₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,794 members, 8,513,727 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 12:29 PM

Toggle theme

Crackhaus's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Crackhaus's Profile › Crackhaus's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 358 pages)

Family › Re: Appreciating With Se_x. by crackhaus:
Mbdovey:
Honestly I don't understand. Why do most men see s.e-x as a form of appreciation? They help you submit your CV, get you a job, help you submit a business proposal, give you a ride, dash you money, generally render help, they want s.e-.x appreciation. Even if they're clergymen, Elderly, married, about to we'd, DGs, Directors etc it doesn't stop them.
Why?
To me, I believe there're so many ways we can pay back, but the idea of putting us in a tight corner to offer our appreciation, is not good enough.
So, men why do you do that?
Do women do the same to you?
But come here fess, lemme ask you something...

Why is it that you people don't like to ask for these kinds of help from your fellow womenss dem?
Must it be from men?
Family › Re: Womanizers That Got Married, How Did You Stop? Share Your Experience by crackhaus: 8:36pm On Sep 14, 2020
DICKstractor:
cheesy
I had a friend who womanized alot while he was not yet married. He told me that he hates the habit and he will try to change before marriage.

But, he tried all he can and nothing happened. He got married later on and the art of womanizing was still there. After having his 4kids, he decided to get totally castrated because he loved his wife very well. He didn't want to do anything that will stain his marriage

Total castration is the key
gringrin
Family › Re: Men Are Of No Value Without Money. True Or Not? by crackhaus:
Brothers, please make some money or at least try to. Be your own person and be able to hold your own.

Anyone who tells you that money doesn't give you value, run from them...run very far from them. They can't be trusted.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Chinese Military Calls US Biggest Threat To World Peace by crackhaus: 9:00pm On Sep 13, 2020
“Many years of evidence shows that it is the U.S. that is the fomenter of regional unrest, the violator of the international order and the destroyer of world peace,” he said.
U.S. actions in Iraq, Syria, Libya and other countries over the past two decades have resulted in the deaths of more than 800,000 people and displacement of millions, Qian said.


“Rather than reflecting on itself, the U.S. issued a so-called report that made false comments about China’s normal defense and military construction,” he said in the statement. “We call on the U.S. to view China’s national defense and military construction objectively and rationally, cease making false statements and related reports, and take concrete actions to safeguard the healthy development of bilateral military relations.”
What sensible adult alive on earth today doesn't/shouldn't already know this?
It's much more than two decades even.

How about we go as far back as Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, etc...

The only people who believe that the US is the good fella, are the US themselves and others who are most certainly high on urine.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus:
bukatyne:
You have seen the new one from Ghana? grin

Not eating wife's food or coming home late or anything to hurt the wife emotionally punishable by fine or up to 2 years imprisonment.

Not sleeping with husband also punishable.

@bold:

True.
If those laws actually exist (I'm doubtful because I found that news terribly half-arsed), there are still loopholes. cheesy

For instance, is there a time duration for how long a man can go home late or not eat his wife's food, before it will qualify as emotional abuse?
What if the man tells his wife he's going on a very important trip while pretending all is well, but secretly he just wants to avoid the house and her food?

What if he is like me who will continue eating a woman/wife's food, coming home early, even having dispassionate sex with her, but can still 100% maintain my emotional disconnect and aloofness, will I qualify as an emotional abuser since they shot themselves in the foot by specifying the criteria for emotional abuse?

Again, I don't think that shít is real.
It even sounds extremely silly just reading it out aloud to myself and I can't imagine how someone could be saying all of that and maintain a straight face all through.
Well he/she could be a professional comic actor, who knows? grin
Family › Re: Sex Is Not A One Way Traffic. Experiment Different Positions: Pst Funke Adejumo by crackhaus:
bukatyne:
I can imagine. cheesy drop small gist here na.

That's the beauty to listening to a preacher over time.

You begin to hear the checks and balances in part 1, part 2 and part 3 of their sermons. Singling one sermon to criticize a preacher is not right in retrospect.
Long gist on that end, can't get into the bulk of it..lol . But just imagine NL arguments/disagreements, only much more refined.

On the issue of obedience/submission, I very much agree with her. I even made a similar explanation to someone on your thread about dominant men where I told her that submission is not the same thing as servitude.

And like the Pastor said in the video, most people interpret these things based on their own perspectives (I would say psychologically-influnced human perspectives), not that of the Bible.

It's the reason why these women will hear the word submission/submissive, and their guards just go up... Mental grin

Regarding sexual positions, this bit particularly did generate a lot of talk in there. Summary from the ladies was, a man will still cheat if he wants to – doesn't matter if his wife hangs from the ceiling to fück him. cheesy
Well, that's true but then I figure that the Pastor is referring to marriages that were already godly to start with – meaning marriage to a good man with principles.

