₦airaland Forum

Kushites:
WHERE ARE PEDESTRIANS SUPPOSED TO WALK?

RUBBISH.

OPEN GUTTER SPECIALISTS.

DON'T BUILD ROADS WITH COVERED DRAINS AND SIDEWALKS LIKE OTHER CIVILISED PARTS OF THE WORLD.

PRIMITIVE PEOPLE WITH NO SENSE.

Kigali, Rwanda (How Civilized People Build Their Roads)
https://www.centreforsustainablecities.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/shutterstock_699139246.jpg

https://blog.tracks4africa.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Johann-groenewald-rwanda-2019-kigali-1024x682.jpg

Apt bro. Nigerians love mediocrity, don't know if its the Stockholm syndrome that's collectively affecting their brain cells. See how the ignorant oafs above you are celebrating mediocre basic amenities. Basic amenities are what's exciting you to sing praises like seals in captivity, when the value of our resources clearly shows we should be capable of solving way more complex issues bedeviling our society. There's really no hope for this country as Nigerians are truly daft, daft beyond measure. Its like taking a child's pocket money of 1000 without his knowledge and then giiving him 10 out of the thousand to buy sweets and he's stupidly excited not knowing its from his stolen pocket money.

codedgalaxy:
petty?
Real Bleep up's starts from overlooked shits like this.

Definitely. Doesn't mean u weren't petty though. If it was me, I'd smile while looking her in the eyes and turn around and walk away without uttering a word after that crappy request.

Different pov, but agnostic chexking in.

Remijuice:
Anyone with tattoo is very selfish and inconsiderate, cause you can no longer donate blood to save lives...

Calm down with your loud ignorance. Go educate yourself.

You're a prick and you're petty. I like you.

MaxInDHouse:
OK.
To illustrate: imagine you working for a wealthy man who has given you so much gifts to the extent that many people begin envying you. Then the CEO of another company who is a competor sent hoodlums after you then you reported to the CEO who told you to keep calm and allow them take whatever they feel like taking away from you but you feel so much important that you began counting your loss instead of relying on the words of the CEO.
So he asked you:
What do you know about the origin of this company?
Do you know how many people are looking up to me as the second to none?
So why are you worried over your loss when you're sure that it's still within my power to give you back all that you've lost so far?

The CEO is hereby assuring you that if you're able to remain loyal despite all the troubles from his adversary then you will be promoted as the most trusted employee!

All those in the company will not question the CEO when he gives you back all your loss and the promotion you deserve.


In this illustration God is the CEO while Satan is the competitor and attack on Job are the hoodlums while all other workers are the angels who are watching how loyal you will prove to be and whether you truly worth the office he gave you!

Dude... Honestly u deserve olympic gold in mental gymnastics, flying around never landing. If u can't explain the point u r going for in few sentences then u don't know what u r talking about, non of what uve said explains the point neither do the references u provide act as references for ur thought process. Your analogies meet me halfway at best and that's been lenient. For example if i say Adam and Eve knew they had done something wrong and God wasn't happy, checking the bible, no verse explicitly states that but if u read Gen 3 you can easily deduce that because they hid from God and then God drove them out. Simplistic example but straight to the point, no plenty halfway analogies and tangential refrences. I tried to have an open mind even while obvious uve been waffling but i gave the benefit of doubt. At least i cleared that doubt. We've not even gone anywhwere before u started beating around the bush. Anyways all the best, cause we'd head nowhere. Do better.

MaxInDHouse:
Please what exactly was God talking about when He mentioned His heavenly sons to Job? Job 38:7
Let's start from there!

🤦🏽
i don't know. do tell.

MaxInDHouse:
Please what exactly was God talking about when He mentioned His heavenly sons to Job? Job 38:7
Let's start from there!

🤦🏽
i don't know. do tell.

MaxInDHouse:
Thanks for complying with my opinion i'm sorry if this got you annoyed but that's how i does my own things.

First of all the name Satan never appeared in the Bible not until God called him to notice a man named "Job" Job 1:6-8
From this narrative it's clear that only God and Satan knew what they're both dragging because God specifically mentioned one man out of all the inhabitants of the earth meaning Satan could turn them against God but as for this man Satan can't break his integrity.

So why can we say other sons of God in the heavens (angels) are watching to see who truly is right between Satan and their father (God)
God went on to tell Job that the mortal man doesn't know what was involved right from the beginning as angels are praising God as worthy of praise for all his works:

When the morning stars joyfully cried out together, And all the sons of God began shouting in applause? Job 38:7

These are the ones watching to see how the challenge goes so God must not misuse His power in order to continue gaining the heart of His loyal spirit sons otherwise they may feel that Satan could have a point.

