₦airaland Forum

lol funny, I wouldn't do it personally, but I know many women who are guilty of it. ! I suppose if I did do that, it would be incase I knew there was a possibility I would stay the night occasionally unplanned, but not to mark my territory, because it's not mine to mark and it's silly. . .  

follypimpi:
Well i come to realise most ladies intentionally leave there underwear specifically pants @ your crib when they come for a weekend or couple of days to mark there territory,i find it quite illarious But i wld love the NL ladies to explain the reason behind this action of there's.

Err, is there something you need to tell me hubby? Which worwor girl is marking her territory in my man's crib? Cos it sure aint me.  

awwwww pele. . . . guess what happened. . . . Your bf was the one who sent HARMED ROBBERS to your compound to steal your phone(s) knowing you don't know his number off head and has not bothered to check on you because it was part of his plan all a long. Once again, I'm sorry for your tripple loss.

stillwater:
It's really not that easy to kill. The point is to do everything possible to escape if ever I encounter an attacker. If he gets killed in the process, well . . . I can only say it's not my fault. It doesn't make life look less to me either because I protected myself.

Very sensible.

platinumnk:
^^Secretz long time o. How u dey

Hey sweety, I dey ohhh. I been in naija for 6 weeks. . . just got back some days ago . . . . Hope ur ok sha? (No mek us derail thread ohhh)
I hope you're not co-habiting?

Gosh! Who gives a hoooot! The only reason I would not co-habit with any one is because I do not want any dude invading my precious space and all the things I have worked hard for to be tampered with. Its not WRONG and it's not RIGHT. It's up to you. People are talking on here as if GOD is gonna punish you and send you to hell if you do and im sure these very people have sexual relations even though they are not co-habiting. Or you think GOD can't see that? mscheewwww!

The main problem that women especially are likely to encounter with co-habiting is that the man is less likely to propose to you as if he would feel as though he is already married, so why bother.

lol funny thread. . .

the title of the movies is not even the worst part, its when they 'drop' the title of the movie in the actual film! If the film was decent enough, we would know the film and the title have a connection rather than them senselessly trying to point it out at some irrelevant stage in the movie!

e.g, Movie title: LOVE CRIME

actor: 'what you did to me was a REAL LOVE Crime!'

I mean wtf!!!

Fhemmmy:
You are just telling some men to go hungry

lol. . . . . . . as if they wont go hungry giving up their extra wives. lol

moi moi, eko and purrrre warra, you will be surprised that you will actually receive change to get on the bus or even anokada ride if you looking for some breeeeeze.

Me, my guy, my parents, his parents, closest friends. . . . at a registry, or church, then p*** off to a peppe soup joint.

or everything all traditional and big if everyone else is willing to pay for it.

Let's all give up pounded yam and jollof rice too.

[quote author=na2day? link=topic=310574.msg4397228#msg4397228 date=1250876779]sweet heart, u cant just come back to NL with such an emphatic knock out blow, haba! [/quote]I love you tooo , but sweetheart it's the truth.

Fhemmmy:
Well said.
I have always said, MIL should not live with the couple.

too right. !

Lets get real, the only person(s) in a marriage who should have the power and authority to send anyone packing out of a matrimonial home are either of the two people who were joined together.

One thing I firmly believe is no mother, father, relative of any married couple who are adults should interfere in their disputes. You say your 2 cents now, when things are good again, you will surely be seen as the bad guy, MIL or not. If the girl and the MIL have issues, yes she should apologise and settle the matter as it's between them both, she has no right to send her out of her own home that she shares with her husband. The guy is weak for allowing such nonsense to happen. Or did he discover she is a killer or not the father of their children.? mschewwww.

Ive always wondered what I would do, but I would probably give it to charity some years after the wedding. I wouldn't think of saving it to pass to a daughter because I might not have one and it might not be of her taste at the time of her own wedding.

Boooooring.

Sauron is the hottest guy on NL. . . . . . he knows why!

If you haven't got a problem with it then there's nothing wrong with marrying a guy who drinks and smokes weed.

I know a lot of women who might like to date your boyfriend . . . . . I mean he's caring, thoughtful, takes you out on dates, seems committed. . . . . Please leave him for someone who would appreciate those little things. Na by force you must stay with him?

Yep, I love me some thick creamy yogurt too. No bits though. . . .

Love them on fruit salads. . . . . yum yum.

Sagamite:
I agree to an extent.

Depends on what the wealth is and the skill required to get it in comparison to her "highly" educated level.

If it is in the region of $5m or less after 20 years of marriage or so, then 50-50 might work but if we are talking about $40m or $1.5bn, how many educated people achieve that? This is normally achieved due to the exceptional ability of the individual and should mainly remain with the individual.

