6,26, Jesus Christ says your claim is HOGWASH

Also, ask other Bible translators why they refused to tow the path of Jesus Christ and translators of the NWT and Aramaic Bible [/s]

Janosky:
Matthew 18:11 is also missing in other Bible translations.
Deal with it.

Bros, STOP this is ignorance about 1 John 5:7. The fake Textus receptus version ("in heaven the Father, the Word and the holy ghost. These three are one" FRAUD in KJV, Geneva, Weymouth Bibles) is not in the holy scriptures.
Bros, go and confirm. No disgrace yourself here.

... Additional works consulted in preparing the New World Translation include the Armenian Version, Coptic Versions, the Latin Vulgate, Sistine and Clementine Revised Latin Texts, Textus Receptus

The only person disgracing himself here is you, as you havent commented on how 1 John 5:7 got a mention in the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible), being that it is an insertion, but other almost twenty odd insertions, that is including Matthew 18:11, got treated as a pariah by JW organisation and never got a mention in New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) but are total AWOL in the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible), hmm?

Deal with this easy, simple, direct, innocent, harmless, and straightforward questions nah, instead of excitedly foaming and drooling from all corners of the mouth

1/ Why is 1 John 5:7 in the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) but Matthew 18:11 and the shy under twenty other verses don't get to have a presence or entry, like 1 John 5:7 does, in the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible). Hmm?
2/ Is the word Jehovah, ever in the Greek original text, hmm?

Janosky:
.
Muttleylaff Framing up FALSE claims everywhere

The fact have been convincingly confirmed.
Matthew 18:11 is an interpolation of Luke 19:10.

Muttley Wailer

MuttleyLaff:
What Jerome/jnr said didnt deem commenting on as everyone knows the Talmud isnt God inspired
- at least, not if we're going by 2 Timothy 3:16 guideline

Anyway, trawl through my past posts, to see what my take is on the Talmud is (e.g. use the search tool with search word MuttleyLaff+talmud)

Better still, saving your the time & effort, you should be able to pick out my view on the Talmud from the below snippet touching on another subject

- SNIPPET -

(4) The Oral Law of the Jews (later written as the Talmud)
- the interpretation of Moses' Law by the Scribes and Pharisees.

It is followed by the Orthodox Jews to this day as of equal authority to the Bible.

They falsely claimed it was passed down from Moses by word of mouth.
Jesus clashed with Pharisees over this law. He rejected it and came against it's legalistic spirit (Matt15:3, Mark7:3).

Now when 1 Cor 14:34,35 refers to a law of silence for women, it couldn't be:
(1) because there's no such law in the Old-Testament and he would say 'it is written';
neither is it found in the Gospels (2).
Neither is it (3) because it is clearly a pre-existing law.
Therefore by a process of elimination it must be (4) The Jewish Oral Law (the laws of the Pharisees)

This is confirmed by the phrase: 'As also SAYS the Law.' - a reference to the ORAL law rather than the WRITTEN law (scripture).
(see also Matt 5:21,27,31, 33,38,43)

Also, we know this because it agrees completely with the Talmud and applies to Orthodox synagogues today. The service is for men only. Women are discouraged from even learning, but are sometimes allowed to watch from the gallery, for their place is at home not with things too high for them! And it would be shameful for them to speak in a meeting.

TALMUDIC QUOTES illustrate this:
A Jewish Prayer:'Praise God He hasn't created me a gentile, a woman or an ignorant man.'
'The woman, says the law, is in all things inferior to the man.'
Only men could speak in public (Beraktoth 4,36; Mishnah Aboth 1,5)
No woman could give a testimony or conduct business. (Mishnah Shabbath 4,1)

Women were viewed with disregard and repression, and the Talmud contains many distasteful insults of women's character. They were to be avoided. They were not required to know or fulfil the law and so few were learned.

One said: 'May the words of the Torah be burned rather than be given to women.'
In public worship they were segregated and silenced and so had to ask questions of their husbands at home.

Clearly the writer of 1 Cor 14:34,35 reflected this Pharisaical attitude to women and used this Jewish Law to support his views.

So why would Paul say something that stands in contradiction to the immediate context and the rest of the New Testament? Why would he establish this teaching on Jewish Laws that elsewhere, both he and Jesus rejected?

The simple answer is these verses are not Paul's teaching!
Paul's letters are written in response church situations. 1 Corinthians is the most responsive of them all. Paul had received reports about what was going on (1:11, 5:1, 6:1,8 ), and the church had sent a letter to Paul with many questions (7:1,8,10,12,25; 8:1,4; 12:1; 16:1). There was disunity (1:10-12,3:3). In particular there were 2 groups of people saved from different backgrounds disputing -Jews who tended toward legalism, and Greeks who tended toward license. Paul goes through the issues and questions raised one by one.

Examples of when Paul is clearly responding to what one group has said are 6:15-20 (Greeks); 9:1-11; 11:1-16 (Jews) and 15:12,35,36.