At your leisure you can read the whole of Job chapter 38 where God was saying that Job's existence is not what really count even though God has warned Satan twice not to kill the faithful man! Job 1:12; 2:6

Bro what's all this? Come on! You've gone on a tangent again saying a lot while communicating nothing. Expected though. Pls be honest, how does ur write up there answer or explain the question : 'How did u come about this that God would have likely destroyed Satan instantly but chose not to for "reasons" ??' Your writeup does nothing to explain how u came to ur earlier conclusion or communicate your thought process to form ur deductions or maybe im dumb, but i doubt that. I doubt anyone that reads that would be satisfied even with the references. I read them all.

MaxInDHouse:
You're not serious jọọ.

If you want to know something you pick points that's disturbing to you as for me everything i typed has backups in the Bible but you can't expect me to start telling you this is for that nah.
It's your who feels what you're reading is strange that will pick the point one after another!

Like i said, its not any particular points, its all of it, as it doesnt disturb me or feel strange like u implied but rather seen by me as made up nonsense based on what u feel and not on the bible hence i asked you to walk me through how u came up with the anecdote, maybe im ignorant. But since u r aiming for plausible deniability, ill indulge you. I've already pointed out your contradiction that invalidates everything up there of which you went on a tangent with more waffle, so lets start from the beginning.

You stated this: "Satan would have been destroyed instantly the moment he challenged God's sovereignty but then how will other sons of God feel about their father if Satan was destroyed immediately?" How did u come about this that God would have likely destroyed Satan instantly but chose not to for "reasons" cause thats what you implied, yes?! What part of the bible made u have that thought process or get that implication to form this narrative?

MaxInDHouse:
If you want to know something you pick the points that's disturbing you one after the other and let's see if the answers are there in your copy of the Bible!

Nah, not points, basically all of it, ergo i said walk me through ur thought process of all of it with bible refs that made u come to this pov. U get?!

MaxInDHouse:
Brutal killings of creatures whose death is sure whether quickly or later.
You need to know the difference between the three first rebels and imperfect humans who has expiring date, there's no reason to allow them live when God's program is ongoing to resolve issues.
For instance consider an adversary who claims he is better than you in handling matters and any of his agents he is using.
If your adversary dies you can't win because people will say it's due to his death that what he claimed wasn't actualized but what about his agents who are irrelevant regarding the challenge? Do you think their destruction has anything to do with the challenge?
Of course not he supposed to continue his own plans without obstructing yours but if his agents comes close to your plans taking them away doesn't mean you're intolerant most especially when the original challenger still lives to work at what he said without disturbing your own plans.

Of course to defend the ironic wafffling done up there after contradicting urself u go on a tangent of more waffling with vague platitudes not realising how tone deaf u sound, quite typical. U guys are so funny that u r not funny. But lets say the concocted drivel of a thought process is valid, which it'll never be, how did u come about this thought process using ur bible? What are ur references or referrals in the bible to come up with that☝🏾. Cause i sure as heck can't see any of this in my bible or did god whisper it in ur ear or dreams? Especially with the shallow analogies completing the convoluted mess of a response.

MaxInDHouse:
That's how a real powerful and all wise person settles issues not just killing His opposers due to anger!

😆
The irony of this waffle considering all the brutal killings and more in your bible. Lol!

Your whole bible is filled with contradictions nevermind the contradictions of one your numerous denominations with a different interpretation, all the while claiming to hear from the same God.

Kobojunkie:
Idahosa was cut of the same cloth!

Do tell. How so?

This reminds me of a similar thread i saw a whilebk on reddit, saved a convo and meme i found funny.

Dtruthspeaker:
No one directly insulted and ad hominemed Christ even before He Spoke.

Everyone first listened to what He Said then they responded by asking reasonable questions or they put forward their reasonable questions and He Responded to them. It was a simple and reasonable engagement.

But none of this takes place here. You evils have made this section as a war zone and a kill or be killed situation

And funny you support the insults of Christians and God and you even praise your brothers for doing so, but when we defend ourselves and fight back you complain.

Clear proof that you atheists are evil and unreasonable people with zero sense of Just is. (Anyway, we all understand that criminals will never like just is)

Damn! This convoluted mess of a response obviously doesn't deserve a coherent reply since you lack basic comprehensive skills, which is quite sad. Imagine being this confident and obtuse to miss a simple point and jump on a needless tangent. Anyways the cognitive dissonance u just displayed shows u are clearly not someone with enough brain cells to be reasoned with. Hv a nice life!

Simply because the bible is a collection of subjective apocryphal texts of the culture and understanding of the divine with respect to the Jewish people. These subjective apocryphal texts are then passed on as objective facts even though they fall like a pack of cards under tiny scutiny. It contradicts itself so much leading to different interpretations of however you want to twist it ergo christianity has over 10000 denominations.

