DappaD's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DappaD's Profile › DappaD's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 81 pages)
freshboi88:OK OK is that all? ![]() Please what's next?? ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:This is Luke 22:42 in any normal Bible: “Father, if you want to, remove this cup from me. Nevertheless, let, not my will, but yours take place.” Meanwhile, this is how Luke 22:42 should read if the trinity doctrine was actually true: “Myself, if I want to, remove this cup from myself. However, let, not my will, but my own will be done.” My brother, Trinity has gone mad oo ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Their “JW is a cult” slander don dey fade. ![]() Them need to find new one oo. ![]() |
bingbagbo:OK so after all of these what's next on the list? Seems all these your “JW is a cult” rants is gradually fading so anything new yet? C'mon you can do better. |
shadeyinka:Mr YES or NO, what did Jesus say at Matthew 20:28 and John 6:38? He said with his own mouth that he came to minister, to serve and to do his Father's will. Just like the angels in Hebrews 1:14 also do.(see Psalm 103:20) So basically, God sent Jesus which automatically makes Jesus an angel and if we add everything up then the short answer to that question is YES sir. John 3:16 |
shadeyinka:If you know JWs well enough you won't be asking me about this “cross” that's keeping most of you in the darkness. Whatever Roman Catholic Church fabricate and hand over to you, you'll accept wholeheartedly but later you'll go insulting and abusing the Popes behind their backs. ![]() |
shadeyinka:Mr double-standard I've heard you. Meanwhile, those people in the churches/denominations you mentioned cannot seem to come to an agreement about form of worship as it is every man for himself—nobody should set the standards for the others—differing doctrines, teachings and personal opinions—yet you're deceiving yourself with this “one church family” mentality. Continue. ![]() |
shadeyinka:Sir I've observed your comments on NL and you're usually of the opinion that one's group doesn't matter. You said as long as it's a “Bible-believing” church, then it's approved by God? Why the double-standard sir? ![]() Their delusion is at the level of satanic possession!No be today we begin hear this one sir. In fact, JWs are taking after their “satanic” master, Jesus. Matthew 12:24, Mark 3:22 ![]() |
WILLuKPquiet:Jehovah's Witnesses always tell people the truth that they don't want to hear. We won't water the truth down for anybody. Perhaps you're looking for who will sugarcoat lies and tickle your ears, if so go and meet your daddy GOs Adeboye and Oritsejafor they'll be pleased to do that. 2Timothy 4:3-4 ![]() |
Meanwhile this one still dey find where to pitch him tent ![]() livingchrist: livingchrist: |
MaxInDHouse:I've noticed that she and her kind normally go into hiding when JWs are around. |
Preciousgirl:1. Those who got baptized on the day of Pentecost were all Jews and Jewish proselytes so they were conversant with Jehovah God in connection with how his holy spirit helped his people in the past as stated in the Law and the Prophets. Acts 2:22-41 2. The case involving Cornelius is extraordinary. First, he was neither a Jew nor a Jewish convert yet he was God-fearing and was making supplications to the true God(not Jesus) and was favourably heard by God. Acts 10:1-4,31 Then as Peter was briefly speaking to them about God(Acts 10:34-43), Cornelius' family all received holy spirit(this has never happened before baptism) [Acts 10:44]so what's left is for they to get baptised in the name of Jesus since Jehovah had already acknowledged Cornelius and his holy spirit had began working with them prior to the baptism. Acts 10:45-48 3. Paul admonished John's disciples to get baptized in the name of Jesus since John(their former teacher) had already instructed them about Jehovah and the coming Messiah. Malachi 4:4-6, Luke 1:17, John 1:29-37 This was done in order for them to receive holy spirit. Acts 19:1-6 4. Colossians 3:17 KJV “And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by[through] him[Jesus].” Of course what Paul is telling the Colossians is correct and in line with John 15:16 but whom are they to give thanks to in their prayers? God or Jesus? |