Sometimes he refers what they are saying and then he answers them -e.g.1 Cor 4:8: 'You are already full! You are already rich! You have reigned as kings without us.' (this is what some of them had claimed) --'and indeed I wish you did reign, that we might also reign with you.' (Paul's answer - see also 4:10)

Sometimes he even quotes what they say and then answers them. The problem is that there are no punctuation or quote marks in the Greek and the translators often miss them out.

Some examples of this, are when he responds to the 'loose' Greeks as in 6:12,13:
(You say) 'All things are lawful for me.'
(I Paul) say: 'but all things are not helpful.'
(You say) 'All things are lawful for me.'
(I Paul) say: 'but I will not be brought under the power of any.'
(You say) 'Food is for the stomach and the stomach for foods.'
(I Paul) say: 'but God will destroy both it and them.'
We see the same in 10:23,24.

In questions about idols Paul challenges those who pride themselves in their knowledge but who do not hold it in love. (8:1-3) 8:4: 'We know that -'an idol is nothing in the world and that there is but one God' (again he quotes their words (their knowledge) before he answers as confirmed in v10,11.

Other examples are when he responds to the 'legalistic Jews', 7:1:
'Now concerning what you wrote to me,
(some of you said) 'It is good for a man not to touch a woman.'
(But I Paul say) 'Nevertheless because of sexual immorality, let each man have his own wife...'

Now we can understand what is happening in 1 Cor 14:34,35.
Paul is quoting what some Jewish converts to Christ, had written in a letter to Paul, complaining about women being involved in church services. Although they were saved they were used to male-dominated synagogue - worship and so found the equality of women in church life hard to take.

They were saying: 'Paul, these women are prophesying, praying out loud, speaking in tongues. The Oral law says it's shameful for a woman to speak in public. Tell them to shut-up!'

So as Paul is teaching on every member participating in church services, it is the natural place for him to deal with their objection. So he quotes what they say: 'Let your women keep silent in the churches, for it is not permitted for them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home, for it is shameful for women to speak in church' (v34,35)

Then he answers them: 'What, came the word of God out from you? or came it to you only? If any think himself a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things I write to you (not the Talmud) are the commandments of the Lord (the true authority) But if any (choose to be) be ignorant, let him be ignorant.' (v36-38) Paul replies by asserting his apostolic authority above the Talmud.

This also explains why these verses come out of the blue, interrupting the flow of thought, which is picked up again in v39,40: 'Therefore brethren,covet to prophesy and do not forbid to speak with tongues.'

The placement of v34,35 in the passage as a clear interruption and marked contrast to what Paul is teaching, serves to separate them from Paul's own views.

We conclude that Paul isn't silencing women, rather the opposite!

Those who are too quick to agree with v34,35 have unwittingly submitted to an unchristian pharisaical spirit

- /SNIPPET -

Bottom line, the Talmud is to the Bible, what the Hadith is to the Quran. Enough said

PrecisionFx:
The talmund is just a religious book whose history is shrouded in confusion like every other religious book. U have no real proof about any part of it, just random unverifiable stories.

"The Oral Law of the Jews (later written as the talmud)- the interpretation of Moses' Law by the Scribes and Pharisees. It is followed by the Orthodox Jews to this day as of equal authority to the Bible. They falsely claimed it was passed down from Moses by word of mouth. Jesus clashed with Pharisees over this law. He rejected it and came against it's legalistic spirit (Matt15:3, Mark7:3)"
- by MuttleyLaff: 8:00pm On Aug 30, 2015

I am sure from reading the above quotes obtained in posts of mine, as far back as 2015, you can see my views about the Talmud and defo now realising that you are whistling in the wind and even barking up the wrong tree. You are not telling me anything about the Talmud, that light moons away, I dont already know. So please, just already, kindly, back off and give it a rest José. OK, hmm?

PrecisionFx:
Hebrews dont come from Europe, Ur questions are irrelevant.

Who have you read here say, Hebrews come from Europe, erhn?.

Just leave me alone to "mano o mano" face this rascal identity thief, covetous, avarice, wannabe Israelite misleading easily persuaded and impressed, over-trusting, as green as grass, people reading the thread.

The person I asked the question, knows why I asked, and is the reason, why he has refused every single cheese baits, I've thrown at him

1/ Who really brought the Talmud?
2/ Where from, was the Talmud brought (i.e. where originated from)?
3/ What period roughly, was the Talmud brought to Israel?

You aren't telling me what I dont already know. The aim of the question was to get OP, committed to an answer. Please answer the above three easy, direct, simple, innocent, harmless and straightforward questions, since OP has shied from responding to them. Thank you in advance.

You sef instead of you responding with your answers to the above three easy, direct, simple, innocent, harmless and straightforward questions, that OP has shied from responding to them, you're busy taking panadull for another man's headache. If you cant bring yourself to answer the three easy, direct, simple, innocent, harmless and straightforward questions, then why not please just mind your own foxtrot, uniform, charlie kilo business

Maximus69:
[s]Please Janosky, can you do US a favour by ignoring MuttleyLaff completely?