Even people from the same denominations have differing interpretations of the same source and sometimes don't see eye to eye. Heck the origin of Christianity which is Judaism doesn't even believe in christianity and Jesus. The intention of 1 Cor 1:10 paints a different picture from what's existing today, and as usual the devil would be blamed while they forget factions had already formed even in the early church. Even the total number of books in the bible is subjective depending on ur denomination. So...

Eye witness testimony is one of the most flawed ways to verify evidence hence its even no longer foolproof in court. Human perception of the same event can vary wildly. 10 people witness an event, ask them to chronological detail the events a few mins after it occured and you get a convoluted mess 10 different ways. Now what happens when you decide to document an event some 50-400 yrs after it occured?! Well...

Add to that the context of the culture and understanding of the world (quite limited world view) at the time, the context of the language, of which some are obsolete leading to not perfectly understood subjective translations and u get different interpretation s. But in all these, if they are divinely inspired according to the verse quoted above and the claims of Christians, shouldn't at least 2 denominations have the same exact doctrines.... But it isn't so, making 1 Cor 1:10 futile and the whole thing doubtful.

Makes me appreciate the statement, "Religion is simply a precursor to science" nothing more.

LordReed:
To be honest my dear buda it is hard to ignore the loudmouths who always shout inanities no matter how many times you show them they are wrong.

Its also quite funny how they're quick to pile on insults and ad hominems while claiming to be "Christians" defending their bible and God. Makes me wonder aren't christains meant to be like christ again. I dont think christ used insults, he simply debated and argued his points to those Rabbi's and Pharisees. Proves the so called christains are just one sad unfunny joke.

jaephoenix:
1. Not everyone has a god
2. Worship of deities stemmed from man's ignorance about his surroundings. Like floods, rains, fertility. The ancients attributed gods to such phenomena.
So such worship is borne out of ignorance not the existence of such deities

Exactly. Religion is simply a precursor to science. How we understood the world before we hd a better understnding of the world.

advanceDNA:
For starters ma, google is search engine that throws all manner of information both true false and sponsored information targeted at engineering the mind of cyber space visitors

....what u posted there is not real research, but pro-women sponsored blog targeted at making women feel better about themselves.. fact is...mmu don't have penis and u don't experience what men experience.....

These are the same mushroom blogs that have now pushed the narrative that nearly all women don't have hymen which u guys now use to lie to men....

These blogs just pass 0.001 % occurrence as norms to manipulate facts ....

U women just like getting away with everything an u now have explanation for everything.....from cheating, to prostitutión, to all manner of decision u make that leads to unfavourable outcomes u don't want men to consider

Like I said ..u only use these false narrative when u want to manipulate other women's son... When e reach ur own sons and brothers u bring out the real facts...

While you have a point of people using false context of data to drive a certain narrative, in this case it's not so, she's actually right. Just as joysticks have different sizes, so do vaginas. Genetics, age and childbirth affect the size never joysticks, also like men when aroused its shape changes like blowing a baloon sort of. The attached image was a project where an internal cast of the vaginas of a couple of women where done to corroborate this. You can see the different shapes and sizes. Hence why some women prefer bigger joysticks others prefer smaller or average.

Basically its because religion is simply a precursor to science and a cultural understanding of the supernatural or God. Most religions are embedded and grow from the cultural understanding and practices of the area where they originated hence they'll be th centre peice of that story. It's just that some dominated and spread rapidly primarily through conquest. There are over 8000 religions and all these have sects in them, Christianity alone has about 10000 plus sects. You have arabs as muslims, asians with buddhism, taoism..., Israelis have judaism, europeans with christianity, africans and their various religions, Indians with hinduism, shiekism etc. If you check all these out, the indigenious people are centre peice to the narrative of that particular religion hence the phrase God of Isreal.

NuCypher:
Just help her,. mehn. What's with the videoing instead of helping? Videoing her to put on social media without her permission is a violation of her rights. What has the world turned to because of social media!?

It's crazy man. Even down to accident victims, you see animals snapping and recording to put on social media instead of keeping the victim's privacy or helping the victim. That said, this lady is most likely on opiods than tired, she's obviously "nodding". It's possible but higly unlikely that tiredness would make you sleep off in a noisy, busy environment while actively interacting with someone, opiods would do that though. Besides if you apply Occam's razor you,ld go with opiods.

Lukepeter:
Another unintelligent response, this is very sad.

I literally lol'd when i read his response. Dude thought of a comeback and doubled down on the dumb take with something dumber.

Jewessgratitud3:
When you finish speaking in tongues @rebar rebar" let me know.

You go talk whether na me build house with bamboo abi me I be architect wen you dey tell me all this things.

Onye rebama

Lol!
Ignorant and dense, you're unique.

Jewessgratitud3:
The average compressive strength of bamboo is about 14,000 pounds per square inch (psi). Compare that to the compressive strength of concrete, which is about 2,500 psi, and you can see that bamboo is indeed a very strong material.