Pastor Funke is good people in my opinion anyway. I don't agree with everything she says, but she ain't bad... I can tell grin
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 7:17pm On Sep 13, 2020
bukatyne:
@bold:

Sad.

Unnatural laws birth unnatural behaviors to beat them.

Well, 3rd wave feminists made it easy:

Get a consent form and hook up.

If you want a kid, get a surrogate and hire a nanny.

EOD.
Like I noted on the first page in my conversation with angelfallz, sensible men will/should continue gaming the system for as long as possible.

Every law, or more specifically, laws that have to do with policing the relationship between men and women, will always have loopholes that can be exploited... and exploited they should.

Cunny man die, cunny man bury am.
Family › Re: Visitation Rights To A Child Born Out Of Wedlock by crackhaus:
descarado:
It's obviously a fabricated story. His aim was defeated.
Don't take most of these things serious kiss


Lol, I went there but my poor heart couldn't handle what I saw cheesy
And see ladies grin
Don't dare ask me what's inside.
People are wild indeed.
I don't like it when people do this, I'm too strong-willed to be dared like this. cheesy

Now you've made my curiosity more curious.

What was happening inside? grin
Family › Re: Sex Is Not A One Way Traffic. Experiment Different Positions: Pst Funke Adejumo by crackhaus: 6:16pm On Sep 13, 2020
bukatyne:
Mummy wa smiley

More anointing.

@Crackhaus, happy Sunday. Please check out this video.

She touched on the obedience/submission dichotomy.
Happy Sunday to you too B.

About the video, way ahead of you. grin

Someone posted it on one of my group chats yesterday and it brought up an interesting conversation lasting more than an hour. cheesy
The woman does have her good points, I must admit
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 3:06pm On Sep 12, 2020
ubunja:
there's a reason why the Red Pill movement is unofficially headquartered in Canada. Its the strongest there because misandry is the strongest there.
A very necessary pushback, honestly.
Family › Re: Visitation Rights To A Child Born Out Of Wedlock by crackhaus:
descarado:
cheesy cheesy
The guy got no case. I was feeling for him until I read some of his explanations. Also, what Co.cocandy said is fact. Don't perch around. Either U are in or out. That's the culture.

Maybe he has a lawyer friend. Who knows grin tongue
Lol... if he's serious, goes to court and convincingly puts forth a case that is based on a genuine need to be included in the child's life, he will almost certainly be granted visitation rights. No fair judge will deliberately keep a child away from its biological father without strong cause.


Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for that gist form the inner room. That you even thought I would forget means you don't know me at all... cheesy
Romance › Re: Nigerians' Reactions To A Post About 'Zimbabwean Women & Love For Money' by crackhaus: 10:45am On Sep 12, 2020
fuckingAyaya:
Dating an average Nigerian girl is like training an orphan
https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/rofl.gif
Foreign Affairs › Re: Afghan Peace Talks To Open In Doha, 19 Years After 9/11 Triggered War by crackhaus: 10:39am On Sep 12, 2020
Peace talks and deals in every corner of the middle-east. cool

Only God knows if any of this would be happening had the murderous war-monger called Killary Clinton won elections in 2016.
Family › Re: Best Advise For Dealing With Daughter In Laws by crackhaus: 10:24am On Sep 12, 2020
Family › Re: Visitation Rights To A Child Born Out Of Wedlock by crackhaus:
Nwaotu:
I don't care how much I will spend, so long I get what I want. The family think they can shut the door on me after all the money I spent and all that.
Don't take this argument to court.

What you intend doing should ONLY be because you want to be in your child's life, nothing else.
Family › Re: Visitation Rights To A Child Born Out Of Wedlock by crackhaus: 9:49am On Sep 12, 2020
Nwaotu:
There are some crazy things I did which I later regret though. Initially i said the child should be aborted and when she was pregnant and the parents dropped their child at my house, i made her life a living hell and they have to come and take her and request for the settlement whilst I go my way. Now I regret my actions and I want the visitation right to the child.
If visitation means that much to you and you have exhausted all avenue to reason with her parents, then take it to court.

You will spend some money though.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Bahrain Recognizes Israel As A Nation by crackhaus: 11:01pm On Sep 11, 2020
DissTroy:
CNN is completely ignoring it but promoting the rubbish from Michael Cohen.
Lol, as expected.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 11:00pm On Sep 11, 2020
MrBrownJay1, anti-spambot?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Bahrain Recognizes Israel As A Nation by crackhaus: 9:59pm On Sep 11, 2020
These peace deals are not the kind of information some media organizations like to include in their news cycles. cheesy
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 9:40pm On Sep 11, 2020
angelfallz:
Lol
I need her to die mad from the constant rejection and inability to gain my attention. That particular alternate will be banned soon just like the last one and she'll create another.