peggywebbs:You seem quick to forget that the reason why the Pharisees were constantly angry at Jesus was because he claimed monopoly of worship. John 14:6 Why, Jesus even said that one must follow him even when family members strongly oppose them if such one is to get approved by God. Matthew 10:32-40, Luke 14:27 This made the Pharisees so upset and bitter and you can even read about their exchange with Jesus at John chapter 8. So my dear, since you're of the opinion that nobody should oblige to teach anybody anything, how did you know it was Jesus who was correct and not the Pharisees since the Pharisees also claimed to be children of God? John 8:41 Another instance is the book of Acts. Acts 2:42 KJV “And they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.” So were the early Christians foolish for following the apostles and foremost pioneers? Why didn't they allow God to speak to them? |
Kobojunkie:When Jehovah's Witnesses knock on your door in the past—if you're open for a discussion—why do you think they'll ask you to bring out your own Bible? So that it will bring an end to all of these misconceptions. On the other hand, if you're so sure of what you're saying now, you'll support it with proof—as in—show that the NWT is truly out of line else you'd be like those who peddle rumours about. I've noticed that you avoid JWs, so I won't be surprised if you ignore me. But try to think about what was said. |
freshboi88:It's not when they've exposed you that you'll begin to use subtle tricks to appease the audience. Nobody be your brother for here. Since it's not the angel who is coming and that those words originate from Jehovah God(not Jesus), then we can agree that it was Jehovah who spoke at Revelation 22:12-13 taking into consideration the channel of communication at Revelation 1:1 but it is Jesus who will act on Jehovah's orders. Mark 8:38; 2Thessalonians 1:7-9; Revelation 19:11-15, 22:20 |
freshboi88:Continue sounding like a broken record . Again, the angel said: “I am coming” at Revelation 22:7, so what are your reasons for we expecting this unnamed angel(since context is to be ignored now)? |
Sanitation is nothing to write home about. But I guess that's the “norm”. |
freshboi88:Somebody who said he'll expose haddeylium has taken the first step to expose himself completely. That verse you just quoted has thrown you off balance that's why you don't know where to go from there. And no, don't bring that idea of the angel relaying words of anybody here since you've decided to ignore the context of Revelation 1:1 so continue like that. At Revelation 22:7, the angel said: “I am coming quickly” whose words were these? If you say Jesus, how do you explain the channel of communication in Revelation 1:1? |
haddeylium:I also asked him this same question and he mischievously avoided it so I overlooked him. He thought he could just pick scriptures anyhow without considering context? |
haddeylium:Good points up there. If you ask them to explain Hebrews 5:7-8, they'll tell you Jesus offered up cries and petitions to HIMSELF and that he learnt obedience to HIMSELF. ![]() These trinitarians suppose dey host that “Nite of a Thousand Laughs” show ![]() |
Tcwork:Your observations and compliments are commendable. But you know—one can easily read the wrong meaning into this as if Jehovah's Witnesses are seeking their glory. Our Master Jesus never sought his own glory and neither do JWs. John 7:16-18 So whatever you see any of us say stems from the accurate truth/knowledge that our God Jehovah provides through his “faithful and discreet slave”—a small band of mature elders situated in Warwick, New York. Matthew 24:45-47 Visit JW.ORG for more. |
livingchrist:Of course your KJV Bible would render it that way so the true meaning of the word won't be understood. The normal Greek word for “Son” is υἱὸς[huiós]. See John 20:31 This doesn't appear in Acts 3:13 but rather the word that appears there is παῖδα[paida] which when translated means “male servant”. A similar wording παῖς[pais] appears in Matthew 12:18 and is accurately rendered as “servant” in your KJV BIBLE. Go and investigate if you think otherwise. Since that issue has been sorted out, the question still stands. Why is Jesus still called a “Servant” after his ascension? Acts 3:13? |
livingchrist:So after Jesus ascended to heaven, why was he still called a “Servant”? Acts 3:13 (compare Matthew 12:18/Isaiah 42:1) P.S. : Don't forget your homework. |
livingchrist:According to John 6:38, he was in heaven when he was sent to the earth. Meanwhile let me give you small homework. Go and read Malachi 3:1 in your own Bible and identify the two “messengers” . |