If you are stinking rich and the marriage is less than 5 years . . . . . . . . . . .bye bye baby, good luck! ^{A few exceptions if she is a wonderful woman}

If it is a long marriage and she has raised wonderful kids, then 10% or even more would make sense.

Kinda of agree.

But my mentality has never been to spoil my kids as I don't think they learn much about life.

So if I am living luxury, I have a right to as I would have sweated for it. My kids will get every single thing they need, some of what they want within reason and more of what they want by sweating/impressing a bit for it. So I don't think my kids have a right to a life of luxury just because I am rich.

I fly private jet does not mean they can not buy a travelcard and catch the bloody bus/tube to school.

I get private helps to dryclean my clothes does not mean they can not bloody operate a washing machine themselves to do their washing.

I spend $1000 for a meal for 2 does not mean they have the bloody right to $50 dollars a day for school meals.

I have worked for it, they haven't. They are entitled to a decent and comfortable life but not to a luxury life.

I don't want any judge to turn around and dictate to me what I should provide to them except for the exceptional essentials to protect kids that have less responsible parents.

Na wa for you ohh Sagamite,

All the blood sweat and tears to get to where you would have got to, was it simply for your own enjoyment or for that of your wife and kids too?
Obama doesn't send his 2 little girls to go and get economy flights whilst him and his wife go on first/business class because of all the blood sweat and tears he used to get to presidency? ? ?

You don't have to spoil your children, but your kids should enjoy the fruit of their parents labour within reason.

How would you also calculate her potential wealth? I mean you are not seriously going to go based on the last job she had before agreeing to stay at home?
What if her qualifications were greater than yours? But you were given the opportunity to go into a great business? What if you used both hers and your life savings to go into this business that ended up making you and your family millions?

Regardless of whether she stays at home with the kids, it's not her sole responsibility to 'make sure' they are raised well. The working father has his own role to play regarding this too. Also, baggabon children can be genetically passed down. lmao!


I believe in pre-nups, yes I do, but when the guy has made his riches before I came into the picture. However, not in a position when you both have nothing to begin with.

GEW:
sadly you are right. remember eneke the bird in things fall apart.
na only small apartment? you know how much some 2/3 bedrooms flats cost?

what if she didnt scarifice any high income? do u still believe she gets 50%?

lol, am sure 10% of his wealth if he's that rich will cover far more than the price of a 2/3 bedroom appartment. If she didn's sacrifice any income, she would probably be just as rich as he is. So they can fight about who gets the house etc etc. . .    

If you both marry when you both have nothing, then die-vorce some 15 years later, with a few kids in tow:

During the 15 years, you and your wife agree she will stay at home and look after the children (she is highly educated and could have pretty much any decent job she wants), but she sacrificed her potential high income to raise YOUR children. I believe she is entitled to 50% .

However, If she met you stinking rich, and she is truly marrying you for love, then she should sign that pre-nup. Especially if you die-vorce after a mere few years of marriage. I don't however, believe she should leave completely empty handed, maybe atleast 10% or even a small appartment as good will gesture- lmao!

In respect to paying child support, I'm sorry but they are your kids as well as hers, if the father can live a luxury life then so can his kids. You do not have to give the mom money every month to support the kids, because you may not know what she is truly spending it on, but what stops you the father paying the school fees directly to the school?, or when you see the kids, taking them shopping to buy their clothes and other relevant things that they need?

She is trying to be discovered by an agent. . . .

[quote author=Georgette$ link=topic=293212.msg4144962#msg4144962 date=1246906244]i hope this doesn't sound stupid b4 all of u but i love mixed children, how they look but i'm sure i don't want to marry a white man. i still love my black guys but is it wrong to want to have at least one child from a white man but still not end up marrying him?[/quote]Yes, it does sound stupid.

No, it is not wrong for YOU.

Sorry, it's a no go area for me. Nope nope nope.

Many companies are against it, especially if one is in a senior position and the other is in a junior one.
Anyways, alot of people in my previous place of work are all shagging each other. Esp the married ones! nonsense.

roflmao. . . .

That has got to be the greatest one ever.

awwwwwwwwwwwwww, thats soooo sweeeet.  

Simple all the way . . . . . . I can have all the money in the world, but that's how I want it.

I know someone in your exact same position, he has had it since childhood and so does his sister. The procedure that will work for him is very expensive.

You can either save the money or live with it , but personally I wouldn't bother. 

YOU wasted 8 frigging years ? ? ? ? ?

It is well.

I think your teeth are naturally coloured that way. . . I can't imagine that you don't brush your teeth or eat so much junk to have allowed it discolour to that extent.
Are you the only member in your family who has it? as it might be a gene thing? Also, have you only had it in your adult years or since you were quite young?

Seriously, it's not a big deal if everything else is in tact and your hygiene in general is up to scratch.

Yes we are complicated, I can admit to tha. I am soo complex I can't find anybody who is good enough for me, due to my complex nature.