Na the work wey I don give her be this.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 9:34pm On Sep 11, 2020
MrBrownJay1:
Again, a common law couple will have the exact same right as a married couple who signed a marriage contract. It's the damn law!!!
No they won't, they can't split property when they break up.
So it's not quite exact, is it?

Again, it all has to do with the lifestyle you guys live... So If you live and consider yourselves as a husband and wife, then it doesn't matter whether or not you live together, have kids together or property together, you will stIll be considered common law husband and wife.
Those are some of the specific criteria for qualifying as common-law couples, and here you are claiming it doesn't matter. cheesy
You also talked about husband and wife lifestyle, he called himself her husband, etc... Is this some information you're privy to from an insider, because I saw no such thing on this news.

But like I noted earlier, I'm willing to believe you but I can't take your word for it until you provide something from a Canadian website (preferably that of the Home office) that supports your claim about how buying gifts, or helping out with mortgage, makes you a common-law spouse. cheesy

But if you can't, then I figure we're done here.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 9:26pm On Sep 11, 2020
angelfallz:
The issue is not whether the person has lived in many countries or not.

That Mr.brownJay has a funny way of thinking. So that's why I asked Crackhaus not to argue with him.
Lol, you're even responding to that rejected chic who has been reduced to hiding behind alternates like a house rat just to get my attention. cheesy

Go through her post history.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 9:03pm On Sep 11, 2020
MrBrownJay1:
The above is a confirmation that they were In a long lasting r/ship with life commitment between them...unless you believe a man pays strangers mortgage and gives them thousands of dollars monthly in salary for 14yrs, abi?!

There is a huge difference between offering someone a one off gift, and taking over that person life's responsibilities (like a husband would). This man acted as her husband, called himself her husband and thus should be treated as such now.

The criteria of common law spouse is very simple: the minute you guys have made life commitment between one another and live/call each other as husband and wife (for a certain period of time) then you guys are legally considered common law husband and wife.... Unless of course, you believe that, if a married couple doesn't live together, have no kids and don't have property under both their names, then they are not legally husband and wife.

The above I posted shows the long term commitment they both had while this man claiming to just be traveling companion
Married people are married under the marriage act, there's a legal contract. Doesn't matter if they live together or don't have kids.
This is a false equivalence... cheesy

Anyway, let's not engage in too much back & forth.

Please just provide a list of the criteria to be satisfied before a couple can be said be in a common-law partnership in Canada.

I already have this information considering it's a process I almost got involved in, it's also available on the Canadian Home office/Immigration website.

But perhaps you have some source that lists such things like:
– Buying gifts for your girlfriend/boyfriend
– helping him/her pay mortgage
– helping him/her with some money every month (no one actually calls it salary)

Go ahead please... Lol
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 7:58pm On Sep 11, 2020
MrBrownJay1:
- he paid her a monthly salary
- he paid her mortgage every months
- he showered her with gifts etc
- this dude did the above for 14yrs as a couple and now wanna claim the they were just traveling friends


If the above is not a confirmation to you that they were indeed a couple, then I don't know what would.
The list in bold is not confirmation of a common-law partnership/marriage anywhere in the world where it is recognized, not even under Canadian law itself.

Those are simply characteristics of a man who was very generous, unless you're now implying that the only thing you need to do as man to avoid paying spousal support after breaking up with your girlfriend, is to never shower her with gifts, never help her with her mortgage, and don't give her any specific amount of money monthly.

I don't need to go bringing up the actual criteria showing what must be satisfied before a couple can be said to be common-law partners.
I'm sure you can do this on your own, and I know without a doubt you will find none of that nonsense in bold as part of the criteria.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 7:26pm On Sep 11, 2020
bukatyne:
Reaping where one has not sown ends in curses.

The men better stand up else they will start paying for proven consensual sex.

Anything and everything to break the 21st century male in the West.

Na them sabi, we have our issues here.
Lol, it may never get to that.

The idea of common-law partnerships/marriages would usually make sense when you consider these criteria that should be met:
– Having child(ren) together
– Living together/shared accommodation continuously, not intermittently.
– Shared ownership of property
– Shared bills/addresses on IDs

If the two persons in the OP had all of this, the court judgment would honestly make more sense to anyone considering that they had built a life together but simply did not take marital vows – spousal support here would be very understandable.

But what happened between those two was nothing more than boyfriend and girlfriend matter, none of the usual criteria for CLM were met.
So is that judge not mad like this... grin
Politics › Re: Ojukwus Letter To Victor Banjo On "Liberating Yorubaland" by crackhaus: 6:33pm On Sep 11, 2020
Ojukwu was no doubt high on weed
Lol, you can't blame him.