MaxInDHouse:I like the way you handled him. No too much arguments. Imagine somebody that stupid enough to attribute the fruitage of God's holy spirit to Satan. This was the same problem those Pharisees put themselves in at that Luke chapter 12 ![]() Maybe because he thinks his brethren are praising him that's why he can feel free to run his mouth anyhow. Yet it's the same brethren he'll go about arguing with on several threads about the identity of their trinity. ![]() When somebody displays such level of ignorance he doesn't know the harm he might be doing to himself because what Jehovah said at Zechariah 4:6 has been evident all these years. Acts 5:38-39 |
ozile:Jesus himself didn't attach that much importance to either his mother or his relatives. Luke 11:27-28; John 7:5 In fact, he viewed those who did the will of his Father as his closest family not even those related to him by blood. Matthew 12:49-50 |
haddeylium:The guy will still come from another angle with arguments. It seems that the scripture you quoted above(and others like Luke 4:43, John 5:19) doesn't exist in their own Bibles else why have they been consistently avoiding it like a plague since you and Max have been reciting it for them since? |
MRAKPORS:The publishers of the New World Translation were not influenced by bias I assure you. They are/were completely honest in their translation work. Hebrews 13:18 The NWT published by Jehovah's Witnesses restores the name of the true God—Jehovah to appropriate places in the Bible which appears some 7,000times. For example, @Deuteronomy 6:4 your KJV would read: “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD” Meanwhile the translators of the KJV substituted God's original name, Hebrew: “YHWH”, English: “Jehovah” with the title “LORD” and no doubt this brought about the confusion of the false trinity doctrine making it difficult for a honesthearted person to distinguish between Jehovah(God) and Jesus(his Son). In order to clear up the confusion, God's original name “Jehovah” was restored to the appropriate places where it appeared. So now, Deuteronomy 6:4 would aptly read: “Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah. Note that this is just one feature about this translation as there are others. Go to jw.org if you need more answers. Or you can use the link below: https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/changed-bible-beliefs/ |
freshboi88:I've told you times without number that you must consider how other scriptures define something similar so that the understanding can become clearer. For instance, @Exodus 3:8, Jehovah said: “I will go down and rescue Israel from Egypt” But after God said these words, the record show that Jehovah sent his angelic representative and Moses to carry out this task. Exodus 3:10, 14:19, 23:20 Jehovah even told Moses that they needed to listen to the voice of that angel because his name and spirit was upon him! Exodus 23:22 What does this prove? It proves that Jesus when he was on earth, never said he was God but that he came in the name of his Father. Matthew 23:39, Psalm 118:26 And that Jehovah's holy spirit was upon him. Isaiah 61:1, Luke 4:18 So whenever you see the words: “I am coming”—just know that those words originate from Jehovah(Revelation 22:12-13) but it's Jesus whom he sends to basically act on those orders that Jesus receives from his Father and God, Jehovah since according to him he cannot do a single thing on his own and he needs a go-ahead before he can do anything. Matthew 28:18, John 8:28, Revelation 19:11-15 |
freshboi88:That's just the usual “scripture-to-inteprete-scripture” technique. Again according to Isaiah 26:21 and Isaiah 45:1 who came against Babylon, Jehovah or Cyrus? |
freshboi88:You forgot that it was an angelic representative that was relating directly with John? Revelation 1:1, 22:8 Is the same angel the one speaking in Revelation 22:12-15 or is it Jehovah God or Jesus Christ? Those verses are direct words from Jehovah. Jesus Christ only began to speak from verse 16. After all Isaiah 26:21 spoke of Jehovah as “coming” to render judgment against Babylon yet Isaiah 45:1 said that it was Cyrus whom Jehovah would send against Babylon. So who actually came and subdued Babylon, Jehovah or Cyrus whom he chose to carry out the work? |
livingchrist:2Peter 1:2-4 says that anointed Christians will share in having a “divine nature” along with Jesus Christ. Does that make them equal to Christ and God? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 (of 81 pages)