Another ignorant take been peddled as fact, the hubris on this thread is outstanding. You've stated this crap like 3 times and its nonsense. Why are u comparing the strength of bamboo to concrete?Do u even know what concrete is? Is the bamboo replacing concrete? Isn't the bamboo part of reinforced concrete just as the steel rebar is? Why not compare both rebars instead of comparing one of the rebars to concrete without rebar or is the bamboo something else?
The irony of "Do Your Research", go educate urself man and thrash this opinion.

Cowbell521:
Material engineer wey dey hawk Gala for Onitsha 🤣🤣🤣

Are u minding the ignorant chewbacca claiming materials engineer. An engineer that says bamboo ultimately has higher tensile strength than steel without considering their different grades and the mean. Doesn't even know the difference between iron and steel. Hubris is worse than alcohol.

CoronaVirusPro:
Bamboo is as strong as steel ?

smh....

Bro these people are something else. Its littered all over this thread ignorantly and confidently. That's why context matters with data if not its misrepresented. They are not taking into context that there are different types of bamboo and steel with different grades ergo different strengths. The lowest grade bamboo has lower tensile strenght than the lowest grade steel and the highest grade steel far surpasses the highest grade bamboo, even in compression as well. So obviously some bamboo would be better than some steel cause there's overlap but if you consider them singular and take the mean, then its obvioulsy steel. They could be as strong but not stronger. Smh.

FreeStuffsNG:
Don't misinform the public. I can figure out where you must have studied is definitely not among the top schools.
Here's an authoritative report on why bamboo has less tensile strength

Its not iron its steel. Rebar steel, steel is an alloy of iron i.e iron + carbon and other elements. They're different.

Crenzywilliams:
I hate it when people start giving insights into things they know nothing about. FYI, bamboo have a higher tensile strength than iron rods and it is actually a very good replacement for it. It's very unconventional, agreed, but using bamboo does not affect the integrity of the structure, it actually is a very good alternative. That's coming from a material science engineer, that also took time to do the research before he made this comment.

This is the beauty of social media, the frigging irony. Calling out others for ignorant insights while making even more ignorant insights. Amazing! In what world does bamboo have a greater tensile strength than steel. Steel has way better tensile strength than bamaboo even with the caveat of type and grade.

Besides you're all mentioning tensile strength as if that's the only quality that matters, what about compressive strenght and bond properties to the concrete mix? Those bamboos are smooth not rough like steel rebar, then not even talking about the size requirement of the reinforcement. This whole thing might actually work but its still experimental and shouldn't have been used yet cause i seriously doubt we've carried out enough testing to use this commercially.

Hopefully this doesn't bear similarities to the ocean gate sub where innovation was pushed too far too soon, without rigorous testing and concerns for result of those tests, with costs being the primary motivator.

If you still have hopes and dreams for this country, you're the most optimistic person ever and that kind of optimism would drown you. Apt analysis though, data is really art. Although i can't help but notice the lack of context of population, eligible voters and maybe demographic as well. Would hv painted a better picture highlighting these issues, like im sure more men would vote than women for several reasons, one being security.

The apathy is too damn high and the last elections just exacerbated it. Nigeria's problem is not necessarily its leaders, that's just a symptom. It's us as a people. We are way more flawed than the average human and that's putting it mildy. Selfishness, greed, lack of foresight... any negative trait is amplified and positive traits minimised. We always take the mean down, hardly up. Anywhere u go from top of the pyramid to the bottom rungs, its the same. Wipe out everyone of our leaders at every level in the country and replace em with new ones, its the same. Its the culture, the way of life.

Our values and value systems are rotten, its innate, so the negative traits amplify causing negative energy to dominate and feed itself in a loop. There's no balance. In working societies, they have way better values and systems that are ingrained so it feeds in a positive loop of energy . Positive traits are amplified, negatives minimized not like its not there. So there's balance, it even tilts more positive even though there are still serious issues, humanity is f***ed. Humans are basically similar everywhere but our levels in africa are so off. Like we are the beta test or runt of the litter.

The only way is to create better values and value systems to imbibe in our yet unborn generations so they'll help us evolve faster cause nothing u do in this lifetime would work cause the rot is too deep. Maybe in like 1000 yrs from now we would have evolved to have sense collectively or maybe 500. Afterall 500 yrs ago, most of these advanced societies where not as advanced as societies as they are now. Hell, we didnt even know boiling water could purify it. So hopefully 500, optimistically 1000, realistically we might always remain behind.

VinnyBaba:
No Animal is Social.😏

The Day they Get Angry, you will see their WILD side!🙁

Still Remember when one ToloTolo pursued me Ehn! 😕😒

Would you say humans are not sociable because you know what they are capable of when triggered. When a hen chased me, i left my heart behind, i was like 7 then. I can't forget.