Biafra on its own never really stood a chance in any war against the greater part of the territory called Nigeria. It was a simple military strategy to try getting the Yorubas on his side.
Although the part I found quite funny in the letter is where he stated that Biafra will assume administrative control of Lagos... Very big ambition here, lol.

The Yorubas have always been historically tied closely more to the North than to the Easterners, and I truly don't see how Ojukwu expected a battle-line to be drawn pitting them against one other.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus:
angelfallz:
It's such a shame. That woman just secured her pension with the aid of the state
Come to think of it, will she keep getting spousal support even if she gets into another common-law relationship within the 10-year period these payments are meant to last?

I mean if I were her, I would look for another rich idïot to scam into a long-term relationship, keep him hooked for more than 3years at least so I can cash-out again. cheesy

Why stop at just one?
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 4:34pm On Sep 11, 2020
bukatyne:
I don't understand this case.

Dude proposed to her seven times and she declined signing marriage contracts so technically the woman was the one wasting bobo's time.

So she never did wifely duties, never joined her funds with him, did not invest in him yet thinks she is entitled to be recognized as a spouse (that she refused 7 times) so she can receive support. Classic eating of cake and having it.

Funny how these unnatural laws never bring happiness.

The rate of clinical depression and mental illnesses still on the rise.

Hopefully, their men stand to fight this madness.
Have women like the one in the OP or those who would support this news, ever be known to make any sense when it comes to reaping from where they had not sown?
They simply want to cash-out. cheesy

Being an opportunist and a gold-digger is the new "independent woman".

That lady is probably going to write a book very soon on how to be a strong beautiful 21st century woman, lol...
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus: 4:24pm On Sep 11, 2020
angelfallz:
When u.bunja and Mar.tinez9s complain about simps, it would seem as if they don't know what they're talking about.

Many western men aren't getting married anymore, hence the need for the law.
If men start circumventing that law they'll reduce the time limit to 2 years or 1 year.

Those outrageous laws were made by simp/beta men, to appease their goddess women.

This should open your eyes to how dangerous such men are. $50k a month you can imagine.
And some men are asking for such laws to be implemented in Nigeria.
Well until then, men should keep gaming the system and continue doing so for as long as necessary.

When it comes to preventing opportunists from getting paid over absolutely nothing, I'm always on the side of men who find loopholes and game the system to their advantage.
It's just common sense and self-preservation.

You can imagine $50k a month, that's $600k a year. Professional Canadian doctors in certain fields aren't even earning that much.
Family › Re: Man Ordered To Pay His Ex Girlfriend $50,000 Per Month In Canada by crackhaus:
These court judgements keep evolving cheesy

They never quite lived together, don't have children together, never bought property together or have shared ownership of anything, yet he is to pay spousal support. Lol

I guess what's left for Canadian men is to restrict every relationship to the 3-year criteria so that it won't be considered a common-law marriage – there's always a loophole in every law if you look hard enough.
Just date a woman for two years and some months, then break up with her and move on to another.

These men are royally fücked. grin
Romance › Re: Married Women Demanding For Money by crackhaus: 1:11pm On Sep 11, 2020
emmaodet:
My brother, it is really well.
Do you know the funniest thing, this babe was jobless during the Covid lockdown and was constantly begging me for help, so i gave her 5k.
Do you know the following week she asked me for money again? Now turning it to a weekly thing and when i replied i just gave her 5k last week she retorted that what did i even give her that am making reference to? Just 5k that she finished up before the end of that day? That can't even last for a day? Is what am talking about?
I felt bad, really really bad because i know if i had given a jobless man that money, not only will he really really appreciate it, he may even hold and manage the money for like 5 days compared to this entitled so called friend not even dating of a human, how much more if we are even dating sef.
This is really the biggest problem with most of them.
Once you start helping out, just expect it to continue...and to make it worse, don't ever remind them you've done something for them in the past, don't try it! They will discount it and make it seem like it was nothing, every damn time like clockwork. cheesy

The one you're talking about here didn't have a job, a little understandable. What about those ones who have jobs or something which provides them with a steady source of income, yet also act in much the same way? Lol
These ones are only more subtle and will simply drop hints/clues for you to pick up on as a gentleman.

I've come to the realization based on my experiences so far, that the only group of women who will never require a dime from a man or feel entitled to his financial benevolence, are those who are much much older (late 40s, 50s) and very well-to-do in their own rights.
These group will like you simply for the company/entertainment you provide them, nothing else. What are you even going to offer that she doesn't already have...

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 358 pages)