Thanks in advance! [/s]

You believe he is a robot like you are. Who is mind-controlled by your GB

Bunch of reprobates having spirits of corruption. Tufiakwa!
Good riddance to bad rubbish lot

Janosky:
WAYO man, when you don't research very well like a good student of the Bible, you come to NL to showcase your NONSENSICAL ignorance .

Bros, go and learn

Luke 19:10 was interpolated in Matthew 18:11 in the KJV, that verse is not meant to be in Matt 18.
That's the case in many other instances , except it's proven that a forgery was done, as in all 1st John 5:7 Textus receptus Bibles
The screenshot evidence.....

Acehart:
I think his responses are rather not well thought of than dishonest. In continuum mechanics, the projection is always equal in magnitude to its sources (sorry for bringing this in here). The projection is always mutually exclusive. Yet he says the projection is not separate.

MuttleyLaff:
Mister man, will you please stay in your hypocritical, sanctimonious, self lane. Afterall you did say, you are done with me, Mister Forgetful-Promise-Breaker

GRIMM\JOE, ask him, Maximus\69, to paste out here what Matthew 18:11 says in or from the New World Translation (i.e. NWT, that is the Jehovah's Witnesses' official bible) and whats the reason for it, if he is unable to do so

"Wọn pi irẹsi, oun na yọ sibi" loosely translates as "rice is served, he too is pulling out his cutlery"

Acehart:
My friend, I read the NWT sometimes; so don’t think I think it is fake. Have we met?

You mentioned tithes - have you collected one from me? If I say you are a bitter person, you will be doing one kind. Your fight shouldn’t be with me, my friend.

We aren’t discussing about Bible versions, so let our conviction speak; what is the meaning of “God”? Please tell me in your own words, your own conviction.

ModestGal:
Bunch of low self esteem fools

Yoruba are from Mecca
Igbo from Isreal
Akwaibom from Jews
Hausa from Saudi Arabia

ModestGal:
You all are fools, if not, you will know that humanity started from Africa and the reason why those countries you so wish to affiliate with are great is because they work for it, they made their country great. But, you all are cowards, only intrested in affiliating with what is good, you only want ''ready made''.

Don't worry, a Congo of rice will still sell for #5000 before the year runs out. We will gather suffer together, if you like claim Jews from now till next year

budaatum:
... Open OpenYourEyes1 eyes so he can see and not be led astray and lead others following him astray please.

budaatum:
This is not about my ego. Please stay on topic.

budaatum:
I'm not after likes, muttley. Open openeyes eyes so he can see and not be led astray and lead others following him astray please.

budaatum:
Do mention me when you address the topic of the thread.

budaatum:
You are really funny. You can't see how your position empowers satan over you by giving satan responsibility for what you are responsible for, and more so for thinking this sort of lame rhetoric has any effect on buda.

The person who sent him of course. Now, answer one of mine.

Whenever you do something evil do you receive instruction from satan to do it? And if you did, could you kindly tell me how satan instructed you?

I'm certain you can read it yourself. The serpent is repeated numerous time in chapter 3 which starts with "Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?

The entire chapter shows God not fully accepting Adam and Eve's excuse that "the serpent made me do it", which should make an intelligent person wary of using that same excuse since you are meant to learn that you will be punished for your sins. I post the punishment below.

lomprico:
you just me to dignify you with am insult, Naaa, I ain't gat that time. peace!

I don't normally like to get into face-offs but I give as good as I get, especially when coming from those taking delight and pride in their ignorances but trust me, when I do, I would even give extra bonus added value. Go in peace with your ignorance and sin no more. Tufiakwa!

olulove:
I go call MC Olu omo

TMSMedia:
"Leave Gay People Alone. They Are Not Your Problem" - Nollywood Actress Blasts Nigerians (Video)

Nollywood actress, Ameze Imarhiagbe, has asked Nigerians to leave gay people alone as they are not the cause of their problems.

According to IgbereTV reports, the actress made this statement on her Instagram page. The actress who was popular in the 90s for her role in movies like ''Flesh and Blood'', said people need to understand that "being gay is totally not a decision most people in the LGBTQ make themselves."

She said that gay people are not the problem of the world and that people need to focus on the problems in their lives and leave members of the LGBTQ alone.

Her post reads:

''It baffles me to see some people condemn the LGBTQ community and accord them total hatred.

Are you God? You think most of them wanted their lives that way? The sooner you start to realize that biological factors and not CHOICE drive homosexuality, the better for your mental health. Go meet God and ask why they are what they are, and tell me if you ever got an answer.

Gay people are not your problem. There are a whole lot of problems in the world that need more attention. Stop the hatred towards the LGBTQ community and face your own problems.

As long as they are not forcing their beliefs on me or imposing anything on me, it’s not my problem or concern. To each, his own! Live & let's live.''

See the video she posted below.
h ttps://youtu.be/dhtWfntlIcM

https://igberetvnews.com/1363696/leave-gay-people-alone-problem-nollywood-actress-blasts-nigerians-video/

Lalasticlala